CLaNZeR can achieve overunity!

[FatChance!!!]

some of us know that overunity is possible.

The correct statement should be:
some of us think they know that overunity is possible.

[sm0ky2]

I've not really seen any overunity achieved by ClaNZer. If you have, please enlight me.

i could point to quite a few of his experiments. but the "non-believers" would surely pull it apart like StringCheeze.
so i will point to one of his more obvious examples.

His Hammell Spinner.  It was not only perpetual, but overcame a great deal of friction, and some marginal wind resistance to boot.

this was undeniably overunity, hands-free, no input, isolated from outside influence, powering itself, and overcomming a great deal of losses.Clanzer went through a great deal of effort to prove this because people kept comming up with all kinds of b.s. excuses for how it was doing what it was.

he ended up eventually putting the whole darn thing underneath a glass bowl to show that there was no wind or anything causing it to self-run.

@ FatChance!!!

What i stated WAS correct.
It sounds to me like you fall into the second or third category.

[Hugo Chavez]

i could point to quite a few of his experiments. but the "non-believers" would surely pull it apart like StringCheeze.
so i will point to one of his more obvious examples.

His Hammell Spinner.  It was not only perpetual, but overcame a great deal of friction, and some marginal wind resistance to boot.

this was undeniably overunity, hands-free, no input, isolated from outside influence, powering itself, and overcomming a great deal of losses.Clanzer went through a great deal of effort to prove this because people kept comming up with all kinds of b.s. excuses for how it was doing what it was.

he ended up eventually putting the whole darn thing underneath a glass bowl to show that there was no wind or anything causing it to self-run.

@ FatChance!!!

What i stated WAS correct.
It sounds to me like you fall into the second or third category.

I'm actively seeking overunity too, but that hamel spinner is not it.  It's spinning due to an adjusting out of balance of the outer ring which is causing an out of balance drag on the ball causing it to spin.  build the device with all parts stationary and you won't get any spin even if you help it start.

Experiment, then be critical of your experiment, then be honest on this forum about your experiments.  Otherwise you're slowing others down.

[sm0ky2]

Experiment, then be critical of your experiment, then be honest on this forum about your experiments.  Otherwise you're slowing others down.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e2kz3DYpZdI


< Sm0ky2 sits down and shuts up >

[Hugo Chavez]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e2kz3DYpZdI


< Sm0ky2 sits down and shuts up >

if you think that works or is an example of overunity, maybe you should sit down and shut up.  That shows exactly what I said.  You will notice it spins good while it is out of balance(not center to the magnetic field above) as it starts to find center you will see the rotation slow down and it does eventually come to a complete stop, just ask clanzer.

I wish no battle, only that people experiment and report honestly so that everyone can advance from our collective experiments.  I know it's easy to get worked up over something that appears to work but we must examine completely and report honestly even on the experiments that seem most exciting.