@MeltDown
Most of those type of magnets are coated with a thin layer of zinc to keep them from oxidizing.
Zinc can be used to make a tunnel diode which has negative resistance properties.
Here is a site were someone made there own tunnel diodes from zinc plated metal.
http://home.earthlink.net/~lenyr/ntype-nr.htm
So maybe the way the zinc plating was placed on those magnets you got formed a tunnel diode effect.
Hope this helps solve the puzzle.

I have a hundred 1cm square magnets of this type would be awsome if they did the same thing.

@MeltDown
Could you show us the layout so we can try this with our own magnets?

Quote from: Koen1 on December 09, 2008, 12:33:52 PM
@IST: perhaps you could claim credit for a neo circuit,
if only you would post clear shcematics and details on that...
But since you never really do that, you only drop a few
words and we're supposed to magically form a clear picture
based on those extremely vague remarks of yours,
I think you're taking it a bit far to claim you've somehow
"discovered" a magnet spark increase effect.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying I don't believe you've
done such experiments. I'm just saying that in order to
claim that you were the guy who "discovered" such an effect,
it would seem that you'd need to at least have explained and
described those experiments in detail. And I don't really
see that.

And what magnets was Tesla talking about?
I bet it wasn't neodymium ones... they didn't have those yet in his day.
That also seems to void any interpretation of Tesla's "no more than
10 magnets in a stack" in the context of using neodymium magnets.

The neo experiments I mentioned used nickel coated neos, the spark
jumped directly from the one nickel coated neo to the other.
If you have not used conductive magnets in your experiments yet,
you clearly have not performed exactly the same experiment.
What was yours then?
Did you stick two electrodes on two ceramic magnets and have them
spark?

What do you mean by your statement "the coils will be biased to the
core pos and neg bifilar"?
See, that's the type of vague statements I mean. Why don't you say
clearly]/i] and precisely what you mean? Can't be that difficult
to just spend a few more words to turn it into a coherent piece of text?

@Sparks: well actually the latest "cuprate" superconductor laminates
do not use direct electron exchange, but rather phonon coupling...
Or at least, that's what I've been reading about.

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=3689.0

http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,1872.2130.html

ITS ALL BEEN DONE B4!!


@ keoen1       perhapes you have not read enough 

notice the date .......   i have done this well b4 posted .....   

   
Re: Lords of the Ring
« Reply #2135 on: August 27, 2007, 12:40:08 AM »
   
hello gk and all

in playing around today  i got my neos out agin  Grin

such fun i have with those little things well i just wish there was an easy to control them but it seams like is it a hard thing to do

i havent seen many play with neos  and well it is just so much fun i think they can teach much here altho how much more must be taught  is there a way to harness power from the neos ? easly?  the ring i am playing with today is about in its simplest form and you all know how i like simple right

i realize most of my posts are not relivant to the tpu but then agin maybe they are i will not know fior sure until i finish it or get output  from it

a picture of my setup as of today i threw some other parts in the mix to see what happins it is a mess but it is much fun

ist

you all think this will light a bulb?  lol


you tell me agin ...   i laugh at you

do i still need draw YOU A PICTURE LOLLOLLOL!!!!!

william!

i can and will find you many more links     of my proof 

i have some vids up here too showing PROOF.....   LOL   

want those too and the DATES....

enjoy ....   

IMAGINE ...............THIS WORKS WIHT MY CAPPAC!   LOL   it is posted long ago tooooooo.....................  bla bla bla

   A voltage impressed on two electrodes can cause ionization of the atoms in the gap.  The ions and electrons can then assemble into a plasma which is just a macroatom.  This plasma or macroatom allows for an electron energy shell configuration that can in effect span the gap.  Very conductive situation here as there is a great chance that the free electrons are creating a coherent path of -charge from electrode to electrode.  The magnetic field can be manipulated to either align the ions so as that the plasma is sustained or to blow the ions into disarray to quench the gap.  Either way it was the original oscillator before vacuum tubes and controlling it's almost superconductive properties would result in alot of high amplitude high frequency currents.  They also use magnetic quenching on high voltage dc circuit breakers and call them blow out coils.  I really don't know if a plasma would be called a superconductor.  You do get alot of weird effects when you get dielectric and magnetic flux fields in phase.

Quote from: TheBuzz on November 26, 2008, 12:14:51 AM
Here is a good example of a shorted coil being used to produce 150% OU that I just spotted and does the magnetic field duplication:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cka7qb0zoc8

That's very interesting. I did the math, and it's in agreement with the input meter -->

First stage: The input meter shows 10.9V, 0.66A, 0.42 PF = 3.0 (3.02) watts, which is in agreement with the 3W reported by the input meter.

Second stage: The input meter shows 10.9V, 0.34A, 0.54 PF = 2.0 (2.00) watts, which is in agreement with the 2W reported by the input meter.

Third stage: The input meter shows 9.9V, 0.14A, 0.70 PF = 1.0 (0.970) watts, which is in agreement with the 1W reported by the input meter.

I have no idea if the frequency is within the meters range, but the meters are showing more output than input, period.

I hope Thane Heins keeps up the good work, regardless of the outcome. There's no shame in trying. Looks like he may be on to something.

PL