It's patent #390721.  In this patent he describes it as a transformer.  GK and local joe did alot of work busting down a series of patents Tesla submitted around 1888 concerning this machine.  Anyway there is one I reviewed further down the road that uses absolutely no rotor and is called a straight out generator using a mechanical exciter and a torroidal ring as the generator.  Real interesting stuff unless you work for greedy assholes that like to sell dead trees then it becomes dangerous stuff.  Even Westinghouse wouldn't back him on this one.  By then they were way too busy making money manufacturing steam converters to ac power alternators.  Who would need one if all you had to do is get the exciter spinning in the morning and and dust her off once or twice a week.  The exciter puts out ac pulses to windings positioned around the torroid.  This induces a real not apparent rotating field (monopolar too cause the bfield closes straight in on it's own behind)
of varying magnitude or apparent poles.  This is like rotating a wheel with a whole bunch of paddles on it that slap the magnetic field around inside the output windings.  No drag because you are staying in the inertial frame of the torroid which has shit to do with the inertial frame of the Earth. Guys messing around with permanent magnets have got to stop wasting their time.  Only way to get power out of a permanent magnet is beat the crap out of it and throw it at somebody.

Quote from: TheBuzz on January 06, 2009, 02:15:40 PM
Not sure I follow. You can break the speed limit and produce a cavitation two ways. Slam two objects together at 1/2 C of cavitation or accelerate 1 object to the C of cavitation.

would this device produce cavitation is the field rotates around the ring?

http://www.magneticpowerinc.com/pdf/MPI-patentapplication.pdf

Hello Mr Heins,

I've just happened to come across your invention and i'm glad that someone has got the right idea.  I've been toying with something similar to your invention.  I've noticed a few sceptics have said what is the point of using a electric generator to power a motor that's powering said generator.  Well if they can figure that out, I think they need to go back to school.  My idea is very similar to yours but not too similar.  I do believe my idea could be made to be extremely efficient.  I don't want to go into any detail as I like to keep the competition strong.

Just thought I'd share,

Daz

Quote from: Pageygeeza on January 06, 2009, 04:01:22 PM
Hello Mr Heins,

I've just happened to come across your invention and i'm glad that someone has got the right idea.  I've been toying with something similar to your invention.  I've noticed a few sceptics have said what is the point of using a electric generator to power a motor that's powering said generator.  Well if they can figure that out, I think they need to go back to school.  My idea is very similar to yours but not too similar.  I do believe my idea could be made to be extremely efficient.  I don't want to go into any detail as I like to keep the competition strong.

Just thought I'd share,

Daz

Competition is actually SIN, as people like to say here. Competition gives rise to greed, corruption and bankruptcy. The saying is simple here"Give and Receive."

I was hoping for my 15 mins of fame. lol

Thing is i've not patented anything, but I know that my system could be assembled to generate enough power for a house.  Thing is, I never did too well at school, but I've trained my brain to visualise physics.  Sounds a bit weird I know.  Imagine some noob like me going to patent a machine like that, they'd just laugh at me and tell me to "bugger off".  maybe I'm just being defeatist. 

Daz