Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder

[fuzzytomcat]

In the first instance that is not my Scribd file. 

Rosemary

Rosemary Ainslie's "SWORN" legal affidavit on Scribd  doc/26240411 http://www.scribd.com/doc/26240411/PROVING-OVER-UNITY-THE-HARD-WORK-OF-MANY-DEDICATED-OPEN-SOURCE-MEMBERS    -    PDF file        Name #2  -  Scribd  doc/26240411 

http://public.blu.livefilestore.com/y1pwJGOmgUob3bhb4rFH8h80a2_WqI_dPm1XtU5xR2Ukb1zMllqjn92RfCWHKoqBc7L1aRTNWF_PbXw-Z0mb_4bMw/Ainslie_Affidavit_Scribd.pdf?download&psid=1

*******************************************************************************************************************

http://www.energeticforum.com/83533-post27.html   (link)

witsend                     
Senior Member
        
More On The Hot Potato

I'm hoping this is the link to my Scribd publication. Note that all authors names have had to be removed as well as reference to all authors. TIE submission requires absolute anonymity. It's a fair criterion in my book. But it has not made it to review. I'll post the editors comments after this.

I hope the link works. I'll check it.
100130-071433-(GLEN)_01 Final Draft   

Ok. It's up and running. Was rather proud of all our efforts but it seems we still can't get it past the editors. This, like Iravani's application befort this, was dropped like a hot potato. Totally discouraged. On so many levels.

100130-071433-(GLEN)_01 Final Draft
http://www.scribd.com/doc/26240411/100130-071433-GLEN-01-Final-Draft       Name #1  -  Scribd  doc/26240411


Scribd  doc/26240411 identification number is in both Scribd  http://  links because it's the same document, just renamed once ...... so .....   


.

[WilbyInebriated]

Glen, quite frankly I DARE NOT open those links. I absolutely do not have any 'sworn affidavit' files anywhere at all.   And if you have pdf's then it is certainly NOT my work.  Just my name that you're using.  And you absolutely DO NOT have access to my files.  I'll get someone to check out the links in the morning.

hi rosemary, the first link is is to the page that was removed by scribd, glen keeps posting screen shots of it. the second link is a copy of the letter you sent to scribd about this issue.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

guys.  I'm intrigued.  Glen keeps posting copies of my earlier posts.  They're really most of them quite clear but hardly controversial.  I would have thought if he needed to malign me - then he'd post something controversial. 

What is happening now is that Glen is CLAIMING that the IEEE requested Scribd to remove that publication of the paper.  I have been in touch with them and certainly their Admin staff know nothing about this but will look into it during the course of the day.  If indeed it is true then we all need to know, myself included.  If it is not true then what Glen is doing now is defamation by proxy.  And what he is doing, however is trying to show the evidence by linking to his own Scribd publication where there would certainly NOT be any reference to a removal.  The TIE paper was never there to be removed.  What then is that removal referring to?

I'm willing to bet that there will be a Glen or Harvey letter of complaint to the IEEE - behind all of this and when I have that information to hand will put it forward here.  Harvey has often advised you that my object was to IMPLY that the IEEE had either reviewed or endorsed that publication.   The above quoted post by Glen is all the proof required that this was never the objective.  And there is ample mention in the title to that paper that it was NOT published.  I simply published it on Scribd as a faithful record of our TIE submission. 

Fortunately I also now have Glen's opinion on the matter that he has sole copyright.  What a load of nonsense.  Copyright in a collaboration is vested in ALL AUTHORS.  And each and any of us can publish anywhere in the world that we want - without any permission of the other collaborators.  It was very much my own work and I certainly have the right to publish.

Regards,
Rosemary

edited

[fuzzytomcat]

Howdy reading members and guest,

How about that Rosemary Ainslie's "SWORN" legal affidavit on her Scribd file -  http://www.scribd.com/doc/26240411/PROVING-OVER-UNITY-THE-HARD-WORK-OF-MANY-DEDICATED-OPEN-SOURCE-MEMBERS    (  Name #2  -  Scribd  doc/26240411  ) ...... Read it ?? ..... here's a copy ..... http://public.blu.livefilestore.com/y1pwJGOmgUob3bhb4rFH8h80a2_WqI_dPm1XtU5xR2Ukb1zMllqjn92RfCWHKoqBc7L1aRTNWF_PbXw-Z0mb_4bMw/Ainslie_Affidavit_Scribd.pdf?download&psid=1    (link)



All right lets go over the required in the content of the"SWORN" legal affidavit  ........  one posting at a time on many incorrect issues stated in the content of the affidavit.

***********************************************************************

I declare, under penalty of perjury, that I have a good faith belief
that the complaint of copyright violation is based on mistaken
information, or deliberate misreading of the law.

ROSEMARY AINLSIE

***********************************************************************

Well the above statement is ok I guess for Rosemary.

***********************************************************************

Lets go onto the quoted information that was provided in the "SWORN" legal affidavit regarding the Tektronix and their pieces of equipment a TDS 3054C and a DPO 3054 oscilloscopes .....

The mission of this Open Source collaboration and the purpose of that
second paper was to replicate the fist tests detailed in that earlier
paper and to then make the information available to the public under
the transparent and stringent requirements of Open Source
disciplines. We contracted use of the Tektronix 3054C DPO to measure
the test data - on the understanding that the data would then be
freely available to the public through Energetic Forum- thereby
advertising the equipment by way of compensating Tektronix for the use
of their equipment.

He has arbitrarily chosen alternate vehicles for the publication of
'live broad casts'which are somewhat less than the advertisement that
I contracted with Tektronix.


***********************************************************************

Wow .... that above set of statements does not go with the record at all ....... not even close to the 100% verifiable e-mail correspondence from Tektronix.

http://public.blu.livefilestore.com/y1p7UrJFtB9dqKeP7JRClHkMTiW-ZOiq4a-vqJCLDv6bLWbQpccxaLs0NoaRBncdtNQ7WjZ21forLZld-UWBFbXwQ/Request_for_return_due_to_misleading_intent.pdf?download&psid=1  (link)




 

[Pirate88179]

Fuzzy:

Have you nothing better to do in your life than to make these sad attempts to malign this woman?  No wait, don't answer this, because you already have.

Very sad indeed.

Bill