simply wind a pickup .. rectify to cap.. dump to source ...  use a super and remove battery all togather ...  battery only used to charge SELF RUNNING SUPER CAP ... might work ...  might even run at 3 vdc insted of 1.5 lol


see ya !

ist!

IST:

If you put instant coffee in a microwave oven you might be able to go backwards in time.

- Steven Wright

I knew the battery connected directly to the Bcap was way too much . these Ni/mh batteries are designed to be fast charged in 1 hour from dead to charged . SO the logic  and  conclusion is to make the charge cycle like the battery likes it . and yep its holding its own fine with the Bulb  regulator . This is temporary until i get My populated Ou controler in a few weeks . We wil be controling these adjustments with a PIC program .This test the experiment with the Ni/mh battery showing to me that the battery will remain charged to its original resting voltage of 1.3 volts . Also it proves to me that after such cycle the bcap regains its ground  and above unity over and over . same thing with bcap to bcap one the second duplicate circuit . .. I'll start another experiment . i'll charge a bcap to 1.3 volts and run it to a bcap charged to half that .650 volts and i can prove that the charge bcap will go above the 1.3 volt run cap and then do my bulb regulator trick and bring that run bcap right back if not higher than 1.3 volts . what would this tell you if i can do that  ? no one else can or ever has done this experiment and succeeded  except me with bcaps .how can you explain this away ?Its totally replica table and easy as pie to do . so dam simple and yet so hard for a scientist to comprehend   .Also remember this . I Do use a secondary on all the models ! It runs a 1 watt led all the time and stays lit .It gets BRIGHTER and BRIGHTER as the charge BCAP increases and when i do the bulb trick it gets brighter still then back to about half bright until the bcap charges above  the run and gets brighter and brighter . this is how i can tell its time to cycle when its bright bright and the charge bcap don't need to be higher than 2 volts to do this . more like 1.8 v

Albert:

Let me put it another way for you:

Battery percentage of full charge: "%FULL"
Resting battery voltage: "RestV"

%FULL  RestV

100%   1.3 V
90%    1.3 V
80%    1.3 V
70%    1.3 V
60%    1.3 V
50%    1.3 V
40%    1.3 V
30%    1.3 V
20%    1.3 V
10%    1.3 V
5%      1.2 V
2%      1.1 V
1%      1.0 V

So you can be continuously be loosing battery energy and the resting voltage will be the same.

Just be sure that you don't connect the two BCAPs together directly.  That's a short circuit condition and the wires in your hand could turn white hot in 1/5 second.

MileHigh

Quote from: MileHigh on December 08, 2009, 11:33:53 PM
Albert:

Let me put it another way for you:

Battery percentage of full charge: "%FULL"
Resting battery voltage: "RestV"

%FULL  RestV

100%   1.3 V
90%    1.3 V
80%    1.3 V
70%    1.3 V
60%    1.3 V
50%    1.3 V
40%    1.3 V
30%    1.3 V
20%    1.3 V
10%    1.3 V
5%      1.2 V
2%      1.1 V
1%      1.0 V

So you can be continuously be loosing battery energy and the resting voltage will be the same.

Just be sure that you don't connect the two BCAPs together directly.  That's a short circuit condition and the wires in your hand may turn white hot in 1/5 second.

MileHigh

well this circuit will run with as low as 0.5 volts and  probable less than 1 ma . I have one running (JT) at  0.18 v and 0.80 ma running 4 white leds all year long off an aaa rechargeable  so this could be an easy win . we all might be dead by the time it stops IF it stops . And i know what your saying about the battery supplying more joules than a bcap but when my batteries start going dead the volts drop . A simple test it put a resistor in series with a ni/mh battery and the volts steadily drop . until a few thousandth of volt exist . this is how batterys  i have discharge . not 1.3 100 1.3 90  1.3 80% NOPE no way hosea . it goes like this 1.3 100% 1.2 90% 1.1 80% 1.0 70% . No one will agree with your fictional battery number % wise . ANYONE  ?