Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



another way to fight lorentz

Started by mr_bojangles, November 07, 2009, 12:59:59 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

should i move this into a different section and if so what should it be considered?

gravity powered device
1 (14.3%)
magnet motor
3 (42.9%)
something else
0 (0%)
leave it here
3 (42.9%)

Total Members Voted: 7

mr_bojangles

Quote from: raburgeson on November 20, 2009, 01:01:49 PM
Looks like you guys are  footing around working yourselves up to a Searl solution?

apologies, but pardon?
"If at first you don't succeed, try, try again. Then quit. There's no point in being a damn fool about it." 
-WC Fields

DreamThinkBuild

Quoteapologies, but pardon?

Raburgeson, might be referencing the way the Searl looks similar to the magnet setup with the ring.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z8qvSNkiB9M
This would be a great HPG if you could find away to pick the current from the center of each moving ring to the stationary ring.

mr_bojangles

i appreciate you clearing that up for me, thanks
"If at first you don't succeed, try, try again. Then quit. There's no point in being a damn fool about it." 
-WC Fields

Creativity

I just gave a fast read to the whole story u r proposing. I may have not grasp fully what r u after but if i got it right u want to spin the magnet around stationary disk? It will produce electricity in the circuit. I just found an experiment video here:

http://www.animations.physics.unsw.edu.au/jw/homopolar.htm

last vid on the right side.

In a simple HPG in my understanding there r two currents flowing. One is obvious in the circuit- the radial one. Second r the charges on the disk that make circular motions in m-field -axial current. An easy way to see it is to see the disk as a collection of co-centric and very thin rings. Spinning the ring is in fact equal to having a superconducting loop with a current in it. All charges in the ring will be under the m-field influence and will jump to the next outer ring etc. until they reach the brush and leave to the circuit.

So in a way the path of the electron is a spiral, much like an old good Vinyl plate.
Blues it through your outstanding life,leaving more than just footsteps behind (1999 B-stok by me).

By being intensively responsive to what others say,i do run a risk: I open myself up to the opinions of others.i will,at times, have a great understanding for their opinion.Sometimes,i will even change my own opinion because i realize that the other person is right.This "risk" i do not run if i am unresponsive to what others say.

mr_bojangles

heres a quick drawing, it has four horseshoe magnets, and four inductors on the armature (second picture added because first one was too small as you can see)

this will give us the rotation we want as far as the fields go, as well as the multiple poles. the only issue we have now is the best method to keep the inductors upright

@all, is there any way we could get this to work horizontal as opposed to vertical, because if there is a method that works horizontal then it will most likely work vertical as well

@creativity

do you think it will work?
"If at first you don't succeed, try, try again. Then quit. There's no point in being a damn fool about it." 
-WC Fields