"g" paradox...

[iacob alex]

 
         Hi Dr !

  Really,the first step is to study,the free gravity fall of a single mass,then of a pair of masses.

  If you take a look at   www.youtube.com/watch?v=FQ02MjqBk7s  and there at the sequences (23-30sec),(66-100sec),you can understand me better.

  With an increasing radius (diameter),we can get (and store...!) more and more energy,so to imagine a self process:the same input (unbalance),in the top position,can  develop a greater and greater output  ,in the bottom position...

       All the best! / Alex

[Dr]

HI Alex: I studied free falling weights for almost a full year,  My favorite setup was a 4 lb.hammer pivoting on a 30" handle free falling 90 degrees and smashing a .49 dia. lead ball. I wanted to see how much static weight it would take to get the same result. I was pretty surprised at the results.

[iacob alex]

       Hi Dr !
The free fall must be correlated with the storage (rotational inertia) of gravity power,so to "pay" the friction,the "remake" of the starting unbalance and...the utilizable ("free") output supply.

      All the best ! / Alex