enox:

Thanks, I will check out that video.  I have the original books from coral castle from a trip my Dad made there some years ago.  Well, I mean they are not the original original books but copies sold there at the castle and not from online somewhere.

I too heard some interviews on Coast which got me interested in Ed many years back.  One great interview was by a guy that wrote the book "Waiting For Agnes" about Ed's love life, castle construction and move, and interviews with the folks in the area when coral castle was built.  I forget the author's name though.

Bill

if you haven't already, i think everyone should take a moment to watch Dave's videos.
all of them...

http://www.youtube.com/user/potatoheadist

Dave is cool he developed a way to show energy halo
to anyone that cares to look
this is what tesla sae all the time you
mostly see them at night around light
you can train your eye to see them
dont look at object look at where the magnetic feild would be
need enough visine or tears you can even connect
your fingers and watch energy drag back and forth
like hes doing try to explain that go to mental ward
but daves got it with camera most use a tv 

Anti gravity is basically a work function.   You getup in the morning after your total defeat by gravity and employ antigravity to go about your life.  When they oxidize vast amounts of hydrogen and oxygen in a rocket engine the rocket flys in the face of gravity.  What amazes me is that they put all the fuel into the object trying to be lifted.  This of course requires that you use more fuel in the first millisecond after ignition then you will during the entire burn lifting the fuel.  This is a huge problem with any chemically driven machine.  This is why I never fillerup unless necessary to make it from station to station.  The amount of energy accelerating and deaccelerating the fuel is inefficient.   The problem with moving anything is that you have to change the vector of your movement,  Even when we are sleeping or at rest we are moving.  The solar system as a whole is moving at 300km per second.  When we want to move in anyway we encounter mass in motion in one direction tends to stay in motion in that direction.  Mass at rest tends to stay at rest which is basically saying the same thing over again.  The rest state is only a relative state to the observer.  The resting body has inertia invested in a vector.  If the observer and the resting mass have their inertia invested in the same vector then it appears that the observed body rests.  Now along comes Einstein and says that there is a limit to how much inertia can be invested into a vector.  At somepoint the amount of inertia starts to mess around with direction itself.  This gives rise to his theory of general relativity which implies that there is no motion other than relative motion.  There is no absolute rest frame which means there is no way to quantify inertia.    This is all based on an idea he had on a train.  If the train moved faster than the light being reflected from objects his reality would breakdown because the light reflected from the objects couldnt get to him fast enough to support his reality. The speed of light through a nonscattering medium then became the limit on how fast something could go in a given direction.  This something had to be massless otherwise it would distort the spacetime continuom itself because it had too much vectored inertia.  So now comes the birth of massless speed of light in a vacuum particles mitigating motion issues between different inertial constructs.  Gravity became dependent not on vectored inertia but on what vectored inertia does so it will not exceed the velocity of massless light particles.  Now according to general relativity the big huge rocks around the castle have a meaningless vectored inertia.  It is only relative to other motions.  The Earth has enough of what it takes to bend the spacetime contiuom so that things fall into its rest frame.  Now say we take a field a spot or whatever and instigate a movement of mass in a vector that exceeds the ability of the Earth to bendspacetime.  The moon does this and we see liquids with freedom of motion moving into the spacetime curvature of the moon.  To do this we must quantify the vectored inertial investment of the Earth.  Not relative to the Sun the galactic core or any other thing.  We must quantify it relative to an absolute at rest object.  The vacuum is a good thing.  The Earth moves through the vacuum at 300km/sec.  The mass of the Earth is mucho so it has a good sized gravitational field.  It isnt very fast compared to the propogation of light but since it is so massive it does a pretty good job of bending spacetime.  So in order to make rocks float we need to make a little tiny moon that we can direct from one place to another so the rocks fall into its rest frame instead of falling into the rest frame of the Earth.  Say Ed or Tesla for that matter can accelerate mass in the form of electrons to velocities near the speed of light in a contained field..  The object would have to take on a velocity and mass that surpasses the entire vm of the Earth.  The angular momentum of the Earth is slow.  Only a thousand miles per hour at the Equator.  So to overcome this we must create a local gravitational field that extends from a body with a velocity of more than a 1000 miles per hour and a mass equal to that of the Earth below the object moving at 1000 mph.  Obviously we are not going to move the entire Earth and make it spin at a 1000mph to a new spot over our rocks to be moved.  We can however create a highvelocity movement of lesser mass to hover over the rocks.  The rocks then fall towards the new heavenly body and appear to float around.  So we need to accelerate mass to realitivistic velocities.  Assume we can accelerate electrons in a vacuum tube to close to c.  The vm of the electron tube current is now dependent on the number of electrons moving at near c from one end of the tube to the other.  Since amperage equals volts divided by resistance and resistance is near 0 then currents through the tube can approach infinity with just one volt across the tube.  Zero goes into one an infinite number of times. The biggest problem you have is that you cant get the electrons to the tube fast enough to be accelerated and the anode starts to heatup and create resistance from the electron collisions.  If the electrons miss the anode or bent by the magnetic field of the conductor supplying the electrons the anode heating problem is mitigated.  This can only happen in a tube that is in pulse mode.  If you hit it with sustained voltage the anode becomes effectively shielded from the cathode by the electrons traversing the tube.  That first pulse of pure dc across that tube can pull current levels in the millions of amperes.  A million amperes moving through a conductor of one or two loops is two million ampere turns.  A typical one hundred horsepower motor has say a total 100 turns at 50amps.  Thats only 5thousand ampere turns.  The circuit described is two million ampere turns.  You will notice that Tesla only has a two turn primary of very very heavy sometimes nitrogen cooled wire.  I believe he was anticiapating large amounts of current to flow through his primaries.  These currents only limited by the capacity of the scource voltage.  He was into shuffling electrons between two capacitors and creating heavenly bodies that could move things at very long distances.

Dam that was to many big words
here a picture says a thousand
Check out this video on YouTube:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CgHQw4KSpuw&feature=youtube_gdata_player

polorise blade
charge the globe
remove with the c
back to below
store energy in the globe
or create your own plasma from frequency
go anywhere antigravity
energy goes up first
reverse of a helicopter
the energy is bending the air on the top of the wing
the energy is going up
then the air is going down antigravity now make the whole thing
the wing no air just frequency magnetism
temperature