@HeairBear: I agree with you on most of your points. I wish a tesla coil could be simulated, but the radiant energy is not considered by the program unfortunately

BUT a MOSFET is such a simple device and i think there is no discussion about the fact that
a N-type MOSFET wont conduct when there is no signal at the gate
except one uses a "Tesla MOSFET"
A P-type MOSFET with inverted control signal could already make it work.

The diagram is not "wrong" but incomplete.

Regards,
Xenomorph

Sorry, my confusion. I'm not sure how you are going about this. The diagrams posted are from another replicator, but, it is incomplete? Is there any diagrams posted originally from Tariel that are complete? Is Tariel still around to answer these important questions? I feel he is the only source to make it work as he did. I also think all the replication attempts and everyone's effort here on this thread are great, but, I don't have enough information to replicate the device myself with confidence.

I have invited the hungarian replicator to this thread, but he has not yet posted anything here. He did reply to my email though, he might be busy or not really interested, who knows. The origin of the diagrams is unknown, only he would know.
If you compare the diagram to Kapanadze`s patents you quickly recognize that it is incomplete and even deviates from the patent by having two transformers instead of one (or 3 circuit parts instead of 2) in there.
Kapanadze was never "around" anywhere in the open source engineering community, his course is of a commercial nature which i personally don´t blame him for, it´s his decision.
I have read on the russian forum that he is said to be checking their discussion frequently just to laugh about their attempts to replicate.

QuoteI don't have enough information to replicate the device myself with confidence.

No-one has. People just started to build on their own. As i understand there is 2 russians that have
"something" running, but i don´t know how far they have gotten.
From all documents about Kapanadze, the russian one by Viktor makes most sense and adheres to the patent as you can see in my post earlier.

It really gets to me that these people laugh and well as far as i know my extreme passion for this is making everyone feel that.

I don't even doubt it for a single second that this won't work because it is a valid principle whether you believe in zero point or not.

I really want this to happen but at the end of the day...riddles again.

Tariel needs to watch this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jqxENMKaeCU even though i do not believe in evolution.

@ HeairBear,

Quote from: HeairBear on July 08, 2009, 01:24:33 PM
Just because a simulation shows it can't work does not mean the diagram is wrong or drawn incorrectly. More times than not, a free energy device is presented and a trained EE will examine it only to say it can't work in it's current configuration and they start to change it from the original. Always build it as drawn and prove beyond a doubt to yourself it wont work before changing anything. I see many people on this forum who use substitutions and get no results and call it debunked. Is it possible to make a Tesla coil work in a simulation?

Now I'm glad to see someone with some common seance (I'm not saying anyone is dumb), as HeairBear has pointed out, the educated EE types have been getting only one side of the energy platform, as being tought by the regular electrical people, so if something different comes along, it is seen as unworkable.

Take a physical look at this "tesla" coil for instance, all tesla coil makers will say the wire on the secondary is too fat/thick. BUT, is it? this "tesla coil is not designed to make lightning bolts, only to produce low voltage at a high amperage.

Different colours the coil is wound with may reflect just a shortage of wire in say a blue insulation, the colour of the insulation doesn't matter, its the correct wire cross sectional area and length that matters.

Now, has anyone picked up a key element of this coil arrangement?
I posted back a bit about this but haven't seen a responce, so it seems it was missed.
There are a couple of frames at the end of one of the videos, I forget now which video it was, BUT this coil was being held UPSIDE DOWN.

I'm NOT going to tell you what I saw, (I have already done this in a previous post), rather I encourage you to go and take a look again yourselves. Its a KEY.

Another point is this, I hooked up my frequency meter to my earth battery, and it is fluctuating in readouts, look at the VIDEO I posted, the waveform is changing constantly, as Stefan has said, has anyone got a way to save their readings and post them.

So why did I post my EB scope shots? because it the same energy in the ground the "invention" is hooked up to.

jim