Bash Rosemary Ainslie

[fuzzytomcat]

Hi members and guests,

Here is another example of misrepresentation of the facts that any "THIRD" grader could do a search http://www.energeticforum.com/search.php at Energetic Forum and find the facts for themselves .....

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=9442.msg255578#msg255578

Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #536 on: Today at 12:57:21 PM »

Guys - just for the record.

Aaron has now officially locked all my threads and buried them on a subforum.  Meanwhile he displays the mosfet heating circuit thread on the front page of every forum.  That thread denies that I was the author of the circuit and it further denies benefit in the circuit.  Effectively the propagandising related to this technology is still rife.

I seriously doubt that EF.com can be accused of 'advancing' ou technologies while these evident propagandising tools are required.

Regards,
Rosemary
http://www.scribd.com/doc/33937867/IF-I-WAS-A-TROLL

The Energetic Forum threads of course through the "NATURAL" progression of any forum member adding a topic or thread has made the COP 17 subjects slip to pages 20 through 25 and beyond, so technically I guess the members at Energetic Forum has buried the threads through lack of interest or better subjects not the Energetic Forum administration.

What has happened was the relocation to the "FRONT" or "PAGE 1" of the Renewable Energy threads for easy access into the "INDUCTIVE RESISTOR"  http://www.energeticforum.com/inductive-resistor/ sub forum where the Mosfet Heater Circuit http://www.energeticforum.com/inductive-resistor/5359-mosfet-heating-circuits.html has been always located.

In addition the unfinished controversial "Magnetic Field Model" thread which was also relocated into the same sub forum, as it has possibly some unproven relationship with the unseen Quantum October 2002 article device or data with a COP>17 that was claimed by the authors.

This allegation appears to be another attempt by Rosemary Ainslie to discredit the work and technology of many others that are slowly working on the yet to be proven 100% by anyone on the planet a COP>17.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

It's confusing.  But I think what is now being alleged is that when a member gets banned it's likely that their threads will 'fall off the front page' so to speak.  When one bans the member responsible for those threads then that may, perhaps, be seen as a natural consequence.

What is not so readily understandable and certainly not natural - is to take the trouble to 'lock those threads' in the interests of closure.  I am not sure that this is a typical consequence of banning.  Threads survive.  Their originators may not.

What is also not readily understandable is the need to display a Mosfet Heating Circuit on page one of every thread reference on OU.com - when the Mosfet heating Circuit has EVERYTHING to do with the locked threads and while the perpetrators of that Mosfet Heating Circuit DENY any association with those same locked threads.

But either way - the fact is that there is absolutely NO interest in the Mosfet heating Circuit and it's only because of it's privileged and happy positioning on page 1 that it is able to survive any attention at all.  Conversely the locked threads sustained a growth in readership and interest that exceeded all previous threads on EF.com and it's been relegated to the dump yard. 

It is my considered opinion that EF.com have lost any rights to claim to support OU technology for open source and I suspect that the circuit technology that I attempted to progress is deliberately being quashed.  It is also my opinion that there is a programme intended to diminish the technology associated with the locked thread and that it is that programme that the adminstrators of EF.com are following.

[fuzzytomcat]

It's confusing.  But I think what is now being alleged is that when a member gets banned it's likely that their threads will 'fall off the front page' so to speak.  When one bans the member responsible for those threads then that may, perhaps, be seen as a natural consequence.

What is not so readily understandable and certainly not natural - is to take the trouble to 'lock those threads' in the interests of closure.  I am not sure that this is a typical consequence of banning.  Threads survive.  Their originators may not.

What is also not readily understandable is the need to display a Mosfet Heating Circuit on page one of every thread reference on OU.com - when the Mosfet heating Circuit has EVERYTHING to do with the locked threads and while the perpetrators of that Mosfet Heating Circuit DENY any association with those same locked threads.

But either way - the fact is that there is absolutely NO interest in the Mosfet heating Circuit and it's only because of it's privileged and happy positioning on page 1 that it is able to survive any attention at all.  Conversely the locked threads sustained a growth in readership and interest that exceeded all previous threads on EF.com and it's been relegated to the dump yard. 

It is my considered opinion that EF.com have lost any rights to claim to support OU technology for open source and I suspect that the circuit technology that I attempted to progress is deliberately being quashed.  It is also my opinion that there is a programme intended to diminish the technology associated with the locked thread and that it is that programme that the adminstrators of EF.com are following.

So silly .....

At Energetic Forum as anyone knows that is a member that one can .....

A MEMBER CAN EDIT OR DELETE A POST IN A THREAD AT ANY TIME FOREVER OR YEARS UNLESS THE THREAD IS LOCKED FOR ARCHIVAL PURPOSES
( such a request was made by Rosemary Ainslie to lock the first thread http://www.energeticforum.com/81742-post3434.html )

At Over Unity Forum as anyone knows that is a member that one can .....

A MEMBER HAS ONLY HOURS TO EDIT OR DELETE A POST IN A THREAD AFTER THAT TIME IT CANNOT BE CHANGED EVER BUT ONLY BY THE ADMINISTRATION

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Glen are you OUT OF YOUR MIND?  I cannot get into energetic forum at all - let alone delete or modify or change any part of anything posted there.

The only time I can even see the thread is when I log in under an assumed identity and that certainly does not allow me to post.

I am never quite sure if you are madly deluded or if you're simply incapable of telling the truth.  Possibly both.  But let me remind you.  The readers here are of a higher caliber than those at EF.com and they see through your lies more readily.  If you think that you can still regain any kind of respect or plausibility then stick to EF.com.  It's better suited to your type.  They actively encourage the outright theft of ideas.  You are over qualified for membership there.

LET ME PUT THIS MORE PLAINLY.  I HAVE BEEN BANNED.  IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR ME TO LOG IN UNDER THE NAME WITSEND OR AETHEREVARISING OR ROSEMARY AINSLIE OR ANY VARIATION THEREOF.  NO AMOUNT OF INSINUATION ON YOUR PART WILL SATISFY ANY ONE HERE THAT IT IS THEREFORE POSSIBLE FOR ME TO GET BACK INTO MY POSTS TO CHANGE THEM - MODIFY THEM OR ADD TO THEM.  YOU ARE EITHER UTTERLY DELUDED OR YOU ARE INCAPABLE OF TELLING THE TRUTH IF YOU THINK THAT THIS NEW VERSION OF REALITY WILL WASH WITH ANYONE AT ALL

And for perfect clarity let me add - the new identity does not allow me to post.  I actually think that admin are aware of this assumed identity as I'm also not able to trace all the links that are posted.  So sick. 

[fuzzytomcat]

Glen are you OUT OF YOUR MIND.  I cannot get into energetic forum at all - let alone delete or modify or change any part of anything posted there.

The only time I can even see the thread is when I log in under an assumed identity and that certainly does not allow me to post.

I am never quite sure if you are madly deluded or if you're simply incapable of telling the truth.  Possibly both.  But let me remind you.  The readers here are of a higher caliber than those at EF.com and they see through your lies more readily.  If you think that you can still regain any kind of respect or plausibility then stick to EF.com.  It's better suited to your type.  They actively encourage the outright theft of ideas.  You are over qualified for membership there.

So very silly ..... shall I hang some scissors on the threads door so some guests and members can use them to place holes in their nickers so they can see ??

A assumed name to try and by pass a member banning ..... such things are not looked on favorably on persons trying to bypass the system in place.