New Steven Mark video released April 2006 !

[lancaIV]

Please read about the Wingate A. Lambertson WIN cell development
www.rexresearch.com/lambrtsn/lambrtsn.htm
www.keelynet.com/energy/win.htm
about their own speculations:"it is- this-the source; no,it is- that-the source;..." and the structural changes(with and without use of ....).

The question/answer about "right measuring" of FE/OU-sphere-gains,
the different "experiment-results"(965% down to UU-85%) and much more !

He/they invested something more than 20 years(1966- ) of re-/search,
with any remarkable kind of success ?

Sincerely
            de Lanca

[Freedomfuel]

I would like to comment on some of the ideas expressed in this thread.

Nrg_revolution in post 87 put forward the idea that the poles of permanent magnets and the poles of the geomagnetic field act as funnels through which ether flows in and out.  This is similar to Earl?s ideas about ether being drawn into the device.  The idea of ether as a source of energy seems odd to me because Faraday, Maxwell and Tesla all thought of the ether only as a medium through which magnetic and electric fields could produce action at a distance.  Tesla, like all 19th century scientists, thought that the stars were the source of all energy although his ideas of what constituted solar energy were unconventional.  If this ubiquitous ether could flow in this way it would be omnidirectional but overunity devices like this one need to be orientated correctly in relation to the Earth in order to function.  Also the rotating magnetic field they produce needs to rotate in one direction only which suggests that the Coriolis effect is at work here.   This is the apparent deflection of a force in a rotating frame of reference, so does this mean that the ether rotates as it enters the device and if so why should it rotate in opposite directions in the north and south hemispheres?  Also how is ether translated into the magnetic field created by the device?  In my opinion ether theories are unhelpful because you cannot design a technology around something so ineffable.

Liberty in post 53 questioned the idea that electrical transients from switching could receive energy from the Earth? magnetic field.  He thinks that such transients would be more like static electrical discharges rather than a continuous train of pulses.  One interesting possibility was suggested by Steven when he advised us to consider what happens to cause the EM pulse in nuclear explosions.  See this link:

An Introduction To the EMP and Lightning Threat
http://www.blackmagic.com/ses/bruceg/EMC/EMP-Light.html

Electro-magnetic Pulse (EMP) Systems
http://www.tfd.chalmers.se/~valeri/EMP.html

It seems that during a high altitude burst gamma ray photons eject electrons from air molecules which then spread horizontally along the Earth?s magnetic field lines while making a spiralling motion.  Such charges accelerating towards a centre of rotation will produce a broad band of radio emissions from 10kHz to 100Mhz known as synchrotron radiation.  This is analogous to the production of synchrotron radiation by solar wind protons trapped in the inner Van Allen belt.  As these zig zag back and forth along the Earth? magnetic field lines they also make a spiralling motion.  Could the Steve Mark device be receiving these radio emissions?  It seems a bit unlikely, but we should consider every possibility.

Elvis Oswald in post 108 suggested that the Earth stores energy like a capacitor and that this could account for lightning.  There is something called the ?equatorial ring current? in the ionosphere caused by the deflection of solar wind protons by the Earth?s magnetic field and this does create a weak electric field between the Earth and the ionosphere like a capacitor.  In my opinion this is not the origin of lightning.  If members of this forum could overcome their aversion to scientific literature they could learn about some exciting discoveries about lightning due in the near future.  Scientist admit that they do not know what lightning really is because the electric field strength in clouds is insufficient to make a spark 3km long.  A clue as to the true nature of lightning is provided by UFOs when their rotating magnet assemblies accelerate before take off.  The production of a bang and a flash of light suggests to me that this is the same phenomenon as lightning and that it is primarily a magnetic phenomenon associated with the Earth?s magnetic field.  What Elvis may be referring to in Tesla?s capacitor discharge experiments is a precursor to the electric discharge in the form of a luminous channel through the air that conducts electrons.  In my opinion such a luminous channel consisting of a magnetic current is formed during a lightning discharge and it can conduct electrons over a greater distance than should be possible by electric force and ionization of air alone.  I also believe that the Steve Mark device also creates an invisible channel to the ionosphere through which a magnetic current can flow, though not so abruptly as with lightning.  This magnetic current is merely static solar photons trapped in the ionosphere where they exist as magnetic vortices.

Liberty in post 53 put forward the hypothesis that the superimposition of the geomagnetic field on the locally produced field of the coil causes a heterodyne effect whereby the mean of the two frequencies added together results in a lower frequency 60 kHz output.  Stefan pointed out the obvious flaw in this argument because the geomagnetic field does not change direction like an alternating current.  However, the geomagnetic field does have transverse waves due to the influence of the solar wind on the magnetosphere and the displacement of the field lines does periodically change direction.  Here is a quote from this article:

Magnetosphere, Ionosphere, and Atmosphere
http://www.nap.edu/nap-cgi/skimit.cgi?recid=2238&chap=75-99

?In addition to receiving steady electrical currents, the Earth is also bathed in a variety of magnetohydrodynamic waves, or pulsations, produced at much higher altitudes in the magnetosphere?

See also:
James L Green.  The Magnetosphere
http://ssdoo.gsfc.nasa.gov/education/lectures/magnetosphere/index.html

ULF waves (geomagnetic pulsations)
http://www.oulu.fi/~spaceweb/textbook/ulf.html

For the Steve Mark device to receive energy from these waves high above the Earth?s surface it would have to act as both a transmitter and receiver in ways I cannot imagine.  This is still a possibility worth considering.

Here is my conclusion about how the device does draw energy from the Earth?s magnetic field.  90% of this field is a dipole whose axis is slightly offset from the Earth?s axis of rotation.  The other 10% is north and south poles randomly distributed over the Earth?s surface.  The existence of these secondary magnetic poles was confirmed by the European Space Agency?s ?Cluster? satellites when they detected micro-vortices in the Earth?s magnetic field.

Micro-vortices in Earth's magnetosphere
http://www.zpenergy.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1449
http://www.rednova.com/news/display/?id=203500&source=r_space

The article ascribed the cause of such vortices to turbulence caused by the impact of the solar wind on the magnetosphere but in my opinion they are an integral part of the geomagnetic field rather than being induced by moving charges.  I see these vortices as being funnels through which magnetic current from the ionosphere is channelled into the Earth.  It has been observed by several OU researchers, including Bushwacker on this forum, that their devices are location sensitive and this could be due to geomagnetic vortices rather than the proximity of power lines as some have suggested.

OK, that?s enough space physics lessons for today.

[hartiberlin]

This backward moving light is very interesting !
If you look at the MPEG video:
http://www.rochester.edu/news/photos/backward_light.mpg

It can only be explained, that the light pulse already has a faster moving other field with it,
which tunnels already through the medium and is reflected back then.
But the most intersting thing is, that a light pulse is already moving forward behind the medium with the same speed.
This lets us make communication must faster cause you can jump a distance without needing to go through to it
and thus save time  !

Imagine having light jump across a distance without delay !
How much faster than light speed is this ?

Also very interesting is, that the backgoing light pulse cancels out the energy
from the incoming light pulse.
Does anybody know, what kinbdof medium are they using for this ?

P.S: It could also be, that the laser they are using has not a pure green light,
but also some other higher speed wavelength , so the other wavelength has already gone
faster through the medium and is just reflected...much easier explanation...

[gn0stik]

This device is no what apears to be. It's a S.E.A.R.L. disc Inside. I have one and works, like a generator. It vibrate because of cilindrical rotation magnets inside. It produces DC voltage high amperage current. I have to turn it off when no current is draw from it, the start to demonstrate some acomulative effects of ether energy.

YOU have a searl disc? Give me a break. Where did you get it? Don't tell me, John Searl drove down your street in an ice cream truck handing them out with plans and building instructions eh? How did you manufacture the rollers? In fact, what are the rollers made of? because they are not simple "cylindrical magnets", according to John, they are multi layers of material.  If you have a searl disc please, post a video and let us all see it in action. John Searl himself doesn't have one, so how on earth did you get one? If you made one, please, show us all the plans, building materials, and exactly step by step the methods of building one, so the world can finally see this technology in the private sector instead of the grubby mits of the public sector bandits who have kept us from it for so long.

BTW Searl is not an acronym, It's his farking name.

[tishatang]

Hi all,
I found an interesting link possibly relating to Mark Device and extracting energy from atmosphere.  Explore all links within article.

http://amasci.com/tesla/tesceive.html

Hope this helps?
tishatang