http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS140822+04-Feb-2008+PRN20080204
TAMPA, Fla., Feb. 4 /PRNewswire/ -- Alternative energy researcher and
inventor O'Keefe Natheniel Douglas has recently developed an apparatus for
duplicating electrical power as it flows through a bypass circuit whereas the
primary power remains unaltered and the duplicated induced energy increases
the sum of the output power to become greater than the input power.
Unlike a transformer, the Duplicator is connected in a series with the
load. The Duplicator harnesses the changing magnetic flux of the passing
current to generate additional current into an independent circuit. Electron
drift is comprised of electromotive force in random directions. The
Duplicator's inductive line of force simply navigates a portion of this drift
into a selected direction, thus, generating an electric current, preferably
described as duplicated current. Duplication requires no energy transfer or
energy depletion, therefore, there is no electrical energy lost within the
main circuit.
Power Duplicator will amplify electrical energy on both small and large
scale, without limitation to the number of duplications. The duplicated energy
can also be connected in parallel with the passing energy - and in series with
another Duplicator. The interconnection between Duplicators, series and
parallel, are infinite. A relatively small electrical energy source is
required to initiate the duplicating reaction. The technology will diminish
and undermine the need for nuclear energy conversion plants and long-distance
power plants. Because the Duplicator converts and duplicates all forms of
electrical energy (alternating and direct), the technological implementations
are quite versatile, thus allowing the adaptation for integration and
mobility.
It is impelling to discuss in brief its ancestor - the transformer.
Transformers may be used to manipulate current and voltage, a very unique
trait. Electrical transformers have the potential to multiply current
indefinitely within its primary circuit, and voltage indefinitely within its
secondary circuit - limited only to engineering. Transformers, similar to the
Duplicator, amplify power. Without this amplification, modern transformers
would never exceed 45 percent efficiency. For any type of induction, the
inducing power has to be twice the induced power in order to cancel opposing
force of the induced and to sustain induction. Transformers held the key to
power amplification, yet mutual induction retards their full potential. Power
Duplicator provides the necessary modifications transformer technology lacks
for efficient power amplification.
The challenge started around seven years ago. The inventor was driving
through rural Georgia and could not help but notice the miles and miles
stretch of high-tension power lines along the highway. He wondered to himself,
"What if I could tap into the varying magnetic field these wires produced to
obtain free energy?" He later started the research project "In Search of FREE
Energy." Advance research into transformer technology provided assurance that
fuels his determination - yet still there was a missing link. On September
19th, 2007 he found it.
Press Contact:
O'Keefe N. Douglas
(813) 675 5678
DougieResearch@yahoo.com
This release was issued through eReleases(TM). For more information,
visit www.ereleases.com.
SOURCE Dougie Research Corp.
O'Keefe N. Douglas of Dougie Research Corp., +1-813-675-5678,
DougieResearch@yahoo.com
All I can say is: Amazing! :o
Look at the coverage!
Whatever e-releases.com is charging their customers to distribute press releases, they certainly seem to be worth it.
@teofilius
Thanks for sharing.
Any sketches or plans available?
The proposed properties are similar to lots of existing patents.
But how to proof?
helmut
Quote from: Mr.Entropy on April 11, 2008, 03:45:25 PM
Look at the coverage!
Whatever e-releases.com is charging their customers to distribute press releases, they certainly seem to be worth it.
Yeah...he made it Forbes.com. Folks, we may have a winner!
You guys aren't serious about this claim of course
Quote from: poynt99 on April 11, 2008, 07:39:27 PM
You guys aren't serious about this claim of course
Why not? You're not seriously expecting people to listen to you are you? :D Ingrained skepticism and ignorance is all you offer. I am not interested in your version of the physics bibles of old.
Poynt99 you sure are bitter you must just be tired of all the free energy scams out there...
Either that or you dont understand why this isnt plastered on the news daily...
Anyhow the story also here:
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m4PRN/is_2008_Feb_4/ai_n24246751
seems to resemble the makeup of the TPU... This gives even more reason to look into the device.
infringer,
yes, true, but also tired of insipents like konduct that not only have no idea what they're talking about, but go out of their way to emulate their worst enemy. (I think he misses you, you should go fight with him for a while). (I do agree with you that your friend omnibus should have been banned long ago, but you've clearly demonstrated and admitted that you too should have been).
re. the so-called invention, just trying to say there's nothing there to see, and besides at this point it's all heresay, so why jump on board so quickly?
think for your self, question what you read, take these kinds of claims with pinch of salt until more info becomes available, if it becomes available. There isn't enough healthy skepticism here, but there are plenty of people that just want to believe without questioning, esp. with little to no details.
I'm a skeptic because I've been through this many times.
I'm a believer in the TPU (and a few others) because I have studied it for quite some time. I've been at this a long while.
Quote from: poynt99 on April 12, 2008, 01:12:46 AM
infringer,
yes, true, but also tired of insipents like konduct that not only have no idea what they're talking about, but go out of their way to emulate their worst enemy. (I think he misses you, you should go fight with him for a while). (I do agree with you that your friend omnibus should have been banned long ago, but you've clearly demonstrated and admitted that you too should have been).
re. the so-called invention, just trying to say there's nothing there to see, and besides at this point it's all heresay, so why jump on board so quickly?
think for your self, question what you read, take these kinds of claims with pinch of salt until more info becomes available, if it becomes available. There isn't enough healthy skepticism here, but there are plenty of people that just want to believe without questioning, esp. with little to no details.
I'm a skeptic because I've been through this many times.
I'm a believer in the TPU (and a few others) because I have studied it for quite some time. I've been at this a long while.
Good. You hate the idea and think it's fake. Then jump offboard.
I dont take any claims at face value ;) no offense to anyone here...
But I do however plan to keep reading hoping to find a point where I can test some of these things without tons of equipment...
I am limited not only by funds but by space as well I suppose I will have to invest in copper enamel coated wire weather I try a torrid or a turbine so thats where I shall start...
Anyone have a cheap source of wire?
Thanks for the excellent insight into your stance on things poynt99 I agree being skeptic of things can be healthy.
Every good thread at any site that amounted to anything had people at each others throats its amazing but I seem to believe the theory that when your brain is under a lot of stress you seem to open up a doorway to learning and producing results. Its almost as if people dont get into something if there emitionally involved.
I prefer good emotional energy. ;D
QuoteAnyone have a cheap source of wire?
There is lots of wire in junk household appliances such as washing machines, dryers, dishwashers, fans,...
Microwaves have big magnets and other goodies but beware of charged capacitors.
I hate being skeptical, i really want to belive that OU is true, but why is it that we only ever read and hear about theory and experiments, but we never have as yet seen any positive results.
these so called inventers have come and gone throughout the years without a trace, they claimed to have created a device to "save the world" so where are these devices? why can we not buy them to order?
and if its all to do with the oil companies and governments putting "gagging" orders on the inventers, why are these inventers telling these bodies about their breaktrough before they spill the beans to the likes of us? (if they ever spill the beans!) shurely if more enthusiastic people like us were to know about these major break throughs before the big boys (which are threatened by them), we can save the world ourselves! the more people who know, the more power and force we will have to make this reality.
just my thoughts.
I really hope this is true and something is going to come of it though!
I do believe a lot of the inventions could be easily silenced once a patent is bought...
The motive behind cheap energy at every corner of the globe is money how many dollars you can generate...
Not many people in this world give a rats ass about someone else you should know that by just everyday living people want but they want for themselves instead of worrying about those that need.
If you wanted big money for OU devices the easiest way to get it would be to contact an oil company!
But better have a patent cause if you do not they will steal your idea and patent your device under something totally differnt I am sure.
I believe it is very reasonable to believe the oil co's could keep tons of things from being released if you dont believe the possibility you may be nieve...
It is also possible the reason we see the raise in oil prices is because advent the internet and open discussion groups like this one if you were an oil barron and people were on to a method you may already know provides tons of free energy would you not try to suck every last bit of gravy out of your gravy train....
Who knows it may be the bio gas that did it it is possible that a cheap method of producing bio gas from switch grass and other things was already known and was being used already by some big oil co's ... Big buisness does dirty things all the time to steal and conceal. Microsoft amongst many others have been caught in these things many times over but they still continue to do so. Now if these guys are caught for it there are many other business folks that are doing the same thing!
Steal and conceal the way of big business dont let yourself be fooled there is many examples of this now and then I am not saying that every thing in this world is conspiracy or to believe what I say even just dont limit yourself to a small set of possibilities in life keep an open mind.
Quote from: mfred68 on April 12, 2008, 09:34:07 AM
I hate being skeptical, i really want to belive that OU is true, but why is it that we only ever read and hear about theory and experiments, but we never have as yet seen any positive results.
I guess,that the big buisness have a nearly perfekt working system to supress all movements, that are able to
bring a change in the existing hierarchie of power.
I am shure,that in our democratic goverment every stage of ruling the folks is deeply korrupt.
I dont think,that it is bad.It is as it is ,and it workes that way.
The System need a little tuning.
Mismanagement in a goverment position even in local goverments need to be handeld with penalty.
Such als loosing all privilegs and being restaged in the lowest position.
Politicians sweare to do the best for their citicens only ,and there is need for a power to prevent them,
for doing something else.
They are all payed by us,so they have to work for us and not against us.
Thats it.
And if this little tuning is done,the way for free energy is wide open.
helmut
I have a question. If Big Oil has been "buying up" all these OU patents, why are they not using them to produce energy, but instead spending billions on oil exploration? I thought Big Oil liked money.
I sent an e-mail to the inventor and invited him to visit this thread.
Sweet action whatsup I doubt he will visit but... Give you an E for effort!
Everyone seems to hate being thrown to the parana's not many have the cahonies to do an open evaluation of there product...
Weather it would be fear of loosing profit potential or plain fear they will recieve negative publicity...
Steorn should have just provided a design for the public to use....
We all know replication is the ultimate form of proof if you can use a single 9v battery to power a CRT TV which in this case it should be feesible!
You have her licked you would have people liscensing your product left and right! Billions of people simply dont like DIY they would rather buy stuff off the shelf!
If you do show up provide a model that works and we will provide you the means to secure finance. Replication and proof of replication.
This website believe it or not is consistantly watched by investors!
Quote from: shruggedatlas on April 12, 2008, 02:51:45 PM
I have a question. If Big Oil has been "buying up" all these OU patents, why are they not using them to produce energy, but instead spending billions on oil exploration? I thought Big Oil liked money.
@shruggedatlas
I think that you are clever enough to know the answer.
Everyone is somehow adicted to energy.
The exchange of energy is controled by money.
Money ist just the Medium to control the exchanging of energy.
Control the energy means to control the folks.
Ones the control of energy is lost--- the Control of the folks is lost.
Free Energy means free Folks
helmut
i have a question atlas, by what logic would an oil company hasten or assist a technology which which would threaten their job security (however fleeting it may be) when they are making billions?
if you make your own power/potable water/heat you make your OWN politics. this is what politics is at its heart.
Quote from: shruggedatlas on April 12, 2008, 02:51:45 PM
I have a question. If Big Oil has been "buying up" all these OU patents, why are they not using them to produce energy, but instead spending billions on oil exploration? I thought Big Oil liked money.
If they build such kind of powerplant I would ask for what I'm paying!
I think I see what the inventor is doing. Suppose you have an Electric Heater plugged into the wall. So there are 2 wires between the wall & the Heater. Now if you cut 1 Wire & place a transformer winding in Series with that Wire, you will get free energy from the transformer when the Heater is on. This is because the Current going to the Electric Heater really doesn't care if it goes through 1 Winding of a LOW IMPEDANCE Transformer on the way to the Heater. The Electric Heater will draw NO additional Wattage.
ONLY qualified Electrical Engineers & Technicians should attempt this. Do this at your own risk!! I am not responsible for injuries or death due to electrical hazards.
Example:
1. Cut 1 Electric Heater Wire in half.
2. Find a Heavy Duty Transformer such as one from a Large Battery Charger.
3. Place the Transformer Secondary Winding in Series with the Cut Wire.
4. Attach the Transformer Primary Winding to a Load such as a Light Bulb.
5. Plug the Electric Heater into the wall.
6. Turn the Electric Heater on.
7. The Light Bulb will light up from free energy from the Transformer PRIMARY.
.
Quote from: teofilius on April 11, 2008, 02:39:09 PM
He later started the research project "In Search of FREE
Energy." Advance research into transformer technology provided assurance that
fuels his determination - yet still there was a missing link. On September
19th, 2007 he found it.
I am very curious as to what the "missing link" is. Should be interesting, if it pans out to be authentic, of course.
Quote from: FatBird on April 13, 2008, 11:35:13 AM
I think I see what the inventor is doing. Suppose you have an Electric Heater plugged into the wall. So there are 2 wires between the wall & the Heater. Now if you cut 1 Wire & place a transformer winding in Series with that Wire, you will get free energy from the transformer when the Heater is on. This is because the Current going to the Electric Heater really doesn't care if it goes through 1 Winding of a Low Impedance Transformer on the way to the Heater. The Electric Heater will draw NO additional Wattage.
ONLY qualified Electrical Engineers & Technicians should attempt this. Do this at your own risk!! I am not responsible for injuries or death due to electrical hazards.
Here is an example:
1. Cut 1 Electric Heater Wire in half.
2. Find a Heavy Duty Transformer such as one from a Large Battery Charger.
3. Place the Transformer Secondary Winding in Series with the Cut Wire.
4. Attach the Transformer Primary Winding to a Load such as a Light Bulb.
5. Plug the Electric Heater into the wall.
6. Turn the Electric Heater on.
7. Free energy will be obtained from the Transformer Primary.
.
@Fat Bird
I guess it will not work that way.
The current that feeds the heater is limited by the resistor from that load.
If you connect a transformer in series to to the Load (heater resistor),the summ of the resistance will be increased by
the number of resistace,which cames with the Transformer in to the circuit.
see here:
Both (heater and transformer) are in series in the circuit. The same current is floating in the circuit I=U/R in this case I=U/(R1+R2) R1=Heather R2=TransformerThe Voltage will be splitted because there are 2 resistors now U= U1+U2U1=U-U2 U2=U-U2 .The Current will be the same for each resistor.But now the Power will be different from the beginning.
Thats the way i see it.
But i am Brainwashed .Better one test it out.
helmut
u can't look at it that way. with a second transformer in series, there definitely will be additional load if its secondary is driving something. the overall used power will not increase, but the power to each load will decrease, because the power will split between the two.
Hello Folks,
I think both Helmut and Poynt99 are correct: You place a new load in series with the heater and this new load is transformed if we accept the way this "idea" works as FatBird supposed it with the transformator solution.
However, you are normally metered for the electricity your heater consumes and so you pay for it, right? Why would this be free energy??? By the way such "solution" already was discussed here as a scam (with toroidal core): http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,1933.msg38559.html#msg38559
And the inventor says it works with DC also and normally transformers do not work with DC current... so till we do not hear further and correct info, I stay on the fence...
rgds, Gyula
Quote from: teofilius on April 11, 2008, 02:39:09 PM
The inventor was driving
through rural Georgia and could not help but notice the miles and miles
stretch of high-tension power lines along the highway. He wondered to himself,
"What if I could tap into the varying magnetic field these wires produced to
obtain free energy?"
OK, here is the clue. Would tapping into a varying magnetic field that was a natural offshoot of electrical energy running through high-tension power lines actually cause any extra energy load to be put on those lines? In other words, by tapping into a natural energy field that would be there anyway, maybe there would be no extra load on the electrical system. Sort of like collecting the water from a hose that has a natural leak in it. The hose is going to leak anyway, but what if you caught that water, collected it, and used to to run a small water wheel to produce energy, in a sense you could call it "free" energy because it would be there anyway. I don't know if that analogy really describes what I mean, but it is the best I can think of at the moment.
This is an interesting "out-of-the-box" type of thinking. I am looking forward to more information on this.
Hey Guys:
I thought the same thing when I saw this the other day. I've tried 4 different transformers. even 1 homemade one where 1 wire from the feed to the load was fed through one side of the transformer . I thought there would be no back coupling of the field if it was fed this way. It turns out that you can draw a load off the other winding but no matter how you slice it the field couples back and increases the current on the original feed. Eg. I fed a 1/10 hp induction motor with a straight feed. The current draw was 2.5 amps @ 120volts. Feeding it through 1 leg of several transformers gave a current draw of 1.5 amps but a lot less power. I could stop it with two fingers. The other winding on the transformer gave enough to barley light up a 60 watt light bulb. When you put a load on the motor it causes the light bulb to shine brightly but the amp draw goes to 3.5 amps. The transformer was a 120 to 12 volt in this case. In every one I tried the initial draw would increase when a load was put on it. I think there is something more to this than a plain transformer with unique wiring. Probably on the lines of Thane Heins transformer being discussed in another thread.
Still fooling with this
Vince
I am shure,that there are many secrets hidden in the transformation process.
Just like the BEMF.And in the load seperation as it is done in a Capacitor.
The secret must be a part of both of them .
Most proposing technics employ Coils and Caps.
Thats what we have to think about.
Have a nice day or nice dreams
helmut
I am not sure about this idea i have,
before i start, is back emf from a coil stronger than the original input in wattage terms?
if so, what would happen if its at all possible to capture this BEMF and feed it into a second coil as a drive current, and as it dies off, the second coil will also create BEMF, and then capture this now stronger BEMF and feed it into a 3rd coil as a drive current and then capture the stronger BEMF of the 3rd coil and so on...
is this possible, and could this be a way of amplifying the power?
just a thought, but im not 100% sure about BEMF if it gives more power than the input as im still new to all of this.
@ALL,
irecently went to tampa and having seen this same article somewhere on the internet, i believe it was here but it could have been somewhere else, so i tried calling the number given several times and got no responce at various times. wish i could have gotten ahold of him while i was down there but to no avail. unfortunately structural steel office building jobs don't last but a few weeks and so back to north alabama i went. sorry but i just have to wo0nder about leaveing a contact number in a press release, and not having anyone to answer the phones ever. this one still makes me wonder. more work coming up in florida again next month maybe i can check him again. but this has been floating around for alot longer than the newly dated press release, however it is definitely the same information and contact info with no one around.
lol
sam
Hi Everyone,
This is Douglas, the Duplicator inventor.
Thanks you Wattsup for inviting me. I will try to answer as many questions as I can.
However, at the time of my press release, my project was only within the scientific stage(exploring and refining this new science), now I am in the engineering stage (establishing preferred designs).
Unfortunately I cannot get too technical at this time. Sorry for the phone calls... It is better to contact me via email.
The Duplicator Series consist of;
Merger Duplicator
Resonator Duplicator
Isolator Duplicator
As for "the missin link" this involve the removal of the ferromagnetic core from efficient electromagnetic induction.
Wattsup, thanks again...... lets talk free energy.
Hi Douglas,
Thanks very much for coming on this forum, we appreciate that.
You know what we want: as much information as you can possibly give us. So we are all ears.
Thanks ahead of time for your efforts.
Hi Douglas!
Welcome to OU.COM!
QuoteAs for "the missing link" this involve the removal of the ferromagnetic core from efficient electromagnetic induction.
Anything you could talk about would be great. At what point are you in the patent/development stage of your tech?
QuoteMerger Duplicator
Resonator Duplicator
Isolator Duplicator
Are these three separate circuits or one circuit that does all three things?
All the best,
Dan
Hi Douglas
welcome to the group and thanks for comming.
Can you please tell us if your invention resembles anything near to Steven Marks TPU ?
Hello Douglas
Welcome .
Be a part of our community.
Please share with us ,as we share with others.
Until now ,we have many ideas,how a free energy mashine might be working.
But to be realistic: If there where some inventor with a good and useable device,he
was leaving as soon as he or she appered.
So please dont waste time.If it is a simple sketch or whatever.
As long as it shows a way to construct a circuit,that ends up in a proofable hardware,
please post and show it now.
It might be not a bad idea,you log in as a new Member and post your input from a
public internet connection and dont use a credit card to pay for the place.
Post all at once,and the dark forces will not be able to get you by the boles.
Meanwhile we can discuss and proof the new available Information.
By this way you will stay cleen,and we have no reason to worry about your savety.
Nice to have you here.
helmut
Has anyone heard more on this invention?
Bill
Quote from: DougieResearch on April 16, 2008, 02:10:36 PM
Hi Everyone,
This is Douglas, the Duplicator inventor.
Thanks you Wattsup for inviting me. I will try to answer as many questions as I can.
Great to have you here Douglas. I have a few questions, if you don't mind. :)
QuoteHowever, at the time of my press release, my project was only within the scientific stage(exploring and refining this new science), now I am in the engineering stage (establishing preferred designs).
Unfortunately I cannot get too technical at this time. Sorry for the phone calls... It is better to contact me via email.
The Duplicator Series consist of;
Merger Duplicator
Resonator Duplicator
Isolator Duplicator
As for "the missin link" this involve the removal of the ferromagnetic core from efficient electromagnetic induction.
Hmm that's interesting, I have been thinking along this line for a while now, to use an air core instead of a ferromagnetic one...
But I can't really find clear descriptions on the terms "merger duplicator", "resonator duplicator" or "isolator duplicator"...
I'm assuming you are talking about specific types of voltage multipliers?
Can you please provide some info on what exactly you mean when referring to those "duplicators"?
Sorry but I do not believe we will get anymore info on this press release.
No response to my emails after two weeks.
I called the phone number... Guess what ....No longer in service.
Maybe the MIB got him.
It sounded to good to be true.
Bill
Sorry Everyone,
Maybe it was my BREATH that chased him away?. :-[ :-\ :-X :-[ :-\
This is one is for skeptics.For people who have contempt prior investigation.Don't want to do the math.Suck off other peoples gray-matter.Look at a Atomic Bomb, Clearly Overunity.Marx Generator,Tesla's Black Box 1932 Buffalo New York(Made A Car Run).Radio Tubes.Antennas,then you have Nuclear Multipliers.Scalar Waves,Photomultiplyers,Solar Cells.Tesla Switch,.Norm Wooton's Generator.(Then there is My Generators).I can attest all of these work!Cold fusion,Destructive Waves.Anti-Gravity,HOJO Permanant Magnet Motor.Regards Andy McQuerry
Well for those interested, I think I may have figured out what douglas meant with
his cryptic statements on "duplicators"...
It came to me when thinking about the caduceus, which I have been for the past week or two.
I had just figured out how an ancient mesopotamian caduceus depiction can be interpreted
as a possible over unity "scalar" amplifier, and was mentally drawing a diagram for a practical
version when the similarities between the elements described so vaguely by Douglas and the
characteristic elements in the diagram struck me.
Alright, now bare with me as this is a bit of mental freewheeling ;)
I am going to describe a setup and then try to point out the "duplicator" elements.
First, we take a primary and a secondary transformer coil, and an air core. Say coils are
1:1 so output of primary coil A should be output of secondary coil B if the core were an efficient
flux path (so if the core were not an air core but a ferromagnetic core).
Then, we take another coil that is identical to coil B, and wind it inside, over, or into coil B,
so the total of "secondaries" is now two coils: coil B and coil C. Again, if the core were
100% efficient, output of coil B + coil C should equal input coil A.
Now, and here's a trick, we take coil C and make a simple LC circuit with coil C as the
selfinductor L. Preferably, the input pulses or alternations at A should match the 'resonant'
frequency of this LC circuit.
Now, when input is fed to coil A, induced current in both coils B and C should amount to
half that input energy; coil B outputs half of coil A's input, coil C picks up an equal amount
of energy and starts oscillating the charges back and forth inside its circuit.
The LC circuit is now fed energy and can accumulate this energy untill it has reached
self-oscillation, at which point it will oscillate at the same frequency as that of coil A.
It no longer needs to be "pumped" by coil A, it does so all on its own, with only a fraction
of the coil A energy needed to periodically "top up" the system (to compensate for resistance
losses). Almost all of the energy fed into coil A can now be output by coil B, because
coil C is now at full energy and resonant oscillation and needs hardly any energy to keep
oscillating. So far so good, an efficient air-core harmonic oscillating transformer.
Already we can recognise elements that can be called a "splitter duplicator": the input of
coil A is "split" and divided over the two coils B and C.
Due to the self-induction effect using the air core, current reversal and discharging of the
LC circuit capacitors is not instantaneous. This allows for a little time to use the selfinduced
current in such a circuit. Perhaps enough time to allow a capacitor based voltage multiplier
to generate a double voltage. (During the selfinductive phase pure capacitance can seperate
charges of a double capacitor layer. I see this may be too vague, may make drawing.)
Let us just assume we can use a voltage multiplier based on capacitance during the selfinductive
phase, so that when the induction stops and current reversal begins, which results in a
reversed magnetic field, not only the originally oscillated charges in the LC system are discharged,
but also these newly created charges from the voltage multiplier are added; all in all
this would result in double the charge flowing throught the inductor coil, and that should result
in double the output at coil B.
Here we have the "multiplier duplicator" element: a capacitive volatge multiplier literally multiplying
the initial energy of the LC circuit.
And the "merger duplicator" is then obviously the function where the flux of both coil A and coil C
is received by coil B, thus merging the output of coils A and C into a single output of coil B.
There you have it, my idea of a possible interpretation of the "duplicator" circuit.
We have all the elements Douglas mentioned:
- splitter 'duplicator', (actually inductive splitting of input current into two components)
- multiplier 'duplicator', (actually capacitive multiplication of voltage in the LC circuit)
- merger 'duplicator', (actually inductive merging of two input currents into one current)
- air-core transformer (actually selfinductive LC circuit)
How do you guys like that one? ;) ;D
Reactions are welcome :D
Kind regards,
Koen
Koen,!!!!!!!!!!! Is this the famos KoneHead ????????If so this is Andy you introduced me to Mike Windell we met at the 2000 Energy Conventionin Dallas. I like your Idea of the recirculating reminds me of a (***Marx Generator***)!Because of the different transformers which serve as several amplifiers,transformers can be used instead of radio tubes, they used 2 or more transformers to do the amplifing action in old radio and audio circuits.Old electronic book I have, something like 1962.You can ;D hook the transformers up just like the Marx generators.(Marx Generators are O.U.) Hope this helps Regards Andy
To Infringer and all:
If you are looking for cheap wire, try a metal recycling yard. You can usually buy whatever they have at the yard for what they pay someone to recycle it or what they are paid by someone else. I just scrapped some material and they have boxes of wire, all types, throughout the place. It is even cheaper if it still has its casing on it.
Mark
Quote from: 1tesla01 on May 03, 2008, 03:09:43 PM
Koen,!!!!!!!!!!! Is this the famos KoneHead ????????
No, sorry Andy, I am not the KoneHead. "Koen" is not an anagram for "kone", it is my first name. (It's Dutch, can't help it ;))
QuoteI like your Idea of the recirculating reminds me of a (***Marx Generator***)!Because of the different transformers which serve as several amplifiers,transformers can be used instead of radio tubes, they used 2 or more transformers to do the amplifing action in old radio and audio circuits.
Yes, indeed, that is a somewhat similar setup, it seems. :)
QuoteOld electronic book I have, something like 1962.You can ;D hook the transformers up just like the Marx generators.(Marx Generators are O.U.)
:) I like to read old electrophysics books too, preferable from 1900-1960, they often have
very interesting ways of describing things. Plus they often contain info that is nowhere to be found in modern study books.
QuoteHope this helps Regards Andy
Well it's certainly some interesting input. Thanks Andy! :D
(https://overunityarchives.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.geocities.com%2Fjayneanastasia%2FBanner2.jpg&hash=d1814d372d57c5447405752382a83402b36e2688)
Yeah... It's real... How can we not believe Douglas O'Keefe ... I mean.. He is a freaking movies star!!
;D
Rasta
and rastas are famous for being OU specialists? ;)
Quote from: Koen1 on July 07, 2008, 07:08:19 AM
and rastas are famous for being OU specialists? ;)
My comment was merely for entertainment purposes.. My apologies to you Koen1, if you found my slightly self-indulging humour offensive.
And I did a little research on the guy.. Found nothing other than the fact he has a common name with a B class actor, which means absolutely nothing and everything.
Rasta
Oh no, nothing of the sort, and if I offended you then I apologise as well. :)
I haven't been able to find anything about the guy either,
but I doubt he is a B actor. ;) lol
He is being suspiciously quiet though... ;)
Indeed he is.. And the funny part is "Dougie" Research Corp? I mean.. Anyone here with the name Douglas would be able to tell you they do no like being called dougie.. Well I would think not.. Might be wrong. ;D
Greetings,
Interesting post, as this inventor was interested in Transformers... which is the partly the subject of my Magnetic Permeability Thread.
He apparently looked at a power line one day and wondered if he could tap into the changing magnetic field to get some free energy.
Now, according to the people who say waves act like gears...tapping into the power line wave's energy means that somebody has to' buy lunch.'
Meaning that the generators at the power plant would be aware that somebody was tapping in.
I went boating a week ago, and a speed boat rushed past.
We bounced up and down as a result of the wake from that boat.
Tell me what in God's name could we do with a wave at that point to stop the speed boat???
The answer is NOTHING... waves are not gears.
The Observer
Hi Observer
I find your simple, yet interesting observations worthy of some thought,in a similar vane,I think,if a stone is dropped into a pond,waves radiant out,the stone doesn't care or know how many corks are going up and down with the ripples,if they were small generators they would make some juice,but the energy needed to drop the stone is not increased.
Also,what is happening in this situation,a 60watt light bulb is on in a room,the walls are covered with solar cells making some juice from the light given off by the bulb,the room will not be darker,and the bulb doesn't draw any more energy.What is happening I have no idea.
happy hunting.
peter
Lo all,
Dumb question time:
Logic sez that putting a transformer in series with the load is not the way to go. Remember in electronics 101, we were taught that putting resistors in series was different to putting them in parallel or something like that....(Soooo long ago)
What about wrapping a coil around the supply lead to the "heater"..note one lead is the supply,the other is the return.
That way we could create an inductive current using the magnetic flux and not place any additional load on the circuit.
Like I said...dumb question
Later
Gary Frank
Peter,
Thanks for comment.
I have been beating this drum for awhile with little notice.
You said,
"if a stone is dropped into a pond, waves radiant out, the stone doesn't care or know how many corks are going up and down with the ripples"
I say Brilliant.
I mention this in my Magnetic Permeability thread, cept I talk about leaves in the water moving as a result of the stone entering the water.
I also like your solar cell example and will most probably use it at some point to explain this concept to someone.
Thank you.
Now build a device that utilizes Magnetic Permeability, which amplifies the magnetic field (a core in a coil).
Also add an Electromagnetic Cavity Resonator and a Resonant Circuit.
And you have one hell of a wavemade from a very small stone...
and a device that would make Tesla smile.
This is the subject of the Magnetic Permeability Thread.
Look for it, and check it out.
The Observer
Hi Observer
Thanks for your comments,I'm afraid you lost me with" Also add an Electromagnetic Cavity Resonator and a Resonant Circuit" I tend to think of things in much more simplistic terms.
I think the "secret" is to find ways were the input,the stone,is not aware of the output,the cork.
Your coil and iron core is an example,in fact as far as I know the coil uses less energy but the magnetism is far greater, but needs to be taken further.
If flux could be induced into iron,with a delay,there would be no lenz effect on the coil around the iron,it's all in the delay,IMHO.I think I'm in the wrong thread,I'll post in yours in future
happy hunting
peter
.
;)
Dougie,
You still around? I thought the MIB got to you.
How is apparatus/invention doing? Does it only work near power lines as others have said?
Bill
Quote from: therealrasta on July 10, 2008, 12:57:29 AM
Indeed he is.. And the funny part is "Dougie" Research Corp? I mean.. Anyone here with the name Douglas would be able to tell you they do no like being called dougie.. Well I would think not.. Might be wrong. ;D
I will agree with that.
test
Quote from: infringer on April 12, 2008, 12:32:09 AM
Poynt99 you sure are bitter you must just be tired of all the free energy scams out there...
Anyhow the story also here:
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m4PRN/is_2008_Feb_4/ai_n24246751
There may be a bigger scam with that article above or not?
Clicking on the link gives a broken link error message. In effect, the page doesn't exist.
A conspiracy? There's lots of them out there.
--Lee