Same input-greater output...

[iacob alex]

...can be a possible outcome,if the same arm difference of a first class lever (equal masses/effort=load) ,performs between a greater and greater gravitational  leves difference (up-down).

    We must take into account the time factor...

        All the best! / Alex

[Alexioco]

How do you mean, i'm not quite with you

Alex

[FreeEnergy]

huh?

[onthecuttingedge2005]

...can be a possible outcome,if the same arm difference of a first class lever (equal masses/effort=load) ,performs between a greater and greater gravitational  leves difference (up-down).

    We must take into account the time factor...

        All the best! / Alex

Shoot a bullet up into the air at 4000lbs per square inch, now measure the amount of PSI as the bullet falls back to earth, you will not get the same energy back. not even close.

also, don't be fooled by levers and fulcrums, there is a trade off and it is called distance over time.

good luck.

[iacob alex]

....is the basic idea of a possible PM.

    If we play the TIME FACTOR (v=g*t),we play in fact the height (level difference).

    To use this opportunity,we need a greater free fall.

    A lever/two spokes only/ (vs. a many spokes wheel...) is allowing this greater fall...

    If we work with a small,constant,same input(arm difference) and the arms become greater and greater (free fall height),the accumulated torque difference is incresing the kinetic energy (the output).

    This is comparable,equivalent to the free fall  of a mass,from  a greater height "H",but we "pay" to remake this fall with  the same,small  arms difference "h",only (H>>>h).

    It's so simple...small input (unbalance),great output (unbalance),Prigogine "style".                                                           

     All the best! / Alex