Electricity Amplification Device - It's so simple !!! (Hatem Magnetic Cogging)

[Magluvin]

That was, big trak   not trax.  Sorry  lol

http://www.bigtrakisback.com/

MaGs

[tagor]

In the midst of ideas setting off the scam alert warning, we may miss the real ones.


Magnetic coupling employed in a far more sophisticated way by these guys:

http://pesn.com/2010/07/14/9501672_Terawatt_Research_LLC_defies_free_energy_stereotypes/


What's your opinion?

Gwandau

yes this one could be very efficient ...
but difficult to replicate ...
who want to give a try ?

[gadgetmall]

Seems to me Magnetic coupling is still coupling and if you add more generators the drag will be the same as if it is coupled with a belt or gears. Take any PM Alternator and you will see they are very hard to turn with a load . If you run one and couple another then another and 3 4 more you will see the drive motor Die or simply the magnetic coupling will just break like a clutch slipping unlike gears .Belts would probably slip also with many Gens running from one motor . If it was so easy then all that would be needed would be a throw switch like the WITTS Dude to remove the power and run it self . Doubtful this is any good . I hope some one could prove this that has some money to burn . I would think that the Pull from two magnets attracting( N-S)  would also require more energy to break away thus taking more energy . Seems maybe a repelling magnet would work better?The original quote "In the test model I built, the drive motor consumed 134 watts of power and produced 184 watts." [1] seems this is enough to self loop buy they couldn't >?

[tagor]

. Seems maybe a repelling magnet would work better?

yes you are true

[allcanadian]

@Milehigh

These things can be very offensive if you forget about the lure of over unity and just look at this at face value.  There are people who work in professions related to what this company does and they are flabbergasted to see other people apparently masquerading around and making a mockery of science all for the almighty dollar.
Now that was a good rant!

It was a pretty god rant however as usual it was completely biased.

As for making a mockery of science I believe the scientific community has already done a pretty good job of doing that all by themselves. Take the "God particle" for instance where billions upon billions upon billions have been spent in search of a theoretical particle which like so many others pops in and out of existence from multiple magical universes we have never proven actually exist. Now all these thousands of scientist and engineers are probably not donating their time so I'm guessing their getting paid to be there, paid obscene salaries plus overtime to search for a fantasy particle we have no proof actually exists and they have been doing this for decades.

To make matters worse this mockery is funded by the taxpayers money, you know those poor people who do not actually have a choice of whether they pay taxes or not, so money is "Taken" from them/us against our will to fund a complete and utter fantasy. At least these private companies seek private investors and these investors have the choice of whether they invest or not where we are not given that opportunity.

If you want to see a great scam then you need look not further than most of the mainstream science that is publicly funded because it should be obvious that if they ever succeed then most of them will find themselves unemployed which is priceless. If there was ever an incentive to not succeed or make up nonsensical BS then this would definitely be it, the ultimate scam.

I should also note that the people you probably think are stupid and delusional and have said as much are the same people I have a great deal of respect for, that is the people here. The people who willingly give their time and resources, all at their own personal expense, for the slim chance they could make the world a better place.
If that is delusion then count me in, I'm all for it.

Regards