Quote from: WilbyInebriated on November 17, 2010, 06:31:28 AM
spinner, why do all your 'laws' have paradoxes associated with them?

ohm's law (charge decay) paradox.
kirchhoff's rule and the two capacitor paradox.
faraday's paradox.

etc. etc. ad infinitum, ad nauseam...

Ohm's law "paradox"? 
"Two capacitors" paradox? 

Jeeeez.

I know.. Both are paradoxes - at least for you.

Faraday's "paradox"? Now here's an area for discussion. Maybe? Or, not, really.

"etc. etc. ad infinitum, ad nauseam..."
I'm sure you'll contribute at least one original, NEW paradox...

Quote from: spinn_MP on November 17, 2010, 06:47:18 AM
Ohm's law "paradox"? 
"Two capacitors" paradox? 

Jeeeez.

I know.. Both are paradoxes - at least for you.

Faraday's "paradox"? Now here's an area for discussion. Maybe? Or, not, really.

"etc. etc. ad infinitum, ad nauseam..."
I'm sure you'll contribute at least one original, NEW paradox...

your response is denied: logical fallacy. try a cogent argument next time... if you know what one is.

let's get back to my main point, which you so neatly attempted to obfuscate with your logical fallacies (strawman, red herring, ad hominem)...
you have nothing that supports your claim that burden of proof is on broli...

"i am asking you WHY after thousands of years and hundreds of proofs is pythagoras' theorem not called a 'law'? i thought my point was obvious... "

Well, in some parts of this lo(n/v)ely planet called Earth, it is actually called "a Law"...

Quote from: spinn_MP on November 17, 2010, 06:54:54 AM
"i am asking you WHY after thousands of years and hundreds of proofs is pythagoras' theorem not called a 'law'? i thought my point was obvious... "

Well, in some parts of this lo(n/v)ely planet called Earth, it is actually called "a Law"...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pythagorean_theorem



so you are saying that 'law' and 'theorem' are synonymous. your semantic argument is as lame as the rest of your arguments... you might as well return to your logical fallacies. if you chose again to refuse to respond with a cogent argument, i will not reply.

Lol, Wilby, as you were...

I give a shit what your next respond "will be" (Wilby), so don't exaggerate.
I'm sure you'll find something to occupy your talent in the future.
+++

Btw, I asked you to join that molecrap forum. It would be a good experience, or at least some fun to "both parties".

Hey, you could kick some asses down there, if that's not a problem for you....

Ah, understand, you're a kind of a King here.... Why would you risk an "ungrateful" and very "annoying" audience....