Help with Ed Leedskalnin Riddle , any idea .

[Mk1]

@all

Ok i can't find any decent pictures of the other example of the use of magnetic current , i was searching for the mini romag generator and ford magneto use in early t models but was actually it was invented by Keeley .

Ok first photo Make and break ...

Now one coil is installed on the holder and a led connected to it , making and breaking the connection of the holder with the magnet makes current flow in the coil and light the led .

This show that you can make a transformer action happen no battery , you just need to break physically the connection , all this can be done completely in the magnetic domain , i will not only show you but also how to improve any motor with the magnetic current switching .

[Mk1]

@all

Other thing to keep in mind , when you have a wave in a core the magnetic current is 90 degrees late , 1/4 of the freq rate ...

I think Tesla was referring to this as quarter wave ..  running the load on the quarter wave , for magnetic wave .

Meaning of things change so much over time  i guess we will have to find out .

Mark

now 6am i am out !

[sm0ky2]

i wish Scotty would chime in right about now, this is HIS subject. hes a professional when it comes to the perpetual motion holder.

he has built many of them, and has done more work on this subject than anyone else i know of.

Second , Ed liked his girls weak , girls is the south pole , he told us about it

This should tell you exactly what he was doing with it.
the forces are both stronger and weaker than one another in opposite ways.
south has a weaker repulsion force (antigravity?) than the north.
inversly, the north has a weaker attraction force (difficult to verify, but ED walks you through that in one of his experiments).
-------------------------------------------------------------

Im putting this into my own words here, but...

Ed defines electricty as the resultant force of the magnetic current
(induction)

when magnetic current flows through a metal, at a non-parallel vector to its length, (length can be defined through any dimension of the metal), it causes the force we know as "electricity". This is simply a reorientation of the normal electron flow through the metal.
electrons always flow through a metal, but without the magnetic induction, the flow is balanced, resulting in a net-0 electrical potential. This theory can be used to show that all of the natural forces are reduced to the magnetic current. (aetheric in nature)

Heat, gravity, magnetism, light, atomic forces (weak/strong), ect.

its still a work in progress, but this analysis helps to clarify many of the "fudge factors" inserted into our current physics model.

[Mk1]

i wish Scotty would chime in right about now, this is HIS subject. hes a professional when it comes to the perpetual motion holder.

he has built many of them, and has done more work on this subject than anyone else i know of.

This should tell you exactly what he was doing with it.
the forces are both stronger and weaker than one another in opposite ways.
south has a weaker repulsion force (antigravity?) than the north.
inversly, the north has a weaker attraction force (difficult to verify, but ED walks you through that in one of his experiments).
-------------------------------------------------------------

Im putting this into my own words here, but...

Ed defines electricty as the resltant force of the magnetic current
(induction)

when magnetic current flows through a metal, at a non-parallel vector to its length, (length can be defined through any dimension of the metal), it causes the force we know as "electricity". This is simply a reorientation of the normal electron flow through the metal.
electrons always flow through a metal, but without the magnetic induction, the flow is balanced, resulting in a net-0 electrical potential. This theory can be used to show that all of the natural forces are reduced to the magnetic current. (aetheric in nature)

Heat, gravity, magnetism, light, atomic forces (weak/strong), ect.

Bring your friend Scotty , we will laugh it out , lol ...

If you are only searching for reasons it will not work , you may pass the working option , at this point you clearly see that i am still going , well yes i know where i am going , when i show my stuff all the details will be already out .

All i will say is copper and iron are 2 different beast and no i am not talking about the perpetual motion holder , i believe building one is enough to get it but its only a example not a tool like the wheel and that is the subject at hand here since no one even comes close i need to go step by step ,by next weekend , you will begin to see the picture .

Btw i also am a expert in Leedskalnin bring one to me so some could grasp what i am saying . Bring him on if he is honest he will see his i am telling the truth and only that.

Ed would iron push and pulls , copper only pulls (i may be push i don't remember , but not really important to this point)

And he made more electricity with iron then copper ...

details on it this can be found in this article its not complete but its a good start ...

http://www3.sympatico.ca/slavek.krepelka/ttf2/fields10.htm

Iron becomes a magnet if you allow it to , ask your self why chains ?
then why are they that big ?

Any i will answer i a really clear and provable way ...

Ed show us a picture of what he could do , he showed just enough so you could figure it out on your own . Not the work of some one else .

What you do with what you learn is up to you really , once you get it ...

But please keep going it show interest , and i can see where i left details out , or things are unclear .

This is really magnetic current not electricity , they don't work the same much simpler . 

But make some magnets , then kill them and reverse the magnetism .

Its fun and entertaining , you can make magnets of every strength but if you only charge one side its not a magnet it take 2 side , hence one can be weaker . 

[jeanna]

This is a great topic, Mk1,
I will be watching.
thank you,

jeanna