Overunity.com Archives

News announcements and other topics => News => Topic started by: Hypercom on December 21, 2009, 01:03:01 PM

Title: ULTRASONIC PIEZONUCLEAR REACTIONS
Post by: Hypercom on December 21, 2009, 01:03:01 PM
Ciao

Nuclear clean there, but we do not want to talk.

Professor Fabio Cardone, expert in nuclear physics since 2007 has been able to develop a technology breakthrough, with which it is capable of producing nuclear fusion by the use of ultrasound and chloride of iron. This system yielded any kind of toxic or radioactive waste but not only, with this discovery is possible to generate an energy twice that produced uranium. Not to mention that an elementary iron is abundant in nature, while uranium is almost exhausted.

But there's more! Professor Cardone found that thanks to this system you can even use the radioactive waste produced by conventional nuclear power plants (the various states do not know where to put it), to make them produce more energy, and simultaneously make them inert. That's right! Not a dream! With this technology we can exploit more radioactive waste and make it completely devoid of radioactivity once exhausted.

Probably too good to be true. In fact since this discovery, not only can make the world a better place, but it can even clean it up by cancer of radioactive waste, the entire policy carefully avoids making known to the people there.

WO2008041255

PROCESS AND PLANT FOR THE PRODUCTION OF ENDOTHERMIC AND EXOTHERMIC REACTIONS BY MEANS OF PIEZONUCLEAR Ultrasounds cavitation OF SUBSTANCES AND THE

http://v3.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20080410&CC=WO&NR=2008041255A1&KC=A1

WO2008041254

APPARATUS AND PROCESS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF NeutroNs BY MEANS OF AND THE Ultrasounds cavitation OF SUBSTANCES

http://v3.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20080410&CC=WO&NR=2008041254A1&KC=A1

WO2008041253

APPARATUS AND PROCESS FOR THE QUENCHING OF THE RADIOACTIVITY OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS BY MEANS OF REACTIONS INDUCED BY PIEZONUCLEAR AND Ultrasounds cavitation

http://v3.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20080410&CC=WO&NR=2008041253A1&KC=A1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TDSoAryImjU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ehOS_o5b_2w

Hypercom
Title: Re: ULTRASONIC PIEZONUCLEAR REACTIONS
Post by: ResinRat2 on December 21, 2009, 03:56:13 PM
Whooaa...thanks Hypercom,

I think I'm dreaming. It seems too good to be true.

The device looks almost like an alcoholic mixer/shaker with some wires attached and a couple of plastic rings around it. LOL!

Hope it's true.

RR2
Title: Re: ULTRASONIC PIEZONUCLEAR REACTIONS
Post by: Hypercom on December 21, 2009, 05:16:50 PM
Quote from: ResinRat2 on December 21, 2009, 03:56:13 PM
Whooaa...thanks Hypercom,

I think I'm dreaming. It seems too good to be true.

The device looks almost like an alcoholic mixer/shaker with some wires attached and a couple of plastic rings around it. LOL!

Hope it's true.

RR2

Ciao

Divine Providence has given us another chance, what will the academic world and politics this time?

We are confronted with evidence of an experiment that gives clean energy. We hope that the System learns from his mistakes for the good of all.

The hope of all researchers is to build a better world for our children and future generations, the hope of Nicola Tesla, a new awareness of energy, that of 'free energy, clean energy.

Hypercom
Title: Re: ULTRASONIC PIEZONUCLEAR REACTIONS
Post by: Hypercom on December 26, 2009, 08:02:48 AM
PIEZONUCLEAR REACTIONS - TOWARDS A NEW CLEAN NUCLEAR ENERGY

For those who are deprived of progress and for those who suffer in ignorance, lest he be denied the benefits of discoveries of human genius, and for the unit, made possible by communication, allowing them greater participation.

CERN Courier
Jun 8, 2009

Ultrasonic cavitation of water speeds up thorium decay

It is a common belief that radioactive decay rates are unchanged by external conditions, despite many examples of small shifts (particularly involving external pressure and K-capture decays) being well documented and understood. However, Fabio Cardone of the Institute per lo Studio dei Materiali Nanostrutturati in Rome and colleagues have shown a dramatic increase â€" by a factor of 10,000 â€" in the decay rate of thorium-228 in water as a result of ultrasonic cavitation. Exactly what the physics is and whether or not this sort of effect can be scaled up into a technology for nuclear waste treatment remain open issues.

Further reading

F Cardone, R Mignani and A Petrucci 2009 Phys. Lett. A 373 1956.

About the author
Compiled by John Swain, Northeastern University.

http://nuovonucleare.splinder.com/
Title: Re: ULTRASONIC PIEZONUCLEAR REACTIONS
Post by: sparks on December 27, 2009, 12:23:01 AM
    The electromagnetic stimulation of radioactive decay rates has been known since the 50's.  Moray Tesla Hubbard all used low level radioactive substances and electromagnetically stimulated them into beta.   There is no imminent energy shortage as nations race to get a stake in the lowlevel radioactive moondust.  BYE BYE sludge.  The oil age end draws near. 
Title: Re: ULTRASONIC PIEZONUCLEAR REACTIONS
Post by: ramset on December 27, 2009, 07:29:55 AM
Nature has found cavitation very usefull!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eKPrGxB1Kzc

Yes cavitation does hold some BIG potential!!
In many ways {thanks Buzz]
Chet
Title: Re: ULTRASONIC PIEZONUCLEAR REACTIONS
Post by: Hypercom on December 27, 2009, 10:33:50 AM

Piezo nuclear reaction: the energy revolution

Friday, January 16, 2009 - 17:55 - Tom Wood

I really appreciate the response of Rutilio Sermonti you posted on Rebirth of October 28, commenting on my article on the folly of energy policies based on nuclear fission (not to mention the expensive, and utterly senseless nuclear fusion research, "hot "magnetic confinement, that" only in the laboratory "which so far have" burned "only billions of dollars of funding and produced results close to absolute zero), blindness and a waste of economic resources, natural and intellectual totally unjustified and unjustifiable, especially given the fact that if you wanted to develop its own at all costs based on nuclear energy technology, then why not invest in much-vaunted "Italian genius" who, in spite of a country that does everything to its collapse continues produce lightning that can tear apart the veil of mediocrity and dissolution that oppresses this country?
I refer in particular to the exceptional work of two physicists, Fabio Cardone and Roberto Magnani, who discovered how to produce nuclear reactions with radioactive elements without sound, introducing ultrasound in various solutions of water and iron salts which generated neutrons measured by thermodynamic tracers, resulting in a repeatability of the phenomenon of 100%. These nuclear reactions, called by two physicists' reactions piezonuclear "free energy" elements to induce change nature, transmutation. (Cold fusion? Reactions with low energy?)
In addition to the tremendous applications of this discovery in the energy, the process could also be used for disposal of nuclear waste, since "if, instead of being inert, these reactions are applied to small amounts of radioactive substances, they reduce the their radioactivity in times ten thousand times shorter than the natural time reduction ". Well, here we are talking about a revolution in the nuclear industry, with further fallout in the defense technology and the study of materials and an increasing independence on the supply of radioactive minerals, perhaps in geopolitical areas "hot". To be sure, the research Cardone and Magnani mirroring those related to the trend of so-called "sonoluminescence", but that's another story that deserves exposure separately.
But we digress from the arguments raised by the good Sermonti, who rightly doubt that "free energy for all", mean a liberation from the painful conditions in which the "modern" Western society, corrupt to the marrow by a capitalist-style economic model places profit above everything, even the life itself, using for this purpose, the education system and more generally the society (sic) to darken the mind of the masses and subject to their own knowledge; a cage without bars built on the altar of "democracy," a dictatorship "soft" based on the consensus of the people who naively believe they can really have a choice simply because going to put a cross in from time to time during any election or referendum . (In this regard, here in Italy then we saw what are the referendums, see that for the abolition of public funding to parties ...)
The bitter reality is beautifully expressed by an untranslatable neologism English that is exactly what we are: sheeple. This term combines two words: sheep (sheep) and people (population). In other words, we are a flock of sheep trapped in a human invisible fence like cattle and exploited by a handful of individuals who, either by ties of blood and / or a culture-esoteric Masonic style handed down from centuries, assume the right to control the destinies of the masses and the planet, and consider it their property, and have both the knowledge and means, technical and economic exercised.
Of course they could not do it by myself, and that is why the "system" provides hordes of extras in the form of corrupt and corruptible politicians, journalists, opinion makers, bureaucrats, teachers and anything else that perpetuate, assuming, unconsciously or not, the role of "shepherd" the flock. The system has no need to protect themselves: we ourselves do it for him.
Sermonti is right: an energy revolution of this kind could have disastrous effects, unless it is accompanied by a "leap" in human consciousness, something that makes each of us understand that we are intimately tied together and all mistreated along with this planet, and that only by taking individual responsibility that we deserve can we hope to take back our lives, transforming this society based on individualism in opposition and one characterized by shared and common good. Specifically, a review of the current economic model, accompanied by the return of monetary sovereignty to the people should be a priority, despite the prevailing narcolepsy and misinformation that poisons the minds are a very difficult obstacle to overcome.
However, everything indicates that we are on the brink of an epochal change: it remains to be seen whether humanity as a whole, will take advantage to get rid of "syndrome of the flock" and express all of its enormous potential, or whether the matter will obediently sacrificed on the altar of this New World Order now close to its establishment.

http://www.rinascita.info/cc/RQ_Economia/EkFkEkEFuZzwWbTzwV.shtml

http://mercatoliberonews.blogspot.com/2009/01/reazione-piezonucleare-la-rivoluzione.html


Title: Re: ULTRASONIC PIEZONUCLEAR REACTIONS
Post by: Hypercom on December 27, 2009, 10:43:24 AM
NUCLEAR CLEAN

Free from oil, thanks to ultrasound

The announcement of two Italian physicists: we can also obtain energy from atomic minerals common, eliminating the problem of radioactive waste ...

by Antonio Socci

It has been said that the key to understanding the history of the twentieth century is the oil (with natural gases like methane). Insignia or under a thousand pretexts and black gold (its geopolitical) that has moved armies and revolutions, conditioned and shaped the world political and economic system. And also our way of life globally. Even the fate of the ecosystem and the planet's future depends on oil.

The explosive Islamic problem would not be much without the oil. Besides the wars in progress or in incubation are all areas of oil. The skyrocketing price of black gold now is a sword of Damocles on the world economy. While nuclear power (the only viable alternative) continues to have the problem of radioactive waste. How to escape this vise?

Times in human history have been of scientific discovery to give the unexpected turn and squeeze out the humanity of some blind alleys. Two Italian physicists, Fabio Cardone and Roberto Mignani, announce a discovery now full of charm and appeal. It will be a historic turning point? Certainly the consequences could be noisy in energy (oil free us from tyranny and from the nightmare of nuclear waste) and even in the medical field. This discovery also promises to expand the vision of Einstein's relativity and quantum mechanics of Bohr, along with other discoveries about gravity and electromagnetism contained, with the scientific description of their experiments, the volume of the two physicists entitled "Deformed Spacetime (Geometrizing Interactions in Four and Five Dimensions) "just published by the prestigious German publisher Springer Verlag.

Essentially Cardone and Mignani announce the discovery of nuclear reactions produced by the radioactive elements without sound: by entering ultrasound in different solutions of water and iron salts have been generated with the measured neutron detectors in use for Thermodynamic defense systems achieved 100 percent repeatability of the phenomenon. But who are these Italian scientists who - in a country where the research is mortified and genius abounds - have made this discovery?

Fabio Cardone (who directed the experiments) is a nuclear physicist who has conducted research at CERN in Geneva and taught at several international universities, with a mountain of publications. Roberto Mignani is a professor of theoretical physics at the University of Rome 3 and he also has a comprehensive bibliography. The experiments were conducted in Italy since 2003 military and civilian laboratories with the collaboration of military technicians A. Aracu, A. Bellitto, F. Contalbo, P. Wall and civilian researchers G. Cherubini, A. Petrucci, F. Rosetto, G. Spera.

We asked Cardone to explain the results.
"We discovered," we say "nuclear reactions caused by ultrasound within the natural elements devoid of radioactivity and we called piezonuclear reactions.

These reactions allow to release neutrons by natural aggregates by using an ultrasonic generator mechanic supplied with electricity. Moreover, these reactions release energy and also directly induce the elements to change the nature transmutes.

One is reminded of the myth of the ancient alchemists who already Enrico Fermi remembered ...
"If, instead of being inert, these reactions are applied to small amounts of radioactive substances, they reduce their radioactivity in times ten thousand times shorter than the natural time reduction '.

So you can think of formidable discovery applications in the energy ...
"This discovery may find wide application fields as well as performing the control and disposal of unwanted radioactive materials into the existing nuclear industry for the production of energy, and nuclear industry in the future thanks to the advantage of being able to work with radioactive substances are not easy to find and supply .

We do understand. We will be able to extract clean energy from nuclear and radioactive minerals common?
"Yes This point is relevant because it would allow the nuclear industry's ability, in perspective, reasonably independent on the supply of radioactive minerals resulting in sharp reduction of dependence on geopolitics from areas of production. A particular case warrant applications in the field of defense and the study of materials, thanks to the availability of machines capable of generating neutrons similar to the X-ray generating machines. "

What scientific developments can have your research?
"The research on reactions piezonuclear has his summary of developments in the exploration of atomic nuclei (nucleosynthesis) and the lesion of the nuclei (nucleolisi), catalyzed by the pressure of the ultrasound elements from which we do not expect nuclear reactions."

What is the way that your new discovery opens?
"The synthesis of the nuclei is similar, but not similar to the thermonuclear fusion that gives energy to the sun, but the lesion of the nuclei is similar to fission that produces energy in nuclear power plants. Since 1944 the experiments of K. Diebner and W. Gerlach in Germany leads to the observation that the pressure produced in nuclear reactions and radioactive substances containing appropriate components, such as deuterium, heavy water. Monitor the implementation of the first nuclear weapons hybrid fission-fusion, which fortunately were not used in Europe during the Second World War.

Those experiments were a continuation ...
"Yeah, kept and have undergone a change in America since 1992 with G. Russ and 2002 with R. Taleyarkhan who applied the pressure of ultrasound to the substances used by Diebner and Gerlach. The natural development is now studying the application of ultrasonic pressure in all known facts, keeping in mind that the reactions piezonuclear can not always happen, but only when you exceed a suitable threshold power of ultrasound.

So the sound is the "key" to turn the matter, but must be calibrated to perfection.
"Establishing this threshold power of ultrasound for the various elements is the goal toward management and a better and safer control of matter. Moreover, the study of this phenomenon may be helpful to understand how the stars will produce elements heavier than iron. Indeed, if today is very clear from the nature of the primordial hydrogen build all the elements up to iron, it is less clear how we proceed from Ferro to build heavier and heavier elements up to uranium. "

What other applications in sight?
"The study of how to govern the transmutations of matter produced by this process can result in medicine methods for the removal of harmful tissue in the human body through their transformation."
One can thus imagine a near future where instead of surgical intervention on body tissues can be harmful in a bloodless change. Fascinating. But - to return to the field of energy - was established on how long you can experience these new ways?

"The time required for the application possibilities in the energy field of the discovery of reactions piezonuclear become reality has been reviewed by managers and directors of companies for energy both in Italy and in America. However, it is a problem that will remain with the CNR who is the owner of the patent application.

So how many years it will take?
"Concerning the current nuclear power industry, uranium-based reactors, has been estimated from a 3 to 5 years to develop the prototype of an industrial plant capable of moving in the elimination of radioactive substances from the current minimum amount of experiments in industrial quantities. For the study of plant production of neutrons and for the production of energy, the estimated time will be greater, 5 to 15 years. "

At what cost?
"The costs of these plants were evaluated in 100 million dollars each for a total of 300 million dollars."

It may seem a long waiting period ...
"Yes, but remember that 20 years passed since the discovery in 1934 of the Fermi method to release nuclear energy from uranium, before having a nuclear powered reactor that was capable of propelling the submarine Nautilus when browsing in the North Pole in 1954. The time is long compared to the desire for immediate solutions to this but we have a duty to make this work which has now begun. "

We owe it to future generations ...
"And also our fathers ...».
How was the first idea of this research?

"The first idea, that in its background spanning over 20 years, was born from the desire to expand and extend the theory of relativity and quantum mechanics. It was followed the analogy of what happens in the theory of relativity where the space around the sun is not flat. Thus it is known, since dall'eclisse sun of 1919, which runs the starlight bending around the sun like a comet, and underscoring the reality that significant space around the sun is not flat. "

What have you raised?
"It was thought that the space around the nucleus of the atom was not flat and this would allow a new way of looking at nuclear forces and their action. Conversely, as in quantum mechanics exists for every problem and fixed a minimum amount of energy it produces, so it was thought that there was a minimal amount of energy and determined enough to prevent the area to remain flat. "

How practical consequence?
"The consequence of these ideas has meant that new nuclear reactions due to pressure is not always realized, but only when you exceed the amount of energy fixed by the forces of nature to prevent the area to remain flat during the reaction.

Basically you have found the key ...
"Yes The search took then to build a machine capable of generating ultrasound with sufficient power to access the non-flat space of the nuclei and in conditions likely to produce reactions that release neutrons of the nuclei reagents.
www.antoniosocci.it

November 2, 2007

http://www.resident.it/piezonucleare.htm
Title: Re: ULTRASONIC PIEZONUCLEAR REACTIONS
Post by: Hypercom on December 27, 2009, 11:01:36 AM
Ciao

We face the history! One of the greatest scientific discoveries ever made!
Clean energy, without residue, no waste, no harmful radiation and, as a "deviation", production of common laboratory reagents and synthesis such as NH4 (ammonia, which, I assure you, in the laboratory leaves to gallons) ...
The world could actually become a better place, thanks to this group of researchers.

The idea itself is brilliant: use of ultrasound and the pressure they exerted in order to trigger a nuclear reaction in an element of it does nothing, the iron ...

Hypercom
Title: Re: ULTRASONIC PIEZONUCLEAR REACTIONS
Post by: Hypercom on December 27, 2009, 11:18:06 AM
Ultrasound can produce nuclear reactions in liquids. In summary, the results of this research, both theoretical and experimental, conducted in the 'last decade by physicists Fabio Cardone of the National Research Council and Roberto Mignani' s University "Roma Tre".
In particular, the experiments carried out (in collaboration with physicists Walter Perconti, John Petrucci and Andrea Cherubini and Francesca chemical Rosetto and Guido Spera) showed that in water irradiated with ultrasound of appropriate power and frequency occur transmutations of elements, both stable that unstable and can produce information not found in nature as l 'Europe. These processes occur apparently with emission of neutrons. The production of neutrons was explicitly found in 'ultrasonic irradiation of solutions containing iron salts. L 'emission of neutrons is a clear marking of nuclear reactions, which causes their ignition by the pressure waves were referred piezonuclear reactions. The phenomenon is reproducible and largely controllable, shows a threshold behavior in the 'energy supplied to the liquid by ultrasound, and takes place without producing radioactive waste.
The theoretical mechanism proposed by Cardone and Mignani piezonuclear to explain the processes is as follows. Under appropriate conditions of power and frequency, ultrasound produces cavitation in liquids process, namely the formation of gas bubbles which then implode. Due to surface tension, the atoms of the elements present in the fluid trapped on the surface of the bubble. When this implodes, the atoms are forced to approach overcoming the barrier of Colombia, and their nuclei are fused. In other words, the surfaces of the bubbles produced by cavitation behave like many accelerators inertial.
Piezonuclear reactions produce energy, as evidenced by the significant evaporation of solutions, and, as already noted, do not give rise to radioactive waste as employees 'fuel' stable. Furthermore, an experiment carried out by irradiating a solution containing thorium with ultrasound showed a halving of the average life of thorium and therefore an 'acceleration of its decay. This implies that reactions piezonuclear may play a role in the disposal of radioactive waste. Possible industrial applications are currently being studied. "
Title: Re: ULTRASONIC PIEZONUCLEAR REACTIONS
Post by: Hypercom on December 27, 2009, 11:27:53 AM
Italian government's commitment to the exploitation of piezonucleare

Session No 195 Wednesday
July 1, 2009
Chamber of Deputies

CHAMBER OF DEPUTIES
XVI LEGISLATURE
195 ^ PUBLIC SESSION
Wednesday, July 1, 2009 - 9:15 pm
 
Resume discussion.

(Resumption examination of agendas - AC 1441-b-C)

PRESIDENT. Resume consideration of the agendas presented (see Annex A - AC 1441-b-C).
I note that the presenter accepts the reformulation and does not insist on a vote of the agenda Aracu No 9/1441-ter-C/1, accepted by the Government, subject to redrafting.

... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .... OMISSIS ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...

AGENDA

A.C. 1441-b-C

AGENDA

Provisions for the development and internationalization of enterprises, and energy.

N. 2.

Sitting of 1 July 2009
(The file does not include agendas aside and declared ineligible)

The Chamber

Given that:

the bill under consideration to address any structural investing strategically important sector of our country with particular reference to the energy sector;

energy resources is a key element for development and wealth of every country, especially for a country like Italy, who is forced to bear heavy burdens on the absolute energy dependency towards foreign countries;

measures taken in the energy laid the foundations for the adoption of a national energy plan that sees the diversification of sources, exploitation of renewable energy sources and development of nuclear strategic objectives to be pursued to bring the cost of energy on levels of other European countries;

Development of the source of nuclear energy is a great opportunity for development, allowing to bridge the energy gap that Italy has accumulated in recent years against other European countries;

last decade in Italy were conducted important studies on piezo-nuclear reactions, both in liquids than in solids, which can be produced by different phenomena such as pressure waves, shock waves, ultrasound;

the results of research on piezo-nuclear reactions could have a major impact on the development of nuclear technologies play the crucial role also in terms of disposal of radioactive waste,

commits the Government

to take, including through legislative action, appropriate financial support for the research and industrial application of piezo-nuclear reactions discovered by the National Research Council (CNR) for liquids and from the Polytechnic of Turin for solids and patented by CNR .
9/1441-ter-C/1. Aracu.
 
http://www.windoweb.it/energia_nucleare_pulita_piezonucleare/piezonucleare_impegno_governo_italiano.htm
Title: Re: ULTRASONIC PIEZONUCLEAR REACTIONS
Post by: mscoffman on December 27, 2009, 11:57:04 AM
The end process of the collapse of cavitation bubbles caused by mechanical
deposition of energy (numerous different causes) in a liquid causes the
formation of a zero barycentric momentum neutron (LENR) directly into the
nucleus of an atom of a "target material". After the deposition of this neutron
standard nuclear reactions proceed apace. This is not a hot neutronic reaction
because the neutron is never free of nuclear forces. This is the basis of the
CF Cold Fusion reaction.

:S:MarkSCoffman
Title: Re: ULTRASONIC PIEZONUCLEAR REACTIONS
Post by: lwh on December 27, 2009, 12:54:24 PM
Fascinating.  This technology has been mentioned here before, but it's good to see more details and up to date news about it, thanks for sharing.  This looks to me like the sort of thing even the most mainstream scientists and politicians could get behind and support, all around the world.  Looking forward to seeing what gets made out of it, or if it gets ignored.

Les.   
Title: Re: ULTRASONIC PIEZONUCLEAR REACTIONS
Post by: wings on December 27, 2009, 01:49:24 PM
for Italian people:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=post;quote=217802;topic=8503.0;num_replies=12;b25c7ce2215=eb79ff0cf81ff693d4cd042a8333c49b

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9nlihQO1MfM&feature=player_embedded

.... the world has an incredible wealth of private interests....
the world has an incredible wealth of selfishness...which are increasingly depleting natural resources ...

this sistem we can easy turn it on and off without problems gamma ray emissions....we can build a pilot reactor that uses traditional turbine power plant

more:
http://www.youtube.com/user/redherojtd#p/u
Title: Re: ULTRASONIC PIEZONUCLEAR REACTIONS
Post by: wings on December 27, 2009, 02:08:00 PM
I like this system that use cavitation flow through an orifice and electric discharge .... is more simple and can be used for house heating,

http://www.rexresearch.com/koldomsv/koldomsv.htm

The Koldamasov Cavitation Device 19. Excerpts of Student Paper: Report on the Work of A.I. Koldamasov 20. Proton-21 Research Presented in University of Illinois Seminar

internet always loose the best pages...

http://web.archive.org/web/20070608200620/http://blake.montclair.edu/~kowalskil/cf/216koldamasov.html



Title: Re: ULTRASONIC PIEZONUCLEAR REACTIONS
Post by: Hypercom on December 31, 2009, 08:33:56 AM
Opinions varied.

If it were true and you could get enough energy than normal nuclear would be the turning point really, why not offer to Iran so we see and understand the answer .....

Because from theory to practice there goes ... while nuclear is now a reality, this type of resource has just been discovered. Still it's true. We shall see, is a little unusual, I would not want to be a deadly hoax.

The project, born a few years ago, was focused largely on creating a job (based on ultrasonic cavitation, or at piezonuclear reactions induced by ultrasounds and cavitation), act primarily to reduce the radioactivity of certain elements. I do not believe, however valid the hypothesis that this physical process, yielding a gain of energy than the energy expended for the initiation and maintenance of process questione.Infatti, paradoxically, being able to control the entire process, as it does not take any form trigger a chain reaction, is what takes away all hope in being able to multiply the energy produced in order to obtain a significant gain and an excellent result between energy expenditure and energy actually produced. For example, in a process of nuclear fission, and prioprio chain reaction of neutrons to ensure that the end is obtained gain energy not indifferent, then the fact of being able to control that chain reaction (that is to be able to keep the multiplication factor k <1, an operation made possible by the fact that some of the neutrons emitted during fission is not immediately from the radioactive products of fission, but with a delay of several seconds), gives us the opportunity can manage the whole process in the best manner and with the best possible gain of energy (the thermo-nuclear power plants are basically nothing more than huge "kettle" is well known, but as we know, even to boil the water needs a certain amount of energy). Without the possibility of triggering a chain reaction (fusion, fission ,...) any physical process suitable for producing alternative energy, is considered very inefficient and very much in contrast to the first law of thermodynamics.

As long as there is to squeeze the oil reserves, I fear nothing done horizon. There are many alternatives but tested against the interests of lobby groups, who had been implemented immediately would be limited emissions of greenhouse gases and pollution and the reduction of petroleum reserves, but this does not suit to imperialism! Always remember the words of Kissinger, who controls the food controls the people, who controls the energy can control whole continents, who controls the money controls the world and in your opinion who is the controller?

http://oknotizie.virgilio.it/info/493018805782a8c7/svolta_storica_scoperta_la_nuova_energia_nucleare_pulito_liberi_dal_petrolio_grazie_agli_ultrasuoni.html
Title: Re: ULTRASONIC PIEZONUCLEAR REACTIONS
Post by: Hypercom on December 31, 2009, 09:03:28 AM
Ciao

TOWARDS NUCLEAR CLEAN

Discovery and exploitation of nuclear reactions Ultrason.

What I got from the meeting with Prof. Cardone is amazing.

I hope to convey a little bit to those who will venture between these lines. And above all I hope that everyone, with their own culture and sensitivity, contributing to spread, even opposition, what we try to communicate, the net is populated by saints and thieves but has the virtue / defect could not be "prosecuted" too easily. I trust in this aspect. One of the biggest risks that you run this new discovery comes from the fact that media criticism as we know it is always under the control of the economic and / or speed.

I try to restore with the highest fidelity possible because the prof. Cardone has authorized me to report and which is contained in the publication of the title to your post.

Foreword

In 1989 it was observed a particular physical phenomenon which was later attributed to the term are-luminescence. Shocked by the fact that liquids, subjected to a sound pressure, became light-emitting. The light at the end is a form of energy, waves or electromagnetic radiation. Many hypotheses were advanced on how it could be explained by the phenomenon. We focused mostly on the sound pressure exerted on liquids, but we soon became aware that the heart of the problem lay in cavitation.

What is cavitation?

The bubbles in liquids and gases dissolved under pressure sufficient to affect the balance inside, they behave in the opposite way to what would a soap bubble floating in the air instead of explode, implode. The blades of the propeller of a boat show in fact a series of abrasion and wear caused its implosion characteristic of these micro gas bubbles in the vicinity of the metal of which the helix is formed. The pressure exerted by the movement of the propeller, then the cause is sufficient to cause micro implosions. We realized that these were so small and so short-term focus an impressive amount of energy in an infinitesimal space. Ultrasound in particular could then cause the collapse of the bubbles dissolved in water at room temperature and pressure environment. Also particularly surprised that bubbles under pressure ultrasonic spontaneously transformed the pressure wave in shock. Opened the way of measurements: the way a favorite of all empiricist.

Looking at the amount of light emitted by ultrasound in liquids stressed, you begin to estimate the temperature reached in the microscopic spaces next to the tiny shock waves: Thousands, hundreds of thousands and finally millions of degrees. Temperatures were obviously confined spaces infinitesimal, but still sufficient to force the atoms dissolved in the liquid to release light through the release of the components of which are set up. The idea that the bubbles could lead to an endless series of tiny shock waves to trigger a chain reaction, was reached very quickly. Certainly it was necessary that the bubbles contain gas profits to cause a nuclear reaction when they had been subjected to cavitation. It felt so different mixtures of deuterium and heavy water with mixed success, mostly assigned to "see what happens if" .... Starts then the analytical phase during which it ushered a new terminology to identify the phenomenon piezonuclear reactions.

No wonder that the first institutions to finance the systematic search in this new field of physics were the Ministry of Defense and Energy of the United States of America.

The surveys were developed during the periods 1992-1998 and 1999-2002. In the dense volume of Prof. Cardone "TOWARDS NUCLEAR CLEAN - discovery and exploitation of nuclear reactions ultrasonic" contains a concise summary of developments in this research, which concludes:

... In subsequent experiments conducted at the University Perdue, Taleyarkhan finally decided to give up the pulses of neutrons from the outside and in addition decided to change back liquid heavy water. Unfortunately he failed to give radiation to catalyze the production of bubbles, and mixes with water a mixture of radioactive uranium, uranyl nitrate, subsequently triggering the usual sterile controversy but this time more violent, with the known result that the controversy between the scientists 'only to challenge the science. In fact, as one might think that nuclear energy is produced with ultrasound, however if you use uranium? ... ... It continues to remain the unknown factor of gamma rays, it was unclear if they were produced or not and if so to that extent, this was a kind of unsolved mystery that continued to hover over all experiments. In fact, these experiments left all with one question, if the pressure as a pressure wave, shock or collapse cavitation, or could not produce or catalyze nuclear reactions, and if so, how? New or notes?

ITALIAN RESEARCH

The methods and approaches differ widely from our home there than the U.S. or German of the last century. Professor Cardone says that ... "we need to think before acting, but without too many preconceptions or prejudices, conscious that the logic of nature is not human, otherwise science would be far too easy ..."

Geometry

Theoretical studies that around 2003 preceded the experiments were debated at length in many universities (La Sapienza, Rome 3, L'Aquila, Perugia, Messina and Turin, and of course the CNR). These preliminary studies also contributed to the University of Gdansk, Maryland, Harvard University, the Polytechnic Institute of Boston (MIT) and the European laboratories of CERN.

The idea was that the space around the atomic nuclei were not flat like a sheet of paper resting on a table, but it was possible for the nuclear forces deform space microscopically at least within certain limits.

This hypothesis stated briefly in the book mentioned above but much more thoroughly in Deformed Space Time (F. Cardone - R. Mignani Ed Springer), formed the basis for a theory is extremely complex in terms of how would deform the space (and time! ) under the action of forces as the radioactivity surprisingly independent nuclear interaction, as both would have to be made an experimental machine that can take them into account. Employees are regularly reported in the book, events and concepts that have led to the prototype that was later built and put into operation. It is also necessary to clarify how and why he thought the iron as "fuel" ideal to be used for Testing (anything but inert radioactive material).


Considering the table of elements ... all the nuclei from smaller, deuterium, to the largest, uranium, are arranged according to increasing value of their binding energy per component. Between these two extremes there is iron, which is located about halfway between Deuterium and Uranium, Iron also has the highest binding energy per component of all nuclei of the elements, plus iron is inert, that is not radioactive. Because of its properties have the highest binding energy, iron is the most disadvantaged to produce nuclear energy and also the least inclined to do so. Joked one can say that its core is ... "hard as iron" and then would be less desirable element to be considered, at least according to common sense, as he said Fermi. But all of this in normal conditions, ie in a flat space. In contrast, in an area deformed by the nuclear energy, the iron is in advantageous position. In fact, if there is an energy threshold to reach, which is above all the binding energies, the nucleus with higher energy is closer, what with the same power delivered over the first among others nuclei and, more importantly, in the shortest time ... This is an argument of extreme simplicity and elegance that summarizes a series of arguments and calculations to very complex and is due to the Italian physicist W. Perconti.

EXPERIENCE

The project was executed by a team of experts led by Prof. Cardone. It was a very efficient synergy between academics and Italian army.

Sure require the iron emission nuclear energy, what's reasonable within a few tens of minutes seemed to be the most reckless one could expect. With ultrasound, then ...

... To understand the enormity of what we consider the fact that ultrasound acting on atoms that are 100,000 times as large as the nucleus, but the core has an energy 100,000 times greater of the atom, hence the huge disparity between nuclear power and chemical industries.

Yet the idea was that warped space, then in the presence of a warped geometry, you could change a lever tragically disadvantage shamelessly profitable.

THE MACHINE

Tested and implemented by the armed forces, the "cavitation" (the name assigned to the equipment) has two strong points are not considered in previous experiments Americans and Perugia: the separation of "sonotrode" from the reaction chamber and a cooling system new concepts.

Without going into details the proportions of the sonotrode and the reaction chamber should have a very precise geometry due to thermal expansion which would have been subjected. Extreme care of these features (geometry and cooling system), would allow the operation at the machine at any time.

The machine worked reasonably stable. Issuance of ultrasonic 20Khz (20,000 oscillations per second) with an intensity of 100 watts.

Now he had to choose the "combutibile.

We chose items sorted by mass and nuclear energy component of the nucleus: Lithium, Aluminum, Iron. The form of chlorides for all three but with the added nitrate of iron. Not expected of course no emission of neutrons by lithium and aluminum, but the iron. Quantities, proportions, dosages and whatever else was necessary to the success of the experience was, however, the theory predicts. It was time to choose another crucial component for verification: a neutron detector efficiency. We opted for the best: the Canadian thermodynamic BTI detectors.

These allow you to block, make visible, to count and photograph the bubbles of a hydrocarbon, immersed in a jelly, and put in boiling energy neutrons. The spending was supported by the armed forces with courage.

Despite the remarkable reliability of the thermodynamic verification, in 2005 he wanted to give the system an additional means of detection: photographic plates of polycarbonate (CR39) was correct at the Boro.

In 2006 finally added an indicator to trifluoro Boron for electronic recording of data. This would permit the drawing of a graph on the emission of neutrons, the quantity of energy produced over 90 'of operating the machine.

POWER ..

Within 90 minutes duration of the experiment was not measured no emission of neutrons with regard to Lithium and Aluminum. But with the iron remained in stone: first experiment and first success.
The cross-checks with our three detection systems began to write in perfect agreement signals of nuclear activity (emission of neutrons) after 50 minutes approx.

No presence of alpha and beta radiation outside the reaction chamber or within 90 minutes of evidence, or posthumously to experience over and the machine off. No presence of gamma radiation in all conditions. Further comparisons were made with iron chloride and nitrate, iron, always with the same results. Chemical form did not affect the production of neutrons, only the presence of iron was decisive.

With increased amount of iron incorporated in the reaction chamber a corresponding increase in time required for the production of neutrons. This definitively confirms the existence of inertia and therefore a field of waiting in the production process of the reactions piezonuclear and ultrasonic cavitation.

In 2006 the experiments were moved from one site to the laboratories of the Italian CNR in Rome in order to verify the repeatability of phenomena: exact same results, that same lack of alpha, beta and gamma.

The absence of gamma radiation that we observed was thorough field investigation of other researchers: experiences using spectrometers with accurate crystal of sodium iodide and thallium further confirms the absence of gamma radiation.

It was at this point is very interesting as proposed by the then President of CNR after having overseen the results: the comparison between our ultrasound machine and a conventional nuclear reactor, uranium (supplied with the ENEA-Casaccia Rome).

This too was an amazing experience.

Another surprise

But what he would do something that unlike iron was radioactive?
With thorium, a mildly radioactive element, something unexpected happened and surprising.
Solutions were prepared very low isotope Torio228. This consists of 90 protons and 138 neutrons, and since it is a hexa-alpha emitter emits 6 alpha particles that form on a photographic plate of polycarbonate image like the fingers of a hand. Its radiation is so unmistakable even in the midst of other environmental radiation.
The natural time when its radiation and its contents are cut in half is about two years.
8 of the twelve samples prepared were subjected to cavitation in our car and the other 4 would be served at the comparison.
After the experience cavitate the samples were subjected to analysis by a high-resolution mass spectrometer (quadrupole magnetic field) and found that both the content and radioactivity was exactly halved!
Measurement of neutron had not given significant results.

What should be considered?

That thorium undergo cavitation had turned in a time like 10,000 times faster than happens naturally, concluding that it was subject to a piezo-nuclear reactions that they had altered the nature making him pass the threshold energy of the radiative forcing beyond which the geometry of this force ... it was no longer flat.

The case of iron and thorium could become emblematic of another fact, which exceeded the threshold of distortion is a bit 'through the Mirror of Alice "to enter a place where the inert iron emits neutrons even though it is the most underdog to do so, while the radioactive Thorium loses its radioactivity in a time too short to produce an inert state. ...

http://redhero.splinder.com/post/17182366
Title: Re: ULTRASONIC PIEZONUCLEAR REACTIONS
Post by: Hypercom on December 31, 2009, 10:01:10 AM
Ciao

Comments and opinions

AND NOW?

a feast of energy

Piezonuclear reactions are a reality. CNR has now the rights to the patent application that could make independent every corner of the planet by the lords of energy. Nuclear energy abundant, safe, affordable, and above all very friendly. Are still their, Fabio Cardone and Roberto Mignani his colleague to appear on the front page of today Free. Now it is about whether patent rights will be useful, "the evolution of species" or consolidation of power "oil based" (assessment of today's oil $ 94 per barrel). For the technical operation of the principle back to a previous post, but what's really arouses my curiosity is not the scientific aspect, but rather the possibility that the interest on the exploitation of the discovery are at least equal to their cover-up, like the past often confirms ... Prevention? Yes, so what?

What we do with this monstrous growth possibilities for humanity? Have the strength to make it available for everyone? We shall endeavor to hide? Make monopoly of some lobbies?

Professor Cardone said:

We will be able to extract clean energy from nuclear and radioactive minerals common. This would allow the nuclear industry to become reasonably independent in outlook on the supply of radioactive material with a consequent sharp reduction of dependence on geopolitics from areas of production.

In the passion that a researcher spends in the name of knowledge, there are also other components, such as the desire to have produced something not only good but also for everyone, just like Henry Ford stated: there is real progress only when the advantages of a new technology are for everyone. The production of nuclear energy for cavitation would indeed constitute the fundamental building block for collective progress, but you know the benefits to the community clash dangerously with those of a select few ...

Thanks anyway Profs. Cardone and Mignani

redhero

http://redhero.splinder.com/post/14557823#comment

Title: Re: ULTRASONIC PIEZONUCLEAR REACTIONS
Post by: Hypercom on December 31, 2009, 10:30:41 AM
Ciao

Some interesting comments:

Dear Red, the issue has returned topical in view of the decision to build nuclear power plants in Italy for three generations. I suggested instead of following the path of miracles Cardone. Because this country many technical decisions are taken, unfortunately the emotional, it would be good that scientists do not use the megaphone of the newspapers to disseminate their eventual discovery. This sense of responsibility. On the merits, I read both documents carefully and follow the lecture of prof. Cardone, but did not dispel the doubts of the fund. Any atomic nucleus loses neutrons is transformed into an isotope, often unstable, which tends to return to the initial state or lose a few proton, becoming a different substance. The only way to observe the production of neutrons in the experiment of Cardona could be represented by a transient state of some nuclei, which emit neutrons stimulated, but to combine in the nuclei return immediately thereafter. This does not account for the radioactivity in the final. The phenomenon is not new and has been extensively documented by others for several decades, though not on iron. The net production of energy would be nothing, unless there is a permanent transformation of iron into something different. Cardone says nothing about it, nor explains why the peak of alleged production of neutrons, the experiment was stopped. Curiously cycle thermonuclear fusion that occurs in stars just stops when all the light material was transformed into iron. So the only statement that I can share the prof. Cardone is that iron is the material with the nucleus more stable.

Reply

I wanted to clarify that the machine used for experiments is a scientific investigation, then only useful detectar the phenomenon, and not explore the economic and speculative purposes. He did very well the reality of the reactions occurring in piezonuclear inert.

Therefore, this machine can not but neither should be considered or used as "industrial prototype.
I do not know if I explain. However, it may certainly help to identify a useful way to identify the technological criteria were able to exploit the phenomenon of reactions piezonuclear through its measurements. Regarding your question about what has become witty iron subjected to ultrasonic stress, there are some theories quite satisfactory (I invite you to download the book from which to extract exactly these concepts any longer a high post in Word format): one hypothesis is that the iron "divide" but not "fission" into two aluminum and two neutrons that escape from the reactor. this would be a balanced response in terms of neutrons and protons but absolutely new type could be called just as new as "nucleolisi" (for example).

The opposite would be the "nucleosisntesi" namely "the union of nuclei. But please refer to the download which I have mentioned. You'll find all this in a much more comprehensive.

When watch ... could be represented by a transient state of some nuclei, which stimulated emit neutrons, but to combine in the nuclei return soon after. There is a fundamental doubt on the analogy of the state transition of some nuclei:
You say ... stimulated emit neutrons, but returned soon after the nuclei to combine ... but then out of the car and how they can be detected and / or even photographed??
Perhaps the analogy should be reconsidered. You think?

It is also important that you understand that the experience is stopped to avoid the dangerous occurrence of a reaction that will not be more divergent checked at least hypothetically. On this but I believe that you too will agree about the human and normal precautionary principle.

Finally I think the nuclear power generation trerza indicated by Scajola could be a suitable response to the current energy needs (see above all the fourth generation of the Westinghouse AP 1000 nuclear reactor on the Internet) is unnecessary that we struggled further, the present nuclear unfortunately that fission "evolved." Nevertheless, the discovery of the CNR gives us the future prospect (though not future) of a new nuclear power, perhaps even a new physics that can transmute matter, a "nuclear ultrasonic" which is certainly necessary to direct scientific and technological research is .

red

http://redhero.splinder.com/post/14557823#comment
Title: Re: ULTRASONIC PIEZONUCLEAR REACTIONS
Post by: Hypercom on December 31, 2009, 12:34:21 PM
Ciao

Other comments

Dear redhero,
after your suggestion I started to do some research on the topic specific.
Actually there are several things, both in approach and the merits of the discovery that I am not convinced.
I would expect to find a description of the experimental and results in a peer-reviewed international journal, instead the original article published in a volume which really is primarily concerned with theoretical physics.
But I found the preprint at:
http://arxiv.org/pdf/0710.5115
which I shall read carefully before making further comment.

Regards, Asmodaeus

Reply

Allow me to answer Asmodaeus the merits of the publication of our results. I should point out that it is from about 8 years working on piezonuclear reactions, and the first esoperimenti we focused our attention on the transmutation of the elements in solution (the philosopher's stone ...) and not on the production of neutrons (although we had indirect evidence in the first experiment performed). These results were presented at two conferences in Russia, held in Moscow in 2001 and 2004, and are published in the proceedings of the conferences in the journal Gravitation and Cosmology. Our other work on the production of stable elements and artificial elements, respectively, have appeared on International Journal of Modern Phisics B and Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, and a proposal for a theoretical model that explains what is happening (and which requires, among other new physics, that we told in our book, and the preceding "Energy and Geometry", World Scientific, 2004) was published in International J. Modern Physics E. Remind those who did not know that the reviews of the series Int J. Modern Phys. are published by World Scientific, one of the most important scientific publishing houses, which also publishes the Nobel Lectures.
If you want, I can also provide explicit bibliographic references.
Regarding the recent results with neutrons, we have around three jobs, but it is not our fault if the referee say 'What did you find it contradicts the existing physical, and therefore can not be true "(sic!), In spite of Galileo and the scientific method!
Thank you for your interest in any case.
Roberto Mignani

http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0710/0710.5115v3.pdf

http://redhero.splinder.com/post/14557823#comment
Title: Re: ULTRASONIC PIEZONUCLEAR REACTIONS
Post by: Hypercom on December 31, 2009, 03:46:26 PM
Ciao

According to prof. Cardone it is neither fission nor fusion. This is the transmutation of matter. Or the application of ultrasound will cause the leakage of neutrons to the nucleus, and this implies a change in the density of the atom. In the video of Grottammare Prof. Cardone focuses on the presence initially of molybdenum during the process that would be transmuted into copper, sulfur and tungsten. The core is not split, or merge with other nuclei. Just change the atomic density of matter. It seems clear that, in addition to energy production, including the ability to create materials in kind from many low abundant materials.

http://vimeo.com/4776140
Title: Re: ULTRASONIC PIEZONUCLEAR REACTIONS
Post by: Hypercom on December 31, 2009, 03:57:39 PM
Ciao

For cavitation can also use electrical impulses:

electro cavitation

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OjkAR33FbF8

ps.

I take this opportunity to wish the researchers and all those interested in alternat energy, clean energy, a good new year ...

Hypercom
Title: Re: ULTRASONIC PIEZONUCLEAR REACTIONS
Post by: sparks on December 31, 2009, 07:43:56 PM
    More bubble fusion.  This is how dumb we are.  We have hydrogen produced by the kiloton everyday and distributed at the northpole.  But we are so selfconsumed with the quest for fusion we produce hydrogen expenditure of energy  then we try to fuse it into helium.  More expenditure of energy.  You cant drink helium.  Why wouldnt you just take the hydrogen you are trying to fuse and have it combine with oxygen in a fuel cell.  Hit some water with infrared it gets less dense.  It rises, overcoming gravity.  Hit is with xrays and gammarays what does it do.  Cant electrons and ionized cores be influenced to be classified in the presence of a magnetic field.   
Title: Re: ULTRASONIC PIEZONUCLEAR REACTIONS
Post by: Hypercom on January 01, 2010, 08:11:46 AM
Ciao

Personal considerations.

Typically these discoveries into possible alternative energy, if not become reality in a reasonable time (few years), in turn inevitably inexhaustible sources by publishing XFILES to the delight of those who see conspiracies around the world.
And of those, then, that somehow we speculated above ... for and against. Let's hope so.
The presence of distinguished researchers, armed forces, of prestigious universities and centers of Italian and foreign research suggests that this is a serious matter. Too many important people misses the face, is not it?
And if the price of oil disproportionately in recent months were the result not only of the increased international demand, but, instead, fear that these oil companies have that their wealth has come at the terminus?
If so, we would be really close to a turning point for humanity's future ... ... and all of us.

http://www.resident.it/piezonucleare.htm

Hypercom
Title: Re: ULTRASONIC PIEZONUCLEAR REACTIONS
Post by: ramset on January 01, 2010, 08:31:27 AM
Hypercom said
Quote:
" we would be really close to a turning point for humanity's future ... ... and all of us."
End quote

That would be nice.

Here's a bug that has been doing this for a million or so years.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eKPrGxB1Kzc

Do you think he's getting more out than in??
maybe I could send a few to Stephan for the OU prize?

Cavitation Nature likes it :o :o :o

Chet

Title: Re: ULTRASONIC PIEZONUCLEAR REACTIONS
Post by: mscoffman on January 01, 2010, 12:35:49 PM
Quote from: sparks on December 31, 2009, 07:43:56 PM
    More bubble fusion.  This is how dumb we are.  We have hydrogen produced by the kiloton everyday and distributed at the northpole.  But we are so selfconsumed with the quest for fusion we produce hydrogen expenditure of energy  then we try to fuse it into helium.  More expenditure of energy.  You cant drink helium.  Why wouldnt you just take the hydrogen you are trying to fuse and have it combine with oxygen in a fuel cell.  Hit some water with infrared it gets less dense.  It rises, overcoming gravity.  Hit is with xrays and gammarays what does it do.  Cant electrons and ionized cores be influenced to be classified in the presence of a magnetic field.

You need to look at the energy balance...You fuse Hydrogen to Helium to get
at the Nuclear Binding energy...not because it's the only thing you can do with it.
The Sun does this quite nicely...so everything is cool. The Sun uses only one
ton per day of hydrogen.

:S:MarkSCoffman
Title: Re: ULTRASONIC PIEZONUCLEAR REACTIONS
Post by: sparks on January 01, 2010, 01:16:46 PM
       I just believe that Earth is a great infrared photon capture field.  Every day water molecules capture untold numbers of infrared waves into its molecular vibrations.  If we can design an infrared wave capture system and feed the system with ocean thermal energy we dont need to mess around with mass to energy conversion.  Simply capture the energy condense it pass it through conduits and release it at a latter time.  How dumb can we be.  There are thousands of endothermic reactions that could take place in  oceansubmerged heat exchangers.  The reactions are totally reversible and become exothermic when and where we want them to be.  The presence of catalyzing agents the trick.
Electricity is a catalyzing agent in the exothermic combination of carbon and oxygen.  Magnesium is a catalyzing agent in the ultraviolet cracking of carbon dioxide an endothermic reaction.  We need to study nature and forget about trying to outwit her.  She has a very good head start on us.
Title: Re: ULTRASONIC PIEZONUCLEAR REACTIONS
Post by: tinu on January 01, 2010, 03:34:50 PM
@ Hypercom,

Thanks for promoting the discovery of ultrasonic piezonuclear reactions!

I am a physicist and I’d like to ask a couple of questions:

1. Is it possible to provide links and/or references that discuss/explain the inertia of tenths of minutes before the nuclear reactions actually start occurring? I find this feature highly puzzling: if it’s because of bubble collapse, it should be instantaneous once the ultrasound is applied to the flask. On the other hand, similar time lag was reported in cold-fusion and other experiments. Why? How? …

2. Do you know if “Deformes spacetime” book is available in electronic format or not? I’m looking for a copy at a better price and what I’ve found at 154EUR is quite expensive for hobby. Or maybe you can help by pointing to a site that lets users preview some of its content?

Best regards,
Tinu
Title: Re: ULTRASONIC PIEZONUCLEAR REACTIONS
Post by: Hypercom on January 01, 2010, 07:06:04 PM
Quote from: tinu on January 01, 2010, 03:34:50 PM
@ Hypercom,

Thanks for promoting the discovery of ultrasonic piezonuclear reactions!

I am a physicist and I’d like to ask a couple of questions:

1. Is it possible to provide links and/or references that discuss/explain the inertia of tenths of minutes before the nuclear reactions actually start occurring? I find this feature highly puzzling: if it’s because of bubble collapse, it should be instantaneous once the ultrasound is applied to the flask. On the other hand, similar time lag was reported in cold-fusion and other experiments. Why? How? …

2. Do you know if “Deformes spacetime” book is available in electronic format or not? I’m looking for a copy at a better price and what I’ve found at 154EUR is quite expensive for hobby. Or maybe you can help by pointing to a site that lets users preview some of its content?

Best regards,
Tinu
Ciao Tinu

I'm not a physicist, but I'd like to know much more about this issue given its importance to be able to give some specific answers.
As to the book "Spacetime Deformes" I hope to find a link in an electronic format.

Here is an article written by Swedish scientists in which refute theories Cardone: http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0910/0910.3501v1.pdf

Another interesting link:
BRITTLE PIEZONUCLEAR REACTIONS FROM FRACTURE
http://files.splinder.com/4ae1443c64aa2e0faf9cdca00d8e7148.pdf

Hypercom
Title: Re: ULTRASONIC PIEZONUCLEAR REACTIONS
Post by: tinu on January 01, 2010, 07:49:12 PM
Many thanks for your answer and links. I study the files.

I apologize for a typo that went into my above post: I should have written “Deformed Spacetime” (instead of ‘Deformes’).

Best regards,
Tinu
Title: Re: ULTRASONIC PIEZONUCLEAR REACTIONS
Post by: Hypercom on January 02, 2010, 11:23:08 AM
Ciao

@all

I think that to have full electronic access to the book "Deformed Spacetime" is required Institutional Login ...

http://www.springerlink.com/content/978-1-4020-6282-7

If anyone has found a way to have the 'full access please post a link, thanks.

Hypercom
Title: Re: ULTRASONIC PIEZONUCLEAR REACTIONS
Post by: Hypercom on January 02, 2010, 04:35:06 PM
Ciao

An interesting video on one of the last public lectures of prof.Cardone, where you see live a reactor that produces electrolytic piezonuclear reactions.

PIEZONUCLEAR REACTIONS IN COMPRESSED SOLID

PIEZONUCLEAR REACTIONS IN ELECTROLYTIC REACTORS

http://blog.duper.org/sito/2009/05/21/grottammare-delle-nuove-energie-2009/

Related Links:

http://www.eppursifonde.it/ricercatori/Cardone/Cardone-index.html
http://www.eppursifonde.it/ricercatori/Carpinteri/Carpinteri-index.html
http://www.space-itv.com/index.php?option=com_hwdvideoshare&task=viewvideo&Itemid=92&video_id=137
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFltGviYlVM&feature=PlayList&p=BEA69BC985E4457C&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&index=11
http://www.vidilife.com/video_play_1178659_nucleare_pulito_fabio_cardone.htm
http://www.worldscinet.com/ijmpb/17/1703/S0217979203015759.html
http://www.worldscinet.com/ijmpe/15/1504/S0218301306004600.html




Hypercom
Title: Re: ULTRASONIC PIEZONUCLEAR REACTIONS
Post by: lwh on December 17, 2011, 03:47:52 PM
Anyone got any recent news or updates on this?