Bash Rosemary Ainslie

[ElectricGoose]

Is this the same Ashtweth Palaise that is over at Energetic Forum spouting crap constantly and supposedly runs the Panacea site?  If so, I have to say that this guy is a total wanker and such a hypocrite who gets absolutely nothing done.

He spouts on about every woeful cause under the sun and how HE is going to be the saviour of the planet (talk about narcissim on a grand scale!).  If he garners any critic for 'his' projects (which have been too many to count that have disappeared into the aether over the years  ), he will go off on a rant like a little child.

He does nothing of his own originality and when he finds something hoards it all to himself, acting all high and mighty LOL.

I have no time for wieners like that.

Peace all.

Electric Goose

[Pirate88179]

Is this the same Ashtweth Palaise that is over at Energetic Forum spouting crap constantly and supposedly runs the Panacea site?  If so, I have to say that this guy is a total wanker and such a hypocrite who gets absolutely nothing done.

He spouts on about every woeful cause under the sun and how HE is going to be the saviour of the planet (talk about narcissim on a grand scale!).  If he garners any critic for 'his' projects (which have been too many to count that have disappeared into the aether over the years  ), he will go off on a rant like a little child.

He does nothing of his own originality and when he finds something hoards it all to himself, acting all high and mighty LOL.

I have no time for wieners like that.

Peace all.

Electric Goose

That would be the same guy. Now he is trying to get Rose banned from this site as well.

Bill

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Hi Rose,

I've started a thread about this situation at the Heretical Builders forum.  There are a few of us there who have also been banned from Energetic Forum, some indefensibly.  The list owner says you won't be banned at http://www.hereticalbuilders.com.

Jerry I'm afraid that I can't log in for some reason.  I think I need to identify a code of some sort and I simply can't read it to identify it.  And I have no idea why it won't take my password when I log it in.  it seems to identify me by name?  And then procedes to ignore my best efforts.  Most frustrating.   As always I'm in some kind of eternal quarrel with internet systems.   

If I don't manage it then just know I'm in sympathy.  The Open Source spirit at EF.com is actually just lip service.  It is my opinion that a more truthful mission statement would be as follows.

While we at EF.com advertise that we are 'open' we actually define the term 'open' loosely.  It is here used in the sense that we have conferred on ourselves an explicit right to appropriate and to 'help ourselves' to any knowledge or any information - presented by those unwitting members who we may successfully DUPE into submitting this, their knowledge.  This appropriation will be on an exclusive basis and our rights here are inviolate.  All work presented will, therefore be considered to be our work.  All ideas presented will be considered our ideas.  And we - this group of '5 PLUS ADMIN' as refered to by Ashtweth - and constituting, as it does, this self-serving EF.com cartel - not excluding CatLady who is Harvey's wife - hereby reserve these rights together with our own adventurous interpretation of TRUTH - which in no way is constrained to, or related to, or has any dependency on - reality or facts.  Should any member defy these our rights with any presumptive or alternate version that requires recognition of their own rights - then they WILL be banned.  Should any member challenge these rights then they will be banned.  Should any member question these rights then they will be banned.  And we will then AND FOREVER, deny such banned members access to their work - regardless of the time or expense thereby devoted to this.  It must be understood that we exercise all these our rights over all member's rights which are hereby deemed forfeit and considered of no force and effect - and in any event trivial to these arbitrary requirements of ours.  And we do so to further our own best interests.

Further.  Our version of TRUTH will be defined as our rights to allege, imply, infer, hint, or simply state 'half truths' precisely as we deem fit.  And we will use these tools to dupe our members and our public, both as and when we can - for as long as we can - in the hopes that they will continue to present us with as much exploitable information as they can manage.



Anyway.  That's my opinion.  LOL
Kindest regards,
Rosie

[Pirate88179]

Rose:

Well said.  I am seriously considering telling EF to remove me from their roles.  I don't go there very much at all anyway.

Bill

[Rosemary Ainslie]

LOL Bill,

You'll be banned for simply considering the issue.  Ask Poynty or Wilby.  I should have added that.

Should any member entertain - even for a fleeting moment - the possibility that they could move away from this forum then that is evidence of 'disloyalty' and evidence of non-comformity with these our self-serving objects - at which point they WILL be banned - without any further ado. 

It is my opinion that we're dealing with a the most extraordinary license to DO AND SAY as they please - while denying anyone else that license.  And I rather think this whole exercise may yet prove to be a salutory reminder to Ashtweth et al that people actually do think for themselves.  LOL.  But I'm intrigued with whatever it was that finally convinced Ash to go away.  Something you said and I've been looking through those posts.  Still can't find it.

You did an extraordinary job there Pirate Bill.   

Kindest regards,
Rosie