the pattend GK posted 8)
http://www.pat2pdf.org/patents/pat390721.pdf
this is a builders thred i will start the transformer today ...
i will post my pics and all are welcome to post there work here too :)
ist
What is built must driven...
--giantkiller.
yes mast see the pdf sheme yes that sheme is from ,< fathere and master of elktrics >
yes inovattin @ lets <start that slepy kics >
lets beagean SPIN whit vortex>
THE FIRST HAS BORN <DIRECKT COURENTS THEN LATER <AC >
HMM NOW THE S.M IS BACK THE TIME 100 YEARS NOW WE MAST MAKE
DIRECKT COURENTS >
:)
POSITIVE VIBRATIONS I SEE HERE MAST KEEP GOING WHIT <HOPE > TO MAKE DC
VOTAGE WHIT NO MOVING PARTS<
FINALY IS GET REAL WAY TO GO TO MAKE DC VOLTAGE <DINAMO > BUT NOW WHITOUT ROTOR INSAID >
WHAT WHILL NOW WHILL SPIN SOMETHING INVISIABLE HMMMMMMMMMMmm
like
Steven Mark say .........<<takes time to slow down like jet engine turbine > when is turn out that small permanent magnet ;)
lets say you have one small magnet and move fast like gun bulit clouse some wire
IS NOT IMPORTANT THE HOW IS STRONG MAG. BUT SPEED IS IMPORTANT
BIG PROBLEM HOW TO SPIN ELKTRONES IN WIRE <HOW TO SPIN IN ONE DIRECTION THE INSAID ELKTRONES IN THE WIRE
THAT ELKTRONES IS CAPTURE IN OWN STRUCTURE IS NOT FREE TO SPIN
MAST BE REALEAST THAT ELKTRONES AND THEN WE BE ABLE TO DOING WHAT WE WHANT
THE FREE ELKTRONES IS EASY TO SPIN TYHE INSAID ELKTRONES IS HARD TO SPIN IN ONE DIRECTION
the main part of this is the transformer here he teaches us how to convert hv re to useable output....
i finished a 6 " 50' reel of garden wire wound as a core from dollarramma for 1 buck and i then seperated it into 4 with 4 zip ties then i wound my tuned wires on it i used 11.3 grams of 22 ga for my first primary .. and 2' of 14ga romex as my secondary ... they both weignh 11.3 grams each then the next coil is 24 ga the same 11.3 grams the one after that is agin 11.3 grams of 28ga... and the last coil is 22 ga bifillar and 14 ga romex bilillar....
just if you all wonder why i did this it is simple .... i want to know what is the best gage to use and the best fit for the size of the ring ...
also i wanted a test tranny to play with ...
i am building right away another 1 or 2 ;) i will stick with 10 grams for ease of mesurements ... in future 6 " coils i will use 28 ga primaries....
i will post a pic when my batteries are recharged for my cam
ist
here is my transformer i just wound....
i numbered the wire gages
ist
:)
ok so in thinking about this transformer i just made it seams in my mind anyways it will not get hot wile in operation i could be wrong but if it is cold engery flying throught my primaries witch are the higher gage wires as the pattend indicates... then it will convert the cold engery to magnetic engery and and will be transfered to the secondary if it is wired as showen in the pattend then it may well rotate wile in operation...
from hv plused dc or cap discharge or spark gap...
tesla also states some where that plused ac or dc of hv can be used ....
@gk i guess you were done your build longggg b4 i started duh! silly me im a hard learner lol
at all the rest that have finished long ago ..... laughf at me and with me cuz i laugh at my self once agin lol
i wasent gonna say this but i decided to ...
there was a thunderstorm here today ... i saw the biggest lightning strike i ever saw in my life today.... it is better than this yet .. i was not at the time at home but close by and i saw the strike from where i was i could of swore it hit the house .... but i was told a bright blue flash of lite flew across my table to the window in the liveing room at the time of the strike ....
just all to strange .. and it makes me wonder
so this will conclude my research on the tpu
for the record im still broke and i dont have a properly working tpu but i will work at it and im sure over time the device will teach me ....
peace ist :)
It seems to me that 390721 is very much two inventions put together.
I wonder if it would be better to separate them, and study them
apart.
Paul.
Re: the above post - I've got this wrong. This is a motor with a toroidal
power supply unit as its stator, isn't it?
@All & special attn to Paul-R
Look at Tesla patent #381,970
http://www.keelynet.com/tesla/00381970.pdf (http://www.keelynet.com/tesla/00381970.pdf)
If you look at the "transformer" in 390,721 then compare it to the device of 381,970, you notice that they are one and the same device.
There is one difference between the two..... notice and compare in particular the connections of each. I find this as interesting, as I just noticed it myself. The manner of inter-coil connection differs between the two, yet for an almost identical application between the two patents. Peculiar.
Both are rotating field devices, Usable as "transformers" (both patents) or as a dynamo (patent 381,970) with rotating powered stator windings AND external rotating field. ("generator" picture top of patent, same device).
I call the device in 390,721 the "Tesla TPU" for a reason.
Many things can be deduced about this device.
1. It is A.C. (as clearly stated in both patents)
2. It creates and utilizes a rotating magnetic field (both patents)
3. It is inherently a versatile operation device (as demonstrated by the use of said in "generator" example)
4. Power take off may be either high voltage/low current or high current/low voltage for either carbon arc lamps or regular lighting (see 381,970)
5. Drive element (primary) is ALWAYS the finer wire of many turns - low current winding (both patents), no matter no 4 above. (both patents)
6. The secondary is heavier gauge or "coarser" wire of few turns. (both patents), NOTE: this makes sense for high current low voltage, but not for high voltage low current use.
7. These units DO NOT WORK OFF OF NORMAL TRANSFORMER ACTION (See note 6 above, and read 381,970 carefully), they operate off of the rotating field.
8. The units are iron core (both patents)
9. Construction shape may vary (both patents)
Something to think about.
Paul Andrulis
The Tesla device referenced is just a rotating magnetic field transformer. Clever, but no magic.
@Grumpy
I respectfully have to state that I disagree with your statement both utterly and completely, and that it demonstrates a complete lack of understanding of this device, or the inventors own statements concerning said device.
Occam's razor, the inventors own descriptions, and device design demonstrate that the original TPU is nothing but a "rotating field transformer" as well. No hard evidence to the contrary has been provided by anyone to the contrary.
Lengthy posts, hotly debated arguments, assumptions more than can be counted, concepts from every quarter from scientific to practically magic have been put forth by many, yes. No hard evidence whatsoever. Self determined "experts" out the keaster, yes, but no actual replications of the "SM" device as mentioned. Other devices of other geometries put forth by other supposed self-determined experts are NOT replications of the SM device. (Yes I include the much vaunted, somewhat diefied, Spherics in this statement. His device is NOT an SM device.)
Let's cover spherics for a second. He comes in. CLAIMS to be an assistant of SM. CLAIMS he knows how SM built his early units. Claims he has a more advanced design. HOWEVER, HE CANNOT REPLICATE THE ORIGINAL DESIGN!
(Which demonstrates he lied somewhere, as you cannot advance a design, without understanding the original.)
This should have been a red flag for everyone concerned, but amazingly enough, he has gained his own elitist faction, which practically think him as the SM God, and themselves reigning experts.
(Yes I do know much more than you think about this, about fancy codes and secret e-mails, and NO, I am neither impressed nor interested. These guys have already taken their "blue pills", so to speak. I have no intention of spouting off about details so these guy's "secret" {gag} is safe.... I know where they are coming from and why, and also know that their "God", knowingly or not, is trying to kill them off slowly, or did they forget that RE kills?)
Paul Andrulis
Quote from: pauldude000 on August 13, 2008, 04:47:03 PM
@Grumpy
I respectfully have to state that I disagree with your statement both utterly and completely, and that it demonstrates a complete lack of understanding of this device, or the inventors own statements concerning said device.
Paul Andrulis
Then you are foolish. Go ahead and build it - then you will see for yourself.
By the way, Tesla authored a very extensive article on "polyphase" devices that explains this device in more detail - I'll see if I can locate it - in this article, Tesla supports my statement with his own words. I believe it was prior to 1892, when he started to persue other things.
I don't know why so many are reading so much into Tesla's patents that just isn't there. Actually I have a good suspician of "why" and do not hold it against anyone - and I commend the strength of thier influence - bastards.
Carry these patents into a cave or underground for a while and you'll see what I'm talking about.
@Grumpy
Some very good points, and one EXTREMELY good question.
QuoteI don't know why so many are reading so much into Tesla's patents that just isn't there.
Very good question. The problem is that this is coming from all sides. People see a carbon arc or a light bulb in a schematic, and assume RE because of the archaic symbol used. Many people see capacitive plates and insert spark gaps in their mind. Many read his patents and assume they are in full understanding of both what he states and also of what his diagrams portray.
They interpret these thing through their own understandings, world-view, and desires, and could care less about Teslas understandings, world-view, and desires. Therefore, to these people, his words and drawings will remain just that, words and drawings.
Occam's razor tells me that your suspicions are probably right, but not to applied to the right people, or to the proper extent. But then again, you may be simply invoking and ancient principle, of "holding your friends close, but your enemies closer". (Seek out those who intend you harm. Just a hint. Also remember the fate of Julius.)
Paul Andrulis
Quote from: pauldude000 on August 13, 2008, 06:05:14 PM
@Grumpy
Some very good points, and one EXTREMELY good question.
Very good question. The problem is that this is coming from all sides. People see a carbon arc or a light bulb in a schematic, and assume RE because of the archaic symbol used. Many people see capacitive plates and insert spark gaps in their mind. Many read his patents and assume they are in full understanding of both what he states and also of what his diagrams portray.
They interpret these thing through their own understandings, world-view, and desires, and could care less about Teslas understandings, world-view, and desires. Therefore, to these people, his words and drawings will remain just that, words and drawings.
Occam's razor tells me that your suspicions are probably right, but not to applied to the right people, or to the proper extent. But then again, you may be simply invoking and ancient principle, of "holding your friends close, but your enemies closer". (Seek out those who intend you harm. Just a hint. Also remember the fate of Julius.)
Paul Andrulis
Exactly! Hey, wait a minute...we are on the same frequency - hmm - let's wait and see if it passes.
Not only are the symbols "open to interpretation", but the terminology is as well, so you really got to take a hard open-mined look.
Tesla explains the reason's for a device in his patents and then explains how they operate - who are we to add to that?
I believe that the really good stuff came later and was not patented - remember Tesla's "Bolts of Thor" and his "Death Ray"? - ever see a pattent for those? He even states in interviews when he is like 60 that the magnifier's arrangement was how this was accomplished at the time. He kept experimenting until he died. Not every device he ever invented works on RE principles. Tesla did not even discover the effect until around 1892 - give or take.
What is really dissapointing is that in the efforts of people to find answers and understand things in their own ways - they often over-complicate simple concepts becasue of preconditioning and erronious beliefs that are not their own. They throw in particles and parts of Einstein's theories, and everything else - including the kitchen sink.
Production of RE is fairly simple to explain and achieve if you pay attention. The park gap that I showed is the first half - the excitation by unidirectional impulses. The second half is just a coil of high self-induction and low self-capacitance. Then there are modifications of this. this is what Tesla first used a gap and a coil. A tuned (resonant) coupled coil system can not approach what is possible with a magnifier, but it can drive one.
If you really want to hear some good ones - ask people to explain the magnification mechanism of the coil of high self-induction.
@Grumpy
I understand completely. You know what my RE "detector" is? My hand.... (may sound stupid, but true.)
For instance, I was messing with the base drive system of my replication of EM's device, adjusting the frequency trimmer pot, when my hand started to "prickle" sting. I checked with my scope probes, and sure enough, the trannies emitter signal was going ape. I am starting to wonder if the effect is coming from the npn junction itself, in that negatively biasing the p junction is making some form of a N(PN)N effect. Basically the effect of the transistor, amplified by the coils. I dont know, just guessing.
It frustrates me that there is entirely too much cr** where we end up "just guessing".... Grrrrrr.....
It also frustrates me when guesses are treated as truth. (Physics in general, including the professional, amature, "inventors", and "new" idealists. This seems to be a common HUMAN thing.)
Paul Andrulis
Quote from: pauldude000 on August 13, 2008, 08:00:36 PM
@Grumpy
I understand completely. You know what my RE "detector" is? My hand.... (may sound stupid, but true.)
For instance, I was messing with the base drive system of my replication of EM's device, adjusting the frequency trimmer pot, when my hand started to "prickle" sting. I checked with my scope probes, and sure enough, the trannies emitter signal was going ape. I am starting to wonder if the effect is coming from the npn junction itself, in that negatively biasing the p junction is making some form of a N(PN)N effect. Basically the effect of the transistor, amplified by the coils. I dont know, just guessing.
It frustrates me that there is entirely too much cr** where we end up "just guessing".... Grrrrrr.....
It also frustrates me when guesses are treated as truth. (Physics in general, including the professional, amature, "inventors", and "new" idealists. This seems to be a common HUMAN thing.)
Paul Andrulis
The hand has long been an easy detector - just keep it out of any nasty field action. I have found several references - some dating back almost 100 years even - that connect our nervous system to the aether - that is to say that it is popularly believed that our nervous system is not entirely based on electromagnetism. So, don't take any chances.
Next time you get the prickly stuff, take a cap, add a wire to each leg about 10 feet long - you can roll them up but keep from shorting, and charge to 45v give or take a few. If you are stimulating the "medium" where the wires are positioned - the voltage of the cap will slowly rise - look up the Rontgen Effect - change in dielectric between opposite charges produces a current - "medium" is a dielectric - that simple.
Another thing that makes Tesla and other's work hard to understand is attempting to apply what they were doing to anther purpose - like applying Tesla's magnifier technology to the TPU - distantly similar but not the same thing. Tesla was transmitting energy to other places - not making a TPU. Perhaps he made a similar device later in his life.
In the end, you have to ask yourself what you want. Is it communication with distant worlds? an electric car without batteries? freedom from utilities? better lighting at little or no cost? a flying craft that reverses gravity? high motive force in a small package with little input energy?
All of these things are related. You just have to be willing to travel down a road that few ever tread, where the answers have to be found and are not readily understood, and where blind faith and intuition is, more often than not, your guide.
What do you want, Paul?
EDIT:
Correction it is called the "Rontgen current" - not "effect" (also spelled Roentgen)
EDIT-2:
Correct spelling is: "R?ntgen current"
I came across this very interesting commentary on globalization and the new world order power struggles emerging, as I'm trying to understand what the Russians are doing in Georgia. Very interesting perspectives !
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=6365
@Grumpy
QuoteIn the end, you have to ask yourself what you want. Is it communication with distant worlds? an electric car without batteries? freedom from utilities? better lighting at little or no cost? a flying craft that reverses gravity? high motive force in a small package with little input energy?
Good question, "What do I want...."
As to your list;
1. I have no desire to communicate with other worlds. (Don't know anyone there.)
2. Electric car without batteries... (Sounds good to me, though I don't care if it has a small battery in it.)
3. Better lighting at little or no cost... (Sure)
4. freedom from utilities... (You hit the nail right on the head. Main Goal.)
5. Flying craft that reverses gravity... (I am afraid of heights.)
6. High motive force in a small package with little input energy..... (Sure. Would be handy.)
I have come across some effects I call "interesting". However, this is just a personal reaction.
My first goal, which I am close to completion, is to understanding exactly why SM's device works,
therefore not killing myself or others in the process.
Goal 2 is to replicate said device, which is the easy part with understanding.
Goal 3 is to make it completely safe, as much as is possible with K.I.S.S. safety devices.
Goal 4 is to improve upon the design and work out all bugs.
Goal 5 is to simplify the design, and increase its efficiency, as simple is reliable. Less parts and functions, less that WILL go wrong. (something ALWAYS breaks down eventually.)
What is worse, these goals are ALL attainable, so long as I attack them in order. I could, quite literally, "replicate till I drop" with absolutely no success. These five goals pretty much guarantee success.
Each goal, by the way, is a "main goal" in itself, with little "attainable" goals like ducks in a row to achieve the main goal, or maybe more like a program flow chart......
After the TPU? I don't know, probably the Steven Meyers H
2O system for vehicles. (I will have electricity for heat, etc...) I am not EVEN interested in the "nasty" stuff. I will not say wea*ons, for obvious reasons.
Concerning patent 381,970, build this device, and ignore the example A.C. generator. Build a 10w Tesla Coil and separate from the secondary using capacitive plates........... You get the drift. Then you can tell me 381,970 is a toy... ;D (You will find out why it is titled "System Of Electrical Distribution", and not "An Improvement in Transformer Technology".)
By the way, the working "headpiece" of the *****ray WAS patented. I tripped across it. I would not have even looked at this patent otherwise, but I came across a reference from Tesla to the patent somewhere, (I believe his autobiography but am not sure), and checked out the patent, which had a mild innocuous title. The simplicity is stunning. The product.................. (That boys imagination was a dangerous thing.)
Paul Andrulis
Quote from: pauldude000 on August 14, 2008, 12:06:50 AM
@Grumpy
Good question, "What do I want...."
As to your list;
2. Electric car without batteries... (Sounds good to me, though I don't care if it has a small battery in it.)
3. Better lighting at little or no cost... (Sure)
4. freedom from utilities... (You hit the nail right on the head. Main Goal.)
6. High motive force in a small package with little input energy..... (Sure. Would be handy.)
My first goal, which I am close to completion, is to understanding exactly why SM's device works,
therefore not killing myself or others in the process.
Goal 2 is to replicate said device, which is the easy part with understanding.
Goal 3 is to make it completely safe, as much as is possible with K.I.S.S. safety devices.
Goal 4 is to improve upon the design and work out all bugs.
Goal 5 is to simplify the design, and increase its efficiency, as simple is reliable. Less parts and functions, less that WILL go wrong. (something ALWAYS breaks down eventually.)
What is worse, these goals are ALL attainable, so long as I attack them in order. I could, quite literally, "replicate till I drop" with absolutely no success. These five goals pretty much guarantee success.
Each goal, by the way, is a "main goal" in itself, with little "attainable" goals like ducks in a row to achieve the main goal, or maybe more like a program flow chart......
After the TPU? I don't know, probably the Steven Meyers H2O system for vehicles. (I will have electricity for heat, etc...) I am not EVEN interested in the "nasty" stuff. I will not say wea*ons, for obvious reasons.
Concerning patent 381,970, build this device, and ignore the example A.C. generator. Build a 10w Tesla Coil and separate from the secondary using capacitive plates........... You get the drift. Then you can tell me 381,970 is a toy... ;D (You will find out why it is titled "System Of Electrical Distribution", and not "An Improvement in Transformer Technology".)
By the way, the working "headpiece" of the *****ray WAS patented. I tripped across it. I would not have even looked at this patent otherwise, but I came across a reference from Tesla to the patent somewhere, (I believe his autobiography but am not sure), and checked out the patent, which had a mild innocuous title. The simplicity is stunning. The product.................. (That boys imagination was a dangerous thing.)
Paul Andrulis
Are you trying to say that 381,970 runs with gain? If so, I'd like to see that.
Freedom from util-ies - and an electric auto - let's look at that a minute:
about 5kw to run your home = 1 unit a 5kw
about 20kw to run a car at a decent pace = 4 units at 5 kw
straight out of the gate - our energy needs are great and we have a hard row to hoe (old farm saying) - fiddling around with a few watts is a long way from Oz.
I still think that first order of business is to either see the "kick" or to see "magnification" - which are related. This anomoly is in the realm of the unidirectional impulse and the dielectric.
If you looked up the Roentgen Current - you see this is forgotten in history. TEsla mentined once that Sommerfeld had written a triatise that proved he was correct.
So, we can either take the bifilar with iron delay approach - and I thnk we need several feet of iron wire and patience to trim it - or we go straight to the coil of high-self-induction and excite it.
Take your pick and let's get to work - we are not getting any younger.
;D ;D ;D
@"System Of Electrical Distribution",
He's not talking about going down a wire. The bucking operation creates huge 'potential' spikes. We like to call RE. That is how the patents are connected in the background and not lines on paper.
--giantkiller.
In patent 381970, it reads
" Besides the currents generated in the secondary coils by dynamo-magnetic induction other currents will be set up in the same coils in consequence of any variations in the intensity of the poles on ring A (the core). This should be avoided by maintaining the intensity of the poles constant, to accomplish which care should be taken in designing and proportioning the generator and in distributing the coils in the ring A and balancing their effect. When this is done, the currents are produced by dynamo-magnetic induction only, the same result being obtained as though the the poles were shifted by a commutator with an infinite number of segments. "
Now what are these other currents that should be avoided?
What happens if you don't maintain the intensity? Is it dangerous?
I think I read somewhere SM mentioning AC plus hash. Is this the hash?
Quote from: the badger on August 24, 2008, 10:15:20 PM
In patent 381970, it reads
" Besides the currents generated in the secondary coils by dynamo-magnetic induction other currents will be set up in the same coils in consequence of any variations in the intensity of the poles on ring A (the core). This should be avoided by maintaining the intensity of the poles constant, to accomplish which care should be taken in designing and proportioning the generator and in distributing the coils in the ring A and balancing their effect. When this is done, the currents are produced by dynamo-magnetic induction only, the same result being obtained as though the the poles were shifted by a commutator with an infinite number of segments. "
Now what are these other currents that should be avoided?
What happens if you don't maintain the intensity? Is it dangerous?
I think I read somewhere SM mentioning AC plus hash. Is this the hash?
You got it, bud!
The idea is to maintain a perfectly even magnetic field so that at the rotational speed with the concentric fields the flux crosses the inductor at a calculated distribution. Smooth potential. Spurious fluxations represent a change in speed i.e spikes. This higher energy can affect the process. This also can create dead zones in your output. We want one type of continous controlled vector alignment. Think Hubbard coil, Hamel, Searl.
My 390721x3layer is a radius of 4 inches. Thank God for that. The more mass with equal level rise in energy would have been shear catastophy at the human level. I want to do what Tesla did and not experience getting blown off my feet or RE bullets flying through my space.
Check the Chris Angel video where he shorts the T-coil to ground through a chain mail suite. They show the T-coil on the generator chasis. They used 1/2 inch copper tubing for the pancake primary with a wind diameter of 4 feet. At that potential and field density his ankles were conductors. In other words, the insulator in the chain mail suite diminished in diameter to 4 inches. The magnetic field saw the chain mail and human flesh as one conductor. And being at a distance of 5-6 inches (ankle height) just above ground puts the conduction path in phase. He broke his foot from the kinetic hit. Similar to the shock at the end of one wire.
Idiot. Thats like wrapping yourself in aluminum foil thinking you can play with the marshmallows in the campfire.
--giantkiller. Think about it.
Hello you wonderful friends of Free Energy
Now it seems its on its way
Here is the new fuel cell that converts to electricity without any moving parts - no machinery free electricity
http://www.genepax.co.jp/en/mechanism/system.html (http://www.genepax.co.jp/en/mechanism/system.html)
Genepax is the name of a small electric car that runs with these new cells.Amazing if this works
Hello,
it's clear that a rotating magnetic field with a lot of speed, will cause some kind of gravitomagnetic effect and energy generation. Since 2 years I follow people who are trying to replicate that SM thing.
It is clear for that:
1. Rotational magnetic field with very high speed of electrons causes this effect.
2. A lot of high voltage is need for the first start of this device, I don't think 12v is enough, 100v or much.
3. At least three magnetic pulse, i mean vertical magnetic coils.
4. For the output, there should be a very high quality regulator which will collect some energy for back feeding.
Unfortunately, so many people replicated this device, have tested it with a very low input voltage on coils, it is better to use very high voltages around 100v and 200v to test it, than a reasonable kick can be seen.
One of overunity threads, I have seen an old TV schematic, which has a toroidal shape, TPU like unit at the center, But I can't find it again. If some body has can you send it?
A small note: Tesla used lamps during their tests. We are still using transistors, MOSFETs? Those devices are slow comparing to lamps. I think Lindsay had a good reason why she tells this thing.
Quote from: redstone64 on December 02, 2008, 09:24:13 AM
Hello,
it's clear that a rotating magnetic field with a lot of speed, will cause some kind of gravitomagnetic effect and energy generation. Since 2 years I follow people who are trying to replicate that SM thing.
It is clear for that:
1. Rotational magnetic field with very high speed of electrons causes this effect.
2. A lot of high voltage is need for the first start of this device, I don't think 12v is enough, 100v or much.
3. At least three magnetic pulse, i mean vertical magnetic coils.
4. For the output, there should be a very high quality regulator which will collect some energy for back feeding.
Unfortunately, so many people replicated this device, have tested it with a very low input voltage on coils, it is better to use very high voltages around 100v and 200v to test it, than a reasonable kick can be seen.
One of overunity threads, I have seen an old TV schematic, which has a toroidal shape, TPU like unit at the center, But I can't find it again. If some body has can you send it?
A small note: Tesla used lamps during their tests. We are still using transistors, MOSFETs? Those devices are slow comparing to lamps. I think Lindsay had a good reason why she tells this thing.
;D
my cold bottles will remain cold a wile yet ;)
ist! 8)
Hello,
I think Large Capacitors on SM's tpu are not for output regulation, they are used for firing collector coils.
IST we are not wile!
;)
Spherics states that:
A pulse into a coil generates an expanding magnetic field. The magnetic field comes into being by an underlying patterning of the ether. It is a cascade action on the part of the ether that causes the EFFECT of an expanding magnetic field. If you then cause a second magnetic field to expand through the same space as the already expanding magnetic field, a specific cascading action, a pattern is setup in the ether which is the EQUIVALENT of a magnetic field and has many of the characteristics of a magnetic field. By this I mean it will interact with metals, and cause the EFFECT of a current, IF the field is moving across the metal. I will refer to this field as a COMP field from now on. But please be clear this COMP field is in addition to the expected magnetic field. This COMP field, a patterning in the ether, is dampened and effectively nulled by magnetic metals.
Let's try!
After making tests with the circuit simulator, I can see the kicks covering both peaks. It seems to be the key.