Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder

[Rosemary Ainslie]

No, no. I'm not asking him whether he attended a demonstration or not. Neither did I ask him as to whether he approved of protocols, whatever that means. I'm asking him if he did confirm independently the claims for the energy disbalance. That's the only thing I'm interested in -- independent confirmation of the discussed energy disbalance. Nothing short of it.

Omnibus - am I dreaming.  Didn't you advise us that you're widely connected to academics - all over the place?  How then, with that much education - can you refer to energy disbalance?  It's termed 'imbalance'.  Unless of course English is not your natural tongue.  In which case I can understand it.  And how does ANYONE independently confirm energy IMbalance without reference to an experiment?  In order to see that evidence requires that there is some apparatus that is able to demonstrate this.  And I have NEVER discussed energy imbalance - nor have I experimented with any concepts related to ENERGY IMBALANCE.  Now you have entirely lost me.  I think what you need to do here in the interests of transparency - is actually disclose your email right here - on open source.  Because, right now the semantics that you are trying to use to disguise the damage you've done is actually patently obvious.  And I need re-assurance that the damage is NOT too extreme.  Right now you are stating to two learned and respected Professors that I have claimed that they accredited my results.  THIS IS FALSE.

[Omnibus]

The e-mail to prof. Tapson is also sent. Thanks @WilbyInebrated for the help. You're good at it.

Before reading the manuscript I'd like to hear what these two colleagues have to say regarding the experiment.

[WilbyInebriated]

The e-mail to prof. Tapson is also sent. Thanks @WilbyInebrated for the help. You're good at it.

Before reading the manuscript I'd like to hear what these two colleagues have to say regarding the experiment.

tu stultus es... qed.

[Omnibus]

Energy disbalance is what's of the primary interest in this forum, that is, the dibalance between the energy input compared to the output energy, in favor of the latter. Here in this forum it is agreed that the said disbalance be called "overunity" and therefore in the future in this exchange the disbalance in question may be referred to simply as "overunity" or OU.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

The e-mail to prof. Tapson is also sent. Thanks @WilbyInebrated for the help. You're good at it.

Before reading the manuscript I'd like to hear what these two colleagues have to say regarding the experiment.

And I intend finding out - from them - your actual name and a little bit more about that 'colleague' status.  LOL  Until this last intervention I rather gave you the benefit of the doubt.