Breakthrough with the Anton HHO cell !

[nicbordeaux]

Hi CompuTutor,
yepp, "A" is not a bad thing.
Without faith, you dont need to get up in the morning.

But in the case of making "fire" from electricity,
it not a bad thing to research on HHO
because has none of the "side-effects" of conventional carbon-based fuels.
No pollution, no tinkering with the planet and no catastrophic
consequences as A.
As long as mankind is using fire and burning stuff,
HHO and its derivates is the first choice because its
absolutely neutral to the environment.
No matter if a system is "Overunity" or not,
i am happy with "Unity".

Is there any other possibility to produce your own fuel
"on-demand" and "on-site"?

Maybe this A desperately searching for
"free energy" instead of efficency is the wrong place for me?

"free beer" is spilling out of the gulf of mexico and the
world gets its bill right now.

The search for efficiency is paramount, just take a gasoline engine's efficiency, don't let anybody tell you all that lost heat can't be at least 50% recovered. The quest for new sources of energy or new ways of harnessing energy is also important, even if a lot of people are confused about you have to use baked bean tins and magnets 

Required reading for anybody who believes we are stuck at the upmost limit of knowledge (and therefore know all) might be Profiles Of The Future by Arthur C. Clarke. In particular pages 18-19 which refer to the utter absurdity of rockets according to most 1920's scientists, who were very dismissive to say the least, and had scientific data to back their argument.
Chapter 5 "Beyond Gravity" is also of interest.

[gmeast]

The search for efficiency is paramount, just take a gasoline engine's efficiency, don't let anybody tell you all that lost heat can't be at least 50% recovered. The quest for new sources of energy or new ways of harnessing energy is also important, even if a lot of people are confused about you have to use baked bean tins and magnets 
...................................

You are so right on the efficiency point !  Having worked on a government-funded adiabatic diesel engine project, I know it is of paramount importance to pursue 'high efficiency'.  In the A-D project we used ceramics to reduce heat loss to the cylinders and head.  In a parallel project we employed both regenerator & recouperator technologies to recover (otherwise) waste exhaust heat.  We had good success with a 6.5 : 1 compression ratio 4-stroke engine wherein the exhaust gas was passed through recoup tubes passing through the combustion chamber ... the low CR being because of the unavoidable dead space resulting from the tubes passing through the head.  But even at the reduced efficiency caused by the low CR, the efficiency GAIN was 25% + because of the new, more sophisticated thermodynamic cycle of the engine.  The next step was to add a turbo charger to offset the CR issue.  The projections from just the recoup config. was enough to suggest this as a good design concept to pursue in a production model. 

The AD required sophisticated materials science to interface the ceramic and metal parts, but the recoup engine required NOTHING NEW (MM&T-wise) just holes, a header, 3/16" x0.010" SS tubing, some vacuum brazing and some good refractory materials (all available & cheap), but none of this fits the current automotive manufacturing/profit models.

However, if you go electric, none of the above matters because you're already at 80% + conversion efficiency and 60% + centralized electrical power generating efficiency ... and that's 48% overall efficiency compared to 23% gasoline engine and 35% - 38% ... maybe 40% for diesel (max for auto-sized diesel & 45% - 50% for large {big, big} truck and marine diesels).

Later,

Greg

[dasimpson]

the reasion the egnine takes off so fast is they are feeding way to much gas into the engine a 12v batterys should be the unit makeing the power to produce that gas this could be run from the engine alternater to keep it charged and the high voltage genny part for the lighting lower the gas produced and it wont take off as fast

[mscoffman]

New Video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fSe943wkUfg

He is so close...He now needs to get rid of the small 12VDC ignition power
supply connection. My advice is to use the (now unused) spark magneto
output from the engine and step it down with a second ignition coil.
Then convert and regulate it to 12VDC to power the electronic ignition
circuit. It can't be taking that much current. Then he would have a real
stand alone self running system.

:S:MarkSCoffman

[Sente]

hi

sorry das ich wieder mal welten zerstöre:

fakt

man brauch keine 2. zündspule  , fakt

last da mal

und das was gezeigt wird ist nur ein teil, also bitte.
nicht versuchen  mit unnützen blödsinn die leute in die falsche richtung zu leiten.


reicht das immer noch nicht ?

ihr bastelt und macht nur rafft ihr es nicht,   1 zündspule,  verstellbare zündung und gut ist.


so könnt ihr ja übersetzen oder lasst es sein und schlaft weiter.

echt grausam hier im forum

23.000  mitglieder und kein video von einem stationären wassermotor ?

was ist hier los ? alle angst oder  sucht ihr nur und wenn ihr es gefunden habt sucht ihr weiter.!?

mfg

sente


p.s
gerade die leutz aus den USA , sollten mal wach werden und auf die barrikaden gehn, ihr habt gerade ein netten mann ins weiße haus gewählt.
ein tip von mir , organisiert euch und jagt alle 50 geheimdienste aus dem land oder löst sie auf und konfessiert alle gelder auch die versteckten.
bzw, steckt sie direckt in die gaskammer , oder auf den stuhl.
die verarschen euch seit 70 jahren.