@marco

I didn't see the corona unless the lights were out. The majority of it was the coils. The lowest I could make a coil resonate was mid 35k. The corona was greatest then and in the dark the coil looked like a very weak fluorescent tube. You had to let your eyes adjust first.

It all took a lot of power and I had no measurable rotation so I strayed from that course. I never lit any bulbs with it except NE1's and 2's and gas tubes.

I don't bother with line frequency or multiples. I ruled that out a long time ago.

I'm running a test now to search for frequencies that resonate with the aether and/or Earth's mag field.  The test is done inside a 7 ft x 3 ft x 3 ft faraday cage.  The assumption is that the frequency of the aether itself would be well above the blocking limits of the faraday cage, so the aether would go right through it, into the  testing area.  Then, IF transients are the result of interaction with the aether or Earth's magnetic field, the size of the spikes at certain frequencies should be larger than the ones around it, as certain frequencies come into resonance with either of these possible sources.  I'm using a 4G sample/sec DSO with a separate square wave generator, both of which are controlled via computer from a program I wrote.  The program sets a certain number of pulses per second, gives the DSO 2 seconds to settle in and calculate the readings, then stores those readings on the computer and moves up to the next frequency.  The wire between the square wave gen and the DSO is 6 ft long, pointed straight to magentic north/south and is suspended in the middle of the faraday cage.  Once I have tangible results, either way, I intend to start a new thread with the results.  Any suggestions as to testing methodology would be greatly appreciated.

PS The test bed is aprox 100 feet away from a power line, but not one of the very-high voltage long-haul lines.  The pictures look to me like they're of the latter sort. Plus obviously the power line field should not be inside the faraday cage, so it may help determine where SM's power could be coming from ( or not coming from).
Neo

Now Mr.Mannix isn't verry cooperative lately.

He makes me remove my posts and talkes to others about privacy.
I am glad EM devices posted these pictures and i do not believe it is a coincendence these powerlines lines are there.

Which brings me back to Mr.Mannix.
It seems as if he doesnt want certain things to come out.

I have found one quote from Steven that proves he knew these lines were there.
As a matter of fact he even knew these lines had a diffrent frequency.............

Here it is:

Quote

Speed of the electrons across the surface of the wire is part of the key in my conversion process.
In this country the electric companies are now converting to long range transmission using high frequency alternating current instead of the ancient 60 cycle system used throughout most of the world for the last 100 years.
I do not know if this will be helpful to you or not.

What are the chances a normal person knows the frequency of the powerlines nearby?

Or better said what are the chances a normal person knows the powerlines above their home have a diffrent frequency then the ancient 60Hz?

Why do you think Steven mentiones this?

@Mannix,

Why did you leave it out of the orgional mail??
You knew didn't you??
Are you trying to play us ?
If you still think this isn't about solving things, you are wrong.
And i'm not going to remove it this time.
I just don't understand that you cannot see it's value.
Deliver the whole story ,or deliver nothing.

Marco.

Since this thread is completely off the rails anyway, I'll throw one more thing out as food for thought.  I mentioned at one time that there was part of my theory of TPU operation that, to my knowledge, had not been considered previously.  One thing that keeps sticking in my mind is that during some of his tests, Tesla said he was 'creating electrons'.  No doubt statements like this only added to the ridicule heaped upon him.  However, I believe he was right.  How could electrons be 'created'?  With muons.  Think about it.  Muons come flying in from space at faster-than-light velocities.  This is proven by their speed measurements and resulting time-dilation.  They come in from all different angles and at all different speeds.  As they slow down, they break down into a photon, and electron!! and other quantum particles.  Muons are the most highly-concentrated non-atomic particle at sea level.  Normally they have to go at least 60 feet underground before they break down into an electron, photon, etc.  However, if there were a way to slow them down enough so the breaking-down occurred, for example, above a TPU (say by a dielectric field expanding, X-number of times per second, at faster-than-light velocities), then if there was an absence of electrons in a collector coil, because the electrons normally in the wire were at that moment pushed out away from the wire, then one could capture these newly-created electrons in that vacuum.  Kinetic energy from the speed of the muons themselves would be transferred to the dielectric field, causing it to collapse with more force than it expanded with.  After the muon deteriorated into its component parts, we would gain an electron, as well as the energy from the newly-created photon.

Some things support this theory.  I think it's no accident that Tesla's Wardenclyffe tower had a grounding plane that went several hundred feet into the ground.  If he were trying to capture muons as they converted into an electron, photon, etc., it could be done most effectively at a depth of 60 feet or more.  The second thing that I believe supports this idea is that the Muon-G experiments determined that 225 Khz was the most effective frequency with which to capture muons, given the magnetic field strength that they were using.  As I recall, SM said something once about how hard it would be to find the frequencies AND voltages....not just frequencies.  He also mentioned that his tube amp would go up to 245 khz maximum, so it's in the same general range.  To effectively capture muons, one would need the right magnetic field strength (determined by voltage), as well as the right frequency (which would determine how many times/sec the incoming muons were 'pushed against' by the expanding dielectric field in order to slow them down and keep them in the area so that when they broke down, the muon components would be in the area, ready to be harvested.  Too strong a mag field, or too many pulses/sec would push the components away, and too weak of either would let them fly right on by into the earth.

Quote from SM:

"Speed of the electrons across the surface of the wire is part of the key in my conversion process.
In this country the electric companies are now converting to long range transmission using high frequency alternating current instead of the ancient 60 cycle system used throughout most of the world for the last 100 years.
I do not know if this will be helpful to you or not."


I don't think this information is accurate.  I just talked to a friend who works on power transmission lines for a living.  He said as far as he knew, all power transmission, at least in the US, runs at a frequency of 60 Hz.  He said the long-haul lines run at much higher voltages (kilovolts) but none that he was aware of ran at any frequencies other than 60 Hz.  If you think about it, rf frequencies would turn the lines into antennas, dissipating more energy as rf, resulting in higher losses over a distance.