Free energy from wave-fields
http://www.zpelabs.com/zpelabs/hungarian/interference.htm
Apparently 2 waves in 4 waves out doubling the output power too rather interesting read...
Kinda wonder if this is not the principal the TPU uses or one of them...
Hi Infringer,
Do you happen to still have the document?, it seems like it has disappeared.
Link he gave above works fine but the study_11.exe file that you probably want was not there. However I found it elsewhere, scanned it at virustotal.com for virus since people don't normally put .doc's into .exe's except to add a virus. All was well and I ran it to convert it to a .doc and have compressed it now as a .doc into a .Zip file for safety as well as making it a bit smaller to download. Ooops can't upload it here as it's over 300 kb. (Only 525kb - about a 1/2 meg.) So I think this will get it: http://www.sendspace.com/file/u8j79p
Here's his patent at the European patent website but the details are missing:
http://v3.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19980629&CC=HU&NR=9601424A2&KC=A2
-Steve
http://rimstar.org http://wsminfo.org
Thank you E2matrix,
This is very interesting, one of my projects I was working on was using two computer monitor degaussing coils fed with a low 5-15hz square wave. Take 2 thin flat rectangular magnets and place them between a rubber exercise band. Varying the taughtness of the band over these coils in different setups would cause violent oscillations in the magnet(The band will vibrate wildly). At one point I destroyed the band as the magnets ripped through the rubber material with great force.
@ e2matrix,
Thank you for posting that. I downloaded it & unzipped it.
BUT there is something wrong with the file because Word will not open it. Any ideas?
Thanks.
.
Fatbird, I just downloaded it from that site to check it and it opened up fine. It give a warning upon opening saying something about 'this should be opened in read only mode unless it is to be modified'. I tried it both ways and worked fine. I'll put up a .pdf version I made from it so that may eliminate any problems with different versions of MS Word that might be causing a problem. Here is the .pdf version in a zip file - called it study12.zip (to avoid any conflicts).
http://www.sendspace.com/file/6gidh9
@e2matrix
Please check Page 36 in the pdf file where the radiant efficiency is calculated at the end as being equal to 1 (the equation symbol = is used) while in the DOC file in also Page 36, I cannot see equation symbol but a small square symbol. And the text says: "...thus in the case of the elementary aperture the thesis of energy preservation is significantly violated (a big loss takes place)."
Common sense here may place a "grater than" or "less than" symbol instead of the equation symbol, i.e. either the > or < symbol, agree? Because the text says energy conversion (preservation) is significantly violated.
I use MS Word 2007 which shows the small square symbol instead of the = or the > or the < symbols or whatever should be there.
This same symbol problem occurs again in Page 44 of the doc file: "This phenomena is connected with our discussions under 6/c, as we have got ... 1 for the elementary apertures."
From the sense of the text it may come as a "less than" symbol should be used there, once the author speaks of big energy losses.
So what can you see in the original doc file for that symbol, I wonder.
thanks, Gyula
hi Gyula, The .doc file had a symbol as shown in the copy and paste of the screen capture (jpeg) below. Maybe it is in a font that's not installed in your computer? Not sure but you can see it in the .jpeg. The same symbol you'll see in the .jpeg was also on page 44 where you mentioned.
That symbol appears to be the Xi symbol which according to Wiki can mean any of the following:
The lower-case letter ξ is used as a symbol for:
A joined variant of Ξ.
Random variables
Dimensionless distance variable used in the Lane-Emden equation
Extent of reaction (a topic found most often in chemical engineering kinetics)
Eigenvectors
Damping Ratio C/Ccr(vibrational analysis)
A parameter in a generalized Pareto distribution
The symmetric function equation of the Riemann zeta function in mathematics, also known as the Riemann Xi function
A universal set in the set theory
A number used in the error term of Newtonâ€"Cotes formulas that falls between a and b
One of the two different polypeptide chains of the human embryonic hemoglobin types Hb-Portland (ξ2γ2) and Hb-Gower I (ξ2ε2)
The correlation function in astronomy
Frequency
A small displacement in MHD plasma stability theory
A parameter denoted as warped time used to derive the equations for homogeneous azeotropic distillation
The x-coordinate of computational space as used in Computational Fluid Dynamics
Potential difference in physics (in volts)
The radial integral in the spin-orbit matrix operator in atomic physics.
The Killing vector in General Relativity.
hi all
thanks for converting & posting the PDF e2m, good work - and good find by infringer also
i think i saw a paper a couple years back which explained about the additive effect of superimposed coherent waves (and it originated from Eastern Europe) but i don't think it had as much detail as this paper
interestingly this appears to be the inverse of Don Smith's explained principle behind say his 'suitcase circuit' where he states that many receiving 'aerials' (coils) close to 1 transmitting coil all receive the same full power as a single aerial would, ie. that there is no loss or 'dilution' of the transmitted power once the transmitted signal is in the magnetic domain
Smith states that the turns of a loosely wound 'primary' positioned above but slightly separated from the 'secondary' acts like an array of aerials each transmitting to each turn of the secondary
if that is true, then could we implement the antennae in this paper's principle also with coils like Smith does - only in this case have multiple coils fed in parallel as the 'primary' Tx antennae and a single Rx antenna as the 'secondary'?
eg., say, three air-cored coils next to each other, all standing on end, the middle one is the Rx receiver 'secondary' the outer two are the Tx antennae or 'primaries', connected in parallel?
or a ring of 4 Tx coils connected in parallel, around a single Rx 'secondary' in the middle? (all coils standing on end)
@Gyula
in that line on p36 of the PDF the value for ξis calculated to be equal to an expression and the author says that part of the expression, ie. (delta-A over ((lambda-zero)squared)) is equal to 1
therefore ξ is equal to the other part of the expression which is (4-pi over 3), so ξ > 1 (ie., approx 4.4)
hope this helps!
all the best
sandy
Quote from: e2matrix on July 08, 2010, 07:44:06 PM
hi Gyula, The .doc file had a symbol as shown in the copy and paste of the screen capture (jpeg) below. Maybe it is in a font that's not installed in your computer? Not sure but you can see it in the .jpeg. The same symbol you'll see in the .jpeg was also on page 44 where you mentioned.
Hi,
Thanks for showing the doc file relevant part, so you see a equation symbol = where I can see only a small square symbol in my MS Word. Because I meant the place where the equation symbol is between the ξ and 1, ok?
Member null-points wrote and I fully agree that mathematically there cannot be an equation symbol there because the 4Pi/3 is greater than 1, so ξ cannot be equal to 1, this is why I also mentioned the "greater than" symbol, > as a possibility in my previous letter, ok? This is why I think it maybe a misprint.
Thanks, Gyula
Gyula, that makes sense. I misunderstood exactly which symbol you referred to as I just assumed the '=' sign would be viewable but the other one might require a special font. I didn't even try running the math in that paper but I do understand what you said above. I'm a little hazy on the details but wasn't there something stated on the web site about needing to install a certain math program of something needed to properly view the document? I didn't bother since it looked okay. I wonder if that has any relevance to this situation.
Yes, there was a certain math program recommended to install indeed and then the symbol in question may have been seen correctly, I do not know.
I still think the = equation symbol cannot be there, otherwise the energy anomaly is not an anomaly, at least not mathematically, for 4Pi/3 > 1, hence ξ cannot be equal to 1, ok?