Overunity.com Archives

News announcements and other topics => News => Topic started by: NKE on March 25, 2017, 09:06:06 AM

Title: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
Post by: NKE on March 25, 2017, 09:06:06 AM
I am presenting the parameters of a new series of houme reactors based on IE3 engines.

1. Engine power (kW)                  5.5             7.5
2. Heat production (kWh)             7.5           10.5
3. Workhead efficiency (%)         182*          187*
4. Power consumption (kWh)         6.5           9.1
5. Total process efficiency (%) 115            115 (2:4)
6. Heated surface (sqm)              200           320
7. Equivalent to a coal furnace (kW) 25         35

For heating the surface of 100 sqm the 5.5 kW engine needs 4 hours of operation, 7.5 kW motor only 3.
In Poland according to the current prices of electricity and coal this device produces heat 3 x cheaper than carbon or gas.

For Germans mehr info: http://nspap.livejournal.com/122015.html
Title: Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
Post by: ramset on April 03, 2017, 10:05:45 AM
Sir
Is this a  cavitation device ?

more info would be great !! ,thanks for sharing this .

respectfully
Chet K
Title: Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
Post by: citfta on April 03, 2017, 02:30:40 PM
Hi Chet,

I don't believe this is a cavitation device.  Cavitation causes damage to the impeller.  Also cavitation creates a tremendous load on the driving source.  This appears to be a centrifugal pump.  The interesting thing about a centrifugal pump is that as you restrict the discharge side of the pump the power requirement from the driving source goes DOWN.  However the turbulence inside the pump causes the liquid to heat up.  I have seen water from a fire truck come out steaming because someone forgot to leave at least one discharge line open to allow a flow of water through the pump.  I am not so certain that heating water this way is the most efficient way to do it but I know it does work.

The title for this thread seems to be somewhat misleading as I see no connection to anything nuclear about this device.

Carroll
Title: Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
Post by: ramset on April 03, 2017, 02:41:17 PM
NKE
do they speak of the actual process which produces excess energy ?
is it a friction [oil bath ] heater ?
or ?


I have to agree.....  a person would be silly to run all of that on electricity, unless it saved money ?
after all .....the worlds most efficient electric heater is a resistor...

we did caloric testing a few years Back on a friction disc oil bath heater and found a resistive heating element out performed it!
I believe the member here was user OilPiggy [it was his system]

also there was [maybe still is] a system down in Albany Georgia {USA} which utilized cavitation or friction.
can't remember the company name ...?
will look into that ..

thanks
Chet K
PS
note I see Carroll posted while I was plunking
Title: Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
Post by: forest on April 03, 2017, 03:11:11 PM
Do you remember ? https://www.africaresource.com/rasta/sesostris-the-great-the-egyptian-hercules/2-african-students-invent-free-energy-power-generator/

Title: Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
Post by: forest on April 03, 2017, 03:15:21 PM
"We used magnetic flux to generate electricity which the conventional magnet cannot. It consists of a shaft fixed with eight neodymium magnets which rotates when an initial current is passed through the field coils. The electricity is then passed from the copper coil to a step-up transformer which steps up the power voltage from 32 volts to 200 volts to power the output of the generator," they said.[/font][/size]


remember http://www.keelynet.com/images/generatornigerian.jpg
Title: Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
Post by: ramset on April 03, 2017, 06:17:46 PM
NKE
we have members in your country, how can we test this or see a unit ??
thx
Chet
Title: Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
Post by: forest on April 04, 2017, 09:05:00 AM
which members ramset ?
Title: Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
Post by: kampen on April 04, 2017, 01:49:51 PM
Free Energy Equinox It Runs On Water Overunity 
Have a look at this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a_5tpAWl7IY
Title: Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
Post by: ramset on April 05, 2017, 06:08:48 AM
Forest
sorry I took so long to respond ,I had to go away on a daytrip for work

@forest quote
which members ramset ?
end quote

We have members here [and elsewhere] all over the globe ,
a true anomaly would be investigated ,it would at times require
covering some distance ,but it is doable , other members here offer to cover expenses .


would you assist in an investigation of this tech ?
if we can get more qualifying info and can arrange a visit ?

of course first things first ,

is this claim a true anomaly ? 7500 watts heating a 100 square meter home... Needs more info to explain ??
Much more info...

respectfully
Chet K





Title: Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
Post by: pix on April 05, 2017, 06:38:39 AM

Quote from: NKE on March 25, 2017, 09:06:06 AM
I am presenting the parameters of a new series of houme reactors based on IE3 engines.

1. Engine power (kW)                  5.5             7.5
2. Heat production (kWh)             7.5           10.5
3. Workhead efficiency (%)         182*          187*
4. Power consumption (kWh)         6.5           9.1
5. Total process efficiency (%) 115            115 (2:4)
6. Heated surface (sqm)              200           320
7. Equivalent to a coal furnace (kW) 25         35

For heating the surface of 100 sqm the 5.5 kW engine needs 4 hours of operation, 7.5 kW motor only 3.
In Poland according to the current prices of electricity and coal this device produces heat 3 x cheaper than carbon or gas.

For Germans mehr info: http://nspap.livejournal.com/122015.html (http://nspap.livejournal.com/122015.html)


Ten same bullshit from infamous Dr.No.
A few years ago he was banned from this website due to propagation of nazi propaganda.
This is the same picture " nuclear reactor" he was presenting years ago.
Title: Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
Post by: ramset on April 05, 2017, 08:08:01 AM
Pix
He did seem familiar ??
It has always been my experience when a man is sincere he will make a path to assist in an investigation of his claim.

here it seems no such path is offered ?
much better data would be a start ....

respectfully
Chet K
PS
@Pix
Your TPU Patent is explored here


http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=302.375 [start at reply 386]

as always, if it bears fruit it will be presented at the thread here and elsewhere

Title: Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
Post by: pix on April 05, 2017, 09:10:15 AM

Quote from: ramset on April 05, 2017, 08:08:01 AM
Pix
He did seem familiar ??
It has always been my experience when a man is sincere he will make a path to assist in an investigation of his claim.

here it seems no such path is offered ?
much better data would be a start ....

respectfully
Chet K
PS
@Pix
Your TPU Patent is explored here


http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=302.375 (http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=302.375) [start at reply 386]

as always, if it bears fruit it will be presented at the thread here and elsewhere


Hi Ramset,
I know about the other page. Myself I am going to perform a test, everything is ready except copper wire 0.75mm I am still waiting to be delivered.
Patent itself looks promising, too many common things with TPU.


Regarding this bullshit "Home nuclear reactor" that looks for me like typical household electric water heater with pump running in closed loop.
Try to run pump driven by 5kW electric motor closed loop- of course it will heat up , all this electrical energy spent on fluid circulation must manifest itself in the heat losses.
It is wery inefficient method of heating up the fluid.
Regarding this guy- I remember him, he is changing his nicknames, a few years ago he named himself "Dr No". He was telling sick nazi propaganda.
He has been removed by Stefan from OU .
Here is a page he is referring to:
http://nspap.livejournal.com/122015.html
And now he is here again.

Title: Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
Post by: ramset on April 05, 2017, 09:45:29 AM
Pix
so this is more A Political Guy who wants to spread his news?

Not a true FE  researcher ?

regarding the build at the other forum, most members do not like having to build elsewhere
its just over here the moderation is a problem [no offence to Stefan he is a hero for keeping this going as a one man band.

and over at OUR Peter is also keeping a fulltime job going and trying to run a forum [which is completely dedicated to open source] ,he does not even allow advertising on his site but also had to close membership because of BOT attacks.

ultimately it is hoped that moderation can be instilled here by volunteers who have good history ...[slow process]

respectfully [and with gratitude]
Chet K



Title: Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
Post by: TinselKoala on April 05, 2017, 10:44:39 AM
Not a true FE researcher?

Quote from: NKE on April 04, 2017, 01:16:16 PM
Sorry but I do not do any tests anymore because it makes no sense.  :-\


Not a true FE researcher. QED.
Title: Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
Post by: Floor on April 05, 2017, 10:45:14 AM


..................    cold fusion via cavitation ............. ?

Title: Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
Post by: Floor on April 05, 2017, 11:07:12 AM
OUR  (Over Unity Research) ?

is

closed to new members  or  exclusive ?
... but for good reasons... problems with bots? or  back ground checks on new members ?
which one ?

moderated or censored ?

secret  / not open source / "regulated" open source?

political ?

a conspiracy trap set by MIB ?

what ?

QUOTE from Ramset

"ultimately it is hoped that moderation can be instilled here by volunteers who have good history ...[slow process]"

END QUOTE

Hoped by some...

            moderation would be one method of gaining controll over the OU board, troll attack has ultimately failed.

           floor
Title: Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
Post by: ramset on April 05, 2017, 12:06:03 PM
Floor
quote
OUR  (Over Unity Research) ?

is

closed to new members  or  exclusive ?
... but for good reasons... problems with bots? or  back ground checks on new members ?
which one ?

moderated or censored ?

secret  / not open source / "regulated" open source?

political ?

a conspiracy trap set by MIB ?

what ?

QUOTE from Ramset

"ultimately it is hoped that moderation can be instilled here by volunteers who have good history ...[slow process]"

END QUOTE

Hoped by some...

            moderation would be one method of gaining controll over the OU board, troll attack has ultimately failed.

           floor
end quote
----------------------------------------------


@ Floor

the people and their work speak for themselves!

Moderation here as you mention is really not preferred [or it would have been done already

moderation anywhere is not preferred ,and this is the very reason persons who actually spend a lot of their valuable time and resources to build and share
chose to work in a venue with men of like mind.

an open source Venue.

too many people will come and say argumentative// accusatory??..disruptive  things [like your post above] whenever they get a whim [bored or Drunk OR ??]

it has proven to be the case time and time again.

Title: Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
Post by: TinselKoala on April 05, 2017, 12:31:13 PM
Looks like your Cold Fusion is leaking all over your basement floor. Better get that fixed, it's bad for the concrete! And you wouldn't want anyone to slip and fall in your Cold Fusion puddles.

And how about some pictures of the Repulsine actually flying?

(By the way, I know where that thing actually is today... and it's not flying anywhere, unless someone puts it in a suitcase as checked baggage on an airliner.)
Title: Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
Post by: ramset on April 05, 2017, 12:35:15 PM
NKE
Here all we do is look for source of alternative energy
LENR, NMR, Electrostatic .  Magnetic , Gravitation field etc etc

Fusion ?
No we don't look for that....never hand a man a stick to beat you with...[Laws]

so Yes if you have shown a cavitation event which manifests excess energy ??


YES please ,but pictures are not what we look for...

respectfully
Chet K
Title: Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
Post by: ramset on April 05, 2017, 01:14:51 PM
The test device doesn't have to go anywhere ,can all stay there
would just need to verify your claim ?

what is your claim ? 7500 watts to heat a 100 square meter home ?
how Hot in house
how cold outside of house ?

what kind of house [grass ,brick wood ,stone?

what does 3hrs mean ??

would be better to measure one very well insulated drum of water  start temp...stop temp "speed to heat"
ambient temp etc etc
and a graph ??

?
you must already have this data ?

respectfully
Chet K
Title: Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
Post by: pix on April 05, 2017, 02:26:18 PM

Quote from: NKE on April 05, 2017, 01:30:05 PM
7.5 kW (10.5 kW heat power) model heats 320 sqm total in 10 hrs of work.
But to do this needs 6 tanks, 300 L each (1.800 L total).

how Hot in house 20 C
how cold outside of house ? -15 C
what kind of house: old brick type with 12 cm insulation
what does 3hrs mean: for 100 sqm heat to accumulate
Crap
Title: Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
Post by: MasterPlaster on April 05, 2017, 04:36:56 PM
Wow this looks like the real deal. Even our resident trolls are not bothering with this thread.
Perhaps they are recognizing one of their own.
Title: Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
Post by: TinselKoala on April 05, 2017, 07:10:16 PM
Golly, a nearly six year old, 20 second video showing the same thing you are talking about in this thread! I'm like totally convinced !
Title: Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
Post by: ramset on April 06, 2017, 07:28:27 AM
Well
Now it would be VERY easy to do a simple test ,heat a 45gallon drum of water [if you need bigger OK]
you will need
a big cardboard Box [not completely necessary if OU is obvious
the Drum
two or three thermometers [only two for basic test [without measuring motor heat to room]
a resistor [to measure power input to motor]
and a stop watch [time to heat

will you do this ?

we can go over the test protocols [would be a very good idea]

you'll be elevated to a deity if you break the OU boundary for energy required to heat water/

very simple and quick test
and I WILL RUN A CONTROL TEST HERE WITH A RESISTIVE HEATER AND YOUR INPUT POWER.

YOU WANNA "RACE"......? INPUT POWER AND TIME TO HEAT !!
I TRULY HOPE YOU WIN..........

Honestly to be fare if we race we'll need yout whole rig in a box since your motor is adding heat too
I will run my settup inside the same size box here [to be fare]
and then the number crunchers/metrologists can compare everything [the water part should show it all tho

yes ??
No ??

respectfully
Chet K


Title: Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
Post by: ramset on April 06, 2017, 02:47:14 PM
NKE
Its an open offer ,when you get the time to grab a Barrel a few hoses and some clamps.

let me know !!
I am truly looking forward to doing this control experiment, and genuinely hope you make me look silly !!

please don't let much time go by , the world needs these things....

respectfully
Chet K
Title: Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
Post by: ramset on April 06, 2017, 03:33:17 PM
NKE
they don't understand the claim, when you heat water in a vessel and all the math [super simple math] is done ?
they will get in line to buy ....

at this moment the claim is not in any scientific measurement protocols.

hard to place a value to all the parameters which could effect the claimed results ?

heat water in a measured vessel and time the temp rise and input power...

end of story

with respect and standing by.....
Chet K

Title: Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
Post by: pix on April 07, 2017, 09:27:37 AM

Quote from: NKE on April 07, 2017, 09:19:11 AM
Current science does not accept such activities.
Although on the other hand would like to have access to such devices.
So they deny themselves.
Complete paranoid schizophrenia (F21).

In attachement.
Victory Monument of my family over Gallas over 2200 years ago under Pergamon.
At present the Altar is located in a museum in Berlin.
This is not the oldest story of my family.
Therefore i look at the pity on others


When did they let you go from mental asylum?
Title: Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
Post by: ramset on April 07, 2017, 09:34:00 AM
NKE
just a pail of water then ?
one pail with known dimension

a resistor and simple meter

one thermometer and a stop watch !

you will have your alter again ...if you Break the boundaries of known science.

I am waiting with my Bucket ,thermometer and stop watch...

you don't have to go anywhere ,take the machine anywhere ,just beat my resistor in a pail !



Chet K
Title: Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
Post by: ramset on April 07, 2017, 12:29:47 PM
NKE
Quote

If you find 10 people with cash to buy the device then you can make an appointment (old engine for clear).
The price is (for 7.5 kW machine with IE3 or IE4 motor) 3.500 EUR  4.000 USD  :-X
end quote

heat the Bucket of water ,beat my resistor and your bucket will overflow with the money.

or do nothing and nothing will happen

but I can assure you of one thing
this is not a political forum and certain things are truly forbidden by the rule's and the laws of certain countries.

please respect that

respectfully
Chet K




Title: Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
Post by: ramset on April 07, 2017, 05:01:50 PM
I'm going to need help on this one , I have never run an almost 10KW [or 9.17] calibrated  load.. also your motor measurements ??

But looks like I should be able to calculate and run a control ...

thank you very much [I think.... ;D

and yes I will do it once I am certain we are on the same page and it is fare to you and the science 
and I can muster an 80 gallon tank [should be able to find one around here ??
or weld two drums up

Thx

Chet

@NKE
what is this head? [ultimate ??] ----- >>>> --- Head mechanical efficiency 1:2 = 186.7
also
how much insulation on the tank ,plus ambient temp where tank is

Title: Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
Post by: Floor on April 08, 2017, 11:58:05 AM
@Ramset

      I notice that you .... Mr. ambassador / Mr. diplomacy ....  have made no comment upon
     the tone of Tinsel koalas' (the former king of disruption)  above postings,,humm. 
     
      And honestly, I am glad to see that TK has regained at least  some of his former
     self  restraint..
..............................
      Quote from ramset
"regarding the build at the other forum, most members do not like having to
build elsewhere"
     End quote

         Build it twice or present it here ? 
         I would get more eyes on it here than at OUR, wouldn't it ?
         
          I don't blame any one for not prresenting here.  This is often
          a tuff venue.   But also a very dynamic, and creative venue.
         
         The trade off,  OU research springs from here...may be validated
         or ... invalidated there.  Or the other way around.. but mostly not.
         The two each play their roles / should not try to become the other.

      Quote from ramset
"its just over here the moderation is a problem [no offence to Stefan he is a hero
for keeping this going as a one man band."
     End quote

        By problem you meant,  for Stephan ?  But It seems to me that also you are
implying that there is not enough moderation here.

There are times (I think) when most here, have wished for more moderation of
the topics.  But I truly respect the way Stephan handles it.

      Quotes from ramset
"and over at OUR Peter is also keeping a fulltime job going and trying to run a forum"

" [which is completely dedicated to open source] " 
     End quote

"Completely dedicated to it "

         I believe this , but just,  not completely open source.

      Quotes from ramset
" ,he does not even allow advertising on his site " 
     End quotes

                                       But his books have been advertised on this forum, while you
                                       advertise that forum itself here.
http://overunity.com/16987/td-replications/msg500765/#msg500765

                                        I don't want to be bothered with advertisements.
                                        But also the lack of them is no proof of some kind of
                                        a noble intent.

"but also had to close membership because of BOT attacks." 

                                          Was no other solution  possible ?

"ultimately it is hoped that moderation can be instilled here by volunteers who have good history ...[slow process]"

      Quotes from ramset
@ Floor

"the people and their work speak for themselves! 
               
                                     Post some of those OU devices over here will you ?

"Moderation here as you mention is really not preferred [or it would have been done already"

                     This statement (below) is a non sequitur.

"moderation anywhere is not preferred ,and this is the very reason persons who actually spend a lot of their valuable time and resources to build and share chose to work in a venue with men of like mind."

"an open source Venue."

                                Look I don't doubt the "OUR" site is well intended / motivated and ultimately
                                has the goal to  open source.

"too many people will come and say argumentative// accusatory??..disruptive  things [like your post above] whenever they get a whim [bored or Drunk OR ??]"

"it has proven to be the case time and time again."

QUOTE FROM RAMSET
moderation anywhere is not preferred ,and this is the very reason persons who actually spend a lot of their valuable time and resources to build and share
chose to work in a venue with men of like mind.
END QUOTE

                                       What ? 
.............................
QUOTE FROM RAMSET
too many people will come and say argumentative// accusatory??..disruptive  things [like your post above] whenever they get a whim [bored or Drunk OR ??]
END QUOTE

      Are you saying that, your statement (above) is not itself, any of those things it describes  ?
                                                 "[bored or Drunk OR ??] "


                      regards
                          floor
Title: Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
Post by: ramset on April 08, 2017, 12:33:03 PM
floor
I know we all speak different languages here ,and honestly being from NYC [the melting pot of the world]

I can usually work my way thru a post from almost anybody here ,and honestly ,I understand your comment

HOWEVER
you have wires crossed on Peter's forum [over unity research
he sells Nothing

and

NOTHING>>>>NOTHING [incase you missed the first nothing

is not for open source
Peter is very very stiff with this rule [me too and others]

Peter wants to grow the science and the What ifs ??

I think you mixed up Aaron's forum [energetic forum]
  there he runs a business ,not my concern everybody knows this.
no comment from me

Re Tinsel
I have grown to Hug Tinsel when he shows up not throw stones ,he does have issues here with old fights from persons who say they can fly ??

but it will all work out in the end [empirical testing of all claims whenever possible by multiple persons or builders.

RE Moderation here
I will never tell a man who does the work [a builder] that he must put up with abuse here ?
and not go off to a quiet spot to work with less noise on open source projects [example over unity research forum

so yes there is a problem here, you do not build so you have no perspective of the huge commitment it takes from a mans life and time  .

it all looks funny to you ??

not funny at all
common sense actually !

@NKE
I am discussing your project with calorimetry guys [just to be fair to your claim
I want to see if I can scale it down a bit so I don't have to cook so much water [300 liters]

should not be an issue at all [scaling down

just to be certain

respectfully
Chet K

Title: Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
Post by: Zephir on April 08, 2017, 02:45:56 PM
QuoteThe interesting thing about a centrifugal pump is that as you restrict the discharge side of the pump the power requirement from the driving source goes DOWN.  However the turbulence inside the pump causes the liquid to heat up.  I have seen water from a fire truck come out steaming because someone forgot to leave at least one discharge line open to allow a flow of water through the pump.  I am not so certain that heating water this way is the most efficient way to do it but I know it does work.

The cavitation heaters are certainly a thing of these days (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wWDFX08rJvo) - Infinity SAV Team also has some (http://infinitysav.com/cavitator) in their portfolio. IMO they're closely related (http://overunity.com/17186/the-bifilar-pancake-coil-at-its-resonant-frequency/510/post/quote/503611) to electromagnetic overunity devices, except that they utilize real bubbles instead of ferromagnetic domains. Interesting thing is, they're often connected with nuclear fusion (https://pesn.org/2012/04/28/9602083_NanoSpire_Inc_on_Harnessing_Cavitation_Zero_Point_Energy_to_Produce_Fusion_and_Transmutation_in_Water/) and transmutations in similar way like BrilliantLight, Energoniva or Zorographos devices.
Title: Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
Post by: ramset on April 08, 2017, 09:32:34 PM
HHMMmm
Zephir
You would have no way of knowing this...[or maybe you would??]
I do indeed have a weakness for the cavitation in water...
and experiments there.

especially  cavity resonator's...

you post lots of interesting things, but you're more like an infomercial ,do you have personal experience or contacts with any of these claims?
@ NKE 
will hopefully get an OK on your test in the next day or two [from measurement expert
I am sure there will be some questions first.[will post them here]

thanks
Chet
Title: Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
Post by: Floor on April 09, 2017, 12:47:04 AM
@Ramset

Quote from Ramset
"you do not build so you have no perspective of the huge commitment it takes from a mans life and time"
END QUOTE

                   not true

http://overunity.com/14311/work-from-2-magnets-19-output-2/dlattach/attach/133573/
http://overunity.com/14311/work-from-2-magnets-19-output-2/dlattach/attach/133572/
http://overunity.com/14311/work-from-2-magnets-19-output-2/msg488465/#msg488465
http://overunity.com/14311/work-from-2-magnets-19-output-2/msg487779/#msg487779

AND A DIFFERENT KIND OF BUILD (STILL A WORK IN PROGRESS)

http://overunity.com/16954/magnets-motion-and-measurement/dlattach/attach/161439/

                 AND MANY OYHERS

              floor
Title: Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
Post by: Floor on April 09, 2017, 01:39:28 AM
@Ramset

Quote from ramset
"I can usually work my way thru a post from almost anybody here ,and honestly ,I understand your comment"
END Quote

                 Reading might help you work through those posts.....
                                    because
                No, honestly, you did not understand. 
                You understood NOTHING. I'll repeat that for you.
                         
                              (Quote from ramset  "[incase you missed the first nothing" END quote)
                                         
                                                     You understood NOTHING.

Quote from ramset
"HOWEVER
you have wires crossed on Peter's forum [over unity research
he sells Nothing"
END Quote
                         
                         No it is you who has have crossed the wrong wires this time.

                        Are you an idiot ?  I did not say he did on his forum. I said his book
                        was sold on this forum.

Now please don't next,  say that I called you an idiot.  It may seem to you, that I
have implied that, as it seems, you have implied this of me, when you said
                 
                        "NOTHING>>>>NOTHING [incase you missed the first nothing".
But I did not call you an idiot.  No need for that.

Try to be a little more honest / use less subterfuge  next time you respond to me please.
I don't respect the lack of honesty, nor subterfuge.
Title: Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
Post by: ramset on April 09, 2017, 04:47:43 AM
Floor


Sorry I had a mental block on your handle and your posting was completely out of character
for the man I am use to reading here [who demands respect of his threads

That and the fact I Had detached retina surgery last month and my mind is very worried and distracted about the future.

a PM would have been much better ??

I honestly had you confused with another member [eastern European]
and that is the truth  :-[

why did you come so aggressively here ?
did I ever treat you poorly somewhere ... anywhere ??

IMO
you are a champion of open source research and Peter is a champion too
for supporting all of Overunityresearch from his own pocket ..

please show me where Peter sells  anything at his forum
or links to any products?
or advertises to help pay for the forum??
I honestly am completely unaware of this ??


this has taken a big turn [for me]  now that I know who you are

I apologize regardless for my behavior above...[when I thought you were some one else who never posted an experiment here .

Chet K



Title: Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
Post by: lancaIV on April 09, 2017, 05:05:26 AM
http://www.mainebiz.biz/article/20130827/NEWS06/130829948/inventor-tests-new-heating-device-at-usm (http://www.mainebiz.biz/article/20130827/NEWS06/130829948/inventor-tests-new-heating-device-at-usm)
https://www.google.com/patents/US9389004 (https://www.google.com/patents/US9389004)

Cavitation heater for warm rooms and hot water

NKE alias Dr.Novak : Nuclear ,koennte sonst mit Nuckler missverstanden werden :P ::) ;D
Title: Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
Post by: citfta on April 09, 2017, 06:16:38 AM
With only a very few exceptions cavitation is something to be avoided.  It is very harmful to the pumping mechanism.  It also creates a lot of noise and high loads on the driving force.

I was called to look at a motor in our plating shop that was kicking out the overload breakers.  The motor was new and was driving a new pump that was pumping acid.  Some engineer that didn't know what he was doing had specified the same size pipe for the inlet as the outlet.  On all centrifugal pumps the inlet pipe should be larger than the outlet pipe to allow the fluid to flow at a slower speed coming in than going out.  Cavitation is caused by trying to pump out the liquid faster than it can come it.

In addition to kicking out the breakers the pump was making a loud rumbling noise that could be heard from several feet away.  I recognized the rumbling as soon as I heard it.  To try and stop the noise someone had turned back the intake valve restricting the intake even more.  This only caused more noise and kicked the breaker even faster.  I checked the current draw and it was about twice what the oveload breakers were rated for.  I opened the intake valve all the way and started closing the discharge valve.  When I had closed the discharge a small amount the noise immediately stopped.  When I then checked the current draw it was well below the overload breakers rating.

Here is an engineering article about cavitation:
http://engineering.wikia.com/wiki/Cavitation

Respectfully,
Carroll
Title: Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
Post by: Floor on April 09, 2017, 09:08:39 AM
@Ramset

Thank you for being the first (between the two of us) to
make peace / offer appology.  __it happens

Honsetly, I was about to do the same.

No worries, no harm done to me, and I hope none was done to you.

Quote from ramset

please show me where Peter sells  anything at his forum
or links to any products?
or advertises to help pay for the forum??
I honestly am completely unaware of this ??

End Quote

Maybe peter doesn't ?  I don't see his books advertised here.
I was certain they were, maybe they were in the past ?
No matter.

Sorry for my insults and inuendo, you didn't deserve that.

           kind regards
                    floor

Title: Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
Post by: ramset on April 12, 2017, 12:06:13 PM
NKE
I have asked a member to assist here a caloric measurement specialist[a physicist ]
he has a family crisis ATM [surgery]

may be a few more days

respectfully
Chet K
PS I see your post below ...thanks , I wish to involve caloric specialist to Dot the I's and cross the T's [be thorough
Title: Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
Post by: ramset on April 25, 2017, 01:02:35 PM
NKE
April 13th I had emergency eye surgery [second time in two months for retina detachment]

this time they did things which I will not even put in print here [lunch time]
and when they were done sewing behind the eye they filled the eye with oil.

I can't risk messing this one up, so I'm climbing the walls and going slow.[reading can be torture]

and I am VERY far behind now with commitments

apologies

Chet K
Title: Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
Post by: alpersddk on April 25, 2017, 01:07:57 PM
Quote from: ramset on April 25, 2017, 01:02:35 PM
NKE
April 13th I had emergency eye surgery [second time in two months for retina detachment]

this time they did things which I will not even put in print here [lunch time]
and when they were done sewing behind the eye they filled the eye with oil.

I can't risk messing this one up, so I'm climbing the walls and going slow.[reading can be torture]

and I am VERY far behind now with commitments

apologies

Chet K
We hope you get your health again..Best wishes. ;)
Title: Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
Post by: alpersddk on April 25, 2017, 01:12:38 PM
Quote from: NKE on April 12, 2017, 12:24:33 PM
It's very easy, do not waste your time, it's like this:
30x300 x4200 :3.600.000 =10.5 kWh
30 =Hourly temperature rise
300 =Tank capacity (kG)
4.200 =specific water heat (J/kG)
3.600.000 =Joule conversion to power (kW)
Hey NKE,what's up!
What about this man;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S22MsRVdDJA (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S22MsRVdDJA)
His device capable of generating COP 1.5/2 excess heat output.Seems like same design as your device.
Title: Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
Post by: Zephir on April 25, 2017, 06:43:27 PM
IMO the erosion by cavitation could be avoided by proper construction of reactor. For example if we expand the compressed water jet from a nozzle into a higher volume of water, some localized cavitation will be also present after the nozzle. But in this case the volume of cavitation will not touch the surface of reactor in any point, so it cannot lead into its destruction. The question is, if this way of cavitation will be energetically effective with respect to generally low COP/KDP of cavitation effect. During braking of jet stream a huge amount of energy will be also wasted with turbulence and by pressure loss without any overunity.

Regarding the overunity during cavitation, I can see some similarity in behavior of small water bubbles under changing pressure and magnetic domains within ferromagnets, the magnetization level of which is changing rapidly. In my theory (http://overunity.com/15124/simplest-theory-of-overunity-devices-possible/) the overunity may emerge when some negentropic process applies in fast repeating cycles. Despite what the mainstream physics says, the law of spontaneously entropy increase (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_law_of_thermodynamics) gets violated all around us quite often. For example the oversaturation, undercooling or overheating of fluids during their boiling are also negentropic thermodynamic equilibrium violating effects.

This is because the formation of bubbles within fluids isn't entirely smooth process: when small bubble is about to form, some excess of pressure must be present there because of surface tension effect. The surface tension force makes the pressure inside small bubbles quite substantially higher, than the pressure outside it and the density fluctuations presented inside the fluid must overcome this barrier (so-called activation energy) first. The thermal fluctuations of liquid (which are assisted with vacuum fluctuations on background) will finally break the activation energy for bubble formation - and just during this tiny period of time the vacuum fluctuations could do an usable work for us. On this principle the alleged overunity in ROSH buyoance geneator (http://revolution-green.com/kpp-rosch-innovations-the-saga-continues/) could be also based.
Title: Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
Post by: ARMCORTEX on April 26, 2017, 01:34:10 AM
Quote from: ramset on April 25, 2017, 01:02:35 PM
NKE
April 13th I had emergency eye surgery [second time in two months for retina detachment]

this time they did things which I will not even put in print here [lunch time]
and when they were done sewing behind the eye they filled the eye with oil.

I can't risk messing this one up, so I'm climbing the walls and going slow.[reading can be torture]

and I am VERY far behind now with commitments

apologies

Chet K

Sorry to hear that Ramset.

NKE, please give this man his overunity before he goes blind, for the love of god.

Be the first, the gladiator champion to release the overunity. Competition is heating up anyways.
Title: Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
Post by: triffid on May 18, 2017, 09:36:58 AM
test,just wanted a link to this thread.triffid
Title: Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
Post by: triffid on June 22, 2017, 09:57:12 AM

It seems like to me this thread exists only to sell something.triffid
Title: Re: Home Nucler Reactor class 180
Post by: GalenLid on January 28, 2018, 09:34:42 AM
I'd love to see it. I thought you were hiding it, NKE.