Overunity.com Archives

https://youtu.be/4Oj5fGAKXaE

Hi, I found the above human powered device on youtube. I am attempting to replace manual operation with a automated pendulum to tilt the table.

Short videos of the project.

https://youtu.be/sQqq6srUljU

https://youtu.be/mVWJ5Dnr8-c

https://youtu.be/iJujIiis5lg

https://youtu.be/Dl7goWuaEyc

What will be your power source? (Ocean waves?)

In other words, what will drive the pendulum?

Greetings, Conrad

https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/1jERgsxrV1yPyaIp4kEyS_R9s-T8iaWpnTcQ2DBFkHyw/edit?usp=sharing (https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/1jERgsxrV1yPyaIp4kEyS_R9s-T8iaWpnTcQ2DBFkHyw/edit?usp=sharing)

Hi, One stator of a the PMA will be used to charge a cap that will drive the electromagnets in repulsion mode. The real power source is gravity.
It sounds like a word game but it is not. Once the device is started, it is stuck in a continues loop. I should be testing in a few days.  Good or bad, I will post results. Thanks for showing interest.   No water required.

burnit0017
yes your vids do a good job of explaining you direction , a bold one it is.
harvesting energy from the gravity field .

intriguing concept , I noticed a little yellow and orange Teaser in you intro and now above a more detailed Pic .
what part does that play or is it another project, sorry if I missed that?

thanks for sharing your interesting build.

respectfully
Chet

Hi, it is a multi stator permanent magnet alternator. I intentionally made the stators with a high internal resistance. It will produce a high voltage at low RPM. I will use a DC to DC step down converter  with a variable duty cycle to reduce (I squared R) loss at the stator. The only claim at this time is it not a overunity device. The configuration is easy to fabricate, so others may do their own testing. Cheers 

https://youtu.be/7OiU1ODOsSg (https://youtu.be/7OiU1ODOsSg)

https://youtu.be/OELKDJZeBxY (https://youtu.be/OELKDJZeBxY)

https://youtu.be/a2Gs6-AOLjQ

https://youtu.be/5rPkBo5JCjA

nice project, it may giver others some ideas

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwO5zSDThdxFRHJvb1dJYXNZd28/view?usp=sharing (https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwO5zSDThdxFRHJvb1dJYXNZd28/view?usp=sharing)

Basic circuit to charge Cap and trigger E-Mag, using SPDT switch.  Working on gearbox for PMA. It should take a few days to complete.

https://youtu.be/jKIWcJiJs04

Interesting option for 360 rotation, just for info

https://youtu.be/o-HxcEx2CoU

burnit0017
your thread is a pleasure to read/view and could probably generate a half dozen others [so as to not sidetrack this one].

intuition is a funny thing ...it just keeps us moving forward !

thx

Chet K

SWING5 video is a better idea. Applying Magnet and E-Mag configuration to drive the device. It should be self powered and using a DC to DC step down converter with a variable duty cycle when generating electricity will prevent system stall. One PMA will power the E-Mag and one PMA will be used to generate electricity. Still not OU, but it should work. A gravity powered pulse motor with zero operational cost, other than maintenance cost.

It will function like a wind turbine with no wind required.

https://youtu.be/98YOi5gLjRE (https://youtu.be/98YOi5gLjRE)

https://youtu.be/aaF1_AyZe-c

proceeding to fabricate swing5 and pulse motor configuration for a gravity assisted pulse motor, it should take a few weeks before the first test

the pulse motor can be made with a larger diameter

No laws of physics are violated and it should function like a wind turbine when generating electricity, output will always be less then 50% of the total power available at the output shaft.

https://youtu.be/yi86QqqBNig

The electromagnet has limits adding two air cylinders with two moving weights may help. Using the swing 5 configuration just add another moving weight to the stationary weight side.  During rotation as one weight falls it will push the other weight toward the center.

Sir
What constitutes a "swing 5 configuration"..?  is it posted here already [above ] and I missed this or is it to be a new build completely?

respectfully
Chet K

https://youtu.be/jKIWcJiJs04

https://youtu.be/aaF1_AyZe-c

Hi, I am combining the above videos to form a gravity assisted pulse motor. Then I will using use the electronics from a wind turbine to generate electricity. This is a first attempt so plans may change. Thanks for showing interest.

https://youtu.be/1AC1svbWS-0 (https://youtu.be/1AC1svbWS-0)

https://youtu.be/4b8ZsFszE8I

good info

no, its not

she is repeating the old paradigma again and again : You cant get anything from ( of for) nothing...   the biggest lie brainwashed scientists spread in the media  in a very mindless way. They should know it better.
Qustion: what is the most miniscule nothing we know  so far ?
Can electrons be destroyed ?

Mike Waters - Breakthrough Energy and the basic physics of global recovery

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fp1wPwszF9M (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fp1wPwszF9M)

Best regards

Kator01

Hi, fabricate a working proto-type and then test and post your results. I hope you succeed.

pulse motor with magnetic spring
https://youtu.be/ul_sjGy6GRM

https://youtu.be/bI8Rh0xDI4I

https://youtu.be/il32nuC6-Y8

I was getting better results without the belt.

https://youtu.be/TJjekzJUp90

https://youtu.be/BPPi8cVoEmg

Idea from other projects on YouTube.

https://youtu.be/QPeIDnyDxvw

One way bearing installed at the flywheel, now the flywheel can function like a wind turbine. So the Betz's limit will apply to the flywheel.

https://youtu.be/u5iuTwM5brI

just for info

https://youtu.be/woVzF59FcsQ

https://youtu.be/sR-nJRKoWhc

just for info, same concept as this project, I will be pulsing the input motor and generator output, small amount of electricity with mechanical advantage and gravity at to input to generate a larger amount of electricity at the output

https://youtu.be/aaF1_AyZe-c

https://youtu.be/73C44sX-xLs

https://youtu.be/jKIWcJiJs04

https://youtu.be/B3dLzZZ5jKQ

Combining the above ideas to complete the project, it should take a few weeks.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwO5zSDThdxFdDBMVmdNMUdlRk0/view?usp=sharing

Correcting flaw in design, it should take a few weeks to fabricate.

Mounting Swing5 on glide swing so no load will ever be placed on the input drive motor. 

After working on this stuff for 5 years I hope you are successful on something  soon , I'm getting a little long in the tooth holding my breath. Cheers

Feel free to start your own project and post your results.

https://youtu.be/kcmO9ubkdds

update

http://peswiki.com/directory:mikhail-dmitriev-gravity-wheel

just for info

https://youtu.be/cvjFX-hdVKY

glide swing complete

https://youtu.be/2u0krL4SW6Q

http://www.engineering.com/ElectronicsDesign/ElectronicsDesignArticles/ArticleID/11200/Electricity-from-Human-Power.aspx

http://www.rapidtables.com/convert/electric/Joule_to_Watt.htm

math for the power calculations

https://youtu.be/VEhsIu4BuJA

https://youtu.be/rpvVYtBlmX8

https://youtu.be/JcBIN8juJ08

https://youtu.be/Emi1xSHv6sM

https://youtu.be/J4cTuCpNntU

All I can say is that you have a strong will, burnit0017 :-)
Aside from that, and not to be a party killer, but I might have experienced from several experiments that gravity and magnets can't provide energy...
If you really want to try something, that I failed in making, is this one:
https://youtu.be/LDRorMyxdO0 (https://youtu.be/LDRorMyxdO0)


If you for some reason can make a magnet that keeps its magnetic orientation while it is spinning around, this device will actually work.
The idea is that the inner rotor is a magnetic south pole at the circumference, and north pole in the center. The outer rotor is magnetized through its diameter so south is on one side and north on the other side - even if it is spinning around.
IF you can achieve this, you have a magnet motor with 20% excess energy.
Let me explain:
In this construction, both outer and inner rotor has the same torque, but the inner rotor spins 20% faster than the outer rotor due to the 5/4 gear ratio. This is proven by simulations only. That means the energy of the inner rotor must be higher. As you know that torque multiplied with RPM is energy.
The problem:
How can I get a permanent magnet keep its magnetic orientation in the same direction while it is spinning? When that problem is solved, you got yourself an over unity device.


You cannot magnetize the outer rotor with external magnets. That will cause the outer rotor to increase the torque to 20% more than the inner rotor. So it will not work.


Now you can start figure things out to make it work :-)

https://youtu.be/8RKKecCTds4

Quote from: burnit0017 on August 31, 2016, 02:16:09 PM
https://youtu.be/8RKKecCTds4 (https://youtu.be/8RKKecCTds4)

I must say you really put lots of good work into your projects. I'm impressed. Hope it works as you want it to :-)

https://youtu.be/0cClk0KGBLA

Thanks, I have a small CNC router.

https://youtu.be/I0MdmaIZrkU

posting just for info, nice pendulum configuration, I will give it a try

https://youtu.be/uIxIjTMn960

Quote from: burnit0017 on September 08, 2016, 03:40:07 PM
https://youtu.be/uIxIjTMn960 (https://youtu.be/uIxIjTMn960)

Phun has a bug. I have experienced unexpected things with phun myself.
I made an unbalanced wheel, and springs attached a little distance from the hub, but 90° offset - one horizontal and one vertical. The wheel accelerated in one direction, and did not want to rotate the other direction.
The "ballbearing" in the center of the chapes does not keep itself in place under stress. This will make false computing of the forces involved in you model, because Phun use the actual location of the mass for computing, and overlook that the bearing isn't fixed to one place.
The experiment is easy to replicate in Phun.


Vidar

Hi, thanks for info.I had to order some parts. I should have more to show in a few weeks. Thanks again. Cheers

https://youtu.be/_lm6vGdGpik

This is an awesome build, burnit :)
Have you kept going for so long that the plants starts growing on you project? Looks like it in the background there :D


Keep going, and keep us posted. Most of all, have fun while building regardless of the outcome. Thanks for sharing!


Vidar

burnit0017 if you have time please consider... see attachment file.

Hi, I had poor results when I built that project. Has anyone had good results??

really? any videos?

Hi, they are on my youtube home channel page.
https://www.youtube.com/user/GoVertical17/videos

Apparently these guys got a working model according to tv news channels.. Someone please translate.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gMk-1ouP-gg


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xqEqjZl3ZOg

Hi, is there a reason you are not building, testing, and posting results for your proposed configuration?

Quote from: burnit0017 on September 15, 2016, 10:59:04 PM
Hi, I had poor results when I built that project. Has anyone had good results??

Speaking for myself, I have not got any positive results yet. I try to make things work without violate laws of thermodynamics. If you succeed in doing that one day, no one can say your'e a fraud ;D  (Well if you claim you're violating anything, people will not believe...that's what I meant ;) )

I run simulations first, and then, if I cannot understand why the concept does not work, I build it. This far, I haven't built so many. I have a project going on now. A small sized project. I have no expectations other than it will most probably not work.
However, I think it's fun to put things together - no matter what it is.
You learn more from practical experiments than any other way of educating yourself. That's why I'm doing this :-)


Vidar

https://youtu.be/4BlPGEn3Ouw

https://youtu.be/5mu5awHjeNQ

Hi, thanks for posting.

Quote from: webby1 on September 19, 2016, 11:04:40 AM
Here is a simple method I use to take an oscillating input and convert it into a single direction rotating output.

In 700 if you look at the top left part of the picture you see the input arm connected to the first input shaft,, then to the right of that first input shaft\gear\one way bearing is the second input shaft with its own gear\one way bearing and then to the right of that is the output shaft with its own gear\one way bearing.

In this setup I am using levers to connect the two input shafts,, but sprockets and chain work as well so that you are not limited on the angle of rotation per input cycle.

I used a one way bearing on the output so that the output flywheel would keep spinning without  the input system moving,, in other words if the input slowed down it did not slow the output down with it.

I like that setup, specially because the fly wheel can run away.

May be one should mention that the ratchet bearing (or one way bearing) in the middle should block in the opposite direction in comparison to the the first and third ratchet bearing.

Greetings, Conrad

https://youtu.be/rtcsLgCZybo

it looks like I have to rework my pendulums, I have the chain drive on the wrong pendulum

https://youtu.be/_LTMU1zuhlk

New configuration, previous attempts failed.

https://youtu.be/7TAb8eIcgsA

https://youtu.be/zT30XMlhKW0

https://youtu.be/jQ9w4btlLzg

https://youtu.be/B0gfFnu_C4M

increased fall weight to 10 pounds, proceeding to fabricate swing5 rotor 
https://youtu.be/jKIWcJiJs04

https://youtu.be/9NABSmLgMUc

new motor mount

https://youtu.be/VUJXHzKPRUs

https://youtu.be/Cn5f8VWt7IE

http://www.algodoo.com/download/

https://youtu.be/N2M3ZTNiVgY

https://youtu.be/-MthI6dZssQ

Last configuration failed.
New configuration attempt.

https://youtu.be/S3MokDKLgH8

Can you post the file as well please?

Thank you.

Hi, the lever  is 8 feet, the fall weight is 10 pounds rotating on 1 foot crank.

https://youtu.be/YWdlyuVDJu4

nice, possible up grade 8)

Quote from: burnit0017 on October 16, 2016, 11:05:40 AM
https://youtu.be/YWdlyuVDJu4

nice, possible up grade 8)

An oscillator, or pendulum like this does not operate very much different from a rotary solution, because both principles are based on the very same sinusiodal fuction. At the moment you load the output coil, the magnet will feel resistance because the coil will resist induction when it is loaded. This resistance will add a delay on the pendulum that will drain the kinetic energy of it, so the pendulum will stop sooner than if it was not loaded. Using big heavy weights, will not make any othe difference than sustaining oscillation longer because higher weight at a given angular velocity has more kinetic energy than a light weight at the same angular velocity.
This kind of resistive electromechanism will apply to any form of generators that is loaded. A rotary solution will keep rotating as long there is no energy output, just like the pendulum will continue to oscillate as long there is no energy output, but both will be drained if you load them.
I can see that the bicycle frame is wobbling like a seesaw. If you take energy out of this seesaw, the very same happens. When you load it with resistance, you basicly are counterforcing the seesaw with a given delay that will cause the pendulum to stop. No free energy in this one.


Vidar

Thanks for the info.

https://youtu.be/Y1cKWIAFT0I

will the same happen

Quote from: burnit0017 on October 17, 2016, 05:27:55 PM
https://youtu.be/Y1cKWIAFT0I (https://youtu.be/Y1cKWIAFT0I)

will the same happen

The same will happen here if it wasn't for the energy input from the pneumatically piston.
The misconception is that a pendulum that is arranged like this will provide energy output with little or no energy input. However, the energy output is a direct consequence of the energy input.
It is both mathematically and practically provable, but the inventors often overlook this because of the construction principle plays mind tricks.
It's difficult, if not impossible, to observe the machine behavior in detail. The counterforce from the energy output is allways slightly ahead of the mechanical oscillation. This is harder to observe the less energy output there is.


However, it has been built water wells with hand powered pumps that is based on this principle. These pumps are more efficient because the loss in the human body is less when operating such a pump compared to the continuous external pressure directly on a pump lever. Try to press your hands hard together for a while. No work is done because the hands are stationary, but you consume lots of energy. The pendulum require a short burst of energy input that in turn does not require much energy from your body, but the energy input is not less than the energy required to pump the water.


Vidar

Hi, thanks again. My project is a attempt to find a configuration that will combine a small amount of electricity with mechanical advantage and gravity at the input that will produce a max torque at the output shaft.  The output shaft will drive a PMA. I plan to use Buck converter with a variable duty cycle  at the output of the PMA. The electricity generated at the output will be less then 50% of the max torque of the output shaft.
I will post results when available.  Thanks again.

Just a tip for your project:
If you want to calculate energy, you must multiply torque with displacement. Torque is usually measured in punds pr feet or Newton per meter radius.


A buck converter is useful. These small devices increase voltage output on expense on current input. If you want to power a 10W load that runs on 20V @ 0.5 Ampére, and the input voltage is 10V, then the buck conveter will draw 1 Ampére from the input. So a buck converter does not increase energy output. The more expensive ones have an efficiency of approx 90-95%, which means for each watt output, it draws 1.05 - 1.1W at the input. Think of a inverted pulley with ropes. You must displace 1 meter of rope at 2kg force to lift a 1kg weight 2 meters up.


Good luck :-)


Vidar

DC to DC step down converter = Buck converter

https://youtu.be/B3dLzZZ5jKQ

You can also buy them as DC to DC step UP converters. Amazingly how stable the output voltage is when you load them. I use such a converter to power my DIY aux head lights on my car. From the 12V car battery, this converter outputs 30V @ 3.2A, and if I hook off the load, the voltage is still 30V. I had to hook it directly on to the battery with a 10A fuse, and a relay, because the converter draws 9A from the battery, and the fuse in the car will blow if I power the converter directly from the head lights.
My LED aux lights are 2 x 5 LEDs at approx 10W each. Mine can deliver approx 160W max. Bought on DX.com.


Vidar

https://youtu.be/uWsDc0oMrmI

proceeding to fabricate  Milkovic 2 stage oscillator  configuration

https://youtu.be/lUm_nV3TRlQ

I will be adding a gear train at the output and use a buck converter at the PMA output.

https://youtu.be/UXo6WvHRs_I

Project on hold until Spring. :'(

is it the Chill in the air ? [an unheated shop can be most uncomfortable to work in the winter

Snow Bird heading south ?

your tenacity in this quest is inspiring.

Thanks for sharing your work !
Chet K

Hi, after a summer of experimentation I found that the fewer moving parts the better, a large flywheel sucks a lot power from the system, and the two stage oscillator appears to be the best way to use a pendulum. I will purchase a hand warmer and try to continue when I can. Cheers

This is a small project I did a few years ago.
https://youtu.be/nfoDyKCA3xs  warm, it is a gravity device  :)

https://youtu.be/3rc2R1LvN0s

just for info

Yep, it looked like it was getting out of hand.
Too many components. All that friction adds up.
Simple is better.

https://youtu.be/Z3_DKdiN1w4

need 4 running in parallel, driving one output shaft to the gear train

https://youtu.be/8mKR51wprG4

https://youtu.be/hK-oZKDowj0

https://youtu.be/rvLuAweY7BI

https://youtu.be/DTAcUhDnDXc

About 900 RPM's at the output.

correction, the RPM is closer to 350 at the output

https://youtu.be/7lu86mWzMeY

https://youtu.be/G_t3AxOi6LM

I have been following your posts with a lot of interest.  I was sorry to see your post a few weeks ago that said you were on hold until spring.  Happy to see you were able to move indoors and continue your efforts.  It looks like you are making good progress.  Thanks for sharing your project.

Hi, thanks. I am spending the winter fabricating the DC to DC step-down converter. This project is showing a lot of potential, I will continue working on it in the spring. Thanks again.   

https://youtu.be/ALutpnyeMm8

High voltage, low current. Next I have to add a bridge rectifier and a Buck converter.

https://youtu.be/ALutpnyeMm8

High voltage, low current. Next I have to add a bridge rectifier and a Buck converter.

https://youtu.be/4u_QWesfYdA

Interesting, Could you use that 200 volts to spike the battery when it is between pulse times of the wiper motor?
If that's too high dump the cap before it gets there ,multiple dumps?
Thanks for sharing.
artv

Hi, it seems possible but the project goal is to use a Buck converter to converter a high voltage with low current to a lower voltage with higher current. This will reduce the (I square R) loss at the stator when the duty cycle is set below 50% . 

https://youtu.be/V5Lw2DwEG8k

The skyMAX PMA is a complete waste of cash. >:(

Proceeding to fabricate Buck converter with a VOC of 400 volts.

variable trigger circuit for the Buck circuit

P channel mosfet buck converter, I will post parts list after testing the circuit.

https://youtu.be/MlEXvh00vtE

just a quick update

https://youtu.be/4hmnA0A1J1Q

project update

https://youtu.be/MX0CPECHeQk

Big swing5 needs some fine tuning.

https://youtu.be/IOdulvy8M7A

working better

https://youtu.be/THHGEgtjDFs

abandoned TSO for a pulse motor to drive the Swing5, will use stepdown gear train for increased torque

https://youtu.be/8OISfRpDZSE

requires a better design of the electromagnet, suggestion welcome

https://youtu.be/G_jt9YJnG5M

Reduced e-mag core end has improved RPM

Hey burnit, just curious but do you have a way to adjust the timing of the pulse? Looks like if you're in attraction mode you could pulse a little before the magnets are lined up, and maybe have better rpm. Reminds me of when I took the flywheel off a mower engine then tried to start it. The timing was so close the piston bucked back instead of crossing TDC, nearly pulling my arm off before the starter rope popped.

Anyway, timing is important in any machine.  ;D

Hi, I am using the e-mag in repulsion. I can rotate the trigger cam to adjust the timing. I have to fabricate away to adjust the position of the repulsion magnet on the stator. Timing is tricky. Thanks for the help.  I may have to increase the trigger voltage. I am fabricating a new e-mag using 18 AWG wire on a 2 by 4 inch bobbin, not sure of the turn count but the coil resistance is about 50 ohms. Thanks again for the help. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Litz_wire

Hi, has anyone tried multi strand wire to fabricate a e-mag? It looks like away to reduce the coil resistance.

I've never tried multistranded, but I would think there's a reason it's not normally used. But whether you use that or normal wire, you'd definitely benefit by wiring it in a bifilar arrangement. After all, Tesla invented the bifilar winding for electromagnets. You'd see a faster response when the switch closes and less arcing and sparking on the switch contacts.

https://youtu.be/EMpry_2-580

https://youtu.be/SMHmLgXWR1U

Hi, I think the main problem is the large  air gap between the e-mag and the rotor mag. There is a limit to the size of e-mag I can fabricate. The design was becoming too complex with too many parts. I found two examples of a linear pulse motor that may work better for this project. Thanks for the help. I am starting the rebuild. Thanks again. 

https://youtu.be/7-P-D6JXSPk

The new project configuration will resemble a early motor design. I will use the swing5 configuration for the flywheel with two large linear pulse motors. 

https://youtu.be/OxuotFUWVGQ

It look like the moving coil design will have the best results.

https://youtu.be/ZX1IDqHEDRw

Basic test.

https://youtu.be/YsLnBcXIH4E

time for a safety lesson 

https://youtu.be/GALNX54jDL4

Another option, but will require a gear train reduction.

I am thinking of using the failed pulse motor attempt rotor with two gap powered devices. The gap devices will be placed in a 180 degree configuration on the outside of the rotor and use a one to one gear set to drive the large swing5 rotor. All the parts are fabricated and I should be able to test soon.

https://youtu.be/GALNX54jDL4

https://youtu.be/sxrJoGZy1to


just found this, looks like the solution

https://youtu.be/y87ZWuoWV_o

if they measure the power at the output shaft and then compare it to the power being generated, not OU, still a great idea and should solve my project problem

https://youtu.be/SUDzFv_hURA

Making progress. 1 to 9 gear train with PMA mounted.

Even if you haven't had success yet, I'm amazed about your skills and crafts. Keep it up. Its fun and inspiring to watch your videos :-)


Vidar

hi, the project really needs a PMA with a high output at a low rpm. i will have to fabricate one.

Quote from: burnit0017 on May 22, 2017, 01:20:37 PM
https://youtu.be/G_jt9YJnG5M (https://youtu.be/G_jt9YJnG5M)

Reduced e-mag core end has improved RPM

Couple of ideas that may help to fine tune the system and  give you more power on electromagnet.


1-you may want use magnetic rid switch to control the electromagnet via mosfet or a power transistor which will allow you to fine tune and get maximum propulsion power out of electromagnet. Similar to pulse dc motor operation.


2- Put your electromagnet into metal tube/pipe and close the back of the tube/pipe as well like round washer or metal plate, by doing so you will increase power of your electromagnet may times. Or else you lose most of the electromagnet force if you don't enclose the coil in a metal housing.  For example: Transformer would not operate without a metal core. 


Mem.

Hi, thanks for taking the time to post the suggestion.  I used that configuration on the first pulse motor I made. basic testing showed me that I can get better results using the GAP power or mostly permanent magnet motor configurations.  Thanks again

https://youtu.be/5EcuuFbSwSg

dual coil, looks easier to fabricate

Quote from: burnit0017 on June 11, 2017, 12:41:50 PM
https://youtu.be/5EcuuFbSwSg (https://youtu.be/5EcuuFbSwSg)

dual coil, looks easier to fabricate

Looking some of your videos it's quite impressive to see  amount of time and labor + $'s that you have invested in this R&D.
More power to you man!
I sure do lot's R&D in Hawaii but it's the fraction of what you do. Having a like minded buddy/friend definitely helps to discuss  these ideas.
Some day I hope to tackle this project. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DKUFoWAuj0  the principle of modification of the generator is here in this drawing. I have no idea who make the drawing, but looks very good.

https://youtu.be/UlGjr2VBxR0


linear pulse motor fabricated, please watch safety videos 

Quote from: burnit0017 on June 15, 2017, 03:53:52 PM
https://youtu.be/UlGjr2VBxR0 (https://youtu.be/UlGjr2VBxR0)


linear pulse motor fabricated, please watch safety videos

Hi, I guess you're using my Mostly Magnet Motor design where the magnets on each ends of the center rod core are opposing each other N-N or S-S?
Looks good and wishing you all the best.


Luc

Hi, yes I am combining your project with the swing 5 rotor.

https://youtu.be/SMHmLgXWR1U

https://youtu.be/jKIWcJiJs04

I plan to use it to drive a multi- stator and multi- rotor PMA. I will use a Buck converter to reduce the (I squared R) loss at the stator. I will adjust the perimeters until it generates more electricity then it is  uses to operate.  Not OU. Thank you for posting your project.

Quote from: burnit0017 on June 15, 2017, 07:18:08 PM
Hi, yes I am combining your project with the swing 5 rotor.

https://youtu.be/SMHmLgXWR1U (https://youtu.be/SMHmLgXWR1U)

https://youtu.be/jKIWcJiJs04 (https://youtu.be/jKIWcJiJs04)

I plan to use it to drive a multi- stator and multi- rotor PMA. I will use a Buck converter to reduce the (I squared R) loss at the stator. I will adjust the perimeters until it generates more electricity then it is  uses to operate.  Not OU. Thank you for posting your project.

That's great!
I wish you success.
Are you aware of the further torque improvement the mostly magnet motor design can achieve without any more power input?
Did you see the Super build of it?

Regards

Luc

Hi, I have been searching for the videos, can you please post the links.  Thank you for any help received.

Quote from: burnit0017 on June 16, 2017, 06:26:20 PM
Hi, I have been searching for the videos, can you please post the links.  Thank you for any help received.

I've copied the below from my original topic: http://overunity.com/8429/mostly-permanent-magnet-motor-with-minimal-input-power/msg420188/#msg420188 (http://overunity.com/8429/mostly-permanent-magnet-motor-with-minimal-input-power/msg420188/#msg420188)
It contains the essential details and developments.

Over five years ago I came up with a unique linear motor design where a coil moves on a steel core between two opposing permanent magnets.

The benefits I found in this design are:
1. The stronger the magnets and the more core surface area, the stronger the push or pull gram force is.
2. The design has no magnet cogging as the cores and magnets don't move.
3. The coils Inductance has next to no change as it moves since it never leaves the core.
4. If designed correctly the coils push or pull gram force is equal throughout the travel stroke.
5. Compared to a standard solenoid my design uses a fraction of the input power, so it can be continuously operated 24/7. A standard solenoid would catch on fire if it tried to continuously push or pull what my design can do.
6. My design offers huge travel distances compared to a standard solenoid.
7. It can be made to travel a 1/4 inch to 4 inches or more if needed while maintaining the same gram force throughout the stroke.

Here is a demo video of how my basic design works: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eTQ49RcFKM (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eTQ49RcFKM)
Here is a larger magnet version: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qa1dO8qWPQU (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qa1dO8qWPQU)
Here is a super build version: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f6pc-XNS9uo (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f6pc-XNS9uo)

All tests were done with the same digital scale which displays pull gram force in 5 gram increments.

Results of the tests in the same order as the videos above:

no.1 has   250 grams pull force with a continuous 1.2 watt input
no.2 has   500 grams pull force with a continuous 0.43 watt input
no.3 has 2500 grams pull force with a continuous 0.43 watt input

As you can see I'm demonstrating that the pull gram force can be increased by the force of the permanent magnet without increasing the input power. Note that test no.1 has 1.2 watt input and test no.2 has 0.43 watt input which is a 65% reduction in input power but still has double the gram pull force.
Test no.3 has 5 times the gram pull force of test no.2 using the same input power since the core and magnet surface area is 8 times wider.
So obviously not just the force of the magnet can play a part but more core and magnet surface area also increases the push or pull gram force.

This is what I've been trying to demonstrate in a nutshell. However, since this is the Overunity Forum people here are mostly interested in OU possibility rather then an innovation.
So to please everyone I did tests to see if the super build could have OU potential even though I knew it would not since the design also suffers of the generator effect as the coil moves in the permanent magnet field. Since it can only move at a certain speed because the coil generates power as it moves, it fights the input power which is coming in the same direction, so we cannot beat the laws of physics here.

Hope this helps

Luc

Hi, yes it does help. Thank you.

https://youtu.be/-Vi4w97YiqE

proceeding to fabricate large pendulum drive and I will use the MPMM to drive the the pendulum

the pendulum was not working well for me. switched back to the swing5 rotor. I increase the stroke on the MPMM to 16 inches. At 12 volts dc it has low power. Suggestions welcome.

i can down size the swing5 rotor, or increase the magnet size and input voltage. I am aware of the inverse squared relationship for the magnet force and distance. suggestion welcome

https://youtu.be/SrYTTa9EPck

coil size is 2 by 4 inches, 18 awg @ 10 ohms

The MMM can be designed to travel efficiently at any distance if you have the money or supplies to build it correctly.
The length and height of your coil determines the maximum travel length and diameter of your center core.

For example:
A 6 inch long coil wound 1 inch thick can efficiently travel 6 inches in each direction on a 1 inch dia. core that is 12 inches long.
A 12 inch long coil wound 2 inch thick can efficiently travel 12 inches in each direction on a 2 inch dia. core that is 24 inches long.
If your coil is 4 inches long and you're trying to get it to travel 8 inches in each direction on a 16 inch long core then you reduce the MMM push/pull force by half.
So not efficient, no matter how many magnets you add.

If you follow the above example then you'll get the best results. And if you also include an outer core which takes advantage of both poles of the magnets like I have demonstrated in my videos, then you'll double the push/pull force with the same input power.
Obviously the stronger the magnets are and the more core and coil surface area there is the stronger the push/pull fore will be and without an increase in input power.
However, keep in mind that generator effect (CEMF) also increases with the above which I've also tested and confirmed in a video demo which confirms the MMM is an under unity device.
I would think it may be as efficient to use an off the shelf geared motor and attach a crank shaft if you're needing a back and forth linear motion.
Hope this helps
All the best in your experiments
Luc

hi, thanks for the help. I ordered a few 3 by 3 inch neo's with 1000 pound pull force. It should get the project moving in the right direction. Thanks again for the help.

https://youtu.be/HbVtXPegW_o

fabricating 4 MMM to drive two small pendulums.

https://youtu.be/0t8yDnyOaQ8

Another SAFETY video.

https://youtu.be/eLq94TdoqxE

posting just for info, it uses mechanical advantage, gravity, and the drive motor could be pulsed on and off

looks easier to fabricate, this could be the solution, the large magnets are scaring me

http://www.magnet4less.com/product_info.php?products_id=982

Hi, I may have found a way to increase stroke length  of the MMM. additional magnet sets could be placed in the iron core, the coil could be pulsed every time it reaches a new set of magnets.
comments welcome

https://youtu.be/fMaayTJK02U

quick update

https://youtu.be/U_q28sfn-NM

hoping other builders will give it a try

https://youtu.be/oUj9ZZ7FTrk

quick update

https://youtu.be/FG6CsoWl3fo

started testing

https://youtu.be/9bzQyEBcQrU

3 by 2 neo's

https://youtu.be/l1sBfNw4VGQ

making progress

https://youtu.be/i-vVyZ7LprE

proceeding to add rack and pinion, gear train, PMA and buck converter. All in good fun. Cheers

https://youtu.be/q198VEMj8B0

increased centrifugal force

https://youtu.be/OSPYNywpyoM

result of magnets on iron core

http://www.kylesconverter.com/power/watts-to-foot--pounds--force-per-second

found a online calculator that maybe useful

https://youtu.be/J9QafZ1QYkU

spring counter balance

https://youtu.be/X5bzjs3ByBU

cap dump circuit should limit the bemf braking at the PMA

https://youtu.be/X4osQhuqp4Y

manual test of PMA and cap dump circuit charging 12 volt battery

https://youtu.be/euGYWZsLGRM

charging super cap bank, PWM reduces BEMF

Working on Atwood and pump jack configuration. the pump jack will act like pendulum using a seesaw to lift a weight then the pendulum will latch and wait for the weight to fall, then the cycle can repeat. Waiting for warmer weather. Happy holidays

https://youtu.be/83g1XByKV0k

not sure how it works?????????????

https://youtu.be/LGNtCVeEDj8

This looks interesting....Seems to have a counter weight.

Quote from: burnit0017 on November 28, 2017, 06:30:41 PM
https://youtu.be/83g1XByKV0k (https://youtu.be/83g1XByKV0k)

not sure how it works? ??? ??? ??? ???

Change in rotational torque by changing tension and path of the cable
It looks like a pneumatic door closer. When the large weight pulls
the cable tight it 'opens' the hydraulic cylinder, it then self closes,
pulling the cable back down, and the counter-weight resets the system.

Hi burnit0017,

Here is a link to some information about a project very similar to what you are doing.  Maybe it will give you some ideas.  Go to post number 984 of this thread: 

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/11933-open-discussion-projects-forum-33.html?posted=1#post307680

Take care,
Carroll

Hi, nice work, it will take me some time to get through all the posting but it looks like I am taking the same approach. Thanks for posting. Cool. I am waiting for warmer weather to finish the project. I am using a low RPM high output PMA with a PWM cap dump circuit to charge a super capacitor bank. I just finished a large pulse motor to drive the spinning weight. Thanks again.

  https://youtu.be/UUZhyh39yP4