vetting god

[WilbyInebriated]

11:11 this is the third time i have had to say this to you.
i repeat, this thread is specially dedicated to the subject of VETTING god. what you 'think' god is does not qualify. babbling about what thought forms you have or like to have does not qualify. babbling about whom you quit associations with does not qualify. babbling about your political preferences does not qualify... in point of fact, NONE of your posts qualify.
if you have some material evidence or a logical proof, great! present it. why is this so difficult? it's only one deity to vet, it's not like i am asking you to vet all 1,111 of your 'spirit guardians'...

please keep your posts to the topic. thank you for your cooperation. don't post again without material evidence or a logical proof or you will be reported to the moderator.

[11:11]

11:11 this is the third time i have had to say this to you.
i repeat, this thread is specially dedicated to the subject of VETTING god. what you 'think' god is does not qualify. babbling about what thought forms you have or like to have does not qualify. babbling about whom you quit associations with does not qualify. babbling about your political preferences does not qualify... in point of fact, NONE of your posts qualify.
if you have some material evidence or a logical proof, great! present it. why is this so difficult? it's only one deity to vet, it's not like i am asking you to vet all 1,111 of your 'spirit guardians'...

please keep your posts to the topic. thank you for your cooperation. don't post again with material evidence or a logical proof or you will be reported to the moderator.

if you had typed that without challenging me,
than i might have respected your wishes.

but you cannot declare war against someones testicles,
AND expect to diplomatically get a cease fire,
at the same time.

you cannot have your cake,
and eat it too.

because you are not bribing others with enough money,
to do so.



i will address the large errors in your argumentational position,
when i'm in a better mood.

because right now,
i have more important things to work on,
than outlining your unsupportable,
philosophically bankrupt,
self-defeating,
line of thinking.



by the way.
the mods on this website,
do not care.

if they did care,
than many of the active forum posters,
would have been banned long ago.

banned for posts that are far worse,
than anything that i have ever posted.



banned BEFORE they had scared away most of the talent,
that actually presented innovative ideas.

not unlike how they are still scaring the talent away,
with pitch forks and torches,
to this day.

[WilbyInebriated]

if you had typed that without challenging me,
than i might have respected your wishes.

but you cannot declare war against someones testicles,
AND expect to diplomatically get a cease fire,
at the same time.

you cannot have your cake,
and eat it too.

because you are not bribing others with enough money,
to do so.



i will address the large errors in your argumentational position,
when i'm in a better mood.

because right now,
i have more important things to work on,
than outlining your unsupportable,
philosophically bankrupt,
self-defeating,
line of thinking.



by the way.
the mods on this website,
do not care.

if they did care,
than many of the active forum posters,
would have been banned long ago.

banned for posts that are far worse,
than anything that i have ever posted.



banned BEFORE they had scared away most of the talent,
that actually presented innovative ideas.

not unlike how they are still scaring the talent away,
with pitch forks and torches,
to this day.

i didn't challenge 'you', and what's your mood got to do with it? mood is a thing for cattle or making love or playing the baliset... you're just dancing around, using logical fallacies as your argument, trying to avoid the FACT that you cannot provide a single shred of material evidence nor a logical proof. which, i might add, does nothing to advance your position. your repeated lack of material evidence and refusal to provide a logical proof only serves to strengthen my position...
furthermore, it is not necessary for you to outline my 'unsupportable, philosophically bankrupt, self-defeating, line of thinking', because that still does not vet your imaginary godfairy... but feel free to engage in more strawman and red herring arguments that further demonstrate your inability to vet your imaginary godfairy.

[Pirate88179]

Wilby:

Very interesting topic.

My only evidence is me.  I type, therefore I am.  Or at least, I am here.  Only God could make someone like me, with all of my faults...any other manufacturer would have not let me pass QC and I would have been recycled.

Proof?  Not really I suppose.  But it was the best that I could do given the circumstances and the available information I had at hand at the time of my post.

I hope you are well and still ice fishing in the winter using a JT flashlight.

Bill

[WilbyInebriated]

hi bill, thanks for the humorous response. great timing.

i am well and hope you are too. to be truthful, i can't wait for hard water, even though the summer fishing has been great this year. i still have a couple jt's in the hard water kit for shining up glow jigs, but switched the icehouse lighting to a SEC circuit. i was playing around using the whole lake instead of just a glass of water... interesting stuff.