Help with Ed Leedskalnin Riddle , any idea .

[sm0ky2]

@smoky

Dose copper becomes a magnet if magnet is applied to it .

yes, it in fact does.
but in comparison to a heavy metal, such as iron, this effect is very very small. So small, that we classify it as a "non magnetic" metal. ALL metals exhibit this effect, to varying degrees, including silicon, hydrogen, aluminum, and calcium.
They are considered "non-magnetic" because the effect is not significant enough to induce a secondary field in a magnetic metal.
For example: a copper "magnet", will not magnetize a piece of Iron.

Ed did not use magnets to create electricity but to create other magnets .

How? i did not gather that from his books.
i have performed Ed's experiments, as he described them, step by step. He in fact uses electricity to create magnets.
He walks you through the process of magnetizing a piece of metal, using another magnet. But as i understood it, this was for example of what he was describing, not as a method of magnet creation. And he also explains why, doing it this way, the magnet is weaker than when you use the battery to create a magnet.
" more tiny magnets go into the iron from the electricity"

I am waiting on fresh battery to make a video example ...

Mark   

Battery?  why not use magnets as you stated above??

[Rosemary Ainslie]

yes, it in fact does.

i have performed Ed's experiments, as he described them, step by step. He in fact uses electricity to create magnets.

Hello Sm0ky2

Did you simply do the experiments he described or did you try and duplicate any effects from his wheel or generator - whatever it is?  And did you see anything anomalous?  I can't get my head around the differences he sees between the strengths in a north and a south.  Nor do I understand how he can isolate the two poles when they always seem to manifest together.  Unless I'm just not understanding him that well. 

Regards,
Rosemary

[sm0ky2]

Hello Sm0ky2

Did you simply do the experiments he described or did you try and duplicate any effects from his wheel or generator - whatever it is?  And did you see anything anomalous?  I can't get my head around the differences he sees between the strengths in a north and a south.  Nor do I understand how he can isolate the two poles when they always seem to manifest together.  Unless I'm just not understanding him that well. 

Regards,
Rosemary

The "true" functionality of his generator is only described from second-hand sources, which most deem to be unreliable at best. Nearly everything that is known about that particular device is merely speculation, and the subject of much controversy.

His knowledge of the individual North/South magnets is not verified by his experiments, only used in his description of the mangetic current. Which cooincides with the knowledge of many ancient cultures around the world. Seperating the two, i believe, is not a physical possibility, for one needs the other upon which to move.

the best way can describe this movement, is to take 2 pieces of stiff wire, and make two spiral coils, in parallel.  then turn one in one direction, and turn the other in the opposite direction.
This is not "exactly" the same, but it is about as close as i can get you, on a large scale. In actuality, they travel in chains, around one another, like the moon orbits the earth. if that makes any sense...
pushing and pulling upon one another, in constant motion.
This is anagolous in nature, as ED does not describe a method of singling out such a "monopole".

The difference between the N and S poles, is easily observed in Repulsion. The difference in attraction (which is equal and opposite) is more difficult to observe, although it can be done.
The difficulty arrises in the fact that both north and south are simultaneously attracting one another.

Repulsion:
place 4 magnets of equal strength in a repulsionary state
such that they are vertically lifting their pair.
Then place mass upon the upper magnets, in increasing ammounts.
and measure the difference in height between the "north pair" and the "south pair".

Some of Ed's experiments, we took much further than he describes, in a laboratory setting, which has led to intriguing advancements in magnetic science. one of the most important of these, is the formation of an aetheric-distortion through the air. ED describes this as " electricity without wires", but i do not feel that description gives justice to the observed phenomena.

[IotaYodi]

My thoughts on this. You cant have magnetism without a flow or movement. The term tiny magnets makes me cringe. I look at the whole of the magnet as 2 opposing moving fields in close proximity in a solid medium,iron etc, that cant escape each other because each field feeds the others motion which in turn attracts each other. The speed or rpms is possibly faster than the speed of light.  If you take a cue ball and use high center english,the cue balls rotation is ccw. The first ball it hits makes that ball cw. If you line up multiple balls the rotation alternates on each ball. Dc electric would be the cue stick. A guess on my part is the helical current flow and its magnetic field is forcing and inducing its magnetic field into the solid medium filling it up to the point of feedback creating 2 opposing fields. The amount of force or current is key to strength. Its already known if a metal goes beyond its magnetic saturation capabilities using extreme currents it will explode.
I think its entirely possible that these 2 opposing directional fields are rotating faster than the speed of light which would make them in free space. Scientists say the magnetic field lines are photons but faster than light photons have been observed.  If you spun a ball in free space when does the spin stop. I dont think it will without an external force acting on it.
Of course I may be totally wrong but that why Im here to learn.
 

[Mk1]

@smoky

The camera unfortunately does not run on magnetic current 

You see there is a special word for copper magnetism its called diamagnetism . ..

I also made all of Ed experiment most of the more them 2 time , he does show how to understand magnetic current but dose not show how he used it ...

Anyway i got to go to work , will make video tonight ...

Mark