Self-Runner NS Coil Pulse Motor Live Video Stream. It's been going for months!

[slapper]

@dllabarre

most likely your copper iron pair has developed a charge.

if your are able - could you please see if you can squeeze your coil together a bit?
stubblefield says compressed in his patent. MK1's brought this up too.

i don't think it's for purely galvanic reasons.

just curious if this changes your voltage readings.

thanks.

nap

[Omnibus]

Good point Don. If you let these clowns derail the thread by talking to them you only have yourselves to blame. They're full of crap. Don't let them suck you in. Don't take the bait. Stick to the topic.

Ted

You are the clown and those like you who are derailing the genuine discussions and competent attempts to achieve free energy, as already explained. Many of us have seen a lot of wasted efforts here due to incompetence and even ill intent so it's time for someone to speak out. It's not for me or those who see the flaws to waste time in doing useless experiments. It's for the person having the audacity to present something trivial to do some more work and honestly concede his mistake. He was told what to explore by more than one person here (although he should have known it to begin with).

[truthbeknown]

NOT TRUE.  I am more than willing to report on failed experiments.  And I've seen many threads where experimenters own up to failed tests.  I personally think failed tests are as important as any other - because they're scientifically relevant and required for progress.

That's a good sign then. I am eagerly awaiting to see some youtube videos from the experimenters here on this thread.


J.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Nice, the foil should be a good basic shield for RF, up to a point.

I feel foolish now, but I re-played the #5 video, and noted that he suggested "Playing" with the LED to get correct polarity.  If this was standard induction, wouldn't there be actual AC coming out of the coil?

Or am I being stupid, seeing that the "Motor" all have the same pole facing out, there is no true polarity reversal.  I would have assumed that as the field increased, the "Current" would be direction #1, and as it decreased, it would be in the other direction, even with the basic one-way bias of this design.

Maybe I'm reading too much into his words, and it worked, either way?

I like to hear a comment or two, if anyone has ideas about this.  This should be simple induction, but that would tend to say otherwise...

Even excluding the motor, and assuming DC applied to the "Primary", this would still produce both positive and negative flows.  Any Ideas?

Hello Loner,

Good points.  All windings on the core are either clockwise or anticlockwise.  That never varies - in line with standard coils.  Presumably, therefore during the 'on' time, so to speak the voltage will reverse compared to the 'off' time - or to the other cycle.  If one assumes that the voltage is first positive then it may repel the rotor.  If it already has a given velocity in a certain direction then the second half of the cycle possibly attracts those same magnets moving the rotor in the same direction as the spin has already been established.

Possibly?   

Regarding whether or not it's ac - I have no idea. My own intention is to see if the rotor can also generate a current in a separate copper wire - possibly wound as a coil - just to see if it can, indeed, act as a generator.  If it does then it will depend on the winding of that coil to determine whether it's AC or DC.  Hopefully we'll have the choice.  And frankly I'd love to be in the happy position to choose.  LOL

Regards,
Rosemary

edited.  I had to delete a whole para related to the push/pull as I realised it was entirely wrong.  I need to think this through again - especially in the way I intend to do my own rig.

[Magneticitist]

@Rosemary, i suppose by atmospheric electrolyte i mean any and all of the EM, RF, ELF, etc that may be affecting the coil.

when i see a battery "ghost charge" voltage back up i dont link that to stressing of the plates. nor do i say its the plates stressing when my electrolytic caps charge themselves up to around 5V on their own.

to me this is the Earth's radiant energy doing this.. when using a Joule Thief with very low switching sensitivity it can be seen better, as the battery drops below switching voltage the LED will start to blink, because the atmosphere is brining its voltage back up automatically, until switching V is hit again and the cycle repeats. the LED will blink until the rate at which the atmospheric intake is not enough to overcome the low voltage in the battery and sustain a steady oscillation.

lets say i have a capacitor that sits on a table, and every 5 or ten minutes it has built up enough charge to turn a small DC motor for about one second.
lets say i put 50 of these capacitors in a bank and had them running and idling all at different times. it could be possible for me to time their discharges just right, so the small DC motor turns almost consistently, just from the electrolyte within them atmospherically charging.

i believe the stubblefield is similar, but i do not know if i were to create a super large electrolytic cap, would it gather the same type of charge but proportionally larger? or would it still receive the same amount of charge as the smaller one. likewise with the stubblefield. however i believe since the Earth itself is so large an increase in the mass of our coil would also increase its reception.