Quote from: Harvey on August 12, 2009, 02:27:53 PM
I too was taken back when I saw not one, but 3 Ads for 'Magnawerx' (sic) - Then I realized that these are simply Injected Google ads that NARF has little control over. Either you allow the ads or remove the module completely - Bleagh - I wish TK would jump on Google for allowing them in the first place. I could probably follow the money trail on that one and end up in some obscure unregulated country somewhere - if anyone gets to the bottom of it, please post the results.

Yeah that seems to be the case, good call.

In case anyone is wondering 'Magniwork' or 'Magnawork' or what ever they call themselves seems to be a internet pyramid scam. You can find just about every related 'OU' video posted all over the internets with the name plastered on top.

Quote from: Tommey Reed on August 12, 2009, 05:17:29 AM
his is how I see it:
The plates are collector from the back wall, very strange picture!
The field is transmiting from the wall to the collector box.
If you look very hard at the 2 wire going into the inside little box, and the other wire going to the left side.
Why is all of the electronics hiding?
Looks like a very simple inverter to me, or a transformer collector...

Tom

If NARF has perfected the transmission of wireless power to the degree you have indicated then let us all jump for joy as even the universities are struggling with keeping the energy focused.

But I can tell you, that when the device was demonstrated to me, if any transmitter existed it would have had to been a minimum of  10 feet away, because that was the nearest wall. The only other two walls were farther away and went to outside and the other  division line was an opening into two entirely different rooms, one about 12' square and the other a long rectangular room with an outside wall about 40 feet from the device. I do not think that this is an inductive receiver.

My educated guesses are:
1. It works as claimed
2. The panels have batteries and some type of wireless switch in them.

So, until either is proven or disproven I will be supporting the claim and awaiting its release.

I am glad to see you thinking about it. Sometimes we have to stare at a puzzle piece for a while before we can fit it into place mentally. 

@TK

My accountant told me once:

"You know those doctors, they always get a priority treatment no matter where they are. For example, if they call to book airplane tickets, and say I'm Dr. So and So, they'd get ahead of the line. Well, I think I'm going to start calling myself a doctor and when they ask me what I'm doctor of, I'll tell them - doctor of love."

So ever since then I keep calling him "The Love Doctor" or Dr. J (his last name initial) and people seem to catch on it as well. He does not mind it and I do not see any harm as nobody can question his "credentials" of being a doctor of love.

Thus, anyone can claim "doctorship" over a field they create. Since there's no one else being an expert in it you have every right to call yourself whatever you like. Let's remember such luminaries as L. Ron Hubbard who created Scientology and gave himself the title of the Commodore, being above all other ranks in his religion.

Anyway, sorry for the digression, I just thought it was an amusing story and befitting the current conversation.

By the way, if I bring my bike to the shop will you service it? Can I also bring my scope for the tune-up as well?

   Whats in a name. If you have the title, use it. Big deal.

  For the fun of it, I am actually Sir Thaelin. Knighted by the Duke
of Cannesbury for good deeds to humanity. I never use it tho.
Just me.

thay         

Anyone remember Sir Basil of Overfirstengoggle ?