Ronald Classen's H2O Motor Project

[rlm555339]

Okay, here's the report on the orthohydrogen vs parahydrogen test.  It's rather unscientific but it's the best I can do in my position.

Same batch of water (no electrolyte), same equipment, same voltage across the 300 square inches of electrodes, same conditions, same (#16 x 1 1/2)  hypodermic needle for a torch tip, 5 pounds pressure.

With the parahydrogen coil turned OFF, all I ever got was detonations.  Blew the needle off the test bottle every time.

With the parahydrogen coil turned ON, it burned with a blue-white flame (a little orange on the tip) until the whole needle finally melted to nothing.

Conclusion:  The parahydrogen coil at 22 Hz did alter the state of the gas in some way. 

I will post this same message on egaspower group also.

[hartiberlin]

Hi Ronald,
sounds interesting !
Did you just use the pulsed coil to generate oxyhydrogen
or did you also use your other electrodes inside the coil drivenn by DC to
generate the oxyhydrogen ?

Regards, Stefan.

[rlm555339]

My setup is basically the same as shown in Stephen Chambers patent photos (US Patent # 6,126,794).  The parahydrogen pulse coil is positioned directly over the main electrodes.  BTW, the patent also uses pulses to do the electrolysis also whereas I do not....so that's different.

The main electrolysis in my process uses 24 VDC, high amperage on 300 sq in of aluma-ti directly from the brushless generator.  The parahydrogen coil is separate; driven by the pulse driver shown in the pics a few replys back on this thread.  It is 12 vdc and is about 0.5 amps.  (basically 1 amp at 50% duty cycle).  Then the pulse generator is turned on, you can hear the coil "click, click, click" in the electrolyzer as it gets pulsed at 22 Hz. 

So to answer your question, the regular electrodes produce the hydroxy, and the parahydrogen coil conditions the hydrogen atoms (according to the patent) by making one proton spin differently thereby creating a particle that burns rather than detonates.  And from the testing I did, it appears to do exactly that to a degree.  Please note that there is no clear difinitive description of "HOW" to build the coil so what you see in the photos is my own conception of what I thought it should be.  I can't say that is the way Stephen Chambers did it, but nevertheless, it seems to do what it's supposed to do.

We'll see how it performs in the motor here soon, I hope.

[KSW]

interesting .....

i wonder what the flame front speed of this would be in the ICE compared to the old mix?

maybe this way the mix will work like propane or gasoline might in the motor, rather than detonating.

sounds promising to me 

[hartiberlin]

Hi Ronald, well done.
A different test would be, to have one electrode inside the coil
and the otherr electrode outside the coil.
If you pulse the coil, that is also a difference voltage between
the inner and the outer side of the coil alone in water already !

Look here for a test I had done about this:

http://www.harti.com/waterled

Maybe this way you can also extract more oxyhydrogen.

Regards, Stefan.