lasersaber,

Could you clarify something? You state you are using "iron wire" but it appears to be galvanized iron wire in the video. If so then you would have a zinc copper battery. Zinc as I am sure you know is the most electrically reactive of metals.

Soak it in lemon juice and you will have a Perraultium fuel reactor. Be sure to register it with the atomic energy commission - it's the law.

Quote from: john_bedini on January 08, 2011, 04:10:29 PM
Water Power is not free either as you must imbalance the magnetic field to get it.

Hi John,

I am going to call you on the water fuel comment. I have copies of Meyer's boards that very few people have seen (his tube cell version of water fuel) and also understand the completely different second generation with the H2O2 production using the laser accelerated ozone generator. Once you have the boards from two different fracture generators in front of you, what Meyer was up to gets real obvious.

I have also replicated the original tube cell resonant charge choke which is actually an RF mixer and a funky final stage of an AM transmitter. It has more to do with Keely and Kanzius and nothing to do with a magnetic field.

Meyer called it "electron bounce" which he accomplished by heterodyning many signals from a cascade generator to produce sideband harmonics far into the GHZ range (burst wave). This is why he called it voltrolysis, there is no magnetic current going into the water, quite the opposite just as Meyer claimed.

Meyer and Puharich were doing the same thing and Puharich confirms this when he stated that he was changing the molecular center of mass from 104.5 to 109.28 degrees. 109.28 = H2O2 (hydrogen peroxide AKA rocket fuel)

Maybe there is a third OU method that I am unaware of? I doubt it, I spent years researching this full time and know far more than I ever posted on a free energy forum.

Trust me John, it is free energy in the fullest sense of the word since you were born in enough water to supply your energy needs for life and it does fall from the sky.

BTW - I have followed you for years and am glad you are posting here. I replicated an 8 coil version of your battery charger several years ago. Mine was not OU unless I accelerated the coil a bit with some pulse compression. I wound my coils a bit differently but used the same basic circuit with better parts.

@john_bedini

QuoteThe thing that concerns me is the experimental work with LaserSaber since he does not talk much.

I am sorry, I really should post more.  I always put family first and I find that with two kids and another on the way plus a full time job it is not easy to find time for this hobby.  What little time I do find I like to spend experimenting.  I usually answer most questions in videos.  I also have found that these forums tend to have too many members that just sit around and post nonsense and criticize whatever it is that you are trying to do.  I did start a thread on this forum that I intended to actively post in, but it was quickly taken over by nonsense posts like the following:

QuoteNo, he's not convincing. What he's showing is nothing, it's trivial, he can't get it and if he wants to persuade those of us who follow the matter closely he should really do some serious work to prove that's something worthwhile. So far it's a joke and we need no more of this.  Besides, if he's not claiming OU what is his device doing in this forum? It shouldn't be in any forum discussing unusual setups for that matter. What he's presenting may be shown at some school fair where kids present experiments based on the known laws of physics. No more than that. Like I said, all he's showing is trivial and worthy of no attention in a forum such as this.

The folks that post that kind of nonsense have a lot more free time than I do to post and will quickly take over your thread and fill it with more noise and nonsense than you can imagine.  That is why I mostly use videos to communicate.  If you want to see what happened to that thread, just look here: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=9687.0

QuoteIt is very important in one of his videos in witch he called it the Mag Tap, that is very important.

That indicates if the probes are not causing it that it is possible to split magnetic current in a bar of steel. If you can do this why would you ever need any rotating device. You would just split the streams and charge any battery. I do not trust the probes unless everything is the same metal. but I think you get the point.

I was able to increase this effect a little by making larger U magnets.  I still have not gotten anywhere near 1mA in output.  I did do a lot of experimentation and I have learned a lot more about this effect.  I will post a new, updated video in the future.

QuoteSo my question to anybody here is did they get LaserSaber's motor reproduced and is it working like his?.

I will post links to a few replications. There are more replications, I just do not have time to hunt them all down.

Lidmotor
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7RpCr9Tjttw

manoloj
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XihmGdDpB2o


I do have an update on the coil that I made last October.  It is still in very nice condition.  It is made with larger wire and can really run a big motor compared with my previous coils.  I used a Bedini style welding rod core in it.  One thing I did not do was put it in salt water.  I did immerse it in calcium chloride and this seemed to work much better than salt water, both for power generation and longevity of the coil.

QuoteNow think about copper chloride if you think you need current.

I will look into it.  I am constantly learning when it comes to these kind of things.  I would love to learn more about the work you have done and your discoveries.  I have not even built a Bedini motor yet.  I see that you have no videos on YouTube.  What would you recommend I check out to gain a basic understanding of your work?  Just point me in the right direction.  I am actually a graphics artist by trade and enjoy this energy hobby more as an art form than anything else.


@quarktoo

QuoteCould you clarify something? You state you are using "iron wire" but it appears to be galvanized iron wire in the video. If so then you would have a zinc copper battery. Zinc as I am sure you know is the most electrically reactive of metals.

On some of my coils I do use galvanized iron wire.  The zinc actually is the first thing to go on the iron wire.  After about a months use it's pretty much gone and you are then left with iron wire.  I have found in my experience that magnesium is much more "reactive" than zink.  Like John Bedini, I have found that you can use many things in place of the iron wire.

@Everybody
I will post a new video in the future with many updates on the NS coil.  I have learned a lot since my last videos on the subject.

Quarktoo,
I think you have not understood what I was talking about, I'm talking about conventional systems. When I said water power I meant a dam generating energy, this has nothing to do with Meyer's fuel cell. I do understand what your saying but that is not for me. Until the time when My car's are running on this system I can't say anything. I do admit I have tried some of these off shoot systems with RF but it did nothing for me in an increase in fuel economy. I'm not into any of this so I really can't answer you on this.
John B

John:

Sorry for the delay in my reply.  Thank you for your kind comments, I really appreciate them.

I have not had a chance to attempt any replication of a lot of Lasersaber's work including his Stubblefield motor.  His link to Lidmotor's work is a good one in that he does a lot of great replications on anything that looks promising and he explains things very well too.

Laser has done some very fine work and I just don't have the time or money to even attempt to keep up with him but I am very glad that he shares his experiments and devices with us.  I still personally believe that we are only at the beginning of what can be done using modern components with some of these "old" and "well known" devices.

I am very glad that you are following what is being done here and also participating with your knowledge as well.  I am sure I speak for just about everyone when I say it is very welcomed and appreciated.

Bill