@hoptoad

Quoteusing normal globes as loads

What is a normal globe?  The opposite of a strange globe? haha!

Thane your attitude is a bit conflicting. On one hand you promote this as a pro peace and pro free energy device. And on the other you're you're ignoring all suggestions of closing the loop. Isn't that what free energy is mostly about? Being completely independent from the grid or external influences. What Stefan suggested is completely realistic and imo not so hard to do. Once the flywheel is up to speed it'll act as the input maintainer while the HV coil's do their job at accelerating it. You should consider who you're real clients are...some corporate entity or the world.

Quote from: Charlie_V on November 26, 2008, 12:23:03 PM
@hoptoad
What is a normal globe?  The opposite of a strange globe? haha!

Good point! Perhaps I should have said, common in lieu of normal. Like a common 18 watt motor vehicle tail light globe. Then again, this might upset all the "royal" globes who don't like to be called common.
Cheers

Folks,

especially @hoptod et al. : I have watched the discussion for a while and feel obliged to ask a few questions here :

If any person in this discussion critizices technical detailes despite the facts shown in the vidos and at the same time claims to have found a easier way of beating the Lenz-Law - so how about presenting your configuration here and explain it ?

It is an old saying in germany : the one who acts much is critizied much, because the one how acts much is liable to make a lot of mistakes which is not the case here

Some of you  really have to review their attitude.

Show your coin and contribute here.

According to a 5 year - delevopment and test-experience I went through where I had two good teachers :
I support Thane´s methode. It is close to mine because I can see the systematics in his development. Systematic innovative development must be learned the hard way or you have good teachers.
In either way slow step-by-step development will teach you walking and minimize failures.

I also do not see any need now to work on a closed loop - because this is far  too early and will lead only  to frustration because you can only reach this goal - if ever -  if you have fully understood the principles at work.

@hopetod : have you understood your design to the extend that you can close the loop ? Can you present the in-between-steps here in case you have not ? Are you willing to share everything - as Thane does here - what you have found and expose yourself to the risk of beeing confronted with critical comments ? No ?
I really would appreciate you would do this.

Regards

angry    >:about behaviour- Kator01

Kator01, don't be mistaken...this is still overunity.com. If find it funny how sometimes mentioning to close the loop is considered a taboo not allowed mentioning. If you can't close the loop to deliver true free energy then what's the point of being here?

As for ;

Quotebecause this is far  too early and will lead only  to frustration because you can only reach this goal - if ever -  if you have fully understood the principles at work.

That doesn't make much sense. You can never fully understand something. The effect is now pretty well known and the main variables that are involved are too. So trying to close the loop should be a straight forward step to take. I know that Thane's sponsors are not interested in this fact, but that doesn't mean people on here aren't.

Not everyone has Thane's privilege. A lab, the equipment and the time. So telling people to build their own bridge to cross the river instead of using the existing one is not very productive.