What happened to smokey2?
After reading his post in the first page I would have to agree with his asessment. The earliest use of electric was most likely of the static nature.The perimids alignment only served to use the earths feilds to polarize the discharge of stored energy. The vastness of the desert around them inspite of the nile river was due to static induced service tension in the soil preventing water from penatrating into the soil once the devices were not longer used. There are lot of really old very cool patenets prior to tesla with regard to static electric harvesting and conversion. Ed like all the others was not giving it up completely to the public with out capitallizing off it first. There in is the main problem it will remain for as long as there is money.

Quote from: ElectricGoose on November 27, 2010, 05:25:20 PM
Lambright, you seem like a nice guy but you have been bumbling on this topic here and at Energetic Forum for a good part of a year with thousands of posts.  I'm not sure you have much to 'boast' about as regards what 'your' device can or cannot do.  Right now it cannot do a damn useful thing and you continue to play and post useless videos which don't really show the viewer anything.
Having said this, I KNOW that the Leedskalnin wheel/pmh produces these effects, therefore dont think I am refuting what you have to say.  Where you are failing big time is in your scientific methodology.  You run around like a little kid, freezing water, doing this and doing that, posting videos and trying to convince people....THIS IS NOT SCIENTIFIC METHOD!  For a start....forget trying to convince the audience of anything....are you a believer?  If the answer is yes, then start building your 'evidence locker' and decide where you want to take this technology.  If you want to attain funding or come out with a useful product you will not achieve this by roping in half interested forum people meanwhile acting like a child yourself who has Attention Deficit Disorder because he can't stay focussed on one track.

Until then all you have is a mystical novelty that isn't doing you or humanity any good.

E-Goose

how about fixing the physics model?....or showing the step by step mechanics of repeatable levitation....we know the effect is real, [Hutchinson]...but how to repeat it?...in my posts i will show all this and more......is it good enough yet goose?.....i will answer for you YES IT IS !!!!

Quote from: BobTEW on October 21, 2010, 10:18:24 AM
Great thread!  I will put my two bits in. "They" forgot too include repel in their equations.  Bring four iron rods to the table, two of them magnets. Take note of the two iron rods have no attraction or repel force of note. Flat line of power. Bring in one magnet and one rod, attraction- a new force 90 degree differents. Now for two magnets have both attraction and repelling forces 90 degrees out. Here is a picture of a electromagnetic field scan.

Quote from: BobTEW on October 21, 2010, 10:18:24 AM
Great thread!  I will put my two bits in. "They" forgot too include repel in their equations.  Bring four iron rods to the table, two of them magnets. Take note of the two iron rods have no attraction or repel force of note. Flat line of power. Bring in one magnet and one rod, attraction- a new force 90 degree differents. Now for two magnets have both attraction and repelling forces 90 degrees out. Here is a picture of a electromagnetic field scan.

David the white eyes are the photon pump area.  The blue is the figure eight electron flow.  The two red center rings is one complete ring. Compare this to the pictures of the "d" orbitals.