@ Bill,

QuoteDo you think it might be because the additional magnet wire is like an antenna extension?

Yes, that is exactly what I'm thinking, but I can also prove it.

QuoteBut, as you said, a change like that could and would effect the resonance a lot.

Yes it does, and this is why I wonder if I just got lucky the first time.

QuoteI just really detest when this happens and then folks say hey, I tried your experiment but it does not work.

I do so sincerely apologize for my mistake, and I mean that to all! But like I said before, if you screw up correctly, the whole world get's to see it.

QuoteMy point is, that this is your experiment and you made what you thought was a slight change and it does not work as before.  So, I think there is an important lessen here for all of us.  One change, no matter how small we think it is at the time may alter the experiment and therefore the results.

I also hate when folks have a great device working, and then take it apart to "improve" it and then can't get it to work again. (I am not speaking of you here)

I absolutely agree, along with keeping notes and writing all this stuff down in detail. That is something I don't do, but I need to start doing exactly that. However, where I end, I have been able to duplicate many times now, so nothing is really lost, but there are some things I am learning along the way. It's only the individual components that have failed to meet expectation, but now I know why, and so do most of you.

My first demonstration worked, and that was honestly the first time I have ever used an extension cord. Again I apologize to all, but I honestly never thought that such change would occur by using a standard household extension cord. It worked as an aerial alone, and that was the first time I tried using it as such. I should have known better, but I didn't. I'm sorry... I guess it was just my time to be the idiot.

QuoteI applaud your efforts here and thank you for sharing this information.  A lot of folks would not admit to not having as good results as before.  Knowing all of the information is key to understanding how a system or circuit might be working and why.

Please keep us posted on your efforts.  We are all in this together.

I said before that I will only tell you all the truth. Although, I never thought I would receive such poor test results as I did. Point is, results are results and truth is truth. I may be a bit eccentric, but I'm always honest. I thank you all for your tolerance in every way. Where this ends may or may not be interesting to you all. Some may think there is some kind of a secret that I'm hiding, but I assure you that is not the case. I have told everyone truthfully how this system works to the best of my knowledge.

It's not magic, it's just induction and resonance. That's honestly all there is to it! Some may want to take it all apart even further, but I personally have no interest. Anyone that tried to duplicate my first demonstration should be able to see the basis of operation. All you have to do in order to get more power is go higher/deeper and tune it to induct more in either case.

The ionosphere resonates between 106Mhz and 108Mhz, but the planet resonates on it's lowest frequency at about 6 Hz. Simply marry the two in one system. I have said all this before, I think anyway. But in either case, again I thank you all for the tolerance you have shown. Do please bare with me, even when I think I know something, this simple little glitch pops up to make me rethink it all.

I'm still at the same point I began, but now I have greater understanding due to my mistake. That's a good thing if you ask me. And you all can learn with me without the public embarrassment. So, it's all good if you ask me.

Thanks again to all. Give me some time, but I can recreate my results. I did it today, or rather, I got close to it. Point is, I know why I failed the second time. And now, so do all of you.

t3t4

Heres some good points from Bodkins. This applys to more than Eb's.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YFg_eSOz3EQ

I have a question...

Have any of you tried to marry the earth battery to the radiant energy receiver by using them in combination? If so, can you tell me, was it good or bad?

Thanks,
t3t4

Also, whenever your doing experiments, only change ONE variable at a time.  No matter how insignificant you think a change is, only do 1 change at a time and fully test it.  If it doesn't improve your results, change it back and retest to verify you're actually back to the original set up before making a new change.

It's extremely important to document what your doing.  With computers now it's so easy to make a list of items in NotePad or WordPad.
A chronological list of every change and result.  It doesn't have to be a 500 word essay everytime you change something.  Just 1-2 lines.

I actually like using power point and creating a picture with documentation added to the picture explaining my setup and test results.

DonL

Quote from: t3t4 on August 31, 2009, 10:34:42 PM
I have a question...

Have any of you tried to marry the earth battery to the radiant energy receiver by using them in combination? If so, can you tell me, was it good or bad?

Thanks,
t3t4

A simple test I did was bad because they are both positive for my setup.
DonL