Relative Permittivity of Water

[Torana]

Collins dictionary
Hypocrite = person guilty of hypocrisy; dissembler , pretender
Hypocrisy = simulation of virtue or goodness; dissimulation, pretence
Dissemble = cloak, disguise , conceal (character , intention, act ), pretend not to see , ignore ,insult etc ; ** fail to mention fact ** ; conceal ones motives etc

Is this accurrate in reference to Stan Meyers ?

Stan lay claim to JOB 38:22 - 23 and presented himself as a spearhead bringing in Gods treasures of the snow in times of trouble and war.

IF so , did he deliver?  It was entirely his choice, he had options and he made his choice.

[Torana]

Stan Meyers Tech Brief

7-3; "The established dielectric value of water (85) being 78.54 ohms"

7-4: " a resistive liquid (having an ohmic value of 78.54 ohms)

7-8;  "the dielectric property of water (being 78.54 ohms @ 25c )

It cant be too hard to work this one out.
Ohms is a measurement between 2 points.

A resistor has a measurement in Ohms between ....
One end..................................................and................................................the other.

So... 78.54 ohms PER  WHAT ? ? ?
Metre ? cm ? mm ? foot ? inch ? linear ? square ? cubic ?

Permittivity is dimensionless , meaning it has no units = NO ohms , NO volts ...etc

Try and measure it and find 78.54 ohms per whatsit.


http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/452314/permittivity

http://searchcio-midmarket.techtarget.com/definition/permittivity

Good luck

[illuminati]

nothing adds up about meyer untill u realise his patents have been altered

they should have been released into the public domain as most patents are. not his mate, when they finally were did we really expect usefull information?

I have worked out the vic, yes so many have claimed this before. but i can be proved right and thats what counts.

[Torana]

Your not wrong !

** ALL tech patents are altered ,thats how patents are written ,otherwise they would all be called ..PLANS!
eg; the original microwave oven patent is a no go. Why ?
Its a huge market and you dont let that go,... by givin it away.  $$$$

No tech manual or science journal qoute patent content simply because its invalid.

http://www.free-energy-info.com/PatE12.pdf

Horvath patent is the best example, its not functional with reversed components + LC etc
its a fore runner to stans 8XA which is hardly interesting, using a SCR (diode).
people change the 8XA in order to just get it operating ,without realising they just proved its a DUD!
At the end of the day its a 555 trigger ,hopefully for a transistor or mosfet.(most cases not)
No one really knows why they absolutely MUST have a 7490 divider ,other than because... stan said so!

http://www.free-energy-info.com/PatE6.pdf
Stephen Meyers ; the order of the day = 2 plates and a curly wire . (very much like Freddy)

As for IRON wire , Ive heard of guys using it thru the years.
Rob Nelson was using it a year or 2 ago.
http://www.rexresearch.com

Legend has it that Stubblefield was using it, I cant see why not, every conductive metal we use is dragged out of the same ground , 2 pole magnetic ball that it is.

I read an article in New scientist a while back about magnetoelectronics, also quantum hall effects.
If your researching that avenue , I say good for you.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spintronics

[illuminati]

true patents are not plans,  yea you can make it hard to read or put the odd duff info in and you can spend money to patent a helicopter that you say can fly to the moon that just wont work. What i am saying is meyers patents are not protecting his work they are not the orginal patents written by meyer, they have been cleverly altered before release so they can never work.