Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Muller Dynamo

Started by Schpankme, December 31, 2007, 10:48:41 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 126 Guests are viewing this topic.

FreeEnergyInfo

Quote from: mariuscivic on June 19, 2011, 03:50:14 PM
Hello!

I did another videoso please watch it am tell me what do you think of it

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NsYuKIOGyDc
T H A N K S ....!!!!

woopy

Hehe

A lot of work here bravo at all

@Ben (K4zep) very interesting testing with bucking coils. In this config the backing magnet will add a lot of output volts. By me about more than the double.

@ Marius  very nice video. Are you using bucking coils (north pole of bottom coil  facing north pole of upper coil ) in serie, or normal setup with S to N to S to N serie config as per initial PDF from Stephan in the first page of this thread ?.

@Doug (Konehead) thanks for the tip of changing the gap between the bottom stator to the rotor and upper stator to the rotor. I noticed very impressive change in the scope trace by doing this. I will modify my setup to be able to fine tune those gaps.

@Magluvin yes i try but sofar i have not found a good way to actuate the freewheeling effect, as per our previous experiment with cap transfer. What i did is trying to separate the upper and bottom AC trace with diode , so i can use the pulse for different purpose . It works very well , but how to combine this to the Romero dynamo is not acquired sofar.
Any idea ?

@Wattsup   Thanks for the AOAO idea, looking for a way to simply test it (as every stone must be returned ).  Perhaps a Hall sensor which switch on at a S pole than stay on until a N pole pass  to switch off and wait for the next S pole to switch on again ?. (for example the TLE 4935 ).
About the X wire i proposed sometime ago a schematic of what Romero did ( see pix ). and i tried it. As you noticed in the first Video( with the bulb), the complete output rail is connected to the battery, but when he put the bulb on the amperemeter does not increase. So or the video is for real or the X wire is not connected to the amperemeter ( i mean not connected to the amperemeter we see in the video, but at somethin else ??) . In the video 2 ( self running ) the X wire is there, clearly and goes under the machine and where ?? i supposed a while it could be connected to the bottom coil and by doing this it should be a shorting system of the complete output rail connected with the driving circuit. Of course i tried it and i got a shorting but nothing intersting sofar. In the video 3, the X wire is always there but impossible to see where it goes (seems to be cut and goes nowhere ) . Concerning this X wire , Romero sayd it was to feed back the battery during the first experiment (before looping ) to maintain charge in the battery, and for the 2 other video the X wire is always there but simply let outside for nothing.

hope this helps.

  good luck at all the magnifics contributors here

Laurent

k4zep

Quote from: erikbuch on June 19, 2011, 04:21:48 PM
@k4zep I see in you schematic you put the cap in parallell with the coils, what happens if you put it in series as Bolt says?
PS: I thought that was a professional video! Be yourself, that is the best you can be!
Best regards
Erik

Hi Erik,

There is series, and there is parallel, then etc.  Note, I did not show the resistance of the coil in series internal to the inductors.  A parallel circuit
at resonance is extremely high impedance, hence voltage, etc.  If you extend the schematic with the series Cap. going through the diodes, you still have a parallel circuit with some diode "notches" in the circuit.  I just made the parallel circuit before the bridge and then let the bridge do it's thing.  Hope this don't stir up too much fuss.........Many ways to do this.  I'm going to make bifilar coils so I get good balance
on my next set of coils and hopefully don't have to use much of a tuning cap.  Mine now are hopelessly mismatched right now.

Video was a mish mash affair, but just tried to give hope in this area!  Thanks for comment.

Respectfully,
Ben K4ZEP

totoalas

Quote from: neptune on June 19, 2011, 02:05:26 PM
? If this is true , can you give rough estimate how far you need to move the second coil from its alignment with the first coil . to find the sweet spot please ?
Hi Neptune talking of SWEET SPOT of stator to coil
I tried to use an ac clamp meter instead of neogen coil  and try to rotate the rotor  ns(HD drive magnet)   manually by hand   Moving parallel the clamp meter  with 3 to 5 mm   clearance  passing by the rotor , The reading registered   more than  40 amps  in ac scale with  one top side of the meters  coil  on top  of magnet .....   so an air coil  placement of one side of the top coil will produce  the maximum effect
Dont know if this is relevant  just an observation ??? ??? ???

cheers :)

totoalas

bolt

I know some of you are wondering how exactly does rotor increase speed faster while under a load?

The magnet charges the virtual capacitor layer between the coils and displacement currents will rush in to try and maintain the balance because the coils are operating as a NEGATIVE INDUCTOR which sucked in energy into the loop. Remember we are operating in purely reactive mode so the opposite happens to normal conventional current in phase induction. This inrush of ambient energy produces an outward pulse of magnetic flux which propels the rotor faster because it happens to be of the same polarity of the neo that just passed off Top Dead Centre :)  So each side of the coil releases a corresponding magnetic pulse of the same polarity as the magnet just a moment after the virtual capacitance field begins to decrease the coil now releases energy taken into its core from the ambient.

In order to make sure this pulse acts uniform and equally from both sides the back end magnet acts as a magnetic bias adjustor to ensure that the magnetic pulse is equal from both sides will maximise the pushing effort to accelerate the rotor under higher loads.

You can also see why a core with a very high Permeability like over > 50,000 will be able to store more joules to be released at this moment thus Romero studied carefully the effects of Mu-metal and other exotic core materials.

Can you see how convenient this is for us. We have in effect a CONTRA BEMF of even better an ASSISTED ELECTRO MOTIVE FORCE as the reaction is positive in our favour. While when the coils are operating in normal entropy mode they accept the lines of flux cutting from the permanent magnet and convert directly to a  current in the coils. Once you have induced current BEMF is always the result  as the resulting  magnetic kickback is opposing our driving force thus slowing down the rotor.