@BWS:

You can no longer defend your patents.  They are no longer valid.  There is a better way to do this than the patents you have.

Since the method I described totally bypasses your patent, now your trying to steer things back towards your patents again.

You can fool some of the people most of the time, fool most of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.

I have no idea why you guys are discussing belts and brushes still.  I'll stop open sourcing my ideas from this point.

Quote from: gravityblock on May 29, 2009, 07:59:39 PM
@BWS:

You can no longer defend your patents.  They are no longer valid.  There is a better way to do this than the patents you have.

Since the method I described totally bypasses your patent, now your trying to steer things back towards your patents again.

You can fool some of the people most of the time, fool most of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.

I have no idea why you guys are discussing belts and brushes still.  I'll stop open sourcing my ideas from this point.

gravityblock,

Please don´t stop open sourcing your ideas. Your brushless idea, if it works, would be much better than brushed. Have you done any quick experiments to test it yet?

We had a discussion earlier in this thread to why the homopolar generates low voltage and high current.  The answer was because of the low resistance in the system.

With the brushless system that I described, the current is being forced to leave and to return to the magnet or disk through the axel.  This will create much more resistance than drawing the current between the axis and rim.

Want a higher voltage, then have your axis to be smaller in diameter.  Want a lower voltage, then have your axis to be larger.

If you rotate the picture that I drew describing the brushless system 90 degrees, you will see how it resembles a UFO.  My information is coming from a higher source.

BWS has already said in this thread that he wasn't going to release information on his highly complex brush system until he had agreements with an investor or manufacture.  He's trying to recover the millions of dollars that he has invested in his research due to all of his failures.  We don't need to exchange the big oil industry for another big industry that will only lead to our continued suppresion.

The brushless system changes everything.  All of the formulas for figuring voltage and current no longer apply.  Non of the textbooks can accurately predict this system.  We have new rules in this system that doesn't follow the older system.

All of the information that we need is here.  We'll conquor anti-gravity next.

Stop chasing the wind. 

Quote from: gravityblock on May 30, 2009, 07:25:01 AM
We had a discussion earlier in this thread to why the homopolar generates low voltage and high current.  The answer was because of the low resistance in the system.

With the brushless system that I described, the current is being forced to leave and to return to the magnet or disk through the axel.  This will create much more resistance than drawing the current between the axis and rim.

Want a higher voltage, then have your axis to be smaller in diameter.  Want a lower voltage, then have your axis to be larger.

If you rotate the picture that I drew describing the brushless system 90 degrees, you will see how it resembles a UFO.  My information is coming from a higher source.

BWS has already said in this thread that he wasn't going to release information on his highly complex brush system until he had agreements with an investor or manufacture.  He's trying to recover the millions of dollars that he has invested in his research due to all of his failures.  We don't need to exchange the big oil industry for another big industry that will only lead to our continued suppresion.

The brushless system changes everything.  All of the formulas for figuring voltage and current no longer apply.  Non of the textbooks can accurately predict this system.  We have new rules in this system that doesn't follow the older system.

All of the information that we need is here.  We'll conquor anti-gravity next.

Stop chasing the wind.

I think your ideas are very creative and they have made me think much on the subject. Indeed the brushless system would change everything, but are your convinctions on the matter strong enough to drive you to experimenting? If not then your sales pitch is weakened. My experience tells me that experimental proof of basic principles are needed before proceeding with designing and refining. Anyone who says "this is how it works" without empirical proof is taking a  leap of faith, usually because it´s easier than proving it, shaky foundations on which to build.

In summation, I agree with you fully, if we can all pull together then there´s no reason we can´t conquer antigrav and more.

Quote from: Groundloop on May 29, 2009, 10:17:32 AM
Paul-R,

Your BBQ analogy is describing the problem well. :-)

But, is there anybody out here that can answer my simple question; Is it possible to put many plates in series (on the same rotation axis) and by this method getting a high voltage out of the generator?

Regards,
Groundloop.

for your information:
I think Tesla had a desgin based on two homopolar generators whose discs
meshed like gears, and he took the current off the two shafts.

i am sure that there is a simple way to mount multiple systems to get the
volatage up and the current down.
Paul-R