Overunity.com Archives

Solid States Devices => solid state devices => Topic started by: saintsnick on November 09, 2009, 10:33:41 PM

Title: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: saintsnick on November 09, 2009, 10:33:41 PM
Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube

Found this MUST see!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neiOQgYw_Qc&feature=subtivity

It's the pitch of the primary coil. The magnetic field is rotating with no effort under load. So simple!
Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: innovation_station on November 09, 2009, 11:58:04 PM
GREAT VIDEO...!!

BRINGS BACK MEMORIES OF HOURS OF SCRACHING MY HEAD ...  ;D


IST!

I WILL SAY I THINK THERE A FEW RINGS IN THERE THAT OPERATE  THE EM WAY  ;) ;D

YOU CAN TELL WICH ARE WICH...  ;D

THE COIL SHOWEN AT 202 IS A WORK OF ART!  I  PERSONALLY THOUGHT ABOUT THAT COIL PROBALLY THE MOST OF ALL OF THEM ...

AND I STILL DONT KNOW FOR SURE HOW THE DAMM THING WORKS .... LOL IT HAS BEEN YEARS ..  THE ONLY CONCULSION I CAN DRAW IS IT IS PERFECTLY TUNE THEN AMPED / TRANSFORMERED ..

IT HAS TO DIRRECTLY SYNC WITH EARTH .. I THINK SOME OF THOSE DO 0 CURCUITRY
Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: onthecuttingedge2005 on November 10, 2009, 12:45:51 AM
looking a little closer on the core winding, the winding appears to be wound around a PVC ring approx 2" in height maybe 1 foot in diameter.

looks to be 'around' 200 windings wound at a greater angle than 45 degree's
Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: innovation_station on November 10, 2009, 12:52:00 AM
WOW GOOD OSBERVATION!! 

YOUR QUICK!!

LOOKS LIKE A 5 GALLON BUCKET CUT LOL

IST

AND A VERRY NICE WINDING JOB I MIGHT ADD ..

IM GONNA HAVE TO BUILD ME 1 OF THEASE TOO .... SHEESH ...  ;D
Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: onthecuttingedge2005 on November 10, 2009, 01:24:19 AM
here is the third core picture, the horizontal wind.

1st core and 2nd core are approx 200 winds each.
here is the direction of wind in order of 1,2,3,4

1.\ 200 count
2./ 200 count, from here it looks to be encased in plumber's putty.
3._  approx 26 turns.
4.| ?

am I understanding that this is Steven Marks coil or is it a replication?

Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: Frederic2k1 on November 10, 2009, 03:17:16 AM
mmmhh, seems that others had more succes in building tpu's ... ?!

There are also other magnetic vortex energy vids, in #3 is a circuit diagramm but I don't know, if it is really tpu circuit diagramm.
Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: innovation_station on November 10, 2009, 09:49:38 AM
ILL TELL YOU RIGHT NOW WHAT IS BEING PRESENTED IS UNSEEN B4 NOW ON THIS SITE ...

MY BEST OSBVERATION THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS THRED IS THE REAL TPU OF SM ..

I HAVE SEEN 0 REPLACATIONS DONE IN THIS MANNOR MINE INCLUDED ...

I HAVE NOT EVER WOUND A COIL IN THIS EXACT SAME WAY ... 

AWESOME !

I THINK THOSE ARE THE ORIGANAL TPUS...

IST!
Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: Topguner on November 10, 2009, 11:17:53 AM
The first half of the video where the coils are lighting bulbs and such looks like a compilation of EM Devices, Marco and CTG Labs fine work from a year or so ago.   ;)
Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: quarktoo on November 10, 2009, 04:59:35 PM
I smell a rat.

I have always been suspicious of Steven Marks. Something about a demonstration that always takes place on a table with a big table cloth over the top and not disclosing details OR filing a patent.

If you watch the videos located here:
http://www.matri-x.ru/video.shtml

On TPU - Home video - part 1 you will notice that he picks the coil up off the table, FLIPS IT OVER, does the test and then FLIPS IT OVER to set it down at the end.

Why so careful to set it on the table with a certain polarity? Because if he was to set it in the other direction, it would either slap down hard or flip over DUE TO THE DRIVING COIL UNDER THE TABLE.

Next look at TPU - Home video - part 3

Notice when he sets it down on the table at the end, you hear a load noise? That is most likely the driving coil on the bottom of the table slapping against something. You can clearly hear something magnetic slap against something.

On video 4 he seems to dispel that by rolling his chair back but there may be more than 1 driving coil or who knows, it coil be real but I doubt it.

I emailed him and offered to replicate and his web site says that he will share the information to replicate. If it is real and he is honest, I will be able to replicate it.
Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: itanimuLLi on November 10, 2009, 05:29:10 PM
this one looks like a successful replication. If we had more detail i would try to replicate it.
Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: quarktoo on November 10, 2009, 06:03:08 PM
Quote from: itanimuLLi on November 10, 2009, 05:29:10 PM
this one looks like a successful replication. If we had more detail i would try to replicate it.

What is odd is how in some of the videos there is a driving circuit and in the 4 home videos he posted, there is not driving circuit.

Since I don't speak Russian, for all I know he is saying there is a drive coil hidden under the table and this is what Steven Marks did to fool people.

On his web site located here:
http://ferromagnetic-energy.com/ (http://ferromagnetic-energy.com/)

He states that he will share replicate information for 30 standard units what ever that is worth.

If you add /forum to the web site URL.. I.e., http://ferromagnetic-energy.com/forum

Then you get a forum signup page that is not linked to the web site but you are probably not going to get anywhere until you pay 30 bucks on some Russian payment system I have never heard of. A paypal account would be nice.

His web site is clearly still under development. Given the fact that he is advertising but has not finished his web site, tells me he is not very organized like most inventors. I would wait and see what others say myself.

Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: wattsup on November 10, 2009, 07:19:20 PM
Quote from: onthecuttingedge2005 on November 10, 2009, 01:24:19 AM
here is the third core picture, the horizontal wind.
1st core and 2nd core are approx 200 winds each.
here is the direction of wind in order of 1,2,3,4
1.\ 200 count
2./ 200 count, from here it looks to be encased in plumber's putty.
3._  approx 26 turns.
4.| ?
am I understanding that this is Steven Marks coil or is it a replication?

@onthecuttingedge2005

Good work there man. I like the way you came up with these derivations. Geez you are reminding me of another member here that has done alot of such types of analysis. His username is wattsup. lol

It is very encouraging to see other members going the extra mile.

The video in question is a collage of many devices. Now if I am not mistaken the first device shown in that video is in fact EMDevices showing us his battery loaded TPU (10 x 9v batteries inside the core). That was a great laugh all right but at the time, some where really convinced it was real. lol

Some of the other devices where using trick bulbs so we have to be careful in what to believe and what not to believe.

As for the build you have diagnosed, that one I have never seen before. I would like to know from which video that part was taken.
Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: quarktoo on November 10, 2009, 07:27:07 PM
The "PVC core" is where I stopped reading.

EDIT - He tells you in the video some acceptable Fe core types. END EDIT

Grumpy posted that doc. regarding duplicating magnetic fields that describes it better than anything so far.

I got registered on his forum but due to error in the web site I got a wrong activation code message so I can't log in.

Personally I would have had those bugs worked out prior to public demonstration. Hopefully he will activate my account and let me try to replicate.
Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: onthecuttingedge2005 on November 10, 2009, 07:42:19 PM
Quote from: wattsup on November 10, 2009, 07:19:20 PM
@onthecuttingedge2005

As for the build you have diagnosed, that one I have never seen before. I would like to know from which video that part was taken.

Hi Wattsup.

which core layer are you referring too? 1st core, 2nd core, 3rd core, 4th core?
Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: wattsup on November 10, 2009, 07:53:48 PM
@onthecuttingedge2005

I am referring to that complete part of the video showing that TPU, first the plastic core, then the first wind, then the second wind, then the forming material, then the third wind (horizontal), then the fourth wind. All that part of the video I had never seen before. Since the maker of that video is basically taking parts of other videos, then where did he manage to take that part?

I know of EMDevices unit and also of the second device, plus that third guy we know is a joker. But the one you worked on is the one I have never seen elsewhere. Damn nice build though.
Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: Mannix on November 10, 2009, 08:37:53 PM
It is a collection of the fakers videos . By another faker .Sad really,what happens when people put fake videos on the net .

it all over ...some people still say that the videos of stevens device are fake , go figure

imagine how many people take this crap seriously.

It's  hard enough with out this rubbish that is never retracted soon enough by the origional posters. perhaps it is good pr for the IDEA. but thats all

Stefan should perhaps put a warning out about this guy

EM, marco, dave , I hope you get the point now.

Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: quarktoo on November 10, 2009, 09:10:42 PM
Quote from: Mannix on November 10, 2009, 08:37:53 PM
It is a collection of the fakers videos . By another faker .Sad really,what happens when people put fake videos on the net .

it all over ...some people still say that the videos of stevens device are fake , go figure

imagine how many people take this crap seriously.

It's  hard enough with out this rubbish that is never retracted soon enough by the origional posters. perhaps it is good pr for the IDEA. but thats all

Stefan should perhaps put a warning out about this guy

EM, marco, dave , I hope you get the point now.

It is not fair to say it is fake since he shows a lot of different methods and coils and we don't speak Russian.

The only thing worse than being a fake, is calling someone is a fake when they are not. Give it time and I am sure he will release more information.

He claims that he will share all needed information for 100% replication. Most people would not be willing to go to prison for such a small amount of money.

His replications are of good quality, they appear similar and he also builds nice circuit boards to drive them. This is not what I would expect a fake to do or look like.

Be patient and give it some time.

Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: innovation_station on November 10, 2009, 10:21:07 PM
ill tell you right now all of you your all damm fools if you think the 202 coil is a fake ....

your a damm fool!

lol

ist !

and you can plainly see marcos 3 fet unit .... hummmmmmmmm

and .. no i do not beleave the plumbers putty is fake ... how in the hell why in the hell would you use plumbers putty .... duh...  if it did not solve a problem you may of had .....  ;)

lol

look to what em has done public recently to how coil 202 could operate ... only thing he tunes to 7.8 in there ... as a source not the wires in your house ... duh!

just cuz i do not know how to tune in like that does not mean i do not see the light lol  ;)
Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: EMdevices on November 10, 2009, 11:56:03 PM
interesting video(s), where have I seen those before... ?      ;)

yes, that video is a collage of our previous videos on this website, plus a few new builds I have not seen before either.   Some of the schematics presented were also not his original designs and obtained from the net.   Very nice build though, I hope it works as good as ours did.   lol   :)

EM
Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: turbo on November 10, 2009, 11:59:21 PM
Quote from: Mannix on November 10, 2009, 08:37:53 PM

EM, marco, dave , I hope you get the point now.


What point is that exactly Lindsay ?
I'm not sure what you mean.

Those video's were simply a means to attract more builders because we firmly believed this would help us solve the puzzle.
The more peepz on the job, the faster the overall process, Remember?

But it didn't work out did it....
You are taking this way too serious.
How much longer will it take for you to realize this isn't going to work out the way we wanted to?

Put it to rest Mannix.
We tried real hard for a real long time.
There are alot of other promesing projects, some of them are verry well documented too.
That alone puts the tpu far behind because we don't know shit about it.

After all those years i still don't understand why i didn't look at the other OU stuff like i do now.
I think it was because of the group. you know what i mean.
The good o'l days...
But sadly enough those days are over.....  :'(

And don't start to blame people for what they have done, or because you didn't get the results you wanted, that is pathetic after all the energy, time  and money they have put into your little story.

Marco.
Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: quarktoo on November 11, 2009, 12:00:13 AM
Quote from: EMdevices on November 10, 2009, 11:56:03 PM
interesting video(s), where have I seen those before... ?      ;)

Maybe you saw it in the attached document? That is what it looks like to me.

Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: otto on November 11, 2009, 12:50:36 AM
Hello all,

fake or not, we have to wait until this guy is "ready" to share. Hmmm....this "ready" sounds familiar. @Tito....

I saw for the first time this video where SM showes a 6" TPU....OK,OK, maybe my memory is totaly rusty.

He mentioned 1 1/2 pound weight, vibration ( we know that!)

and

SLIGHT NOISE!!!! ( heared it for the 1. time)

Something to say??

Otto
Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: forest on November 11, 2009, 03:22:02 AM
hmm..isn't noise a mechanical response to vibration of field  in a range of sound ? < 30khz maybe
for example magnetic field acting on current in wire at 5khz ?
Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: otto on November 11, 2009, 03:28:54 AM
Hello all,

@forest

or magnetic field acting on something like contacts. No, not a relay.

Otto
Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: forest on November 11, 2009, 04:11:54 AM
@otto,

you mean a "hummm" noise from transformers ?
Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: otto on November 11, 2009, 04:28:33 AM
hello all,

@forest

a 5kHz or so huuuuum from my coils I can clearly hear at various much higher frequencies but thats NOT it.

Somehow I have the feeling ( again) that this noise is a soft noise, not like 2 contacts are activated, a klicking noise.

Otto

Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: forest on November 11, 2009, 05:43:06 AM
@otto

Can you slowdown vibration effect to hz  but instead rise voltage to kV  ? Do it become then electrostatic force in air, "stinging" effect on skin and secondary emission in metals ? If so then we are talking about the same phenomena maybe...
Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: otto on November 11, 2009, 05:58:30 AM
@forest

yes,yes, yes but I have a high voltage and can slow down the vibrations to Hz or what ever I want but.....its soooo hard to replicate and so I have to "invent" another, easier way to do the same.

The vibration Im talking about has nothing to do with the voltage. Its only a little 470pF cap discharging in my oscillator. Of course this discharge is magnified a lot with the OP amplifier and the transistors in the oscillator and then again amplified in the coils...like I showed in my video.

Maybe you can be a little bit clearer what you mean?

Otto

Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: forest on November 11, 2009, 06:48:04 AM
@otto

I'm trying to understand if any ordinary HV source like car induction coil driven by normal electronic circuit produce electrostatic effects and "stinging" effects on air if frequency is low OR is that VIBRATION required to produce radiant energy around which in kV range produce those effects and much more.

Unfortunately I have never worked with Tesla coil.
Anyway,why not connecting car coil to vibration and look what it generates on output ?
Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: otto on November 11, 2009, 07:09:57 AM
@forest

Here a idea if you allow:

take a car ignition coil but connect the MOSFETs as I have showed here and pulse this coil.
This means, connect the Drain of your MOSFET to the + (plus) from the power supply, the Source to the coil and the - (minus) from the power supply to the other end of the coil. The Gate to the oscillator.
The other 2 MOSFETs connect the Drain to the + from the power supply and the Gate to the oscillators. You DONT have to connect the Sources!!! At least I dont have to connect them but they work.

But you have to connect a bulb to the output because the coil could blow.

You will see kicks but they are negative and thats OK.

Otto

Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: forest on November 11, 2009, 08:23:03 AM
@otto

can you post schematic ? I'm not good in electronics and cannot visualise this circuit.

Seems that I have something opposite , I have car coil connected between Drain and plus of the battery

Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: forest on November 11, 2009, 08:29:37 AM
also , what kinds of mosfets work ? there are too many variations. I suspect that to operation it has to be matched with circuit assembly - in other words it probably matter if mosfet is open at start of closed - what is the initial characteristic of power
Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: forest on November 11, 2009, 09:05:49 AM
@otto

This is my schematic.Transorb is 1.5KE300CA bidirectional transient high current diode,varistor afaik is 400V rated.
Generator is not shown (but here is the schematic http://s194.photobucket.com/albums/z209/boguslawb/car%20ignition%20coil%20experiments/?action=view&current=cewka.jpg) 2200uF/25V  electrolytic cap is placed in separate board with mosfet,varistor and transorb, directly connected to car battery while oscillator is connected later to that circuit board by 3 tiny wires.
Resonant frequency is around 54hZ (coil primary is 3.88mH) but secondary can add to it IMO.
Anyway, oscillator is producing around 120-140hz maybe it's second harmonic of resonant LC circuit.
I don't want to patent it (and nobody can - because I'm here publicly presented the circuit ) :-) I just want to improve it, because now electrostatic effects seems to flow over all circuit wires and I'd like to place additional mosfet to concentrate radiant effects only on secondary of coil.Of course higher energy and higher frequency is needed too !

It looks to me as parallel LC circuit which can be improved. The idea is to "push the swing" at correct moments to accumulate energy in parallel resonant circuit during on time of mosfet (mostly in coil working in that part of cycle on short-circuit mode) while during off time to let "natural swing".I think it is the equivalent of Tesla patents with large self-induction, but for parallel resonant LC circuit. Here the same coil is high self-induction storage and path of discharge.

Of course it is only my theory but something really happen here if you power it at harmonic of resonant frequency.

I think I couldn't  be more clear !
Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: innovation_station on November 11, 2009, 09:31:42 AM
OK BRO ....

we need to get you on the the jt ... fireing it with harmonics...

its all comeing togather verry nicely now...

THIS KIND OF EVENT TAKEING PLACE RIGHT NOW! ONLY HAPPINS WITH TEAM WORK!

IST!
Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: forest on November 11, 2009, 09:40:46 AM
My knowledge is very limited but I know that at resonance parallel LC circuit has almost infinite impedance.Doesn't it mean that is looks like an open circuit to the power supply and no power should flow to that circuit ? So HOW it SEEMS to ACCUMULATE power when power source is connected at higher harmonic make&break rate to it ?! :o

This is WHAT I WANT TO ASK EVERY EE on THIS board !!!
Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: wattsup on November 11, 2009, 10:39:30 AM
@otto

Where do I start. Maybe at the end.

I see you are looking for vibration, etc., but maybe this is not the good way.

When I had my pulse generator working (new one on its way), I built a FTPU mock up, with the two rings, control coils, a center dual coil toroid, a few caps and did some pulsing into it and managed to get the rings to make a vibration.

If I can give you some advice, maybe consider that the closest you can make a FTPU and then concentrate on doing testing with that, this would give you better direct knowledge of the results. Don't get me wrong. What you are doing is OK, but I feel you need to get into the closest known build method of a known TPU and work from there. This is where you may make a new discovery with your oscillators.

I personally am suffering these days from information overload. I had my next plan of attack to do more testing but instead of putting it on paper, I kept it in my head. Then something else manages to come along and pull your attention elsewhere. This is a big problem and it has to do with being able to keep your focus on the task at hand and not always think "well this new info may be better". Yes, what I just said flies in the face of what I am suggesting, but I am just concerned about you and your present situation.

I don't know. During some spare time I will finish my FTPU diagram to the best of my knowledge and observation ability and just put it out there for you guys to consider and or maybe connect the dots, since there is still some unknowns and I am now going to have to concede that even with more hours and hours of looking at that damn bad quality video of the FTPU, I will not get any further then this. That is until there is a better quality video that will pop up one day - soon. hic hic hic. One day soon I hope and I trust. lol

But until then, this will have to do. Give me a few more days and I will post it. I know I have said this a few times now, but to tell you the truth, it is not always fun to do such observations that become tedious, tiresome on the eyes and then you have to make the 3D diagram to show it in a comprehensible manner, and just to get back into "the mood" you sometimes have to give yourself a major "kick" in the ass. Anyways keep well.
Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: bolt on November 11, 2009, 12:09:34 PM
"Doesn't it mean that is looks like an open circuit to the power supply and no power should flow to that circuit ? "

Correct in AC circuits this is called power factor Zero. In RF we can say we have infinite VSWR. In conventional electronics believed we are achieving nothing but nothing can be further from the truth:)

AS RE = RF where we take Power Factor 0 as a total loss is converted to GAIN.


Quote from: forest on November 11, 2009, 09:40:46 AM
My knowledge is very limited but I know that at resonance parallel LC circuit has almost infinite impedance.Doesn't it mean that is looks like an open circuit to the power supply and no power should flow to that circuit ? So HOW it SEEMS to ACCUMULATE power when power source is connected at higher harmonic make&break rate to it ?! :o

This is WHAT I WANT TO ASK EVERY EE on THIS board !!!
Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: giantkiller on November 11, 2009, 08:40:20 PM
From reading Don Smith:
Infinite impedance in the coil equals Zero impedance in space.

Achievable when a spark gap fires into a coil.

My take:
What happens to the equipment in the room when you measure this? Kaboom.
Tesla said 'Men were blown off their feet and died'.
Any other ways you can get this kind energy in a small package with a small 9v battery?
When you ring the primary coil you can then catch copies of that transported energy into many secondary coils with no degradation.
Then channel that into an L.M.D.

--gk.
Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: otto on November 12, 2009, 01:15:19 AM
Hello all,

@forest

the picture is posted in the forgotten thread "Steven Marls secret" page 1.

After almost 40 years in electronics I can also say that Im NOT good in electronics.

99% of the people are connecting their MOSFETs like you did but I never saw something "special" when I had my MOSFETs connected in this way.

In my setup works the IRF 840 and the IRFP 450 because they have the capacitance at the OFF time at around 300pF or so.

@wattsup

tis IS what Im doing. I have 2 TPUs:

a 6" open TPU
and a 6" TPU with a HV coil sitting on top of the TPU with a silver ring....

thanks for the dimensions of that silver ring!

Im working with vibrations because I see that such vibrations are doing a fine job. My oscilators are not good so Im surching for a solution to pulse my coils without oscillators or at least with oscillators that can easily be builded so the people can rebuild them.

You think Im on a wrong path. Hmmm...a little collapse from a 470pF cap is amplified to such a collapse that it fires a coil very high into the air.

Now imagine a lot of such collapses at 2 or 3 different input frequencies.

Or to say it in another way:

this vibrations are kicks. As I have my MOSFETs connected in another, better way, the kicks - vibrations are negative.

My oscillators are only charging and discharging a tiny cap and they are fired into my coils. Nothing more.

Is this a wrong way to build a TPU? I dont think so.

Otto




Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: Tito L. Oracion on November 12, 2009, 04:03:19 AM
Hi everyone gooday  ;D

in most of tesla's work i notice that he only used motors to switch on and off and walla high voltage and high currents are produced. amazing isn't it.  ;D

the simplicity of his works makes him great !

WOW !!!.

including the antenna in the tpu makes produce an input source to a circuit. wow really amazing! ;D

its like a recursion in  c programming repowering itself.

from little caps into big caps discharging in a coil.

little kicks into big kicks.  :D

update in my current tpu:
i'm using ozone patent circuit in my tpu, you know what? its amazing.
Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: gadgetmall on November 12, 2009, 07:33:25 AM
Its a Trick Light bulb . make your own glass bulb here http://www.metacafe.com/watch/975794/mysterious_lightbulb_hack/

and here http://www.wonderhowto.com/how-to/video/how-to-make-a-magic-lightbulb-271313/
Trick your friends into thinking you got a coil that lights up a bulb with a coil of wire to make contact . Also you can put warm leds in them to make them produce real golden light unlike the one in the video that produces a blue light . As far as multimeter measurements , a Polaroid flat battery and a tiny jt  taped up with the wire and a either a reed switch to trigger it on or a mercury switch . flip it . .
theres even one that looks real and lights up and explodes like theres too much power http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Df5jx9UUGrE&feature=player_embedded

and as far as all the fancy electronics  you can get 128 volts from a 1 volt Jt and a transistor .
you can also buy them on Ebay  ;)
Gadget
Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: innovation_station on November 12, 2009, 08:03:20 AM
Quote from: Tito L. Oracion on November 12, 2009, 04:03:19 AM
Hi everyone gooday  ;D

in most of tesla's work i notice that he only used motors to switch on and off and walla high voltage and high currents are produced. amazing isn't it.  ;D

the simplicity of his works makes him great !

WOW !!!.

including the antenna in the tpu makes produce an input source to a circuit. wow really amazing! ;D

its like a recursion in  c programming repowering itself.

from little caps into big caps discharging in a coil.

little kicks into big kicks.  :D

update in my current tpu:
i'm using ozone patent circuit in my tpu, you know what? its amazing.

WELCOME ABOARD !!  ;D 8)

IST!

IM VERRY HAPPY TO HEAR YOUR CONCLUSION ..  I THINK YOUR ONE OF THE FIRST TO BRING THIS UP AGIN IN A LONGGGGG TIME ...  ;D

JUST IMAGIME ... WHAT A PROPERLY TIMED AND TUNED IST GATEKEEPER WILL DO ...  ;D  3 PHASE

POWERED BY EXACTLY WHAT GADGET JUST TOLD YOU ...  ;) ..

AND AN ULTRA CAP OF COURSE...
I HAVE GOTTON WELL OVER 500V CONSTANT OUTPUT FROM A JT  SOME SAY IT MAY WELL BE THE SMALLEST TESLA COIL EVER BUILT! ;D

HERE IS A VIDEO .. http://www.youtube.com/user/innovationstation#p/u/6/psRWo7wwtK0

277VDC RECTIFIED AFTER TESLA SPARK.. AA BATTERY..
Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: stprue on November 12, 2009, 08:06:49 AM
Quote from: gadgetmall on November 12, 2009, 07:33:25 AM
Its a Trick Light bulb . make your own glass bulb here http://www.metacafe.com/watch/975794/mysterious_lightbulb_hack/

and here http://www.wonderhowto.com/how-to/video/how-to-make-a-magic-lightbulb-271313/
Trick your friends into thing you got a coil that lights up a bulb with a coil of wire to make contact . Also you can put warm leds in them to make them produce real golden light unlike the one in the video that produces a blue light . As far as multimeter measurements , a Polaroid flat battery and a tiny jt  taped up with the wire and a either a reed switch to trigger it on or a mercury switch . flip it . .
theres even one that looks real and lights up and explodes like theres too much power http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Df5jx9UUGrE&feature=player_embedded

and as far as all the fancy electronics  you can get 128 volts from a 1 volt Jt and a transistor .
you can also buy them on Ebay  ;)
Gadget

This is a great find Gadget.  This is probably how they did it.
Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: giantkiller on November 12, 2009, 12:21:15 PM
How do you explain the 'White' light in Marco's flat coil with 3 555s?

Quote from: stprue on November 12, 2009, 08:06:49 AM
This is a great find Gadget.  This is probably how they did it.
Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: quarktoo on November 12, 2009, 01:01:00 PM
Quote from: Tito L. Oracion on November 12, 2009, 04:03:19 AM
Hi everyone gooday  ;D

in most of tesla's work i notice that he only used motors to switch on and off and walla high voltage and high currents are produced. amazing isn't it.  ;D

the simplicity of his works makes him great !

WOW !!!.

including the antenna in the tpu makes produce an input source to a circuit. wow really amazing! ;D

its like a recursion in  c programming repowering itself.

from little caps into big caps discharging in a coil.

little kicks into big kicks.  :D

update in my current tpu:
i'm using ozone patent circuit in my tpu, you know what? its amazing.

Tesla didn't have transistors to work with and he didn't like tubes. He also used spark gaps for switching.

If you read the ozone patent, you will notice that he states it can be used to create free energy. Ozone + steam = H2O2 which is rocket fuel (hydrogen peroxide)

Stan Meyer made ozone in his air gas processor and Dr. Puhirich also used this method.

H2O2 has a higher viscosity than water and the bonds cleave much easier than water. This is why Meyer called it hydrogen fracturing and Puharich called it molecular shattering.

If you watch the Puharich videos on youtube, you will note that Puharich stated that he changes the molecular bond angle of water from 104.5 degrees to 109.28 degrees from center of mass. That is the bond angle of hydrogen peroxide.

Bond angle of H2O2 - This info. is difficult to find.
http://www.washburn.edu/faculty/sangel/Courses/CH121/Recitation6ans.pdf

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_h2o2%27s_bond_angle

This might hold the clue as to why Meyer stated he was using red laser LEDS in his ozone generator:
http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=AD0263364

There are over 10,000 ozone generators patented.
http://www.valdosta.edu/~tmanning/research/ozone/

Puharich also stated in his videos that he was not going to get into the complex aspects of the ceramic in his injector. That is because it was piezo electric and the ceramic probably contained silver which is a catalyst that cleaves off the extra oxygen atom.

Both NASA and the Russians use this to boost space junk. That might explain why Meyer filed an affidavit in the international test report stating that he didn't get information from NASA.

A laser ozone generator (Meyer's air gas processor) is the most efficient method to produce ozone. Meyer's microwave steam generator is the most efficient method to produce steam.

Meyer described the water going to the injector as "ordinary processed water"

The "high frequency / high voltage burst pulse"  going to the injector both ran the piezo to fracture the bonds and polarize the gasses and detonate the gas.

To make a resonant cavity to combine the ozone and steam, a round ball shape is most efficient as it is isotropic meaning it radiates in all directions equally. Tesla stated that starting with the round tank, all things become possible. The WITTS ultrasonic water heater is another example of an isotropic storage probe producing overunity. Talk to a metal spinner about getting the tank fabricated, they probably have the bell shape mold sitting on the shelf already and it only takes them 1 hour to make the two halves.

Tesla was one of the brightest people that ever lived.
Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: Grumpy on November 12, 2009, 01:03:02 PM
Quote from: otto on November 12, 2009, 01:15:19 AM
You think Im on a wrong path. Hmmm...a little collapse from a 470pF cap is amplified to such a collapse that it fires a coil very high into the air.

If you place a conductive object such as small piece of foil, wire, or pencil lead - will it move towards your coil when the coil is excited? 

Is there any effect on an insulator such as plastic film or foam ball?
Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: poynt99 on November 12, 2009, 02:06:01 PM
@quarktoo,

A little off-topic, but a great post!

I've saved it to my archives, thanks.

.99
Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: gadgetmall on November 12, 2009, 02:06:41 PM
Quote from: giantkiller on November 12, 2009, 12:21:15 PM
How do you explain the 'White' light in Marco's flat coil with 3 555s?
In the first picture they show a clear bulb but its not lit.This is to Beef you up for the trick .   and @ 1:06 they show a 9 volt lighting a "TRICK bulb" using pure white leds . have many of them . Its a pure white light! Notice they never show a clear 110 volt bulb ever again . they all are frosted .I .in another they show a tiny filimant bulb glowing at the end of the video . This Means nothing . looks lile a 1.5 to 3 volt flashlight bulb . I can lite a 130 volt 8 watt bulb from my bedin coil running  from less than 50 milliamps 12 volts . Also the original TPU demonstration did not have a big board hanging off it with 555's and such . What could convince me if they show a 110 volt bulb with the filament showing to actually see it glow . never happen . In another video  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1wvrkNqsgLA he shows a pack of supposed 60 watt bulbs  and pluggs them in a "110 volt outlet " Its rigged to short the lamp cord to turn on the trick FROSTED bulbs.So when he plugs it into his Energy vortex it shorts it again . DIDNT NOTICE AND DIFFERENCE IN BRIGHTNESS . flip the unit over  and it stops  working (mercury switch) put a magnet on it and it starts (reed switch ) . Man . o Man . I wish you could get electricity from a ring of wire .

Gadget
Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: quarktoo on November 12, 2009, 06:02:46 PM
Quote from: poynt99 on November 12, 2009, 02:06:01 PM
@quarktoo,

A little off-topic, but a great post!

I've saved it to my archives, thanks.

.99

No sweat. Like Meyer said "what we are doing is the exact opposite of Faraday electrolysis". First they built the H20 molecule, then they shattered it.

My only point in posting the info. was to show that Tesla was probably the original inventor.
Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: wattsup on November 12, 2009, 07:27:50 PM
@quarktoo

Yes it was Tesla. What a guy.
http://www.teslauniverse.com/vault/timeline/1901?PHPSESSID=6gu31r4g5gqbg629ghi9ohudb4;#goto-1900

At the time Tesla made some ozone generators with his Tesla Ozone Company (the first OUer was a good capitalist) and some where using it to breath the ozone bubbled through olive oil. Incredible to believe that. I once worked with an ozone unit that produced only 1 lb/day. When my employee turned it on, the tube that was on the air sparger came off, flew around a good 20 feet, then got stuck right under my armpit with the end right under my nose as I breathed in. I almost died. My lungs just froze up and it took all my effort to just barely breath. Took a good 10 minutes. I was scared shitless. I'll never do that again. If you smell watermelon, run.
Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: innovation_station on November 12, 2009, 07:55:21 PM
Quote from: gadgetmall on November 12, 2009, 07:33:25 AM
Its a Trick Light bulb . make your own glass bulb here http://www.metacafe.com/watch/975794/mysterious_lightbulb_hack/

and here http://www.wonderhowto.com/how-to/video/how-to-make-a-magic-lightbulb-271313/
Trick your friends into thinking you got a coil that lights up a bulb with a coil of wire to make contact . Also you can put warm leds in them to make them produce real golden light unlike the one in the video that produces a blue light . As far as multimeter measurements , a Polaroid flat battery and a tiny jt  taped up with the wire and a either a reed switch to trigger it on or a mercury switch . flip it . .
theres even one that looks real and lights up and explodes like theres too much power http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Df5jx9UUGrE&feature=player_embedded

and as far as all the fancy electronics  you can get 128 volts from a 1 volt Jt and a transistor .
you can also buy them on Ebay  ;)
Gadget

GADGET ...

THIS IS CLEARLY A DEMONSTRATION OF HUMAN TACKION ENGERY!

YES HENCE HOW THE EGYPTIAN TOYS WORK ...  ;) ;D

IF YOU LOOKD A LITTLE FURTHER ... YOU CAN SEE A YOUNG BOY LIGHTING THE DAMM THING FROM THIS SAME SOURCE OF ENGERY ...

;)

MAGIC ... MAYBE ?

IST!

CUZ ITS ALL IN THE MIND YOU KNOW....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aN7ya07DDR0&feature=related

SOME OF THE PEOPLE THAT LIVE ON EARTH HAVE ACHIEVED CERTAN LEVELS OF SELF MASTERY ..

TESLA SAID HE COULD DISSASSEMBLE THINGS TO THE TACKION LEVEL ...  MELTS IN YOUR HAND NOT IN YOUR MIND ..  ;)

ANY HOW.... IT IS HOW SPOONS ARE BENT  LEVEATION ... CERTAN UN UNDERSTOOD PUBLICALLY  ENGERIES  THAT INFACT DO EXSIST IN REALITY ... 

NOW THIS BRINGS UP   KRYPTON I QUE !
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q233CxlIZtk


http://www.world-famous.com/DavidHamelStuff/Hamel-Blueprints.html

DAVID HAMMEL! 

MY #2 PIC CLEARLY SHOWS ENTANGLEMENT  A CHORD IF YOU LIKE ...
Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: gadgetmall on November 12, 2009, 08:17:48 PM
Quote from: wattsup on November 12, 2009, 07:27:50 PM
@quarktoo

Yes it was Tesla. What a guy.
http://www.teslauniverse.com/vault/timeline/1901?PHPSESSID=6gu31r4g5gqbg629ghi9ohudb4;#goto-1900

At the time Tesla made some ozone generators with his Tesla Ozone Company (the first OUer was a good capitalist) and some where using it to breath the ozone bubbled through olive oil. Incredible to believe that. I once worked with an ozone unit that produced only 1 lb/day. When my employee turned it on, the tube that was on the air sparger came off, flew around a good 20 feet, then got stuck right under my armpit with the end right under my nose as I breathed in. I almost died. My lungs just froze up and it took all my effort to just barely breath. Took a good 10 minutes. I was scared shitless. I'll never do that again. If you smell watermelon, run.
:) AHHH thats the smell i get from My sharper image Quadra 2 :) thats why they are now defunt;)
Al
Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: otto on November 13, 2009, 12:35:39 AM
Hello all,

@Grumpy

I didnt try it but.....its not a problem to try.

Otto
Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: pauldude000 on January 06, 2010, 03:32:21 AM
Quote from: gadgetmall on November 12, 2009, 02:06:41 PM
In the first picture they show a clear bulb but its not lit.This is to Beef you up for the trick .   and @ 1:06 they show a 9 volt lighting a "TRICK bulb" using pure white leds . have many of them . Its a pure white light! Notice they never show a clear 110 volt bulb ever again . they all are frosted .I .in another they show a tiny filimant bulb glowing at the end of the video . This Means nothing . looks lile a 1.5 to 3 volt flashlight bulb . I can lite a 130 volt 8 watt bulb from my bedin coil running  from less than 50 milliamps 12 volts . Also the original TPU demonstration did not have a big board hanging off it with 555's and such . What could convince me if they show a 110 volt bulb with the filament showing to actually see it glow . never happen . In another video  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1wvrkNqsgLA he shows a pack of supposed 60 watt bulbs  and pluggs them in a "110 volt outlet " Its rigged to short the lamp cord to turn on the trick FROSTED bulbs.So when he plugs it into his Energy vortex it shorts it again . DIDNT NOTICE AND DIFFERENCE IN BRIGHTNESS . flip the unit over  and it stops  working (mercury switch) put a magnet on it and it starts (reed switch ) . Man . o Man . I wish you could get electricity from a ring of wire .

Gadget

You know what really burns my hide?

Supposed debunkers. I say supposed as they debunk nothing, personally investigate nothing whatsoever, and never truly replicate anything for their supposed debunking.

They tend to suppose that since a thing can be faked, why it then has to be!

You can put, for instance, a led in a light bulb to make a fake light bulb. Does that mean all light bulb's are led fakes? No.

You can fake digital photographs quite convincingly, does that mean all digital photos are fake? No.

Or are only the ones fake that they do not agree with, or find reason to dispute based solely upon personal convictions? Yes, most generally.

You know what is not fake? Severe personal motivations, such as EE Professors at colleges risking their professional reputations on a hair brained money making scam. They have far too much to lose for a gain which is only potential. and not realized. SM had such backing him.

If nothing else, I will believe that professor over, say, YOU.

Because a person does not believe something is true or false, does not actually change anything. Whether it is true or false is dependent solely upon what is termed reality. 200 years ago, all scientists thought they were on the 'cutting edge' of reality, and that their concepts were impeccably logical.

Yes, such cutting edge concepts as electricity being a fluid.

For those that rely on today's fount of knowledge, just how much is going to be viewed as complete BS in another 200 years? The only difference I really notice between science today, and science then, is an overabundance of cocksure ego.

At least the scoffers then they had more honesty and admitted that they didn't know everything. They were better off in one major way then we are today. At least they actually tried.

Makes you wonder how many people tried to claim Edison put a candle in a glass tube, or similar type nonsense.

Paul Andrulis
Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: forest on January 06, 2010, 04:12:47 AM
Paul,investigate Edison etheric force from his papers....very useful info
Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: CTI on April 20, 2010, 06:09:31 PM
[A author=saintsnick link=topic=8276.msg208116#msg208116 date=1257824021]
Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube

Found this MUST see!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neiOQgYw_Qc&feature=subtivity

It's the pitch of the primary coil. The magnetic field is rotating with no effort under load. So simple!
[/quote]


Does any one have a copy of this video. Youtube has deleted it, and I was wondering if I could get a copy of it from anyone?
Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: giantkiller on April 20, 2010, 06:42:49 PM
Violation? The Military Industrial complex is getting closer.
Quote from: CTI on April 20, 2010, 06:09:31 PM
[A author=saintsnick link=topic=8276.msg208116#msg208116 date=1257824021]
Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube

Found this MUST see!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neiOQgYw_Qc&feature=subtivity

It's the pitch of the primary coil. The magnetic field is rotating with no effort under load. So simple!



Does any one have a copy of this video. Youtube has deleted it, and I was wondering if I could get a copy of it from anyone?
Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: stprue on April 20, 2010, 07:17:39 PM
Video has already been removed due to terms violations!
Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: exnihiloest on April 21, 2010, 03:27:48 AM
Quote from: pauldude000 on January 06, 2010, 03:32:21 AM
...
Supposed debunkers. I say supposed as they debunk nothing, personally investigate nothing whatsoever, and never truly replicate anything for their supposed debunking.
...
You can fake digital photographs quite convincingly, does that mean all digital photos are fake?
...

Debunkers waste much time in investigating, replicating, measuring and analysing. Their difference with bigots of free energy is that when they found nothing, and they found nothing, they don't claim it is OU. They say there is nothing.

After 20 years of hundreds of OU claims, do you have a working machine? Don't you pay for your current at home?
100% of OU claims of the last 20 years did not give even one working device that any body can duplicate. So the situation is simple : photographs or youtube videos are supports for egocentric people in lack of recognition or for ignorant people unable to lead correct measurements. Imho their attitude is criminal because the enormous buzz and noise they generate can hide valuable ideas from smartest but modest people.
Debunkers are welcome to reject photographs or videos when no other evidence is provided (such as measurements or detailed plans).
"What is asserted without proof can be denied without proof"
(Eukleides)


Title: Re: Steven Marks Replication Disassembeled on You Tube
Post by: giantkiller on April 21, 2010, 10:54:07 AM
The current failure paradigm is based on the movement of electrons. We call that current and we are measured by the number of electrons that go past a give point.

What if I told you that you can gain infinitely more by looking at the universe as a kinetic tuning fork?
What if I told you that Tesla pushed this model against all perversion of thought...
What if I told you that Dollard proved this many times over...
What if I told you that Hamel's device is a mechanically based virtual kinetic charge pump...
What if I told you that the Solfeggio frequencies are based on the harmonics appearing that stretch and compress the magnetic/gravitational bonds between the atoms and sub atomic components...
What if I told you that Keely proved this with metal spheres and fluidic and gaseous compression...
What if I told that Shauberger proved this with a water based model?
What if I told that the 5 steel ball swinging desktop toy is a demo of all this right in front of your faces...
What if I told you that the rabbit hole is too deep for most of you to see the light...

No need to tread lightly in your reality. It is a lie of the most monstrous kind.

Why do we argue over trivialities in a nightmare?
What starts the 'Arrival syndrome' at the instance on any progressive thinking?

QuoteThey called me deranged. The hope is that they are right. It is of no greater import if another fool wander this Earth. But if I am right and the science is wrong - then may the Lord God have mercy on mankind. 
Viktor Schauberger
http://www.vortex-world.org/
http://news.yahoo.com/nphotos/Iceland-volcano-erupts/ss/events/sc/041510icelandvolcano#photoViewer=/100419/481/urn_publicid_ap_org82aec3d883f4434a8208d49035e0054f

Tesla stated that 'A match flick can be seen at both ends of the universe instantaneoulsy'. The three middle balls of the desktop toy never move but the final object of mass flies from an impact 6 inches away.

--giantkiller. Most have far to go...