Fibonacci, platonic solids and Vortex coils

[Mk1]

@Egoose

Yes you are right , sorry i did not notice that i load the wrong picture .

Right now i use 1k pots , but with those merged circuit the resistance value really need to be reevaluated .

To charge a super cap .047 farad 5.5 volts without going over 5.5 v is almost impossible , the meter can't read fast enough .

Now that circuit got me thinking about making a third one powered by the output from both circuit .

Both coil work great side by side but the output is greater when one inside the other.

Mark

[ElectricGoose]

@Egoose

Yes you are right , sorry i did not notice that i load the wrong picture .

Right now i use 1k A , but with those merged circuit the resistance value really need to be reevaluated .

To charge a super cap .047 farad 5.5 volts without going over 5.5 v is almost impossible , the meter can't read fast enough .

Now that circuit got me thinking about making a third one powered by the output from both circuit .

Both coil work great side by side but the output is greater when one inside the other.

Mark

No worries Mark, thanks for clarification.

Yes, if you are looking to 'close the loop' you will have to watch the tolerances of the caps otherwise a few might blow up!

E-Goose

[ElectricGoose]

Mark

Did you try the new coil jig and ascertain whether the effect/output is the same as winding 'circular' on a cardboard form?  I'm just wondering whether that very minor difference will effect performance.

E-Goose

[Mk1]

Mark

Did you try the new coil jig and ascertain whether the effect/output is the same as winding 'circular' on a cardboard form?  I'm just wondering whether that very minor difference will effect performance.

E-Goose

I did not like my first jig , i will have access to a press drill today and can't wait to make a new coil , i will have more detail later today ...

Mark

[Mk1]

@all

Pictures of the new Jig ...i need more nails !