I took my good old time in the last reply, but I didn't realize there were replies sent in the process. So let me back up a little so everyone know who I'm speaking/typing to.

My last reply was to all, but was in reply to Xee2.

@DonL (aka) dllabarre

Yes, patent #685,957 is what I am referring to, among others. What I focus on specifically as best I can describe here, is not any one specific invention or discovery, but rather the entire "culmination" of Tesla's work. But I take no offense to you simply asking a question or to you offering an opinion. If we're not all here on this site to think, discuss and to learn, then why are here?

No worries DonL....

@jeanna

QuoteAnd I will thank you. I have already thanked Tesla for other things.
I was not able to get this to work any other time.
So, thank you.

Well, I accept, but only humbly so. This is my working field currently, but it is not my work. I have only combined and modified what some others have long since already done. And honestly, that might not even be true. I can't read everything ya know, so who knows how many others have already perfected this device. All I know right now is, none that I am aware of in current day times or otherwise still alive have perfected this devise for public use.

So all I'm still doing is using the dead guys work. And by guys, I mean it in the plural sense, meaning multiple people.

QuoteI used 2, 47uF can electrolytic caps

I use electrolytic caps now, but I use 220 uF in my original build. There is a trade off with capacitance, this is something that needs further exploration. But for a fast charge, use caps rated between .001 and 10 uF. That's just my advice, which does not mean it's correct!

QuoteNow,
What inductors and where?
Tell me about the inductors, please?

Honestly jeanna, you have already caught up to me. You have the basic circuit and the basic understanding. Now all you have to do is play! This will take some time to fully explain, so I'll get to the specifics in a later post. But for right now, all you really need to experiment with is different aerials and different material. It may sound a bit depressing right now, but wait, I'll get to the particulars in a later post. You live out west and I'm here in the east, the fact that we both can do the same thing tells me it's not location dependent.

That right there is a wealth of information to me, since I have only been running on theory and speculation verses my own test results. Now at least I have a few to back me up. The more the merrier! Anyway, your results are good, but it sounds like the charge is slowing down, hopefully I can help you do much better. After-all, you are closer to a major body of water then I, so you can extract more easily things that I cannot. I'll do my best jeanna to help you exceed my results. This is exactly why I am concerned about location. We all have different elements available to us in different points on the globe.


Thanks to all,,,,

t3t4

Hi everybody,
It seems that I have maxed out my voltage pressure at about 2.2volts.
I have 2 batteries which have not gained more than 1mv each for the last hour, so 1.178v and 1.012v.
I guess I need to get the al plate higher to fill these batteries to be full.
I will wait til tomorrow, however and let the farads come in so the charge will last. Then I will get a ladder (I don't like going there) and put the foil up to the roof level , which is only about 10 feet. The problem there is checking the battery because it will be to high for me.
I don't know how deep I am.
I dug a hole and lowered a galvanized pail into the hole and filled the pail with the dirt then affixed the wire to the bail. I don't know if it is the bail at the surface or the bottom of the pail 16 inches below the surface that counts for pressure. I am hoping/assuming it is the bottom of the pail.

I wonder if I should wet this??

Any ideas t3t4?

But,
I will wait for another day in direct sun to see if and how much more will go into the batteries before I change any of this.

The supercap connected between the EB N and S is creeping up 1/2v/hour.
I better take it off and do some datalogging. Maybe I will do that tomorrow too. Unless Jim has more to share today and we can check it out simultaneously. I like that global idea.

jeanna

QuoteAfter-all, you are closer to a major body of water then I, so you can extract more easily things that I cannot.

How close do you have to be? Im about 50 miles from the gulf. I do have a pond.
When I get my scope I may try a different kind of aerial scheme but it may not work.
I have about 8 acres of galvanized barb wire fence which is tied into another 100 acres of barb wire fence. Fence lines are usually 4 to 5 strands. Im thinking I may use jumpers to tie all 5 strands together. On 8 acres thats about 1664 feet just in one strand.

hmm
roasted wild rabbit all over!

 

jeanna

 Greetings to all fellow experimenters, but to all in general as well. This will be a rather long post, so I will do my best to simply stick to the point.

This experiment is simple as I understand it, but that does not mean my theories are correct. I can only speak of what I have tested thus far. I simply start with the highest AC voltage I can obtain and then feed that into storage capacitors, and then from that, simply charge batteries. That's all there is to it. But maybe there is more then meets the eye. I have looked over all the Tesla patents, all that are available anyway. I see a common pattern within them. Maybe I'm smoking crack, but everything he did mostly relied upon a resonant factor. So, this is my theory below.

The aerial in the sky came from Moray when I say to use wire, the rest is pure Tesla with a bit of Moray mixed in here and there. These two researchers/experimenters alone are all we need. But focus is required. There are so many "so-called" free energy devices out there today that it's totally ridiculous.... I'm all for over-unity! But not at a cost!

True over-unity to me at least, is when you put nothing in but time and gain something truly usable in return (also known as free energy). Time does not equal energy, so if you look at things from that perspective, you gain everything you need, but only lost a few heart beats in return as the total cost. Perhaps my view is twisted, but this is the place to share viewpoints, is it not?

So let's cover the basics here. The earth has a rotating magnetic field. Is it the earth itself or is it the earth in correlation to or with other planets in our solar system that causes this reaction? Truth is as I see it, I just don't care which is what.... All I know and focus upon is the fact that we know there are magnetic fields on or within this planet. We also know that if we draw a magnet across a copper wire that it will induce an electron flow in terms of an electrical output. Correct?

So, if this is true, then by using an already existent magnetic field, we should be able to attract or otherwise capture this energy!

So in my humble opinion, this is exactly how the radiant energy device functions. It just simply attracts or otherwise captures electrons. Regardless of weather or not these electrons are free radicals, they all have either a positive or a negative polarity. If that is true, then a positive will be drawn into a negative and vise versa. When you have a greater potential in any one area, you see the weaker of all potentials are drawn to the strongest. I don't know why it is, but it just is that way!

You can see the same thing in nature, within animals, insects, trees and even water. It all moves towards the strongest force. Again, I don't know why, I only know that it happens. So if we can attract a weak electron, then we should be able to attract a strong one in like kind. This is where the real power lies, if you ask me that is. This is all just theory, so do please correct me if I am incorrect! But what we see on an oscilloscope is something quite interesting. What you find are multiple wave forms, some from the earth, some from the sky and some from man made industry. So how do you discern one from the other?

The answer goes beyond the scope of this post.

I can only tell you all what I have seen along with my own theories. I cannot and will not tell you B.S. I have nothing yet to prove concept that I can show to you, so I guess you'll just have to trust me on this. But I'm working on it, I will have a packet of pics you can download soon. Point is: If the theories are correct and you know some of them already via your own earth battery experiments, then going from earth to sky should be easy for the most part.

So the spinning magnet (the earth) creates a magnetic field which our receiver/aerial can attract. This attraction of energy must have some place to go, otherwise it will not be attracted. So now we need a load. This load can be anything, but what we are using in the diagram I previously provided, are the capacitors as the load. These are what draw the energy in, not the aerial. The aerial is simply a conduit to the source of the load. So if this is true, then all we have to do is attract a few weak electrons in order to attract some strong electrons, which in turn attract more weak electrons and then some more strong electrons.

I'm sticking to the point as best I can, but I just want to make sure everyone understands my theory! It's coming up, no worries....

Here we go, and this is what I'm focused upon right now: "If" these electrons all have different vibrational frequencies due to the physical size of the molecule or electron, then what size molecule equals a strong electron? Are they all the same size? If so, then why are some stronger then others? And most importantly here.... Does size equal strength? Yeah size matters I guess in terms of (), you know what I mean, but how about molecules and/or electrons? How much potential truly exists? You see, I'm full of questions as well! My theory is: electrons are variable in size and therefor in frequency as well. I don't know what some of you have read let alone what you know, but if this theory is un-true, then why does a difference in weather condition change the results of this simple little device? I have many theories that might explain this, but that's another story.

So, if we all understand there is a gigantic magnet beneath our feet, then what can we do with it? As I see it, we can attract the electrons from both the earth and the ionosphere and collect them to use for our purposes. But if the electrons are all different sizes and with different potentials, then what? This is where resonance comes in.

If you find the strong electrons on the correct vibrational frequency, you can then attract them. All you have to do is tune your device to their vibrational frequency, but slightly out of phase so as to be weaker then they are. Don't look for them, force them to come to you! Then, simply collect these electrons someway, somehow. And then the question, so how to do it all? I don't know, this is what I'm working on currently among other things. I'm just trying to tell you all exactly where I'm at and how I got here, all the while sticking to the point as best I can. It's hard to do I assure you, as I tend to ramble a bit!


All I do know is this, every molecule has a vibrational or resonant frequency. If you can find it and prove it, then your way beyond me! But what if you do find it, what then? There are so many ways of doing this I can't even begin to mention them all. But I'm thinking in terms of a simple tank circuit just as Tesla used. Now, what if you used multiple tank circuits? What then? You know a tank circuit resonating at the proper frequency acts like a voltage multiplier, correct? Either voltage or amperage, I can't remember cause it's been so long since I've hit resonance that the numbers in my head are gone! What I can remember is this: If you hit resonance, you can feed that into another circuit that will resonate at a slightly different frequency, and then again and so on from that point....

Each time stepping it up. Until you reach the point of diminishing return that is. Which is to say that when you begin to lose something, you stop! Efficiency is not my concern at this point, but utilization is the prime factor. But never spend more then you have to, and I'm not speaking in terms of pure money. I talking about pure energy. Even a sloppy system works, why is that? Are my theories correct? This is only "my" extrapolation from things I have read verses my own test results, I don't know for fact in either case. All I can tell you are my theories. Even in pictorial form I cannot prove some of the things I have mentioned above. However, prove my results I will do! But I have told you guys enough for one post. But rest assured, there is no magic here. It's all science to the best of my understanding. So do please correct me if I am incorrect with anything I've said above.

There will be a "part two" for this post, but in the mean time.... I need a break....

t3t4