Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder

[Rosemary Ainslie]

LOL.  He actually proves my point.  Thank you for that.  It seems that I don't have to dig around to substantiate my statements.  He does it for me.  Indeed those applications by Glen were precisely what delayed the research on campus.  It took a while but they eventually discovered the real reason behind Glen's interventions.  I am entirely satisfied that Glen would not even get an acknowledgement of receipt of an email today.  They've now got his number - as have Scribd.  And our lab and research project is well underway - with everyone's blessings.

Fortunately I've been able to warn all interested parties as to the extent and length that Glen will go to to kill this research.  We're all well prepared.  In fact it's precisely this level of attack that has intrigued all and sundry.  It rather speaks to a desirable technology.  Here he simply tried - very hard - to kill the research project on campus.  He found the address by rifling my photobucket.  What a joke.  I will never be able to accuse Glen of decency, moderation, upstanding high principles, kindness, or anything associated with the qualities of a professional or a gentleman.

Regards,
Rosemary

@Glen.  BTW.  You need to answer Pirate and you need to answer my own posts?  Not sure if you'll manage the real challenge of actual articulation - but I think we'd all be rather interested. 

added.  And guys.  Read away.  It's intriguing to see a so called over unity enthusiast struggle by foul means - to zap some technology that simply doesn't belong to him. Let me remind you.  It's free for the taking.  Don't let anyone kid you otherwise.  You will notice that there is no principle too high, nor for that matter too low that will EVER BE exploited by this apology of a man.  Like I've said before.  It is my opinion that Glen is a scoundrel.

Rosemary

[b4FreeEnergy]

Hi Rosemary,

Apart from this not so nice fight do you plan to post any new results or measurements done by your team at the university in SA or are all chances of seeing more now blown because of this fight? If I read between the lines there are new results and interesting things going on, can we see them or are you heading for front-page news in a few major newspapers immediately? Or any hints to improve my own setup here at home? I would really like to see some real over unity results and preferably in this life not in the next    I still get those funny looks from my friends, colleagues or family if I dear bringing up something even only remotely connected with over-unity or zero-point energy or whatever you want to call it …

By the way, you don’t need a lawyer, you’re doing such a good job defending yourself he or she would only stand in the way! 

Cheers,
B

[fuzzytomcat]

@Glen.  BTW.  You need to answer Pirate and you need to answer my own posts?  Not sure if you'll manage the real challenge of actual articulation - but I think we'd all be rather interested.

@ Rosemary ..... there is a question on November 05, 2010  http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=9442.msg262997#msg262997  Reply #780  you haven't answered at all in my response to your continued allegations of ME stealing some technology for a patent application or patent on electronic circuits that are posted openly and freely available on the internet

Howdy reading members and guests,

I would assume that most would know when you put your information on the web without any restrictions, without copyrights, all rights reserved or trademark notices like myself does, the public can use it with no strings attached except for gross misrepresentations, it's in the public domain and any patents are out of the question.    The "Mosfet Heating Circuit" is not patentable !!

I have made comments at Energetic Forum on Patents ..... and how there stolen from the inventor .....

http://www.energeticforum.com/90969-post21.html

Sections 182 through 188 are really interesting !!

Good Luck !!

Best Regards,
Glen

What has been avoided by Rosemary Ainslie is in any response in her "Intellectual Property Rights" as a INVENTOR of PATENT APPLICATIONS that are in her name.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intellectual_property
Intellectual property (IP) is a term referring to a number of distinct types of creations of the mind for which property rights are recognizedâ€"and the corresponding fields of law.[1] Under intellectual property law, owners are granted certain exclusive rights  to a variety of intangible assets, such as musical, literary, and artistic works; discoveries and inventions; and words, phrases, symbols, and designs. Common types of intellectual property include copyrights, trademarks, patents, industrial design rights and trade secrets in some jurisdictions.


My question is how can a INVENTOR  without the knowledge of electronic circuitry or electronic component operation or capability of construction of a electronic circuit INVENT a electronic circuit for a PATENT ?? and how can someone claim INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS as Rosemary Ainslie does on that electronic circuit ??

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=9645.msg254309#msg254309
http://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=23243.msg255644#msg255644
http://www.energeticforum.com/59001-post169.html
http://www.energeticforum.com/61040-post798.html
http://www.energeticforum.com/61453-post920.html

Regards,
Glen
.

My question is how can a INVENTOR listed on the patent applications without the knowledge of electronic circuitry or electronic component operation or capability of construction of a electronic circuit INVENT a electronic circuit for a PATENT or PATENT APPLICATION ?? and how can someone claim INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS as you Rosemary Ainslie does on that electronic circuit ??

Patent Applications
http://public.blu.livefilestore.com/y1pmDTYsvO5wFpJKvF34_-_L0RFEs91CobL5JI2CtmSG23h3_Dgqa_fWZDZnDI8HLEKs873g-29N0Kr0gBKfK7lPw/ZA9900385A.pdf?download&psid=1
http://public.blu.livefilestore.com/y1pY9zromnq3JHJ1o0T0g9QjRs7VPZcqThJ86nKtpoaSvUW6gP6jPLbaOqFGvp4ihuV1n9LyS8Bvnr8-i2QuEQmyQ/EP0932248A1.pdf?download&psid=1
http://public.blu.livefilestore.com/y1p3kQ7ZZSqJBdRdeq3O2tajGhBgpE_oR8D9cwHxinHkZN3YxQ29N20s6mDVwlxF5HcnITG-XkrKAuOfPjp9_gS5g/WO9938247A1.pdf?download&psid=1
http://public.blu.livefilestore.com/y1pZikJBtJ8iE-5lGkZODp8Ye42KnDF3jQkw_QGxc6y6acTDhhhWpNLVY_PVnjLgiZ4prto3e2F1zSgiFIaXYzpOg/WO03007657A2.pdf?download&psid=1

Please clarify the above question posed fully Rosemary to the best of your ability ..... legal counsel for me the process of investigating the rules and regulations on what comprises the term and definition of "INVENTOR" from the respective patent application document locations.


Glen

.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Hi Rosemary,

Apart from this not so nice fight do you plan to post any new results or measurements done by your team at the university in SA or are all chances of seeing more now blown because of this fight? If I read between the lines there are new results and interesting things going on, can we see them or are you heading for front-page news in a few major newspapers immediately? Or any hints to improve my own setup here at home? I would really like to see some real over unity results and preferably in this life not in the next    I still get those funny looks from my friends, colleagues or family if I dear bringing up something even only remotely connected with over-unity or zero-point energy or whatever you want to call it …

By the way, you don’t need a lawyer, you’re doing such a good job defending yourself he or she would only stand in the way! 

Cheers,
B

Hello B.  I am reasonably confident that we will all know the results within a few months.  You've waited this long B.  Just a little while longer.  We're so nearly there.  I actually don't know where to post at the moment.  My son's given me a blog and I can't find it.  And the child is just so frantically busy at his own work that I feel guilty asking him.  But even when I get there - I will need to learn how to work it.  I'm slow B.  Really, really slow - on these internet systems.  And it doesn't help that I'm half blind.  The beauty of this forum is that once I get into it - I can move around and touch type and more or less get things right. 

My only promise to you is that you've got much to hope for.  And if you want to play with your own circuit - that's good - provided only that you check your shunt measurements on a simple DC coupling - to establish optimised performace.  There's no need for a degree in harmonics to get there. 

I am actually not in a position yet to fully disclose the details of the research.  For one it's nowhere near ready - and for another - I think that Glen and Harvey simply plan to duplicate whatever I post and then - as ever - claim it as their own.  I need to see Glen out of the picture or not - before I know which way to jump.

But I assure you I'll always be public.  And I'll let you know where this goes if Harti needs to ban me.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

[Rosemary Ainslie]

@ Rosemary ..... there is a question on November 05, 2010  http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=9442.msg262997#msg262997  Reply #780  you haven't answered at all in my response to your continued allegations of ME stealing some technology for a patent application or patent on electronic circuits that are posted openly and freely available on the internet

What the hell are you doing if not trying to divorce me from my own work and to what end?  There is ONLY ONE CONCLUSION.  And we've all reached that conclusion.  Otherwise I must conclude that you waste hours of my time and your own in your desparate attempt to malign me for the fun of it.  As a rule people do not indulge in such CRAZY activities at such an enormous expense of their time and trouble.  What are you thinking?  What other possible conclusion is there to reach?  You have given us ALL the evidence required that you will do just about ANYTHING to destroy this work.

What has been avoided by Rosemary Ainslie is in any response in her "Intellectual Property Rights" as a INVENTOR of PATENT APPLICATIONS that are in her name.

You ass.  You unmitigated, insuferable, unprincipled, idiotic, assinine halfwit.  You KNOW that there is absolutely NO REGISTERED PATENT EXTANT ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD.  You KNOW that this was applied for for purposes of using the public disclosure of the patenting office to put the technology into the public domain.  I KNEW NOTHING OF THESE  FORUMS OR OF THE INTERNET.  I HAD NO OTHER MEANS OF GETTTING THIS KNOWLEDGE INTO THE PUBLIC DOMAIN TO RENDER IT UNPATENTABLE.  But what is particularly hard on the stomache is that you DARE to assume that the readers here think - FOR EVEN ONE MOMENT - that this technology is patented.  And you pretend and pretend and pretend.  You insinuate.  You imply.  You post links.  You ass.  You only show yourself as a manipulating twisted horror that you are. You ENTIRELY underestimate the intelligence of either the members or the readers of this forum.   It is insulting to see such transparent motives rendered with the subtleties of a sledgehammer and you assume that all an sundry cannot see what it is you are doing.  It is that embarrassing that it makes the toes curl.  What you need to do as a matter of extreme urgency is show a REGISTERED PATENT in my name or any member of my family's name.  Then I promise you my attention will be RIVETED.

No-one reading here needs to be reminded of the definition of intellectual property ownership with the possible exception of yourself.  One day I trust you and Harvey will explain the niceties that you discovered in your own replication that elevated it to something that was not a replication.  Something to do with the fact that you never quite reached COP>17.  LOL.  And then the added insult of seeing those jokes of data test 14 through God knows what - where you conveniently discovered a mistake.  WHY?  WHAT WAS THE DIFFERENCE?  WHAT IS THE MOTIVE?  I know perfectly well that the intention is to cast doubts on the result and then - no doubt - you will pull out a brand new discovery from under those two horns that protrude from your head.

My question is how can a INVENTOR  without the knowledge of electronic circuitry or electronic component operation or capability of construction of a electronic circuit INVENT a electronic circuit for a PATENT ?? and how can someone claim INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS as Rosemary Ainslie does on that electronic circuit ??

I cannot tell you how an inventor can manage so much with such little knowledge and so little intelligence - but I suspect it's because the circuit's that EASY that my granddaughter could manage it.  What's not so easy is the methods of driving that switch.  Fortunately - there are MANY SWITCHING CIRCUITS on the internet - free and for the taking - that one does not need more than the ability to read.  And it is my mission to prove that an ABSOLUTE IGNORAMUS - SUCH AS MYSELF - can manage this.  That way, those others who are NOT trained in electronics - can get the confidence to put this together themselves.  I am very PROUD of my inabilities.  I share it with many.  And unlike you and Harvey et al - I am most ANXIOUS to assure all that you do not need to be Einstein to understand electricity.  IT'S ALL VERY SIMPLE AND VERY STRAIGHT FORWARD.  It's been obfuscated to the point of absurdity.  I hope to get rid of all that obfuscation.  And BTW.  While I am the first to admit to not being an expert - I have more than an adequate working knowledge - certainly for the purposes of my thesis.  And frankly I probably know as much about circuitry as you do.  Which may or may not being saying very much.  I am happy to admit to ignorance - I flinch at claiming more knowledge than I have.  I wish you'd follow this example.  It would save us all from embarrassment.

Please clarify the above question posed fully Rosemary to the best of your ability ..... legal counsel for me the process of investigating the rules and regulations on what comprises the term and definition of "INVENTOR" from the respective patent application document locations.

This is another one of your confusing absolutely meaningless statements - more or less as muddled as those strange links that you never tire of posting and that no-one bothers to open.  THERE IS NO REGISTERED PATENT.  WHY MUST I CLARIFY ANYTHING AT ALL?  GO AND SPEAK TO YOUR ATTORNEY.  HE COULD POSSIBLY HELP YOU.

Rosemary

added