a new kind of visible radiant energy?

[twinbeard]

Hi All,

I have been reading this thread with some interest, having been cross-pollinated to it from EF.  I am going to share a few observations, voice an idea, and allow you all to draw whatever conclusion comes to you. 

First, the idea:  I posit that our model of an electron, or any subatomic particle, is not quite right.  We represent them as point charges with spheres or dots;  I am of the opinion that with a microscope capable of resolving such small items, we would see them looking more like globular clusters of stars.

Next, Dave's device creates a rotating magnetic field... a relatively weak but fast one.  Here are the relevant videos which allow visualization of this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=onuHOufJoeY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0uDiofHpSMo

Can someone put a thin film of ferrofluid on top of the working device, in a glass pan or so, and see what happens?

Cheers,
Twinbeard

[david lambright]

hi everyone...jesus, your device might come today!.....jetijs, yours wii be there soon...guys, when you get the device, dont expect it to shoot green sparks, lol....just look at it, i have found if there more people looking at the device, the ones who see it right off can help by their description of what they see....hold it up, turn it slowly, do not try too hard, kindof let yuor eyes relax....the words people are using to describe this....looks like heat, a bubble or film, and like a lens...take your time, it will manifest...also my newest device!!...i made the ferro fluid core device using a clear vinyl tube, about 2" diameter.... the tube is 1/4" vinyl, coupled with a short piece of just larger tube....i filled the tube with ferro fluid, not very easy, wear gloves, it was messy but worth it....i could not get all the air out, i left a 1mm bubble in it...i do not think is affects the orbital path....20 or 30 wraps of copper wire and energized first one way, then flip the battery and do it again.....very quick, so that the wires do not get hot.....this device really does the lens thing good...is is just as smokey2 said, you gotta see it for yourself.....david

[david lambright]

gravity block...i would be honored to send you a device, but it will be the oxide core model, if that would be alright...it will be my pleasure to build one like the one i built for jetijs!...PM me with an address, and i will put you on the list!....david

[DreamThinkBuild]

Hi All,

Some of what you are describing sounds like what Pier Luigi Ighina was working on.

http://www.svpvril.com/ighina/magatom.html

"...
When observing an atom under an atomic microscope, he defined 4 fundamental laws:


1) The light atoms, when they excite the observed atoms, give part of their motion to the latter.

2) The observed atoms absorb part of the motion of the light atoms to speed up theirs.

3) In order to excite an atom, you need it to get in touch with an atom of higher motion; the atom with the highest motion will attract the one with the lowest motion.

4) The higher the atoms motion, the more luminous it will be and vice-versa.
..."

I'm wondering if #3 is what is causing the Aluminum to attract? If you could excite the Aluminum atoms to a higher motion then it would be more likely to attract those with a lower motion? The glimmer effect could be part #4 when exciting the surrounding atoms to a higher motion.

I could be all wrong in the thinking of this but the implications of the Lambright effect are amazing.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Hi All,

I have been reading this thread with some interest, having been cross-pollinated to it from EF.  I am going to share a few observations, voice an idea, and allow you all to draw whatever conclusion comes to you. 

First, the idea:  I posit that our model of an electron, or any subatomic particle, is not quite right.  We represent them as point charges with spheres or dots;  I am of the opinion that with a microscope capable of resolving such small items, we would see them looking more like globular clusters of stars.

Next, Dave's device creates a rotating magnetic field... a relatively weak but fast one.  Here are the relevant videos which allow visualization of this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=onuHOufJoeY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0uDiofHpSMo

Can someone put a thin film of ferrofluid on top of the working device, in a glass pan or so, and see what happens?

Cheers,
Twinbeard

Hello Twinbeard and most welcome to our discussion.  Some very appropriate links.  Many thanks for that.

They have actually photographed pictures of atoms - believe it or not.  It looks like nested eggs held in cottonwool - or morning mist.  Extraordinary photograph - but I can't for the life of me remember where I saw it.  Just have the picture of it welded on my mind.

I think Dave or someone with a rig will need to do that thin film of ferrofluid that you recommended.  I must say I'd also like to know the outcome.

Regards,
Rosemary