An obersvation that laws of motion missing some math.

[The Eskimo Quinn]

Obsevations found during machine calculations and tests.

What was realised during the calculations was that Newton's math equations seemed incomplete
Newton’s laws of motion are in fact incorrect or incomplete -
two objects of exact size shape and weight, with the same external friction properties
placed on the same surface take exactly the same amount of energy to move according to those laws
This is not true, the machine discovered that fact.
take two balls/spheres of identical size and shape and weight and place them on a track
now it does not matter if the inside of one ball is a cement compound and the other a plastic compound
as long as the external physical properties and weight are the same, and according to Newton's law will roll an equal distance when
an equal amount of energy force is applied to them.
Now simply fill one ball completely with water and no air, ensuring the other has the same weight.
the ball filled with water will require less energy to move.
why?
even though each needs the same start push to move the same weight, take a ball
cut the ball in half so it looks like a wheel, the right hand side of the wheel must have all its weight on one side lifted over the
12 o’clock position with each rotation, the ball containing the water only rotates the shell, the water is not lifted at all,
so no energy is required to do this, initially it was thought that friction of the water inside against the shell
would level out this effect, however we realised that
the glass on the table test proves this does not occur, in short it is as if one weight was on a pallet being dragged and one is on wheels, yet the math described by Newton does not account for this effect under objects in motion, they both have the same weight and external forces.
The wheel has momentum!! So does the ball!!
What does this mean  the scheme of things? well if nothing else the limits of the math are flawed, and it means new machinery can be built
So it seems you really can reinvent the wheel.

Want to prove it without any expense?
Take a large glass of water and fill another glass with any non fluid item, weigh them, now place them on a table ensuring both glasses are the same now tape a piece of string on each glass one at 10 o’clock and one at 2 o’clock, pull the string between the glasses keeping them apart, now tie the string to each end of a pencil, place your fingers in the centre of the pencil holding lightly and pull with a little speed, so as to rotate the glasses, you will find the pencil will swing off centre as it struggles more against the one with the solid fill. Point proven, equal objects with equal friction do not move equal distances with equal energy. Whilst the math may work for most items it is not complete, therefore we are not using all the available energy efficiency in design.

Just an observation you may wish to consider.

A Quinn 25/08/10

[exnihiloest]

Obsevations found during machine calculations and tests.

What was realised during the calculations was that Newton's math equations seemed incomplete
...

You say that Newton's math are incomplete but I don't see any math in your thesis.
In order we can treat the problem, please apply Newton's math to your system and show us what is wrong.

[cletushowell]

its simple the energy cannot transfer to the wayer the energy is going between the water and the inside of the ball the non water filled ball the enrgy is being conducted thru the ball hence the inside spins
a wheel within a wheel within a wheel you dont see the enrgy wheel
  144,000 divide 1-12 each gives you your exact corresponsding opposite
your three loops of your enrgy watch my axis of infinity video on you tube
1= 144,000
7/3 2.33333
but when 144,000 is 1
7x144,000= 1008000/3 =336000 a perfect number. three loops your zero a wheel within a wheel within a wheel
your water your energy you ball
no water is one wheel a ball another fluid with drag becomes a wheel within a wheel but partial midles wheel your shorting energy between the outside and inside

[cletushowell]

Im a bit frustrated on this
0 zero
144,000/0 theres more zeros in 144,000
the any other number
why can I not determine how many zeros
are in 144,000 with a calculation
10 100 1000 the zeros are very important
there loops
so i tried a manipulation
-2 and 2 = zero right
then why does 144,000/-2
give me -288,000 then times 2
give me -144,000 that tells me -2 and 2
are not equal so what does equal zero
and thru what calculation gives me the loops all them?

[cletushowell]

Zero is not two theres 4 corners
of earth 144,000x1015 /-1015
x -1015 x1015 = 144,000
but had to stil do it in three
which was bs 144000/1000
=144 = 15 zeros 14x10= 140
but 100 has two and if you count the first
zero its 16 but beings i axis that zero
its already included