Self-Runner NS Coil Pulse Motor Live Video Stream. It's been going for months!

[Omnibus]

Hi Groundloop.  What a comfort to see you're a member here as well.  Thanks for the advices.  I'm not sure where to find a computer to disassemble though.  LOL.  It'll be easier for me to buy the stuff or manufacture them.

But I'll ask around. 
Many thanks 
Rosemary

Don't call people who criticize nonsense trolls. You are an impudent person who has no shame. Being incompetent as you are the prudent thing to do is be silent and try to learn something rather than overwhelm the net with your gibberish.

[Pirate88179]

I disagree that this question should be left hanging and those who don't understand that galvanic potentials are trivial should be left unchecked. First it should be understood that wetting the separator, that is, making the two dissimilar metals in contact through an electrolyte disqualifies at once the setup in question as being an OU. Therefore, experiments with wet separators should never be mentioned in the context of OU (unless some extremely precise measurements are made, beyond the scope of this discussion, showing OU; without such any implying that a wet cell may be OU is plain wrong).

Secondly, I disagree that @laseraber is setting the pace in this. if what you say is real then you would be the one setting the pace (@laseraber's being being only a forseeable application of what you've done). Therefore, it is extremely important to go back to your experiments and verify especially that the metals are in no contact whatsoever and that you can measure a potential even when the coil placed in a Faraday cage.

As for the setup remaining intact despite the galvanic potentials developed across, it is quite usual -- think about the amalgam fillings some people have or the various dentures -- galvanic potentials are there and yet the dentures and the fillings remain intact for years. In fact changing them is never because of the galvanic potentials developing.

Omni:

We can agree to disagree then.  lasersaber is not replicating mine, or anyone from our group's work, he is replicating Nathan Stubblefield's work.  I want to be clear on that.  My efforts were kind of cheesy as I was using parts I could locate around here easily and most probably not the best ones for the job.

It did serve as a proof of concept however and we learned that more experiments needed to be done.

I can assure you that there is no contact on the metals in any of my coils because, if you build one, and it does not work, the first thing you do is a continuity check to find the short.  So, if it works at all...no contact.  I never ever even tried a secondary because although we had some ideas in our group, no one ever built a make/break device so a secondary was useless to us at that point.

This is where Laser has taken this to the next level and then some.  He used materials true to the NS original coil and also devised a make/break device.

All of my earth battery experiment videos lighting leds from JT's is from a different way of generating energy.  I went with the electrode approach which, interestingly enough, also exhibits some galvanic reactions and some not.  It has been working now for almost 3 years.  Many folks back then said the magnesium would break down in a few days...well... it has not.  Others claimed I was tapping into a "leak" from the power company although my scope shots showed much higher freqs. then 60 hz. and none at 60 hz.  I have not tried that in a Faraday cage but then again, it is in the ground and I am not sure that would be possible to do.

Bill

[Omnibus]

Omni:

We can agree to disagree then.  lasersaber is not replicating mine, or anyone from our group's work, he is replicating Nathan Stubblefield's work.  I want to be clear on that.  My efforts were kind of cheesy as I was using parts I could locate around here easily and most probably not the best ones for the job.

It did serve as a proof of concept however and we learned that more experiments needed to be done.

I can assure you that there is no contact on the metals in any of my coils because, if you build one, and it does not work, the first thing you do is a continuity check to find the short.  So, if it works at all...no contact.  I never ever even tried a secondary because although we had some ideas in our group, no one ever built a make/break device so a secondary was useless to us at that point.

This is where Laser has taken this to the next level and then some.  He used materials true to the NS original coil and also devised a make/break device.

All of my earth battery experiment videos lighting leds from JT's is from a different way of generating energy.  I went with the electrode approach which, interestingly enough, also exhibits some galvanic reactions and some not.  It has been working now for almost 3 years.  Many folks back then said the magnesium would breakТ down in a few days...well... it has not.  Others claimed I was tapping into a "leak" from the power company although my scope shots showed much higher freqs. then 60 hz. and none at 60 hz.  I have not tried that in a Faraday cage but then again, it is in the ground and I am not sure that would be possible to do.

Bill

Like I said @laseraber's work deserves no attention since it's just powering a motor with an energy source. Your experiments are earlier than his and they are about the very essence of things and therefore are of real importance. I'd be very interested to learn more after your assurance in the last post that there's no contact between the metals and yet you can measure a potential difference. Is it possible to redo some of these experiments, placing the coil in a Faraday cage, and then possibly send one coil to me to study it (I'm in Europe right now but I'll be back in a moth or so)?

[Mk1]

@oblivious


Thanks for your input , but it dose seem that no one cares about your post or opinion for that mater , why are you apparently lowering your self to reason with deluded people ?You have better things to do here .You are a great asset ? Do good show them better! Don't shout that they failed because you have no part in there work ...

I for one am pleased to see a Ns coil working , you can't even see that in a museum !

Now can't you get people's attention in other ways than attacking them ?

Take a break , stop posting here or it will be clear that you are a paid troll .

Only some one that gets paid could bother that much , or a juvenile or else ..





 

[Omnibus]

@oblivious


Thanks for your input , but it dose seem that no one cares about your post or opinion for that mater , why are you apparently lowering your self to reason with deluded people ?You have better things to do here .You are a great asset ? Do good show them better! Don't shout that they failed because you have no part in there work ...

I for one am pleased to see a Ns coil working , you can't even see that in a museum !

Now can't you get people's attention in other ways than attacking them ?

Take a break , stop posting here or it will be clear that you are a paid troll .

Only some one that gets paid could bother that much , or a juvenile or else ..

It isn't at all obvious that the coil in question works as claimed. So far, aside from @pirate88179's assurance, it it appears to be a galvanic cell. Note, we're talking about the coil, not about it's application such as that by @laseraber. Like I said, if there were anything interesting about it it would be @pirate88179's research and that has to be pursued until we get to the bottom of it.