Quote from: CRANKYpants on January 10, 2009, 09:08:51 PM
I HAVE ALSO PURCHASED 32 & 34 GAUGE WIRE TO SEE WHAT EFFECTS THEY HAVE.

Why such small wire?  What size wire are you using now?
One effect would be more power dissipation compared to a larger wire, say #18 AWG.
P = I²R
So using smaller wire increases resistance thereby increasing power dissipation - reducing efficiency and increasing power lost.

Are you thinking a smaller wire means more turns thus greater effect?  Will it overcome the increased power dissipation?  Usually it will not.
Smaller wire/more turns is usually a means to an end: achieving a required (higher) voltage.

Quote from: capthook on January 11, 2009, 01:47:04 AM

Why such small wire?  What size wire are you using now?
One effect would be more power dissipation compared to a larger wire, say #18 AWG.
P = I²R
So using smaller wire increases resistance thereby increasing power dissipation - reducing efficiency and increasing power lost.

Are you thinking a smaller wire means more turns thus greater effect?  Will it overcome the increased power dissipation?  Usually it will not.
Smaller wire/more turns is usually a means to an end: achieving a required (higher) voltage.

"TO SEE WHAT EFFECTS THEY HAVE" IN ACTUAL LAB TESTING TheBuzz, RATHER THAN DEBATING USELESS THEORY.
BUT TO ESTABLISH LAB VERIFIED DATA POINTS FOR THE DESIGN.

T

Thane since you're going to start from scratch again. Please take pictures as you go. So then later you can bundle them in a nice HOW TO tutorial pdf file and link people to them. This would be a nice research log and people wouldn't need to dig through countless pages to find the info.

Quote from: broli on January 11, 2009, 08:21:49 AM
Thane since you're going to start from scratch again. Please take pictures as you go. So then later you can bundle them in a nice HOW TO tutorial pdf file and link people to them. This would be a nice research log and people wouldn't need to dig through countless pages to find the info.

YOU HAD TO SAY IT DIDN'T YOU? 

YES I AM STARTING FROM SCRATCH YET AGAIN - NEW LOW HYSTERISIS CORES - HAND WOUND AND MACHINE WOUND (3 WEEKS DELIVERY) - NEW ROTORS, 1 WITH DOUBLE STRENGTH MAGNETS.

AND YES I AM TAKING PICTURES AS I GO.

ATTACHED IS THE CORE MATERIAL BEING USED...

T

Quote from: PaulLowrance on January 10, 2009, 12:44:49 PM
Thane Heins, I hope you don't mind that I added your above video to my Major Accomplishments Award list -->
http://greenselfreliantenergy.com/forum/index.php?board=39.0

I think that video of yours is fascinating! Maybe you'll get a Nobel prize one day. 

For those who make it to the "Confirmed" list should get an award. What should that award be?

Regards,
PL

DEAR PAUL,

THANKS FOR THE KIND WORDS - BUT PLEASE TAKE NOTE; THAT THE DATA PRESENTED IN THOSE VIDEOS HAS NOT BEEN INDEPENDANTLY VERIFIED BY A THIRD PARTY AND I POST THINGS TO SHOW A PROGRESSION (OFTEN INCLUDING FAILURES) TO SHOW PEOPLE THAT IT IS ALL PART OF THE PROCESS.

MY CONLUSION FROM THOSE TESTS LED ME TO THE "BIG BANG" DESIGN WHERE THE SECONDARY INDUCED BACK EMF WOULD BE LITERALLY SUCKED OUT TO THE OUTER SECONDARIES AND AWAY FROM RETURNING TO THE PRIMARY.

CHEERS
Thane