FATHER OF WATER POWER CAR - Stanley Meyer's SECRET

[h20power]

resonance and 180 degree phase shift

Do you have anything on video showing this in a real world application or is this just a thought experiment that seems correct?


Edward Mitchell
Owner
True Green Solutions
https://gofund.me/94431e56

[tysb3]

This is only idea from this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rgq8OR8HdnA
From 13:00
Sorry, in Russian.
Its about healing by resonant fields. The pathological bacteria can not be destroyed by only resonance. Additionally needed the switching phase of electrical field. The best option is 180 degree. The switching phase is creating high frequency pulses. 

[h20power]

This is only idea from this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rgq8OR8HdnA
From 13:00
Sorry, in Russian.
Its about healing by resonant fields. The pathological bacteria can not be destroyed by only resonance. Additionally needed the switching phase of electrical field. The best option is 180 degree. The switching phase is creating high frequency pulses.

Hi Again,


It's kinda what I thought in that one unknown is being lumped with another unknown in the hopes of a solution popping up out of thin air. So, I'll direction your attention to that graph I provided and will now teach you how to read it correctly as though it appears simple it is actually complex. The vertical lines represent a single pulse time or square wave pulse that was sent to the VIC transformer. As shown in blue and red for every one pulse sent to the VIC transformer you get two pules headed to the Water Fuel Capacitor (WFC). The horizontal lines represent time and show just how many pulses were sent to the VIC transformer. In that example five pulses where sent to the VIC transformer resulting in ten pulses being sent to the WFC.
Now for the math part that shows just why the water bath never heats up when breaking the bonds of the water molecules in this fashion. The blue and red areas are to be summed up as they represent current flow that will pass through the system, IE, the water bath. With a perfectly balance waveform there will be no current flowing through the water bath as the blue and red areas of the graph simply cancel each other out when their sums are taken. The amplitude of the waveform represents voltage levels and you get a negative and positive voltage being sent to the plates of the WFC which is just a capacitor who's dielectric material being used is just water.
Now when looking at water it is made up of hydrogen and oxygen atoms whom both have a voltage threshold that once crossed will get them to release their electrons. With me so far? It is this act of removing the electrons that causes the water molecules to simply fall apart which is something can learn when studying photosynthesis as it turns out this is how plants break the bonds of the water molecules also but by a different method. Just know that the end process of breaking down the water molecules into their component atoms is always the same, take away the electrons and the water molecules fall apart into hydrogen & oxygen gases and the creation of an electric charge.
This is how Meyer's technology actually works to break the bonds of the water molecules and know it is most comparable to a thunderstorm as the whole process is just a means to mimic the earth's Global Electric Circuit electronically.


So, with this being said there are no more unknows as to the science behind the technology, correct? This was my gift to this forum but as you have seen it's been largely ignored by the many forum members of this forum. But this leaves us all in learning how to build it correctly by way of trial and error testing hopefully making use of the scientific method so that one can map out how to get it built correctly over time. As know even I fall under this part of this technology as I too must learn how to build it correctly so that this technology can see the light of day and truly make a difference in our lives. But the actual science is now known as I went and shared it with everyone that has come to this forum and took the time to read my thread or in any thread I posted the need to know information in free of charge.


Now I will post all the graphs just so that you all have the complete information showing that current gets canceled out with this technology as the voltage does the work of getting the electrons away from their atoms by way of ionization. I do this as I am getting tired of being ignored by the community here and also getting tired of seeing people lump one unknown with another with the hopes of some kind of miracle taking place that will allow the technology to work without any understanding on how it works scientifically.
If all of you reading this go through my thread you will see me doing what I can to build this technology correctly so that it works all the time every time it is needed for us to be able to take full control of our own energy needs. It's not an easy technology to build correctly as the rules of building it are roughly unknown and thus must be discovered by way of trial and error testing. I poured a lot of money into this technology can still need to pour more money into it but it's a must have technology if we are to be able to take full control of our own energy needs and do something meaningful about our climate change problems.


Shalom and take care,
Edward Mitchell
Owner
True Green Solutions
https://gofund.me/94431e56

[kolbacict]

https://youtu.be/sdSO8_hKx7A
Here is a dude posted his new video.
Accidentally stumbled upon. Can't comment, see for yourself.

[TommeyReed]

Hi All,

These claims are just that, it's becoming a circus bringing up old claims that nobody has produce a working model.

If Stanley Meyers system really work, then why was he sued for false claims?

Some information people need to read:

In 1996, inventor Stanley Meyer was sued by two investors to whom he had sold dealerships, offering the right to do business in Water Fuel Cell technology. His car was due to be examined by the expert witness Michael Laughton, Professor of Electrical Engineering at Queen Mary, University of London and Fellow of the Royal Academy of Engineering. However, Meyer made what Professor Laughton considered a "lame excuse" on the days of examination and did not allow the test to proceed.[3] According to Meyer the technology was patent pending and under investigation by the patent office, the Department of Energy and the military.[14] His "water fuel cell" was later examined by three witnesses in court who found that there "was nothing revolutionary about the cell at all and that it was simply using conventional electrolysis". The court found Meyer guilty of "gross and egregious fraud" and ordered him to repay the two investors their $25,000.[3]

Meyer demonstrated a dune buggy which he claimed was powered by his water fuel cell. He estimated that only 22 US gallons (83 liters) of water were required to travel from Los Angeles to New York.[8] Furthermore, Meyer claimed to have replaced the spark plugs with "injectors" to spray a fine mist of water into the engine cylinders, which were subjected to an electrical resonance. The water fuel cell would split the water mist into hydrogen and oxygen gas, which would then be combusted back into water vapor in a conventional internal combustion engine to produce net energy.[3] Philip Ball, writing in academic journal Nature, characterized Meyer's claims as pseudoscience, noting that "It's not easy to establish how Meyer's car was meant to work, except that it involved a fuel cell that was able to split water using less energy than was released by recombination of the elements ... Crusaders against pseudoscience can rant and rave as much as they like, but in the end they might as well accept that the myth of water as a fuel is never going to go away."[2]
There is no documented proof that the system produces enough hydrogen to run an engine. To date no peer review studies of Meyer's devices have been published in the scientific literature, although his claims have been thoroughly discredited in scientific journals.

Lets be very clear, these false claims people are making today needs to be called out. Without a true working prototypes these past claims on UO need to stop. It really hurts those who are looking for real facts and a working prototypes.

The only way we can work together is to look in the past and not to repeat the same old BS.

Stanley Meyers was a con-man, if he really believe he was saving the world and God showed him this technology then why was he looking for money?

I stand by my own claims of keep it open source, until you all realize money is not the answer to true freedom of free energy. We are no different then Big oil and any other greedy person.

Nobody will create free energy if they think of the money, a 5 cent bullet would make anyone disappear. Another reason it need to be open source and free for all!

Tom