Quote from: poynt99 on November 20, 2008, 09:25:23 AM
AbbaRue,

Yes, that is to be expected isn't it? Normal stuff, but it's not a way of obtaining free energy.

That's like stating "if I run a single motor off a battery, this costs me energy, but if I now insert a second motor in series with the first, the second motor will run for free and I still get the same power and torque from the first"

It doesn't work that way, and neither does the capacitor scenario you outlined above. There is no energy gained, it is conserved.

Remember the one cap and two cap scenarios? The one cap scenario the way Captainpecan is doing it is extremely wasteful, and because of this, the scenario two appears as though a gain of energy occurs, but of course it does not. Apply a short pulse in scenario 1. You will get the same "work" done on that rotor, yet you will still have voltage on your cap!!! PROVE JUST THIS ONE THING TO YOURSELF!

Curious that Captainpecan has not made one single rebuttal to any of the facts I've pointed out. I hope he takes the time to do some of the tests, or at least think through some of them.

I am a free energy enthusiast, but I will try my damnedest to explain any anomaly I see on the bench before making a OU claim. Otherwise you just haven't done your due diligence and odds are that you've overlooked something which is going to come back and bite you. I hope you've got your Kevlar suit on Captainpecan.

Poynt99

Quote from: TheBuzz on November 20, 2008, 01:42:45 AM
After a closer look, I'm afraid I would have to agree with poynt99 on this. The capacitor switch thing was posted on ionizationx for hydrocars to teach him the difference between charge and potential. It is something that I have seen on the web elsewhere as well  - a brain teaser, not a free energy machine unless you only see what you want to see.

Extra voltage found in the charge transfer when you shorted one cap to another came from the spark itself. It is a cavitation and there is a mass to atomic energy conversion that takes place.

All free energy machines work the same way, can only work the same way, they convert mass into the atomic energy contained within the mass. Cavitation is the process to do that.

In the Tesla shuttle circuit which I feel you are loosely basing this on, the mass being converted can come from one or more places. The spark gap and the inductor if it is configured to cavitate properly.

Tesla liked to work with high pressure nitrogen as a mass source. Free energy devices have been produced in the past using nitrogen by others. Any element from 56 down will transmute just fine if you know the techniques used to do that.

Energy does not come from nowhere, it has to have a source. Mass = energy - Maxwell. It is stored potential and in order to unlock it, you need to create a cavitation. All free energy machines cavitate mass somewhere in the process. No exceptions.

Sorry, but that dog ain't going to hunt.