Quote from: mariuscivic on June 18, 2011, 05:35:56 PM
toranarod

Thank you
this is on my to do list.
every person has there own version and interpretation of the device. its impossible to think up all the 100 of different wiring configuration your self.

this looks very interesting
I will let you know how it works for me.

Rod

   

duff,

rotor 20cm
magnets rotor 25mm per 3mm
stator magnets 20mm per 5mm
the coils are made by me on 10mm thick ferite per 20mm. Made 8 coils with 0,6 cooper wire and 10 coils with 0.4cooper wire; 600 turns per coil. I know that the wire should be more thikerlike 0.8 but i'm having difficultes finding it. I've  worked a lot building this coils since i dont have a machine that does that.

I made some calculations:
input power = 4 watt
output power=0.75watt.
So  there is far more work to do here

Hi Ron, Doug, All,

Thanks Ron. I am building but my motor is not the same as RomeroUK's so for this reason I am not posting information on my motor. Its more like a Lutec but using all the same principals as RomeroUK's and others.

I dont want to distract those that are replicating and doing such a good job too!!! I was just sharing the fact, that a set of coils, (2 Coils) can be wound and wired in such a way that they do not interact with each other. That is no Mutual Inductance between them, no lenz's Law effects between them.

This means one coil (Coil 1) can do Work and the second coil (Coil 2) can be used as a Generator Coil and the coils have no mutual effects on each other. This does not mean that the Rotor will not slow. Lenz's Law still applies to the Generator Coil, in some configurations, but it is a thought to have when looking at these coils in mind.

@Bolt, I was under the understanding that "Displacement Current" was a myth? or a Mathematical Convenience? Do I have this wrong?

Thanks all, good luck, you guys are doing real good keep up the good work.

P.S.

All of the Motor Concepts in the RomeroUK Muller replication are the same as Richard Willis's Motor seen here : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aqDS8QQ_9Z0

We can list the effect similarity's:

1: No Lenz's Law effects seen on the running system.
2: Rotor and Backing Coil Permanent Magnets used.
3: High Output for the size of the coils used.
4: Load is connected to the Motor once Motor is up to speed. Not before.
5: Big Permanent Magnet, small Permanent Magnets are used, this is in reverse to Richard, Richard had big Permanent Magnets on the Stator, RomeroUK has big Permanent Magnets on the Rotor (I believe to be a better way to do it)
6: Rotor Speed was fairly slow compared to the level of output, in the area of 1400 - 2000 RPM's.
7: a type of Sweet spot is optimal for the best output.

The list goes on.

Hope this helps.

All the best

  Chris

Another little experiment
Take a look at the circuit and see points A and B
When shorting in point A Lenz appears and the rotor feels a lot of drag.
when shorting in point B Lenz does not appear and the rpm increasses

Quote from: mariuscivic on June 18, 2011, 07:59:56 PM
Another little experiment
Take a look at the circuit and see points A and B
When shorting in point A Lenz appears and the rotor feels a lot of drag.
when shorting in point B Lenz does not appear and the rpm increasses

Great work. Are you shorting one coil or all coils at once?

Fausto