Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder

[WilbyInebriated]

Hmm...
Since when the language spoken has anything in common with the possibility of "OU" claims?
You're one of the "innebriated" guy bots?
Jeeeez....

it's inebriated... jeeeez

[gmeast]

AGAIN !

Hi all,

I am saddened that there is venom here !  I view this topic and the work already done as very significant.  I compare it to CF, Cold Fusion, CANR or whatever name you give it ... not the same mechanism I admit, but the same 'flavor' of initial observation(s).

....an anomalous amount of heat (energy over time = power) evolving from a physical set up of components ... the observed and measured cumulative power output unquestionably exceeding the input power.

The important term here is "POWER".  In TOO many experiments, people get all excited over a spike in energy, or temperature.  For a brief moment, something displays OU chacteristics ... for example, a pulse ... which is where most errors or misinterpretation occurs ... beautiful ignorance and arrogance blind experimenters much too often.

In the case of this COP>17 Circuit, there is none of this "misinterpretation" the same as there is NONE with CF.

It seems Aaron from Energetic has been the only one to post a replication ... it appeared inconclusive because of some technical roadblocks, but still something was demonstrated.

If there have been other replications I have not seen, sorry, and please steer me toward them.   This is too important to just argue and criticize over.

Greg

[Rosemary Ainslie]

AGAIN !

Hi all,

I am saddened that there is venom here !  I view this topic and the work already done as very significant.  I compare it to CF, Cold Fusion, CANR or whatever name you give it ... not the same mechanism I admit, but the same 'flavor' of initial observation(s).

....an anomalous amount of heat (energy over time = power) evolving from a physical set up of components ... the observed and measured cumulative power output unquestionably exceeding the input power.

The important term here is "POWER".  In TOO many experiments, people get all excited over a spike in energy, or temperature.  For a brief moment, something displays OU chacteristics ... for example, a pulse ... which is where most errors or misinterpretation occurs ... beautiful ignorance and arrogance blind experimenters much too often.

In the case of this COP>17 Circuit, there is none of this "misinterpretation" the same as there is NONE with CF.

It seems Aaron from Energetic has been the only one to post a replication ... it appeared inconclusive because of some technical roadblocks, but still something was demonstrated.

If there have been other replications I have not seen, sorry, and please steer me toward them.   This is too important to just argue and criticize over.

Greg

Greg - indeed it's important.  Which is precisely why I am fighting this corner.  But for now - here's the paper.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/26240411/PROVING-OVER-UNITY-THE-HARD-WORK-OF-MANY-DEDICATED-OPEN-SOURCE-MEMBERS

[Rosemary Ainslie]

You have put a lot of time into this theory and your earnest is evidence of your intent Rosemary.   Thank you for your efforts.   Is this theory able to model an "electric cavity" created by your switching circuit?  It will be much easier to work with radiant wavelengths once we can convert them into something we can sense.

Hope - welcome to the discussion.  I'm afraid the circuit was only ever designed to prove that COP>1 is possible.  But that, in itself, is important.  I know nothing about 'electric cavity' but will look it up.  Unless you can provide a link which would be much appreciated.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

BTW I'm afraid you've joined here where I'm in a kind of insurgency warfare with 5 Free Energy players who are trying to appropriate this technology or - to divorce it from my input.  Not serious in itself but it will rather put paid to our attempts to keep this technology open source.

Again.  Kindest as ever,
R

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Guys, not sure if I've done the right thing.  But effectively Ash and Glen can post to their heart's content on the new thread. 

I agree that there needs to be complete halt to this flaming.  It is ruining this thread which is the actual intention.  I should have followed my off forum advices and simply not tolerated their posts at all.  I apologise.  I do not intend allowing any further posts from either of them and they are free to spam, or do what they want there - or elsewhere.

Out of respect to our members here I've not deleted anything other than a post by shruggedatlas - in error.  Apologies.

Kindest regards, and abject apologies that I let this go on as I did.

Rosemary