Quote from: MeltDown on December 01, 2008, 07:55:11 PM
I think you mean 1:100

Oh yeah I see, typo, a zero too many. Sorry. But indeed,
a 1:100 or 10:1000 trafo should increase 1,5V to 150V.
And let's say the battery can put out 1 amp, the
150V would be somewhere around 0,01 amp.
Very basic transformer stuff...

Quoteand if you use alternator you
need diode to rectify AC to DC for unidirectional pulse

Obviously.

Quotebut we know what you try to say.

Oh good. Was starting to wonder how complicated it could be.

Now I'm not entirely sure, but it looks to me like this is "just"
using an input pulse to generate a magnetic field, and then
using both the initial pulse and the self-induction of the coil
to get more out of the "back emf".
According to most books that shouldn't be able to yield
any more energy than the input...

@CaptainPecan:
Here's an idea: what if you do away with the battery,
you don't count the battery as circuit element.
Let's say you charge the starting capacitor from your
battery and then put the battery away.
Can this circuit now take that charge, run it through
the coil etc, then finally store it on a parallel cap
arrangement, and now according to what you and
IST have been posting you should have more
energy in the parallel cap arrangement...
Now pump all of that energy back into one single
capacitor identical to the initial starter cap,
by for example simply discharging the entire
parallel capacitor array through a transformer...
If you're right and you are getting out more actual
energy (and not just volts), then you should
be able to charge this second cap to a higher
voltage than the starter cap had.
And if both caps are identical, with identical
capacitance (farads), then a higher voltage on
the output cap would seem to indicate a real
higher energy level, and would seem to confirm
the energy gain in your setup.

Can you try that?
So basically, use the setup you already have for your
energy gain experiment, but instead of measuring the
total voltage of the parallel capacitor arrangement,
you simply discharge that entire arrangement through
a pulse trafo and use the output of the trafo to charge
a fresh cap identical to the single starting cap.

Seem to me comparing the total input voltage and the
total output voltage when both these voltages are stored
on single identical capacitors will give a nicely comparable
measurement, or at least, without all the issues related
to the nonidentical parallel arrangement.

Oh, I kind of repeated myself I see... Lol that's another tip:
always drink your coffee before you start a reply.

Quote from: MeltDown on December 02, 2008, 03:37:05 AM
I would like to add two books to your list.
1. A dictionary
2. A basic electronics handbook

yea what ever shove the dictonary....   

and basic electronics....   lol

how about tubes     my garbage is made of electronics.....

and this is what you get to see 

when i build the REAL SH!T  IT WILL NOT BE SEEN 

ist!

has anyone made the video yet of the mot spitting rf flames??  from the colapse of the feilds  humm   la dee da...  this is the first step ...

second would be to capture it and convert it to run with gain ....

stpe 3 improve it ... so it draws no power and you still get the flame....

then apply it as i currently am ....

you must first crawl b4 you run

Quote from: innovation_station on December 02, 2008, 07:40:48 AM
has anyone made the video yet of the mot spitting rf flames??  from the colapse of the feilds  humm   la dee da...  this is the first step ...

second would be to capture it and convert it to run with gain ....

stpe 3 improve it ... so it draws no power and you still get the flame....

then apply it as i currently am ....

you must first crawl b4 you run

Is this what you mean?!?!?!  I think I'm starting to crawl a little bit... 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hR_1EfqCtCQ

Quote from: captainpecan on December 03, 2008, 03:42:15 AM
Is this what you mean?!?!?!  I think I'm starting to crawl a little bit... 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hR_1EfqCtCQ

In your video you stated "58 volys in one shot"

Not really. When you dragged that clip
across the wire, it made and broke contact many times. Each
time it sent a charge pulse to the cap and so the cap charged to
higher level. :-)

Quote from: MeltDown on December 03, 2008, 03:54:42 AM
In your video you stated "58 volys in one shot"

Not really. When you dragged that clip
across the wire, it made and broke contact many times. Each
time it sent a charge pulse to the cap and so the cap charged to
higher level. :-)

It is amazing how quick people jump up to tear things down. This time I think you should rethink how that voltage got there.  Watch a little closer I guess. I dont know what to tell you.